>go out of mom's basement
>be asked if I have a gf
>have to invent one to not look unhinged
>repeat every time
Any historic societies where failing to get a gf was not looked down upon as a failure or mental illness? I dont even disagree btw for an adult man to be single there has to be something wrong with him and society is justified in shunning him
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/nearly-30-gen-z-women-identify-lgbtq-gallup-survey-finds-rcna143019
30% of the women are LGBT and 10% of men are.
This isn't organic. ~~*They*~~ are doing this to harm you.
Women find most men unattractive, hypegamy is very organic ad natural
Correct. Monogamy has always been promoted by force, it's basically rape culture.
There is a possibility women would have more to lose from monogamy being abolished than men. Monogamy being abolished would mean women would lose a partner to materially support them, as well as raise their offspring. Meanwhile Loser men would in all likelihood have an easier time getting laid from things like drunk sex , pity sex, flings etc since those girls wouldn’t have monogamy to inhibit and shame them to not have sex 24/7 whenever their emotions feel like it . And this even with “chads” gaining more sex than they already have. The current system definitely disfavors common men/loser men any way you slice it. Abolishing monogamy might not make it worse for them. But that’s if monogamy is replaced with a free-for-all, not with hypergamy. Because women in hypergamous relationships are still expected by their partners to be monogamous.
Men can live without women sex being the only difficulty, now compare that to women living without men, even ' LGBT' ones
zero problems thus far and in many ways eaiser
Yeah but most women also don’t care about looks, women not caring about looks is equally organic and natural.
This has to be bait
>Yeah but most women also don’t care about looks
More like "women pretend not to care about looks if the man is wealthy or powerful".
It’s a lot lower on their hierarchy of needs. Look at couples around you a notice most men in relationships fall in the bottom 80% of looks. This should be obvious, and yet women still choose to get in monogamous relationships with them.
Identifying as LGBT doesn't exclude a woman from the dating pool the same way it does for men, it actually opens the door for a wider circle of cooperation and sympathy while repelling men who might try to make them monogamous, so they can get pregnant with who they choose at their leisure
>30% of the women are LGBT
Doesn't mean shit, most 'lesbians' still frick men.
In Ancient Greece, it was socially acceptable for an adult man to live a single life without being looked down upon by society. As an example, Pythagoras was viewed as a wise and virtuous individual despite not having a romantic partner.
>Pythagoras
L. Ron Hubbard-tier cult leader.
>Farstar88 is a Fascist artist from South Africa who specialises in political cartoons as well as comics in order to provide a much needed narrative that is ruthlessly suppressed and excluded from mainstream consciousness. In a world of political correctness gone completely insane, telling a contrary story even if it is more than sufficiently backed up by facts, is considered an act of aggression and the victims apparently are those whose feelings get hurt when they can’t have their way.
Yeah plenty that’s why there were so many hookers back then. If you were wealthy and unmarried though they’d think you were weird
Many
>Ancient Greece
>Medieval Europe
>Buddhist societies
>Enlightenment/Romanticism Europe
We need to go back
Being single isn't considered weird at all. Being permanently single, maybe, but not being single at just a point in time.