I'm going to piss off a lot of incel IQfyners, but Rowling is a great writer of Children's literature (not adult lit, Casual Vacancy sucked).
I'm not putting her above Le Guin or Jones, but she is in the conversation. I actually think Harry Potter has better characterization, more of a heart, and a better sense of humor than the Howl and Earthsea books. I think her creativity also excels.
While Earthsea is great, I don't think highly of it and the first book reads like mythology. The Howl comparison is apt, but Jones has protagonists with personalities that Harry lacked. The kids act like kids and the adults act like buttholes. I do think Rowling had a stronger, more coherent vision for the world and supporting characters, although she couldn't commit to the magic in a sensible way, which detracted as it was so intrinsic to the story.
Her real strength came from allowing the story to mature and be written in a slightly higher register than most children's books, which I find to be the weakest point of children's literature. Jones, in spite of Howl being one of the few books that adults can read without it feeling 'off', is more on the level of a graded reader, while HP had more room to touch on things that children's literature doesn't have room or the ability to. HP had a lot of interiority.
>I don't think highly of it and the first book reads like mythology.
It's meant to resemble an old saga.
1 month ago
Anonymous
I should clarify, I don't think highly of it on the whole because the later books are increasingly stupid, and the first book is written in the tone and register of myth, or as you say, a saga. Wizard is the only one I'd compare to Rowling, and it's nothing like HP because of that massive tonal difference. I actually think the first two books are excellent and symbolically rich like few other books are, but that also makes it far removed from how HP is.
I'd also read better fantasy by the time I got around to it and it didn't have the kind of impact it would have.
Harry Potter is a shitty version of Chrestomanci. Or a boy version of The Worst Witch, and it takes itself too goddamn seriously for what it is.
>some 60-year-old british hag has a political meltdown because she's reaching that age where your relatives start "forgetting" they're not supposed to bring up politics at the dinnertable >this is really important for some reason
i miss when the most obnoxious thing about Harry Potter was how many overgrown babies wouldn't shut the frick up about it. they're half-decent books for ten-year-olds. i read them growing up, i really liked them at the time, and then i moved on. there's better fantasy (Tolkien), better "contemporary"/"urban" fantasy (Gaiman and Pratchett), better high-concept kids' books (Animorphs), and better YA (Hunger Games); all Harry Potter has going for it is nostalgia.
10 is too old for HP, shit reads like it's meant to be read to 5 year olds.
https://i.imgur.com/x0GKVU6.png
And that's based.
She just hates men, whenever she starts shit talking trannies it innevitable devolves into shitting on straight white men. She attends fricking Lesbian feminist events and hangs out with literal Political Lesbians and FTM trannies, she may actually be a closeted FTM according to some interviews.
>Never read her pseudonymous work either.
Red pill me on her pseudonyms. Is it like how Dr Seuss used to write softcore porn that was illustrated in the same Grinch/Cat in the Hat style he's known for?
Or is it like Bachman, the fake name for Stephen King's book about a school incident?
You went to the grocery store and were discriminated against because you were cis? I kinda doubt that. But yes everyone deserves basic human rights
1 month ago
Anonymous
First of all, its already illegal to discriminate based on identity. There is no second of all. You already have the rights you want.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Then why does JK Rolling seethe so much on twitter? Really makes you think
1 month ago
Anonymous
gee man idk, might have something to do with the dedicated campaign against her person.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Its almost as if its just people reacting to her insane posts. If she would just shut the frick up it wouldnt be a problem but he keep on screeching about something that doesn't effect her
1 month ago
Anonymous
you say that like she isnt reacting to other peoples insane posts. why is she held accountable, but not those others?
1 month ago
Anonymous
>People should stop telling the truth because mentally ill people might get mad uwu
Nice try troon
1 month ago
Anonymous
Transphobia is a mental illness, therefore you are the one who is mentally ill. No first world country considers being trans a mental illness. Move to Saudi Arabia or something, you would fit in better
1 month ago
Anonymous
If being trans isn't a illness, why do you go on drugs and get surgery for it?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Doing drugs or having surgery doesn't mean you are mentally ill. Are you stupid?
1 month ago
Anonymous
please learn to read
1 month ago
Anonymous
People get surgery for a lot of things, would you consider people getting your appendix out as someone who is mentally ill? You transphobes have like 80 IQ between all of you guys
1 month ago
Anonymous
People don't remove healthy body parts unless they are mentally ill
1 month ago
Anonymous
>People don't remove healthy body parts unless they are mentally ill
Oh, you mean like people who are born with six toes or fingers called Polydactyly who get them surgically removed? Those people are mentally ill? LOL.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Challenge for the trannies: don't conceptualize yourselves along with intersex people and other birth defects that you don't have... what's left?
1 month ago
Anonymous
troony-ism is founded on mental attributes. Your physical state doesn't matter. Also people with the polydactyl deformity do it to be healthier and normal, trannies do it for the opposite result and still wind up mentally weaker.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001971.20
1 month ago
Anonymous
transphobia has never been in the dsm5
1 month ago
Anonymous
no troony has ever been discriminated in public for being trans. you get discriminated against for being ugly, or as you call (cope) it "not passing"
1 month ago
Anonymous
Cry about it chud, you WILL die alone.
1 month ago
Anonymous
if by alone you mean with my family, then sure. luckily im not a moron so none of my kids think they were born wrong.
transexualism is such an insidious idea. it is literally no different than evangelicalism.
1 month ago
Anonymous
According to statistics there's a 41% chance that (You) will die alone, tranner
1 month ago
Anonymous
This is the same dude saying trans people have all the rights they should. Hate never wins
1 month ago
Anonymous
must be easy when you just make shit up, fricking delusional
1 month ago
Anonymous
>y-you are the one making things up, not the minority of angry incels on IQfy!
cope! you will cry about this issue for the rest of your life while society moves to a more and more trans accepting one. Look at the progress we made in the past ten years alone. We aren't going to go backwards no matter how much you guys seethe about it.
1 month ago
Anonymous
holy projection batman
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Claim that men pretending to be women aren't actually women which is factually true >People turn hostile and indulge into name-calling
Speaking of hate, huh?
Trannies have no ground to stand on, never had.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Staring and inappropriate comments
Normal people have no laws to protect them from this
>Visiting businesses
There are zero laws preventing trans people from buying food and opening bank accounts. If normal people show up to the store in fetish gear, they too will be denied service
>Renting and jobs
There are no laws preventing you from getting a rental or a job. Normal people get passed up on these for looking the wrong way or having the wrong name all the time. You aren't special
1 month ago
Anonymous
what rights, idiot?
1 month ago
Anonymous
[...]
-We want to walk down the street on our way to work and school without inappropriate comments, stares and general transphobia.
-We need to have the same right to visit the grocery store, bank, restaurants and other business without experiences discrimination.
-We want to be accepted for the rental agreement, job opportunity, team position and not be denied solely because we are Trans.
-We are people too! People just trying to go about our day
How is she a misandrist when the MC of her latest book series is a capable, competent, likeable, ex-military man?
1 month ago
Anonymous
>That doesn't sit well with western society
Very few outside the internet think transgenderism is natural, it's just that most are too polite to admit how they really feel.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>actually people think just like the incels on IQfy
No.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>No.
There is a difference between outright hatred and thinking something is unnatural, if you think ordinary people think a man wearing women's clothes and demanding to be called a woman isn't weird, then you are living in a complete fairy-tale, most working class people don't hold university liberal beliefs, even economically left wing ones. You have a right to wear women's clothes and believe whatever you want, but don't expect other people to understand you and have the totalitarian view that they have to accept you or else, like a small child would do. You are an eccentric outlier and that is completely fine.
You are completely within your rights to believe whatever you want to be, but other people don't have to.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Thats why we are educating the public about trans acceptance and in most cases its working especially with young people
1 month ago
Anonymous
Transgenderism is a biopunk hellscape. I doubt you would ever find acceptance in not even 5, 10 or so years if you continue. In most cases people do hate this sort of mkultra brainwashing, and if you really cared about stuff you say you should've really followed the footsteps of MLK's ways. He knew that true activism and pushing for equality and acceptance lies within tolerance of the normie. "I have a dream" is literally about tolerance and basic human values. You would think that the sitouts and bus rides and black panthers made the country more tolerant to Black folks. No. Its the opposite. You push for action and you get a reaction. Americans rioted and were forced by government at a gunpoint to socialize with Black folks. And so, if you really want acceptance and not a horrid existence for the sake of constant validation, I would approach this as would most black activists and scholars. Get rid of your special month, we are all people and we are not special. Integrate and promote socially acceptable values and programs. Find companionship.
It just seems to me that you folx always do the opposite for attention and media coverage with child grooming and rape allegations.
1 month ago
Anonymous
She has George Lucas syndrome in which she struck lighting with a mega franchise and never recovered. Fantastic Beasts/Cursed Child/poop remover blog post are on par with the Star Wars prequels.
Rowling only started the anti-trans stuff practically a decade after the finished deathly hallows
I'm a leftist and I think it's silly to judge Harry Potter based on actions by the author 10+ years after the books were written. For that matter, I think it's silly to judge Ender's Game for the writer's views when they don't impact the story in any significant way.
[...]
I believe shit like this hinders the movement to protect trans rights at the policy level. MLK Jr. succeeded because he was focused on discrimination in businesses, schools, housing, etc., not whether or not it's okay to like Gone with the Wind (although he probably wasn't a fan lol).
These.
1 month ago
Anonymous
tldr + you will never be with a woman
1 month ago
Anonymous
I have been a eccentric autist all my life, i long ago realised that if you are different then people are going to be less friendly towards you and think you are strange, that is just how it is, human beings are a pack animal. I also placed more value in what i think of myself instead of what others think of me which has no bearing on my own happiness and is of no importance.
I don't see myself as a victim, and i don't blame other people or society, there is no strength in doing so, have you ever thought people dislike transgender people because of the constant self victimhood and blaming others instead of looking at their own flaws? i don't even hate them, i don't even think about them, but i can understand why people find them annoying, who wouldn't find such people annoying?.
