actually theres been some debate if khvalynsk was an even more early stage of IE and they carried J
2 years ago
Anonymous
>if khvalynsk was an even more early stage of IE and they carried J
They weren't and neither was Sredny Stog
2 years ago
Anonymous
then how could there have been genetic continuity established with yamnaya?
2 years ago
Anonymous
2018 paper already solved that with new samples
2 years ago
Anonymous
and which would that be?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Eneolithic steppe samples that displayed clear continuity with Yamnaya that Khvalynsk and Sredny didn't have.
2 years ago
Anonymous
is that the name of the paper?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Pretty much
2 years ago
Anonymous
so i take it that there is no paper, and you made this whole thing up to distract from being humiliated
2 years ago
Anonymous
All you had to do was google it instead of crying
2 years ago
Anonymous
no evidence = no argument
2 years ago
Anonymous
It's not my fault you are stupid
2 years ago
Anonymous
look who's stupid now, and with evidence too!
https://www.academia.edu/39985565
Sredny-Stog does share continuity with early steppe cultures and consequently, yamnaya and corded ware on the west.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I think you haven't read the latest articles, yamnaya and corded both share a genetic continuity with Sredny-Stog.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Sredny Stog isn't ancestral let alone possessing a genetic continuity.
2 years ago
Anonymous
https://www.academia.edu/39985565
Sredny-Stog does share continuity with early steppe cultures and consequently, yamnaya and corded ware on the west.
2 years ago
Anonymous
That paper never stated Sredny is ancestral to Yamnaya. Quite the opposite.
look who's stupid now, and with evidence too!
[...]
I'm afraid you're still stupid.
2 years ago
Anonymous
meant for
my bad, im moronic
2 years ago
Anonymous
Are you okay moron?
2 years ago
Anonymous
dude you just called yourself a moron 3 times what are you doing? take your meds
2 years ago
Anonymous
It states that Sredny-Stog shares continuity of paternal lines with Dniper-Donets culture and with EHG-like ancestors, that progresses with yamnaya plus CHG and EEF maternal lines. That is continuity.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You do not know the definition of continuity. That paper argues Khvalynsk is the ancestor of Yamnaya and they destroyed Sredny Stog.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Sredni almost certainly was IE
Khvalynsk and Samara culture likely not.
actually theres been some debate if khvalynsk was an even more early stage of IE and they carried J
neolithic Steppe J is likely from the Caucuses via the Volga.
2 years ago
Anonymous
i can just state my opinions as well, doesnt mean it changes the evidence
2 years ago
Anonymous
The evidence is in the genetics and archeology. Go read Telegin or Kotova if you want an expanded answer.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Khvalynsk had a much better chance of being IE because they had IE cultural features. Sredni has zero IE cultural features and to make matters worse they were destroyed by the Yamnaya.
Brahmins also have higher amounts of J and L than lower castes.
its over
j is exclusively brahmin while r1a spread's into other castes.
Haplo posting screams of non whites trying to get something satisfaction.
your post is literally esl
why is it ok for you to wewuz anything but your opposition isn't allowed to cite DNA evidence
J is originally caucasoid CHG and whiter than the brown Dalit negrito/abo R tho
>J is originally caucasoid CHG
not possible, J has been found in IE cultures predating yamnaya
and it comes from CHG
>IE cultures predating Yamnaya
Such as? First IE culture was Yamnaya
actually theres been some debate if khvalynsk was an even more early stage of IE and they carried J
>if khvalynsk was an even more early stage of IE and they carried J
They weren't and neither was Sredny Stog
then how could there have been genetic continuity established with yamnaya?
2018 paper already solved that with new samples
and which would that be?
Eneolithic steppe samples that displayed clear continuity with Yamnaya that Khvalynsk and Sredny didn't have.
is that the name of the paper?
Pretty much
so i take it that there is no paper, and you made this whole thing up to distract from being humiliated
All you had to do was google it instead of crying
no evidence = no argument
It's not my fault you are stupid
look who's stupid now, and with evidence too!
I think you haven't read the latest articles, yamnaya and corded both share a genetic continuity with Sredny-Stog.
Sredny Stog isn't ancestral let alone possessing a genetic continuity.
https://www.academia.edu/39985565
Sredny-Stog does share continuity with early steppe cultures and consequently, yamnaya and corded ware on the west.
That paper never stated Sredny is ancestral to Yamnaya. Quite the opposite.
I'm afraid you're still stupid.
meant for
my bad, im moronic
Are you okay moron?
dude you just called yourself a moron 3 times what are you doing? take your meds
It states that Sredny-Stog shares continuity of paternal lines with Dniper-Donets culture and with EHG-like ancestors, that progresses with yamnaya plus CHG and EEF maternal lines. That is continuity.
You do not know the definition of continuity. That paper argues Khvalynsk is the ancestor of Yamnaya and they destroyed Sredny Stog.
Sredni almost certainly was IE
Khvalynsk and Samara culture likely not.
neolithic Steppe J is likely from the Caucuses via the Volga.
i can just state my opinions as well, doesnt mean it changes the evidence
The evidence is in the genetics and archeology. Go read Telegin or Kotova if you want an expanded answer.
Khvalynsk had a much better chance of being IE because they had IE cultural features. Sredni has zero IE cultural features and to make matters worse they were destroyed by the Yamnaya.
A is good. Z is evil.
Who cares
Zoroastrians were feminine cucked eunuchs who wore cuck muzzles