Historically speaking, who has a better colonial claim on the rest of Asia once the burger problem is sorted, India or China? Why is the answer India?
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Historically speaking, who has a better colonial claim on the rest of Asia once the burger problem is sorted, India or China?
India wasn't even a country before the 19th century. They can't even claim themselves. China has at least had Vietnam as a vassal.
>India wasn't even a country before the 19th century.
this is like arguing germany didn't exist the 19th century
It didn't.
>this is like arguing germany didn't exist the 19th century
yes, this is true. and neither did India. except when Muslims from the northeast decided they were sick of doing manual labour and invaded to unite the subcontinent and make Hindus their subservient slave class.
China just surpassed the US to be the most favoured nation in SEA. Although SEAmonkeys generally lack vitality and a capability for high culture thought processes so this changes back and forth every other year or so
But even they managed to unite by themselves and gain prominence, this is not the case for bharat. They did not even succeed in uniting themselves, and now they are desperate to cling on to what they have
It wasn’t, and neither was India
Several Indian states had vassal far out there
>modern Chinese diasporas slowly building bunch of mini Singapore settlements across the region right now
Lol the locals make sure Chinese don't step out of line. That Vietnamese billionaire was targetted because she was a Chinese Viet, her impending death is a lesson for Vietized Chinese and modern Chinese immigrants to not fool around.
>Several Indian states had vassal far out there
Actually not sure about that but I pressed post without deleting the line.
>Lol the locals make sure Chinese don't step out of line
if that were true Singapore wouldn't exist lmao
troll post
>Most of Asia follows Islam or Indian religions
>Everyone in Asia hates China
> India controlling anything West or South of Myanmar
> India controlling Tibet, on the other side of the Himalayas
> India controlling Afghanistan
Like why? So what if one Hindu empire controlled these regions a long time ago, who cares if this is well within India’s historical sphere of cultural and political influence, that doesn’t mean it’s in need of direct annexation or even indirect control. Even if I were the most ardent, unapologetic, jingoist, ultranationalistic Indian expansionist I would have absolutely no interest in any of the stated territories.
Okay well maybe just the Malay Peninsula, so all of Thailand and Malaysia from the point of southern Myanmar, to the city of Singapore, but even that is pushing it and is only for the sake of checking China and threatening the vital sea trade routes
Forgot to mention because there’s no flags on this board, I’m American
Really ugly looking
mainland SEAsia is one of the most hostile places in the world to try to colonize, those hilly jungle motherfrickers have bled and waited out empires for thousands of fricking years. its in their very souls
island SEAsians will just passively mix the colonizer's culture into their mixing pot and ignore the parts they dont like, like always
India influenced SEA religiously like Italy
China influenced SEA economically like Germany
Its mixed but you get Burma, Cambodia and Indonesia on Indian side, Vietnam and Philippines on China side and the rest somewhat in between
True but I would say relation between SEA and India is more like between Europe and Middle east, since while it's true that India influence by religion, there's no modern Indian central figure that SEA Buddhist or Hindus answers to the same way Catholic Christian would answer Vatican pope. And I would say relation with Chinese is like USA and Latin America in dynamic, with modern Chinese diasporas slowly building bunch of mini Singapore settlements across the region right now
My bad, what I mean is prehistoric ancestor coming from modern day south China
Well yes Bharat has the right to claim that land hsitorically and culturally they were its vassals and sons, Chola subjugated most of Indonesia and the Philippines
No they dont, they can't even claim toilets
India have toliet since ancient times sir, even before the the times of the Great King Vikramaditya (Vishnu bless him), and they were more advanced than the current ones that exist. But the br*tishers such as yourself become jealousy and destroy it of greed and try to copy the model but its worse. Smh
This was made to commemorate the victory of Rana Sanga against Turkic Mahmud of Khalji of Khalji dynasty (Delhi Sultanate)
hindu tamil BVLLS agree with this post.
>4 inches
>bvlls
uh huh, sure raj lmao
Bloody benchod bastard i frick your women and become mayor of your city britisher
Its as its says in the holy hindu text of the Mahabharata: " It is not the sword that makes the warrior but rather the technique"
Speaking as SEA, this depends by your priority
By race, southeast Asians are Mongoloid, descended from prehistoric south Chinese settlers, if you were to unite all Mongoloid race under one banner it's master would be China, and modern Japan and Korean softpower indirectly streghten this race based ideal priority
By culture this map makes sense, but this narative doesn't fit once you go into detail, in mainland, the majority Theravadas Buddhist have very different cultural outlook to Hindu India, and in the islands Muslim and Christian majority feel very little relation to India and would even opposed to this
>prehistoric south Chinese
They were not Chinese.