She has George Lucas syndrome in which she struck lighting with a mega franchise and never recovered. Fantastic Beasts/Cursed Child/poop remover blog post are on par with the Star Wars prequels.
Rowling only started the anti-trans stuff practically a decade after the finished deathly hallows
I'm a leftist and I think it's silly to judge Harry Potter based on actions by the author 10+ years after the books were written. For that matter, I think it's silly to judge Ender's Game for the writer's views when they don't impact the story in any significant way.
https://i.imgur.com/gWIOXgW.jpg
Well IQfy?
I believe shit like this hinders the movement to protect trans rights at the policy level. MLK Jr. succeeded because he was focused on discrimination in businesses, schools, housing, etc., not whether or not it's okay to like Gone with the Wind (although he probably wasn't a fan lol).
nta but expanding on this, the reason the civil rights movement worked (mostly) and didnt turn to resentment (for the most part) is because, as that leftshitter said, it was focused on the technicalities of driscrimination and not with the moral outrage. the morality was the foundation, not the purpose.
>I believe shit like this hinders the movement to protect trans rights at the policy level. MLK Jr. succeeded because he was focused on discrimination in businesses, schools, housing, etc., not whether or not it's okay to like Gone with the Wind (although he probably wasn't a fan lol).
Redpill me on Gone with the Wind. I've never read it, but I heard its about a woman who cucks her boyfriend, but then goes back to her boyfriend at the end, so I'm probably never going to read it.
Was it considered racist or antisemitic?
I only watched the movie but >one of the major characters is a "happy slave" and "mammy" archetype (this was the first time a black person won an academy award for acting) >Scarlett O'Hara refuses to hire black people during reconstruction because she has to pay them more than whites
Overall the story expects you to sympathize with these rich slave-owners and how difficult their lives were.
I hate how nowadays webcomics are mainly used as a tool for political debates, reaction images to post to "own" your political "enemies". Not so long ago people made webcomics about stuff they liked or stuff they've always wanted to write about. Internet poisoned people's minds
It's literally a blog post, and there's no set-up/payoff. You can re-arrange the panels in any order you like, and nothing would change. You could shift the talk balloons to point to either character and nothing would change. The fourth panel has the word "And" in it, so that sort of forces it not to be the first panel, but still.
It's literally a blog post, and there's no set-up/payoff. You can re-arrange the panels in any order you like, and nothing would change. You could shift the talk balloons to point to either character and nothing would change. The fourth panel has the word "And" in it, so that sort of forces it not to be the first panel, but still.
>It's literally a blog post, and there's no set-up/payoff. You can re-arrange the panels in any order you like, and nothing would change. You could shift the talk balloons to point to either character and nothing would change. The fourth panel has the word "And" in it, so that sort of forces it not to be the first panel, but still.
I have work in 2 hours, and I decided to waste 13 minutes demonstrating this is true. You're welcome.
"Perpetuating trans oppression." Give me a break. Some homosexual puts on a dress and people look at him like he's an ugly self-deluded cross-dresser, which is exactly what he is. But if he can't get the government or the pack wolves on leftist social media to coerce people to go along with the lie that he's as female as Audrey Hepburn, then he's "oppressed." He's just a posturing totalitarian queer. Rowling should shit all over him.
>"Do you know how the troons first came into being? They were incels once... still are, invited into discord, tortured and mutilated. A ruined and terrible form of life."
Wow...gave me goosebumps.
I hate leftists so much, man. They ruined everything
https://i.imgur.com/fwdE44o.jpg
honest thoughts?
I think her books are very fun and comfy. She deserves credit but maybe not the worship she received pre-trans crusade. But I began to love Rowling when she began to speak the truth. Also, she's a milf and would love for her to put both my nuts in her mouth
What was even the point of making this in comic style? Literally nothing visual happens and you can't even tell what the hell the characters are supposed to look like because they are just mask faces.
Started reading HP after seeing twitter seethe about it. Its actually a solid series and I wish I read it earlier. Its up there with Dune, Lord of the Rings, Blood Meridian
Too far right for the left, too far left for the right. Made all the wrong decisions to get shat on by everybody. That being said, her views on feminism are pretty based, and like her or not she did change the world for the better
This author has to quote another person to sound intelligent and then immediately below nullifies it by thinking woke and political correctness mean the same thing.
>she did change the world for the better
she helped create an entire generation of women that refuse to grow up, then those women got mad at her when she said trannies aren't real women
I barely read anything up until I went to college. Harry Potter books were really the only books I've read the moment they got published. I would usually read them in like 2 days. Which was an amazing feat for someone who didn't really read books. Other than the occasional Cather In the Rye or something similar.
Its a great children's book that really lets you get lost in its world and completely forget about the outside world for a couple of hours or days. Or at least that's how I felt reading the books as a kid in the late 90'/early 00'. By the time the last parts got out I was older, the magic has disappeared and reading them felt almost like a chore. But even then, I thought they were still entertaining.
Harry Potter should unironically be mandatory reading if you want to post on this board. The amount of cultural relevance it has even today is insane. Those books basically raised me
6 was the best, anon. 5 was the worst. Her writing struggled hard, she harped on umbridge for far too long, and repeated the same dream sequence a dozen times
A woman who will not attain the proper respect until after she dies. She inspired and encouraged countless children to read a book about an ethno-state that could be destroyed by the inclusion or outsiders.
She will be remembered as a nationalist and beacon of truth that withered a storm of hate that will only be properly contextualizes by a future Far-Right/Normal society.
>Only american "conservatives" are like that
Reminder that Angela Merkel is the German equivalent of a Republican, though you probably thought she was the German equivalent of a Democrat.
No, every single Western Conservative, Tory, Republican, Classical Liberal, whatever vague definition of slightly Center-Right you have, it is all the same. They have failed and have done for the last one hundred years.
You can cling to your dead values of free speech, tolerance, equality before the law, freedom of religion and all that shitwash and ignore that all it has accomplished is to welcome the outsider in to your home, to shit on your heritage and replace you demographically. Or you wake up and embrace some form of Quasi-Fascistic authoritarianism or we die. It is not a hard choice.
Glad to see IQfy isn't so tight assed about Harry Potter anymore. I hated pseuds who would post that Harold Bloom shit. In reality its a great series that a lot of us were raised on
Whatever year IQfy was created until the mass turnover began after gg. Hardcore litgays who were older than that audience thought it was (rightfully) lame and over-hyped. But there are a lot of pottergays on the internet and this place had a massive Tumblr migration some years back. Watching the reaction come around was interesting, to say the least.
t. ancientgay
Mediocre kids' writer. Only hates trannies because she hated men in the first place. Advocates leftist politics while living in a gated mansion. First degree hag.
>Ive been here since 2016 (longer than most people here)
Thank you for making me feel old. I've lurked IQfy since 2004, when IQfy didn't even exist. The only place where you could try to start a discussion about Harry Potter was /b/ in those days.
You could troll IQfy with it because of the games. It was more obvious then that anyone born before 1987 didn't give a frick about it and even the late millennials had a mixed reaction. I was in high school by the time it wrapped up and while there were hangers-on who were immature, most only read it out of habit and had moved on.
>I was in high school by the time it wrapped up
I was in like 5th grade when the first couple HP movies came out, some kids got into both books and movies around that time, other kids felt like it was meant for kids a little younger than we were. In middle school, boys that were into HP in elementary had grown out of it and the actual fans were mostly girls, by high school girls too had move on from HP and even amongst geeky people liking HP in High School was consider kind of cringy, the only two guys that I remember were still into HP were plebbitor types, people that I'm assuming lost their shit over JK being a TERF.
>billionaire >bulletproof reputation from writing perhaps the most beloved children’s book series of all time >throws it away to troll troons on twitter
Unimaginably based.
>Is there greater context to these "chairs" in the conversation?
yes. people have tried to use the argument that words are hard to define to prove that trans women are women and "chair" is one word that is used it that. it's kind of a "is a hotdog a sandwich" thing.
>Is there greater context to these "chairs" in the conversation?
yes. people have tried to use the argument that words are hard to define to prove that trans women are women and "chair" is one word that is used it that. it's kind of a "is a hotdog a sandwich" thing.
No, the context is that a trannie had a meltdown at some protest in the UK, yanked a chair out from under a very elderly woman and threw it (the clip went viral and was featured on news broadcasts). The trannie is sarcastically pretending trannies were protesting chairs (as in: yeah, we were there just to throw chairs and not because we're being le oppressed).
She got lucky once and is living off the past, she is like al bundy being super confident because he scored a touch down in high school and won the big game once.
Talk shit about stephen king, but king was able to break out of his horror cage and write shit like the green mile and shawshank redemption and stand by me.
No one has read her post potter stuff, i think thats why she went nutso about the trannies.
If i were her i would write another fantasy novel series, but more adult and in the vein of game of thrones
>No one has read her post potter stuff, i think thats why she went nutso about the trannies. >If i were her i would write another fantasy novel series, but more adult and in the vein of game of thrones
i wonder which really came first, obsession with dumb activism or the inability to create. is it that she can't get back into that creative headspace so she copes by fighting for "important issues," or that engaging with social media politics bullshit killed her ability to enter a creative headspace, or maybe it's all one big feedback loop of brain damage
Definitely had some good ideas, and a genuine retelling of the hero's journey can never be truly bad. But she's massively overrated, and the writing is not deep like the diehard fanbase loves to pretend.
Probably the most skillful thing she did was really capture Harry's development as an adolescent boy growing through his school years. Most writers will frick it up and write a child character almost identical to their adult self, aside from more knowledge of the world.
She made some great children's books that are written with charming prose. IRL bit of a libshit, advocated/donated for a bunch of immigration programs into the UK which frankly does more damage than any amount of anti-trans stuff she posts on Twitter could make up for
Wokeists are so petty and jealous of genius. It's insane observing it from the outside. They believe themselves to be some sort of master of the universe whereas everyone with an IQ above 80 recognizes their subterfuge for what it is. I would create this kind of thread if I wanted to help conservatives win even more votes.
Books are fine, nothing really great, but that's okay. I just wish the ones who obsess over Harry Potter understand that it's written for children, and then later became a Young Adult series. It's okay to like it, but just don't make it your whole personality, yeah?
When it comes to politics, I find it really funny. She's still a leftist through and through, and only because of her trans views has she become a pariah in leftist circles. This also lead to a lot of right-wing people calling her based, but she disagrees with pretty much everything they believe in.
She's the perfect embodiment of the left eating their own, as well as the idea that the enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend.
so you'd side with an anti-israel commie or an ancap troony when you could just side with actual antisemites and non-troony ancaps?
sounds moronic tbh
this kind of half-assing is why /misc/ is full of shitskins
NTA but it's because no one wants to be associated with you. You're a detriment to every belief you espouse. Simple as.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Simple as
You're a fricking moron who's siding with a man hating feminazi. The amon you're responding to is more based than you or Rowling because he actually has principles.
If they say something correct, yes? How is that even a question. Would you disagree that 2 + 2 = 4 if the guy holding a gun to your head said it? Dude you need help...
1 month ago
Anonymous
Even a broken clock can be right twice a day. Doesn't mean you have to think she's based just because she said one correct thing out of a hundred inane babblings. Remember she willingly blackwashes her characters like she did with Hermione.
Rowling is not someone to look up to or admire.
At this point, I wouldn't be surpised if IQfy simped for a YA slop author like Sarah J Maas if she said something against trannies and started liking her books despite being a blight on literature.
>creates a world of imagination and fantasy for generations of children to get lost in >tells should-be adults their imagination doesn't make them a woman and their fantasy (fetish) isn't real
Unabashedly based.
>some 60-year-old british hag has a political meltdown because she's reaching that age where your relatives start "forgetting" they're not supposed to bring up politics at the dinnertable >this is really important for some reason
i miss when the most obnoxious thing about Harry Potter was how many overgrown babies wouldn't shut the frick up about it. they're half-decent books for ten-year-olds. i read them growing up, i really liked them at the time, and then i moved on. there's better fantasy (Tolkien), better "contemporary"/"urban" fantasy (Gaiman and Pratchett), better high-concept kids' books (Animorphs), and better YA (Hunger Games); all Harry Potter has going for it is nostalgia.
>i miss when the most obnoxious thing about Harry Potter was how many overgrown babies wouldn't shut the frick up about it.
Her transphobia is what alienated that audience.
>i miss when the most obnoxious thing about Harry Potter was how many overgrown babies wouldn't shut the frick up about it. they're half-decent books for ten-year-olds. i read them growing up, i really liked them at the time, and then i moved on. there's better fantasy (Tolkien), better "contemporary"/"urban" fantasy (Gaiman and Pratchett), better high-concept kids' books (Animorphs), and better YA (Hunger Games); all Harry Potter has going for it is nostalgia.
I just wanted to chime in that I remember reading all 3 books, and by the time you reach the third book, there's lazy shit, that I want to call "post-facto exposition" for lack of a better term.
I read the book about a decade ago, so the point isn't as salient as it would be if I were willing to download the book and read the whole thing before my work shift in two hours, but what I mean is for example on page 150, through the book, the character will do something with an item that it's explained she got in the much earlier chapters despite zero mention of it in those earlier chapters. Like b***h, edit your earlier chapters. If it was a case of retconning events in earlier books, that would atleast be understandable.
Also, I vaguely remember the first book alludes to hidden history of a dystopian footage that sort of mysteriously hides something that begs deeper investigation and neither of the sequel books dig into it. Maybe the prequels that these new movies are based off of explore it. I don't give a frick any more, but I remember that.
She could have retired and coasted through the rest of life on a passive income of harry potter nostalgia money but instead chose to be a twitter poster
is the mainstream opinion that Harry Potter sucks? Outside of Hogwarts Legacy, I do feel like people have kind of left HP behind, and in the case of HL I think the shitstorm in the internet is what actually drove the sales of that game, because months prior to the game the third Fantastic Beasts movie came out and it flopped in the box office, and they canceled other HP related proyects in WB. I don't really see people using HP as a good example of a fantasy series, like in youtube channels about writing for fantasy and sci-fi, or sometimes in fandoms and stuff I've seen people using HP almost like an insult like "oh the world building in this series is awful, it's almost as bad as Harry Potter" and similar.
>everyone who gets a mugshot is antifa
there is zero basis behind the claim that they are antifa just because they were at a protest/riot
1 month ago
Anonymous
>arrested for being part of a black block >not anifa
pick one
1 month ago
Anonymous
>ackshually just because they were at an antifa riot doesn't mean they were antifa
Obviously a pathetic attempt at damage control LOL
1 month ago
Anonymous
Source on that mate? Oh you don't have it because it never happened? Yeah I thought so
1 month ago
Anonymous
This image is incredibly unfair.
16 people (A10, B9, C12, C18, C19, D6, D7, D17, E3, E14, E15, F1, F3, F11, F13, F17) stand out clearly as humans against this morass of genetic god knows what
The ultra politically correct types what transgender people usually are hate this because it shatters their whole worldview, spend any amount of time in a British pub with older working class people who have left wing sympathies and you will realize many of them have social views what would not be seen as acceptable by the middle class left today, even if they have left wing economic views such as Trade unionism, nationalisation/public ownership, public healthcare etc.
I don't know where this idea came from that you cannot be economically left wing and socially conservative, this was pretty much the norm until well into the 1990's, pretty much every single eastern blok state and leftist political party was socially conservative, if they started ranting about trans and gay rights they would've alienated the population, much like they're doing now honestly, new labour for example is alienating working class voters.
I think the horcrux is a very interesting idea that is original as far as I know. Very cool.
As for the bigger question, the male-led household was the product of an artificial scarcity of men created by war... A near equal population distribution means female control of cultural norms through collective bargaining in sexual preferences, and those men who "drop out," by becoming trannies, gays, incels, or asexual monks are doing their part to restore order in an adverse situation. People should be allowed access to hormones as soon as they are 18 & legally old enough to be independent of their parents, and since troonyism is not a mental illness but rather a psychological reconfiguration to a harsher sexual-ecological environment than they were prepared for, men should also allowed unrestricted access to steroids, and those who burn out their reproductive capacities in this way will have incurred no loss by the same logic in which trannies remove themselves from the species-being
the horcrux is very reminiscent of the phylactery of a Lich. a lich will regenerate if you do not destroy the phylactery which contains the essence of his soul
>I went to the Yale bookstore and bought and read a copy of “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone.” I suffered a great deal in the process. The writing was dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character “stretched his legs.” I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling’s mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing.
>But when I wrote that in a newspaper, I was denounced. I was told that children would now only read J.K. Rowling, and I was asked whether that wasn’t, after all, better than reading nothing at all? If Rowling was what it took to make them pick up a book, wasn’t that a good thing?
>It is not. “Harry Potter” will not lead our children on to Kipling’s “Just So Stories” or his “Jungle Book.” It will not lead them to Thurber’s “Thirteen Clocks” or Kenneth Grahame’s “Wind in the Willows” or Lewis Carroll’s “Alice.”
>Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, “If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King.” And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read “Harry Potter” you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2003-sep-19-oe-bloom19-story.html
>As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character “stretched his legs.” I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous.
Why did he feel the need to make this up? Were there not enough bad things in the book for his essay so he had to invent them?
Simple, he didn't read the book and thought that nobody would check if he just made something up (and he was pretty much right, most people that know the "stretched his legs" meme think it's actually true).
>The decision to give the National Book Foundation’s annual award for “distinguished contribution” to Stephen King is extraordinary, another low in the shocking process of dumbing down our cultural life. I’ve described King in the past as a writer of penny dreadfuls, but perhaps even that is too kind. He shares nothing with Edgar Allan Poe. What he is is an immensely inadequate writer, on a sentence-by-sentence, paragraph-by-paragraph, book-by-book basis.
>The publishing industry has stooped terribly low to bestow on King a lifetime award that has previously gone to the novelists Saul Bellow and Philip Roth and to playwright Arthur Miller. By awarding it to King, they recognize nothing but the commercial value of his books, which sell in the millions but do little more for humanity than keep the publishing world afloat. If this is going to be the criterion in the future, then perhaps next year the committee should give its award for distinguished contribution to Danielle Steel, and surely the Nobel Prize for literature should go to J.K. Rowling.
The context of his criticism of Rowling there is kind of important.
>Saul Bellow >Philip Roth >Arthur Miller
Does make you wonder whether he actually read any of these either.
>The decision to give the National Book Foundation’s annual award for “distinguished contribution” to Stephen King is extraordinary, another low in the shocking process of dumbing down our cultural life. I’ve described King in the past as a writer of penny dreadfuls, but perhaps even that is too kind. He shares nothing with Edgar Allan Poe. What he is is an immensely inadequate writer, on a sentence-by-sentence, paragraph-by-paragraph, book-by-book basis.
>The publishing industry has stooped terribly low to bestow on King a lifetime award that has previously gone to the novelists Saul Bellow and Philip Roth and to playwright Arthur Miller. By awarding it to King, they recognize nothing but the commercial value of his books, which sell in the millions but do little more for humanity than keep the publishing world afloat. If this is going to be the criterion in the future, then perhaps next year the committee should give its award for distinguished contribution to Danielle Steel, and surely the Nobel Prize for literature should go to J.K. Rowling.
The context of his criticism of Rowling there is kind of important.
>bro JK said horrible things about trannies
OK but specifically what? >uh bro it was awful and transphobic trust me
But what exactly did she say? >shut up that's too many questions
exactly. nobody at all is affected by genital mutilation cults that explicitly target children, and if you have a problem with the state promoting them, you must be some kind of weirdo
Misery loves company. Forcing the misery onto others is how they convince themselves they didn't make an irreversible mistake. troonyism must be objectively correct otherwise it means they ruined their life.
incredibly disingenuous post. even if surgical interventions are postponed until 18, you know very well that the indoctrination that makes you think you need them is targeted at children. troonyism cannot exist as a mass movement without exploiting minors because the basic mechanisms of recruitment rely on hijacking the confusion and alienation that come with puberty.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Even if surgical intervention doesn't occur for minors you're still irreversibly ruining their puberty and development via hormones. And these freaks expect to be treated kindly while considering it a public right to poison children like that.
1 month ago
Anonymous
That doesn't happen except for in the minds of chuds
bros i`m reading the Order of the Phoenix and i can`t... this fricking book feel endless, i`m still on the middle and it felt longer that it should be, i just want it to end
If you look at things in a dichotomy of power, transgender people are incredibly powerful compared to for example white working class people, they can cancel people, influence the media, have multi billion dollar corporations on their side, the average working class person doesn't have this.
It's an illusion that they created that they have no power whatsoever, and are perpetual victims. It comes from a constant psychological need for approval and totalitarian control, by constantly trying to get others to focus on their needs they are also diverting attention away from issues which may be affecting ordinary people, like the epidemic of drug addiction, crime, poverty etc, things what are of actual importance in making sure a nation is worth living in, not things such as a persons physical features or how they dress and perceived by others which is of literal no importance.
If you keep neglecting a majority of the population in favour of a insignificant minority, it will eventually get ugly.
They aren't particularly bright or competent to have the platform that they do, it's propped up for them, power granted by ESG and other none-goy factors.
Makes sense, the constant focus on trans rights actually helps maintain the status quo and diverts attention away from the massive elephant in the room, that is that society is decaying at a exponential rate, in the UK at least anyway, we are in the latter stages of the decline of Rome.
Didn't Nietzsche also talk about this?
Maybe, I haven't read him, I may do so some time as i enjoyed reading Schopenhauer
>being obsessed with trannies is as sad as being troony
speaking out is not being "obsessed," and our rulers forcing something so absurd on us is a big deal
>our rulers forcing something so absurd on us
yea honestly i thought Biden making me cut my dick off was going too far
1 month ago
Anonymous
No one is forcing you dumbass incel. We are just asking you to be quiet and stop being so fricking hateful
>our rulers forcing something so absurd on us is a big deal
Nobody is "forcing" anything. We all still have our dicks, after all.
probably 3/3 trolls but what's being forced is >lying >men in women's spaces >the destruction of parental safeguarding of children
there are zero trans people in the universe because trans is not a thing. women, children, and free thought and expression are under attack from these perverts and their oligarchic patrons
No one is forcing you dumbass incel. We are just asking you to be quiet and stop being so fricking hateful
1 month ago
Anonymous
>We are just asking you to be quiet
People are going to say whatever they think anon if they feel something is wrong whether you like it or not, other peoples opinions are not something within your power, the only thing in your power is whether you let it disturb you or not, i suggest you grow a thicker skin.
It's peculiar that older transsexuals generally don't seem to try and force their views on others, and are mature enough to know that their lifestyle choice isn't the norm, i think this all comes down to immaturity.
Your willingness to immediately resort to insults also shows the maturity level you are currently occupying(it's not high) not everybody who disagrees with you is a ''incel'' whatever the hell that means anyway. I technically have a woman but I am at the age where i'm not that bothered anymore, not everybody who disagrees with you is a ''fascist'' or ''right wing'' either, I am neither of those things.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Or... you can hide threads that make you throw incel tantrums instead of being upset all the time.
Get some help for your anger-issues where you seek and encourage your anger. You can't control what others think and you need to get over the idea you're the arbiter of what everyone should think.
Rowling is creative but she's a terrible writer. Unironically her best work has been on Twitter. Her actual prose in Harry Potter is garbage and full of rookie mistakes, the kind of thing you'd expect from a new writer but not someone who'd had years of international success as the series went on. I feel like it got worse over time rather than better. Always assumed that was due to a combination of less criticism from editors after be became super successful, and the characters and readers outgrowing her writing ability. Like if you're writing for 10-year-olds you can put some really moronic stuff down on paper and it works. Not when you're dealing with 18yos. But a lot of it was just writing frickups. My mother was an editor, and I kept thinking "if mom read this to me as a kid she'd stop and explain why this is wrong every couple chapters."
Now, I'm not hating on HP in general. It's fun and if I was more into rolling with the wizards and shit I'd still like it despite the furry-fanfic-skill-tier writing. What really concerns me are people in their 30s who say they're the best books they've ever read. I read it for the first time as an adult and I came away thinking it was pretty meh.
Malehating turbofeminist who turned half of her characters retroactively into Black folk and homosexuals. Also the books were shit. Simping over her just makes /misc/cels seem moronic.
She spent a good chunk of her day seething about a bunch of stuff and I did a bit of shitposting myself.
3 bottles of rosé deep she opens up the folder where she has saved a bunch of photos of trans people along with articles about them and she posts like 11 or 12 consecutive back to back seetheposts because a law came into force and she's concerned about her rights as a woman.
I'm sitting down here posting 2000 char posts on IQfy all morning about shit nobody in the streets of Edinburgh gives a frick about and so was she.
She's a rich LARPer who pretends to have been working class and she can afford those 3 bottles of rosé but I'm disabled and after reading the hate crime & public order acta bit ago and again just last week, it's pretty good stuff and a step forward. It would have been used against my junkie neighbour before he offed himself on cheap street diazepam and fent.
She's fricking around in her giant garden with her dog and I was fricking around in my giant garden with my dog.
She's abusing substances and aging like milk caring about her identity a bit (typed b***h here by accident) much, getting her rocks off posting on twitter in a frenzy and I'm taking 46 degree 2 hour baths reading shitty Japanese novels blasting the FF V soundtrack on repeat because I'm not inputting attacks fast enough due to my brain melting and when I finally ascend from my hot throne I'm trying to not pass out due to the triple threat combo of POTS, near heatstroke and low blood pressure from trying to cook myself alive.
I felt mega relaxed apart from the brief FF V sesh but my smart watch used to monitor my blood pressure thinks I'm the most stressed I've been this week
Jo will be a few more bottles deep and she might go for a nap, wake up in the late evening and go back to posting or maybe she'll commit a hate crime accidentally.
I'm much the same but without the alcohol; because MUP & austerity has priced it out of my range. I might finally get to sleep and I might just wake up at 9pm or I may soldier on and accidentally also commit a hate crime by accident.
It's moments like these that it all comes into focus, that we're not so different after all.
I mean we have different political opinions, she hates her neighbours and abandons her hedge and I quite like a bit of gardening and also hate my neighbours but in the granular moments, in the most obtuse sense we are kindred spirits and the only difference is that we have different obsessions.
I spent the morning thinking about villainy and the philosophical concepts attached to it and if a crime can be committed if no one is left to witness it and she spent the morning doing the same in the same city at the same time.
Funny how the world works. In a different life I'd be the billionaire class traitor arsing around the other end of town and she'd be the NEET mentally unfit loser. Well she's close on the others.
You constantly spam the same allegation that Rowling "hates men" as if this will change anyone's disgust at trannies. You are an abomination, normal men and women aren't. This is why your samegay argument that she hates trannies because she really hates men falls on deaf ears. Cope, seethe and dial8, m8.
1 month ago
Anonymous
We're saying that because Rowling isn't on your side. She doesn't care about you or your ideology. Yes trannies are disgusting. So are feminists, which is what Rowling is. >you are an abomination
Biological man (male) btw.
I liked her stuff when I was a kid, but haven’t cared to read any of it again recently. Never read her pseudonymous work either.
I'm going to piss off a lot of incel IQfyners, but Rowling is a great writer of Children's literature (not adult lit, Casual Vacancy sucked).
I'm not putting her above Le Guin or Jones, but she is in the conversation. I actually think Harry Potter has better characterization, more of a heart, and a better sense of humor than the Howl and Earthsea books. I think her creativity also excels.
Rowling is considered an incel icon now.
Get on with the times and by that I mesn Xitter demagogy.
While Earthsea is great, I don't think highly of it and the first book reads like mythology. The Howl comparison is apt, but Jones has protagonists with personalities that Harry lacked. The kids act like kids and the adults act like buttholes. I do think Rowling had a stronger, more coherent vision for the world and supporting characters, although she couldn't commit to the magic in a sensible way, which detracted as it was so intrinsic to the story.
Her real strength came from allowing the story to mature and be written in a slightly higher register than most children's books, which I find to be the weakest point of children's literature. Jones, in spite of Howl being one of the few books that adults can read without it feeling 'off', is more on the level of a graded reader, while HP had more room to touch on things that children's literature doesn't have room or the ability to. HP had a lot of interiority.
>I don't think highly of it and the first book reads like mythology.
It's meant to resemble an old saga.
I should clarify, I don't think highly of it on the whole because the later books are increasingly stupid, and the first book is written in the tone and register of myth, or as you say, a saga. Wizard is the only one I'd compare to Rowling, and it's nothing like HP because of that massive tonal difference. I actually think the first two books are excellent and symbolically rich like few other books are, but that also makes it far removed from how HP is.
I'd also read better fantasy by the time I got around to it and it didn't have the kind of impact it would have.
Harry Potter is a shitty version of Chrestomanci. Or a boy version of The Worst Witch, and it takes itself too goddamn seriously for what it is.
10 is too old for HP, shit reads like it's meant to be read to 5 year olds.
She just hates men, whenever she starts shit talking trannies it innevitable devolves into shitting on straight white men. She attends fricking Lesbian feminist events and hangs out with literal Political Lesbians and FTM trannies, she may actually be a closeted FTM according to some interviews.
see
>Never read her pseudonymous work either.
Red pill me on her pseudonyms. Is it like how Dr Seuss used to write softcore porn that was illustrated in the same Grinch/Cat in the Hat style he's known for?
Or is it like Bachman, the fake name for Stephen King's book about a school incident?
She should just shut up.
The only people who think this are mentally ill
this, its hilarious seeing her destroying her own legacy. the more she talks the more people will hate her
The only thing she ever did wrong was write a series that attracted so many mentally ill people.
She's a misandrist and transphobe. That doesn't sit well with western society
shes not a misandrist, and theres no such thing as transphobe
source: my headcanon
define transphobia
dislike of trans people
then she is literally, by definition, not a transphobe.
someone not agreeing with you doesnt mean they hate you.
Well?
well what? the comic is wrong by your own definition.
WELL?
pictured: two pedophiles
Denying their rights = dislike of them
I don't care what mental gymnastics you are going to pull.
Educate yourself
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transphobia
What rights do trans people not have that other people do?
-We want to walk down the street on our way to work and school without inappropriate comments, stares and general transphobia.
-We need to have the same right to visit the grocery store, bank, restaurants and other business without experiences discrimination.
-We want to be accepted for the rental agreement, job opportunity, team position and not be denied solely because we are Trans.
-We are people too! People just trying to go about our day
https://www.queerevents.ca/education/transgender/trans-rights
not even cis people have those rights...
You went to the grocery store and were discriminated against because you were cis? I kinda doubt that. But yes everyone deserves basic human rights
First of all, its already illegal to discriminate based on identity. There is no second of all. You already have the rights you want.
Then why does JK Rolling seethe so much on twitter? Really makes you think
gee man idk, might have something to do with the dedicated campaign against her person.
Its almost as if its just people reacting to her insane posts. If she would just shut the frick up it wouldnt be a problem but he keep on screeching about something that doesn't effect her
you say that like she isnt reacting to other peoples insane posts. why is she held accountable, but not those others?
>People should stop telling the truth because mentally ill people might get mad uwu
Nice try troon
Transphobia is a mental illness, therefore you are the one who is mentally ill. No first world country considers being trans a mental illness. Move to Saudi Arabia or something, you would fit in better
If being trans isn't a illness, why do you go on drugs and get surgery for it?
Doing drugs or having surgery doesn't mean you are mentally ill. Are you stupid?
please learn to read
People get surgery for a lot of things, would you consider people getting your appendix out as someone who is mentally ill? You transphobes have like 80 IQ between all of you guys
People don't remove healthy body parts unless they are mentally ill
>People don't remove healthy body parts unless they are mentally ill
Oh, you mean like people who are born with six toes or fingers called Polydactyly who get them surgically removed? Those people are mentally ill? LOL.
Challenge for the trannies: don't conceptualize yourselves along with intersex people and other birth defects that you don't have... what's left?
troony-ism is founded on mental attributes. Your physical state doesn't matter. Also people with the polydactyl deformity do it to be healthier and normal, trannies do it for the opposite result and still wind up mentally weaker.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001971.20
transphobia has never been in the dsm5
no troony has ever been discriminated in public for being trans. you get discriminated against for being ugly, or as you call (cope) it "not passing"
Cry about it chud, you WILL die alone.
if by alone you mean with my family, then sure. luckily im not a moron so none of my kids think they were born wrong.
transexualism is such an insidious idea. it is literally no different than evangelicalism.
According to statistics there's a 41% chance that (You) will die alone, tranner
This is the same dude saying trans people have all the rights they should. Hate never wins
must be easy when you just make shit up, fricking delusional
>y-you are the one making things up, not the minority of angry incels on IQfy!
cope! you will cry about this issue for the rest of your life while society moves to a more and more trans accepting one. Look at the progress we made in the past ten years alone. We aren't going to go backwards no matter how much you guys seethe about it.
holy projection batman
>Claim that men pretending to be women aren't actually women which is factually true
>People turn hostile and indulge into name-calling
Speaking of hate, huh?
Trannies have no ground to stand on, never had.
>Staring and inappropriate comments
Normal people have no laws to protect them from this
>Visiting businesses
There are zero laws preventing trans people from buying food and opening bank accounts. If normal people show up to the store in fetish gear, they too will be denied service
>Renting and jobs
There are no laws preventing you from getting a rental or a job. Normal people get passed up on these for looking the wrong way or having the wrong name all the time. You aren't special
what rights, idiot?
bad bait
How is she a misandrist when the MC of her latest book series is a capable, competent, likeable, ex-military man?
>That doesn't sit well with western society
Very few outside the internet think transgenderism is natural, it's just that most are too polite to admit how they really feel.
>actually people think just like the incels on IQfy
No.
>No.
There is a difference between outright hatred and thinking something is unnatural, if you think ordinary people think a man wearing women's clothes and demanding to be called a woman isn't weird, then you are living in a complete fairy-tale, most working class people don't hold university liberal beliefs, even economically left wing ones. You have a right to wear women's clothes and believe whatever you want, but don't expect other people to understand you and have the totalitarian view that they have to accept you or else, like a small child would do. You are an eccentric outlier and that is completely fine.
You are completely within your rights to believe whatever you want to be, but other people don't have to.
Thats why we are educating the public about trans acceptance and in most cases its working especially with young people
Transgenderism is a biopunk hellscape. I doubt you would ever find acceptance in not even 5, 10 or so years if you continue. In most cases people do hate this sort of mkultra brainwashing, and if you really cared about stuff you say you should've really followed the footsteps of MLK's ways. He knew that true activism and pushing for equality and acceptance lies within tolerance of the normie. "I have a dream" is literally about tolerance and basic human values. You would think that the sitouts and bus rides and black panthers made the country more tolerant to Black folks. No. Its the opposite. You push for action and you get a reaction. Americans rioted and were forced by government at a gunpoint to socialize with Black folks. And so, if you really want acceptance and not a horrid existence for the sake of constant validation, I would approach this as would most black activists and scholars. Get rid of your special month, we are all people and we are not special. Integrate and promote socially acceptable values and programs. Find companionship.
It just seems to me that you folx always do the opposite for attention and media coverage with child grooming and rape allegations.
These.
tldr + you will never be with a woman
I have been a eccentric autist all my life, i long ago realised that if you are different then people are going to be less friendly towards you and think you are strange, that is just how it is, human beings are a pack animal. I also placed more value in what i think of myself instead of what others think of me which has no bearing on my own happiness and is of no importance.
I don't see myself as a victim, and i don't blame other people or society, there is no strength in doing so, have you ever thought people dislike transgender people because of the constant self victimhood and blaming others instead of looking at their own flaws? i don't even hate them, i don't even think about them, but i can understand why people find them annoying, who wouldn't find such people annoying?.
Harry Potter is an amazing series of books. Leftists who shit on it have no taste
She has George Lucas syndrome in which she struck lighting with a mega franchise and never recovered. Fantastic Beasts/Cursed Child/poop remover blog post are on par with the Star Wars prequels.
Rowling only started the anti-trans stuff practically a decade after the finished deathly hallows
I'm a leftist and I think it's silly to judge Harry Potter based on actions by the author 10+ years after the books were written. For that matter, I think it's silly to judge Ender's Game for the writer's views when they don't impact the story in any significant way.
I believe shit like this hinders the movement to protect trans rights at the policy level. MLK Jr. succeeded because he was focused on discrimination in businesses, schools, housing, etc., not whether or not it's okay to like Gone with the Wind (although he probably wasn't a fan lol).
I think when a certain group enshrines itself into a policy level tolerance turns to resentment.
nta but expanding on this, the reason the civil rights movement worked (mostly) and didnt turn to resentment (for the most part) is because, as that leftshitter said, it was focused on the technicalities of driscrimination and not with the moral outrage. the morality was the foundation, not the purpose.
>I believe shit like this hinders the movement to protect trans rights at the policy level. MLK Jr. succeeded because he was focused on discrimination in businesses, schools, housing, etc., not whether or not it's okay to like Gone with the Wind (although he probably wasn't a fan lol).
Redpill me on Gone with the Wind. I've never read it, but I heard its about a woman who cucks her boyfriend, but then goes back to her boyfriend at the end, so I'm probably never going to read it.
Was it considered racist or antisemitic?
I only watched the movie but
>one of the major characters is a "happy slave" and "mammy" archetype (this was the first time a black person won an academy award for acting)
>Scarlett O'Hara refuses to hire black people during reconstruction because she has to pay them more than whites
Overall the story expects you to sympathize with these rich slave-owners and how difficult their lives were.
Bargain bin Le Guin
KEK, this is quite an apt description
Got you a better one, Discount Diana Wynne Jones.
Casual Vacancy was a failed attempt at a kind of country drama that she should have excelled at.
Well IQfy?
I hate how nowadays webcomics are mainly used as a tool for political debates, reaction images to post to "own" your political "enemies". Not so long ago people made webcomics about stuff they liked or stuff they've always wanted to write about. Internet poisoned people's minds
wowiee woe is you
They were always bad and political, just like stand-up.
didn't this guy use real toddler photos as references for furry toddlercon art
yes
Why do alphabet folx care so much about what children interact with?
More often than not, they create damaged people.
this isn't even a comic, it's just a diatribe of conformist ideologies
Is that Death Stranding?
It's literally a blog post, and there's no set-up/payoff. You can re-arrange the panels in any order you like, and nothing would change. You could shift the talk balloons to point to either character and nothing would change. The fourth panel has the word "And" in it, so that sort of forces it not to be the first panel, but still.
>It's literally a blog post, and there's no set-up/payoff. You can re-arrange the panels in any order you like, and nothing would change. You could shift the talk balloons to point to either character and nothing would change. The fourth panel has the word "And" in it, so that sort of forces it not to be the first panel, but still.
I have work in 2 hours, and I decided to waste 13 minutes demonstrating this is true. You're welcome.
Where's the punchline?
The bloody joke is genital mutilation they made along the way
"Perpetuating trans oppression." Give me a break. Some homosexual puts on a dress and people look at him like he's an ugly self-deluded cross-dresser, which is exactly what he is. But if he can't get the government or the pack wolves on leftist social media to coerce people to go along with the lie that he's as female as Audrey Hepburn, then he's "oppressed." He's just a posturing totalitarian queer. Rowling should shit all over him.
Transfreaks get no sympathy from me
>"Do you know how the troons first came into being? They were incels once... still are, invited into discord, tortured and mutilated. A ruined and terrible form of life."
Wow...gave me goosebumps.
Where's the punchline?
I hate leftists so much, man. They ruined everything
I think her books are very fun and comfy. She deserves credit but maybe not the worship she received pre-trans crusade. But I began to love Rowling when she began to speak the truth. Also, she's a milf and would love for her to put both my nuts in her mouth
What was even the point of making this in comic style? Literally nothing visual happens and you can't even tell what the hell the characters are supposed to look like because they are just mask faces.
Potter is a pretty good series for teens. Top tier for the vibes of the 90s and early 00s.
Harry Potter is honorary IQfycore
Started reading HP after seeing twitter seethe about it. Its actually a solid series and I wish I read it earlier. Its up there with Dune, Lord of the Rings, Blood Meridian
8/10 bait
>voldemort was an allegory for liberals
kek, finally realizing this makes the books all that much better.
Too far right for the left, too far left for the right. Made all the wrong decisions to get shat on by everybody. That being said, her views on feminism are pretty based, and like her or not she did change the world for the better
friendly reminder that all of leftism is just one giant shit test, and holding a legitimate opinion on anything means you'll eventually fail it
truth
This author has to quote another person to sound intelligent and then immediately below nullifies it by thinking woke and political correctness mean the same thing.
~~*Curtis Yarvin*~~)
What are her views on feminism?
Trannies are just dudes in dresses
As a FTM thanks, this is inspiring
how far can yuo squirt
>she did change the world for the better
she helped create an entire generation of women that refuse to grow up, then those women got mad at her when she said trannies aren't real women
Should be obligatory reading in schools. We need more people like Joanne
/lit/core. enough said
Harry Potter is a solid book series. Probably the last great book ever written
I like that she filters libs. Harry Potter predicted a lot of events of current society
I barely read anything up until I went to college. Harry Potter books were really the only books I've read the moment they got published. I would usually read them in like 2 days. Which was an amazing feat for someone who didn't really read books. Other than the occasional Cather In the Rye or something similar.
Its a great children's book that really lets you get lost in its world and completely forget about the outside world for a couple of hours or days. Or at least that's how I felt reading the books as a kid in the late 90'/early 00'. By the time the last parts got out I was older, the magic has disappeared and reading them felt almost like a chore. But even then, I thought they were still entertaining.
Just my 2 cents.
Harry Potter should unironically be mandatory reading if you want to post on this board. The amount of cultural relevance it has even today is insane. Those books basically raised me
Always has been IQfycore. Dont listen to seething leftists who disagree
Great series by a great author, nuff said
Frick TERFs
yes, pls frick us
If you haven't read HP you shouldn't be posting on a literature forum.
I think your autocorrect changed have to haven’t accidentally
cope
Cops with what exactly? I don’t know what you’re talking about
4 > 3 > 1 > 5 > 2 >>>> 7 > 6
3 > 1 > 4 > 2 > 6 > 7 >>>>> 5
6 was the best, anon. 5 was the worst. Her writing struggled hard, she harped on umbridge for far too long, and repeated the same dream sequence a dozen times
A woman who will not attain the proper respect until after she dies. She inspired and encouraged countless children to read a book about an ethno-state that could be destroyed by the inclusion or outsiders.
She will be remembered as a nationalist and beacon of truth that withered a storm of hate that will only be properly contextualizes by a future Far-Right/Normal society.
>pic
Only american "conservatives" are like that
>Only american "conservatives" are like that
Reminder that Angela Merkel is the German equivalent of a Republican, though you probably thought she was the German equivalent of a Democrat.
No, every single Western Conservative, Tory, Republican, Classical Liberal, whatever vague definition of slightly Center-Right you have, it is all the same. They have failed and have done for the last one hundred years.
You can cling to your dead values of free speech, tolerance, equality before the law, freedom of religion and all that shitwash and ignore that all it has accomplished is to welcome the outsider in to your home, to shit on your heritage and replace you demographically. Or you wake up and embrace some form of Quasi-Fascistic authoritarianism or we die. It is not a hard choice.
Glad to see IQfy isn't so tight assed about Harry Potter anymore. I hated pseuds who would post that Harold Bloom shit. In reality its a great series that a lot of us were raised on
When was this? Ive been here since 2016 (longer than most people here) and have always seen people praise her
Whatever year IQfy was created until the mass turnover began after gg. Hardcore litgays who were older than that audience thought it was (rightfully) lame and over-hyped. But there are a lot of pottergays on the internet and this place had a massive Tumblr migration some years back. Watching the reaction come around was interesting, to say the least.
t. ancientgay
>2016 was 8 years ago, and is no longer new
I just realized I've spent over half my life /here/ now.
Mediocre kids' writer. Only hates trannies because she hated men in the first place. Advocates leftist politics while living in a gated mansion. First degree hag.
>Advocates leftist politics while living in a gated mansion. First degree hag.
This. Only decent takes she has is her troon takes.
would frick her repeatedly in the vegana, don't care for her books
b4bbc
BIG BONGLAND wiener
>Ive been here since 2016 (longer than most people here)
Thank you for making me feel old. I've lurked IQfy since 2004, when IQfy didn't even exist. The only place where you could try to start a discussion about Harry Potter was /b/ in those days.
You could troll IQfy with it because of the games. It was more obvious then that anyone born before 1987 didn't give a frick about it and even the late millennials had a mixed reaction. I was in high school by the time it wrapped up and while there were hangers-on who were immature, most only read it out of habit and had moved on.
>I was in high school by the time it wrapped up
I was in like 5th grade when the first couple HP movies came out, some kids got into both books and movies around that time, other kids felt like it was meant for kids a little younger than we were. In middle school, boys that were into HP in elementary had grown out of it and the actual fans were mostly girls, by high school girls too had move on from HP and even amongst geeky people liking HP in High School was consider kind of cringy, the only two guys that I remember were still into HP were plebbitor types, people that I'm assuming lost their shit over JK being a TERF.
A nonentity, means absolutely nothing to me.
>honest thoughts?
You have to be over 35 to post on IQfy and no one born before the 90s read any of these gay books
are we being raided by twitter? IQfy usually loves harry potter
Well?
Why are the teeth pink?
Mouthguard.
Even transfolk like Contrapoints will disagree with this. People are allowed to have preferences
Who is contrapoints
>no way to tell
To be attracted to a trans person I need to know they're trans
>You've likely had many crushes-
Let me stop you there.
I loved the book when I realized Death eaters = leftist twitter mob
Harry Potter predicted modern society almost eerily. I see parallels all the time
>billionaire
>bulletproof reputation from writing perhaps the most beloved children’s book series of all time
>throws it away to troll troons on twitter
Unimaginably based.
Did Rowling invent the "Cope and Seethe" meme?
Is there greater context to these "chairs" in the conversation?
>Is there greater context to these "chairs" in the conversation?
yes. people have tried to use the argument that words are hard to define to prove that trans women are women and "chair" is one word that is used it that. it's kind of a "is a hotdog a sandwich" thing.
"Cope and Seethe" but no Dilate. Missed opportunity right there, Rowling-chama
No, the context is that a trannie had a meltdown at some protest in the UK, yanked a chair out from under a very elderly woman and threw it (the clip went viral and was featured on news broadcasts). The trannie is sarcastically pretending trannies were protesting chairs (as in: yeah, we were there just to throw chairs and not because we're being le oppressed).
She got lucky once and is living off the past, she is like al bundy being super confident because he scored a touch down in high school and won the big game once.
Talk shit about stephen king, but king was able to break out of his horror cage and write shit like the green mile and shawshank redemption and stand by me.
No one has read her post potter stuff, i think thats why she went nutso about the trannies.
If i were her i would write another fantasy novel series, but more adult and in the vein of game of thrones
Stephen King wrote Stand By Me??? What the fug
>No one has read her post potter stuff, i think thats why she went nutso about the trannies.
>If i were her i would write another fantasy novel series, but more adult and in the vein of game of thrones
i wonder which really came first, obsession with dumb activism or the inability to create. is it that she can't get back into that creative headspace so she copes by fighting for "important issues," or that engaging with social media politics bullshit killed her ability to enter a creative headspace, or maybe it's all one big feedback loop of brain damage
I like to think of Gryffindor as regular trad culture and slytherin as toxic twitter leftism. Makes the books more enjoyable to read
Slytherin would have won 7 house cups in a row if not for HOWEVER
slytherin was the old money randian house. Gryffindor was the hooligan house.
Trad house was unironically hufflepuff.
Hufflepuff is always stereotyped as the gay beta loser house for some reason. Can someone who read the books tell me if that's true or not?
No, it was just the least archetyped house. So it included anyone from weirdos to people who ought to have been in a different house.
She admitted to having no inner voice
Definitely had some good ideas, and a genuine retelling of the hero's journey can never be truly bad. But she's massively overrated, and the writing is not deep like the diehard fanbase loves to pretend.
Probably the most skillful thing she did was really capture Harry's development as an adolescent boy growing through his school years. Most writers will frick it up and write a child character almost identical to their adult self, aside from more knowledge of the world.
A hero.
I liked her before all the trans stuff, and I like her after
She made some great children's books that are written with charming prose. IRL bit of a libshit, advocated/donated for a bunch of immigration programs into the UK which frankly does more damage than any amount of anti-trans stuff she posts on Twitter could make up for
Wokeists are so petty and jealous of genius. It's insane observing it from the outside. They believe themselves to be some sort of master of the universe whereas everyone with an IQ above 80 recognizes their subterfuge for what it is. I would create this kind of thread if I wanted to help conservatives win even more votes.
Rowling is literally just last season's woke. I don't know who you think you're sticking up for.
She's not exactly Robert E Howard, is she?
Political activism is ugly.
Books are fine, nothing really great, but that's okay. I just wish the ones who obsess over Harry Potter understand that it's written for children, and then later became a Young Adult series. It's okay to like it, but just don't make it your whole personality, yeah?
When it comes to politics, I find it really funny. She's still a leftist through and through, and only because of her trans views has she become a pariah in leftist circles. This also lead to a lot of right-wing people calling her based, but she disagrees with pretty much everything they believe in.
She's the perfect embodiment of the left eating their own, as well as the idea that the enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend.
>IQfy sides with a twitter feminazi because she hates trannies to the point of reading children's genre fic
lol
anyways, she's mogged by tolkien
>IQfy sides with a twitter feminazi because she said something true
...yes? are you fricking stupid?
so you'd side with an anti-israel commie or an ancap troony when you could just side with actual antisemites and non-troony ancaps?
sounds moronic tbh
this kind of half-assing is why /misc/ is full of shitskins
NTA but it's because no one wants to be associated with you. You're a detriment to every belief you espouse. Simple as.
>Simple as
You're a fricking moron who's siding with a man hating feminazi. The amon you're responding to is more based than you or Rowling because he actually has principles.
If they say something correct, yes? How is that even a question. Would you disagree that 2 + 2 = 4 if the guy holding a gun to your head said it? Dude you need help...
Even a broken clock can be right twice a day. Doesn't mean you have to think she's based just because she said one correct thing out of a hundred inane babblings. Remember she willingly blackwashes her characters like she did with Hermione.
Rowling is not someone to look up to or admire.
Harry Potter has always been IQfycore. Maybe reddits book section is more up your alley
>reddit has better taste in books than IQfy
How far this place has fallen
I don't see the issue. Do you think I need to start supporting trannies just because a feminist is against them? That's so moronic.
At this point, I wouldn't be surpised if IQfy simped for a YA slop author like Sarah J Maas if she said something against trannies and started liking her books despite being a blight on literature.
>creates a world of imagination and fantasy for generations of children to get lost in
>tells should-be adults their imagination doesn't make them a woman and their fantasy (fetish) isn't real
Unabashedly based.
>some 60-year-old british hag has a political meltdown because she's reaching that age where your relatives start "forgetting" they're not supposed to bring up politics at the dinnertable
>this is really important for some reason
i miss when the most obnoxious thing about Harry Potter was how many overgrown babies wouldn't shut the frick up about it. they're half-decent books for ten-year-olds. i read them growing up, i really liked them at the time, and then i moved on. there's better fantasy (Tolkien), better "contemporary"/"urban" fantasy (Gaiman and Pratchett), better high-concept kids' books (Animorphs), and better YA (Hunger Games); all Harry Potter has going for it is nostalgia.
>kid disrespects his elders and dismisses their teachings because his childless public school teacher told him to
cmon, do something new
>triggered troon pretends he's above children's lit because he managed to fool himself in thinking he related to Sally Rooney's self-inserts
>i miss when the most obnoxious thing about Harry Potter was how many overgrown babies wouldn't shut the frick up about it.
Her transphobia is what alienated that audience.
>i miss when the most obnoxious thing about Harry Potter was how many overgrown babies wouldn't shut the frick up about it. they're half-decent books for ten-year-olds. i read them growing up, i really liked them at the time, and then i moved on. there's better fantasy (Tolkien), better "contemporary"/"urban" fantasy (Gaiman and Pratchett), better high-concept kids' books (Animorphs), and better YA (Hunger Games); all Harry Potter has going for it is nostalgia.
I just wanted to chime in that I remember reading all 3 books, and by the time you reach the third book, there's lazy shit, that I want to call "post-facto exposition" for lack of a better term.
I read the book about a decade ago, so the point isn't as salient as it would be if I were willing to download the book and read the whole thing before my work shift in two hours, but what I mean is for example on page 150, through the book, the character will do something with an item that it's explained she got in the much earlier chapters despite zero mention of it in those earlier chapters. Like b***h, edit your earlier chapters. If it was a case of retconning events in earlier books, that would atleast be understandable.
Also, I vaguely remember the first book alludes to hidden history of a dystopian footage that sort of mysteriously hides something that begs deeper investigation and neither of the sequel books dig into it. Maybe the prequels that these new movies are based off of explore it. I don't give a frick any more, but I remember that.
She says the truth about them and twitter trannies can't do shit about it. You love to see it.
wrote some good kids books; seems like a dumb c**t
harry potter is the only book i ever enjoyed
I really enjoyed her harry potter series as a child and it helped me get into reading, they are rather boring to reread now though.
Couldn't care less about her personal views.
I'd prefer a timeline where instead of literature she gets into a Xev Bellringer kind of content.
I would love it if she did mature milf porn.
She could have retired and coasted through the rest of life on a passive income of harry potter nostalgia money but instead chose to be a twitter poster
And that's based.
>you lived to see IQfy become so contrarian that they started to praise Harry Potter
This board is beyond dead
is the mainstream opinion that Harry Potter sucks? Outside of Hogwarts Legacy, I do feel like people have kind of left HP behind, and in the case of HL I think the shitstorm in the internet is what actually drove the sales of that game, because months prior to the game the third Fantastic Beasts movie came out and it flopped in the box office, and they canceled other HP related proyects in WB. I don't really see people using HP as a good example of a fantasy series, like in youtube channels about writing for fantasy and sci-fi, or sometimes in fandoms and stuff I've seen people using HP almost like an insult like "oh the world building in this series is awful, it's almost as bad as Harry Potter" and similar.
>Thats why we are educating the public about trans acceptance and in most cases its working especially with young peo-ACK
Its sad to see her screaming into the void, she could just keep these opinions to her self instead of ruining her legacy
>into the void
kek, is this the latest troony cope?
Her crying on twitter isn't changing anything bro, its just an embarrassment. Grow up
trannies crying on twitter isnt doing anything bro, its just an embarrassment. grow up
Glad to see people here sticking up for trans rights. Im so tired of these /misc/ ass losers shitting up the site
I'm left wing and I hate trannies, you can't chalk everything you don't like up to the /misc/ boogeyman
you can't be left wing and hate trannies
every communist in history disagrees
Every communist in history is a troony
>21st century
>history
>everyone who gets a mugshot is antifa
there is zero basis behind the claim that they are antifa just because they were at a protest/riot
>arrested for being part of a black block
>not anifa
pick one
>ackshually just because they were at an antifa riot doesn't mean they were antifa
Obviously a pathetic attempt at damage control LOL
Source on that mate? Oh you don't have it because it never happened? Yeah I thought so
This image is incredibly unfair.
16 people (A10, B9, C12, C18, C19, D6, D7, D17, E3, E14, E15, F1, F3, F11, F13, F17) stand out clearly as humans against this morass of genetic god knows what
>random twitter troony's dogshit opinion
>mattering
Oh shit guys nightcorefan86 is about to share their opinion on Leftism, everyone listen up
The ultra politically correct types what transgender people usually are hate this because it shatters their whole worldview, spend any amount of time in a British pub with older working class people who have left wing sympathies and you will realize many of them have social views what would not be seen as acceptable by the middle class left today, even if they have left wing economic views such as Trade unionism, nationalisation/public ownership, public healthcare etc.
I don't know where this idea came from that you cannot be economically left wing and socially conservative, this was pretty much the norm until well into the 1990's, pretty much every single eastern blok state and leftist political party was socially conservative, if they started ranting about trans and gay rights they would've alienated the population, much like they're doing now honestly, new labour for example is alienating working class voters.
I think the horcrux is a very interesting idea that is original as far as I know. Very cool.
As for the bigger question, the male-led household was the product of an artificial scarcity of men created by war... A near equal population distribution means female control of cultural norms through collective bargaining in sexual preferences, and those men who "drop out," by becoming trannies, gays, incels, or asexual monks are doing their part to restore order in an adverse situation. People should be allowed access to hormones as soon as they are 18 & legally old enough to be independent of their parents, and since troonyism is not a mental illness but rather a psychological reconfiguration to a harsher sexual-ecological environment than they were prepared for, men should also allowed unrestricted access to steroids, and those who burn out their reproductive capacities in this way will have incurred no loss by the same logic in which trannies remove themselves from the species-being
the horcrux is very reminiscent of the phylactery of a Lich. a lich will regenerate if you do not destroy the phylactery which contains the essence of his soul
>I went to the Yale bookstore and bought and read a copy of “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone.” I suffered a great deal in the process. The writing was dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character “stretched his legs.” I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling’s mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing.
>But when I wrote that in a newspaper, I was denounced. I was told that children would now only read J.K. Rowling, and I was asked whether that wasn’t, after all, better than reading nothing at all? If Rowling was what it took to make them pick up a book, wasn’t that a good thing?
>It is not. “Harry Potter” will not lead our children on to Kipling’s “Just So Stories” or his “Jungle Book.” It will not lead them to Thurber’s “Thirteen Clocks” or Kenneth Grahame’s “Wind in the Willows” or Lewis Carroll’s “Alice.”
>Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, “If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King.” And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read “Harry Potter” you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2003-sep-19-oe-bloom19-story.html
>“stretched his legs.”
This was never said in the book btw. Lying israelite BTFO.
>As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character “stretched his legs.” I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous.
Why did he feel the need to make this up? Were there not enough bad things in the book for his essay so he had to invent them?
Simple, he didn't read the book and thought that nobody would check if he just made something up (and he was pretty much right, most people that know the "stretched his legs" meme think it's actually true).
>Saul Bellow
>Philip Roth
>Arthur Miller
Does make you wonder whether he actually read any of these either.
>The decision to give the National Book Foundation’s annual award for “distinguished contribution” to Stephen King is extraordinary, another low in the shocking process of dumbing down our cultural life. I’ve described King in the past as a writer of penny dreadfuls, but perhaps even that is too kind. He shares nothing with Edgar Allan Poe. What he is is an immensely inadequate writer, on a sentence-by-sentence, paragraph-by-paragraph, book-by-book basis.
>The publishing industry has stooped terribly low to bestow on King a lifetime award that has previously gone to the novelists Saul Bellow and Philip Roth and to playwright Arthur Miller. By awarding it to King, they recognize nothing but the commercial value of his books, which sell in the millions but do little more for humanity than keep the publishing world afloat. If this is going to be the criterion in the future, then perhaps next year the committee should give its award for distinguished contribution to Danielle Steel, and surely the Nobel Prize for literature should go to J.K. Rowling.
The context of his criticism of Rowling there is kind of important.
>sorcerers
>not philosophers
Its obvious how dumb she is by her writing. Transphobes are also dumb so she is in the right crowd
>Its obvious how dumb she is by her writing.
her writing is very competent for the genre, clear, concise and witty. post yours
ads
the line between love and hate really is thin, isn't it?
i couldn't imagine supposedly hating trannies and being obsessed with them 24/7
Stop begging for attention and people will ignore you, troony.
>bro JK said horrible things about trannies
OK but specifically what?
>uh bro it was awful and transphobic trust me
But what exactly did she say?
>shut up that's too many questions
ok but who are you quoting schizo
how does this affect you? or anyone?
it's National Doughnut Day, who gives a shit
exactly. nobody at all is affected by genital mutilation cults that explicitly target children, and if you have a problem with the state promoting them, you must be some kind of weirdo
Misery loves company. Forcing the misery onto others is how they convince themselves they didn't make an irreversible mistake. troonyism must be objectively correct otherwise it means they ruined their life.
Are you talking about circumcision? No one gets trans surgery under 18 unless its rare cases
You think we like circumcision either?
incredibly disingenuous post. even if surgical interventions are postponed until 18, you know very well that the indoctrination that makes you think you need them is targeted at children. troonyism cannot exist as a mass movement without exploiting minors because the basic mechanisms of recruitment rely on hijacking the confusion and alienation that come with puberty.
Even if surgical intervention doesn't occur for minors you're still irreversibly ruining their puberty and development via hormones. And these freaks expect to be treated kindly while considering it a public right to poison children like that.
That doesn't happen except for in the minds of chuds
bros i`m reading the Order of the Phoenix and i can`t... this fricking book feel endless, i`m still on the middle and it felt longer that it should be, i just want it to end
It's a book for children and women, of course an adult would probably find it boring.
would
Decent world building
Dismal at romantic pairing
HP is better to be read alone in your bedroom. Never join or discuss with the fandom, and avoid crappy fanfics at all costs
Never liked Harry Potter. I don't like school settings.
I would rail her MILF butthole and clap those fat cheeks all night tho.
If you look at things in a dichotomy of power, transgender people are incredibly powerful compared to for example white working class people, they can cancel people, influence the media, have multi billion dollar corporations on their side, the average working class person doesn't have this.
It's an illusion that they created that they have no power whatsoever, and are perpetual victims. It comes from a constant psychological need for approval and totalitarian control, by constantly trying to get others to focus on their needs they are also diverting attention away from issues which may be affecting ordinary people, like the epidemic of drug addiction, crime, poverty etc, things what are of actual importance in making sure a nation is worth living in, not things such as a persons physical features or how they dress and perceived by others which is of literal no importance.
If you keep neglecting a majority of the population in favour of a insignificant minority, it will eventually get ugly.
They aren't particularly bright or competent to have the platform that they do, it's propped up for them, power granted by ESG and other none-goy factors.
Makes sense, the constant focus on trans rights actually helps maintain the status quo and diverts attention away from the massive elephant in the room, that is that society is decaying at a exponential rate, in the UK at least anyway, we are in the latter stages of the decline of Rome.
Maybe, I haven't read him, I may do so some time as i enjoyed reading Schopenhauer
Didn't Nietzsche also talk about this?
PLAP! PLAP! PLAP! PLAP! PLAP! PLAP! PLAP!
GET PREGNANT GEET PREGNANT ROWLING
Your kids would still be black
Wtf, I'm not black though?
Get back to work
Rowling's not fat, ugly or poor enough to frick Black folk. Keep coping, shitskin.
my queen
If only her books were half as good as her politics
homosexuals are a cancer on this earth. it's sad so many wait so long to neck themselves. almost half wont even bother!
keep screeching into the void. literally no one gives a frick outside of your hugbox
Queen. troonyism is the most delusional bullshit imaginable.
being obsessed with trannies is as sad as being troony
2 different sides of the mentally ill coin
>being obsessed with trannies is as sad as being troony
speaking out is not being "obsessed," and our rulers forcing something so absurd on us is a big deal
>our rulers forcing something so absurd on us
yea honestly i thought Biden making me cut my dick off was going too far
probably 3/3 trolls but what's being forced is
>lying
>men in women's spaces
>the destruction of parental safeguarding of children
there are zero trans people in the universe because trans is not a thing. women, children, and free thought and expression are under attack from these perverts and their oligarchic patrons
No one is forcing you dumbass incel. We are just asking you to be quiet and stop being so fricking hateful
>We are just asking you to be quiet
People are going to say whatever they think anon if they feel something is wrong whether you like it or not, other peoples opinions are not something within your power, the only thing in your power is whether you let it disturb you or not, i suggest you grow a thicker skin.
It's peculiar that older transsexuals generally don't seem to try and force their views on others, and are mature enough to know that their lifestyle choice isn't the norm, i think this all comes down to immaturity.
Your willingness to immediately resort to insults also shows the maturity level you are currently occupying(it's not high) not everybody who disagrees with you is a ''incel'' whatever the hell that means anyway. I technically have a woman but I am at the age where i'm not that bothered anymore, not everybody who disagrees with you is a ''fascist'' or ''right wing'' either, I am neither of those things.
Or... you can hide threads that make you throw incel tantrums instead of being upset all the time.
Get some help for your anger-issues where you seek and encourage your anger. You can't control what others think and you need to get over the idea you're the arbiter of what everyone should think.
>our rulers forcing something so absurd on us is a big deal
Nobody is "forcing" anything. We all still have our dicks, after all.
Unfriendly reminder you're destined to lose because you're a gay moron, and I'm going to cave your skull in with a rock in real life and not Minecraft
What's your high score?
what I learned from this thread is that chuds read childrens books
trans right forever
I would absolutly frick her.
Happy trans day of visibility friends. Hate will never win
History has shown that hate has won plenty of times. Also, ywnbaw.
Rowling is creative but she's a terrible writer. Unironically her best work has been on Twitter. Her actual prose in Harry Potter is garbage and full of rookie mistakes, the kind of thing you'd expect from a new writer but not someone who'd had years of international success as the series went on. I feel like it got worse over time rather than better. Always assumed that was due to a combination of less criticism from editors after be became super successful, and the characters and readers outgrowing her writing ability. Like if you're writing for 10-year-olds you can put some really moronic stuff down on paper and it works. Not when you're dealing with 18yos. But a lot of it was just writing frickups. My mother was an editor, and I kept thinking "if mom read this to me as a kid she'd stop and explain why this is wrong every couple chapters."
Now, I'm not hating on HP in general. It's fun and if I was more into rolling with the wizards and shit I'd still like it despite the furry-fanfic-skill-tier writing. What really concerns me are people in their 30s who say they're the best books they've ever read. I read it for the first time as an adult and I came away thinking it was pretty meh.
It's not about the prose numbnuts, it's about the story, characters and immersive worldbuilding.
Congratulations you autist, WHOOSH, you missed the fricking point.
Malehating turbofeminist who turned half of her characters retroactively into Black folk and homosexuals. Also the books were shit. Simping over her just makes /misc/cels seem moronic.
She spent a good chunk of her day seething about a bunch of stuff and I did a bit of shitposting myself.
3 bottles of rosé deep she opens up the folder where she has saved a bunch of photos of trans people along with articles about them and she posts like 11 or 12 consecutive back to back seetheposts because a law came into force and she's concerned about her rights as a woman.
I'm sitting down here posting 2000 char posts on IQfy all morning about shit nobody in the streets of Edinburgh gives a frick about and so was she.
She's a rich LARPer who pretends to have been working class and she can afford those 3 bottles of rosé but I'm disabled and after reading the hate crime & public order acta bit ago and again just last week, it's pretty good stuff and a step forward. It would have been used against my junkie neighbour before he offed himself on cheap street diazepam and fent.
She's fricking around in her giant garden with her dog and I was fricking around in my giant garden with my dog.
She's abusing substances and aging like milk caring about her identity a bit (typed b***h here by accident) much, getting her rocks off posting on twitter in a frenzy and I'm taking 46 degree 2 hour baths reading shitty Japanese novels blasting the FF V soundtrack on repeat because I'm not inputting attacks fast enough due to my brain melting and when I finally ascend from my hot throne I'm trying to not pass out due to the triple threat combo of POTS, near heatstroke and low blood pressure from trying to cook myself alive.
I felt mega relaxed apart from the brief FF V sesh but my smart watch used to monitor my blood pressure thinks I'm the most stressed I've been this week
Jo will be a few more bottles deep and she might go for a nap, wake up in the late evening and go back to posting or maybe she'll commit a hate crime accidentally.
I'm much the same but without the alcohol; because MUP & austerity has priced it out of my range. I might finally get to sleep and I might just wake up at 9pm or I may soldier on and accidentally also commit a hate crime by accident.
It's moments like these that it all comes into focus, that we're not so different after all.
I mean we have different political opinions, she hates her neighbours and abandons her hedge and I quite like a bit of gardening and also hate my neighbours but in the granular moments, in the most obtuse sense we are kindred spirits and the only difference is that we have different obsessions.
I spent the morning thinking about villainy and the philosophical concepts attached to it and if a crime can be committed if no one is left to witness it and she spent the morning doing the same in the same city at the same time.
Funny how the world works. In a different life I'd be the billionaire class traitor arsing around the other end of town and she'd be the NEET mentally unfit loser. Well she's close on the others.
Frickitybye Joanne.
Holy based
Lol, she's at the top of the trending list because of that tweet.
>abloobloobloo what about women???
She literally just doesn't like men.
ywnbaw
Good, because I don't want to be like Rowling.
She has a platform to protect women and sees trans for the freaks they are
>protect women
That's the problem, moron.
You constantly spam the same allegation that Rowling "hates men" as if this will change anyone's disgust at trannies. You are an abomination, normal men and women aren't. This is why your samegay argument that she hates trannies because she really hates men falls on deaf ears. Cope, seethe and dial8, m8.
We're saying that because Rowling isn't on your side. She doesn't care about you or your ideology. Yes trannies are disgusting. So are feminists, which is what Rowling is.
>you are an abomination
Biological man (male) btw.
Bro I love JK Rowling now.
My queen
Fine for kids and teens, otherwise kind of boring.
grew up with harry potter and loved the books, her based takes are such a nice icing on the cake. also, not to be creepy but would
>not to be creepy but would
Nothing creepy about liking milfs, it's a sign of a cultured male.
would
threadly reminder that trannies are big pharma socially-engineered divide & conquer agents
Insane skeleton b***h, just shut the frick up
>Woman acting like a woman
Nothing to see here
My honest thought? NEED HER MILKERS
Somebody post her mummy pasta