How common were slave mistresses really? Was it mainly just pro-Union propaganda against the South?
How common were slave mistresses really? Was it mainly just pro-Union propaganda against the South?
How common were slave mistresses really? Was it mainly just pro-Union propaganda against the South?
>plantation full of beautiful women
>no mechanism to prevent abuse
Gee I wonder anon
>plantation full of beautiful women
Pretty sure slaves in America were black
You must be confusing with Ancient Rome or something
I'm attracted to black women but then I'm not a homosexual
t. zoophile
Why are /misc/tards so homosexual? Seriously, the only women they seem to be attracted to are little jailbait white girls and Asian women with no breasts or ass.
We actual human being are attracted to pretty faces, not to obese bottoms
Okay.
While I personally couldn't care less what kind of woman (or even dude) you're into being "into black women" makes you a minority, even among black people.
Also, plantations were not full of the best and brightest africa had to offer, stunningly beautiful princesses or whatever.
You say shit like this, then conveniently ignore the fact that white and asian women are statistically the most desirable not only to white men, but to every other race of men as well
/pol/tards are just closet gays. I've never seen a group of "heterosexual" men so eager and passionate to jump into a thread just to tell people about all the women they wouldn't want to frick.
Glow harder you fricking tourist.
Virtually no one, including black men, find black women the most attractive type of partner in general. Only black men or less attractive according to every study. Pointing that out doesn't make us "/pol/tards" or homosexuals, insisting only homosexuals and /misc/tards don't however does tell us a lot about your disingenuous ass though.
And stop same gayging.
I'm not but if you legitimately believe black women cannot be attractive at all I have to assume you are a gay as heterosexuals will find women from any race attractive so some extent as to not be homosexuals. Maybe I'm being mean and your bisexual and thus prefer men but occasionally frick women so sorry if that's the case.
homosexual.
Romans had black slaves too, anon. Maybe a read a fricking book instead of skimming Wikipedia, you would know this.
Yeah, maybe 1% of their slaves and probably horners rather than ugly ass West Africa
Still most slaves in Rome were Gallic, Germanic and Greek cuties
It wasn't as common as the slave owners wife sneaking out to get some BBC
Louisiana literally held debutante balls where young white men would pick out the prettiest black women to be their mistresses.
So close to correct then you drift off into utterly ignorant coomer shit right at the end. They had debutante balls, yes. Judged by white men, yes. Who had black/colored (mixed) mistresses, YES!
But the ball was not to decide who got to be a white man's mistress, and they didn't frick the winner.
They paired them off you nonce. The whole point was to find mistresses. What the frick else would possibly be the fricking point.
I swear to fricking Christ the pendulum onLULZ has swung in some moronic direction again.
>What the frick else would possibly be the fricking point
Whats the point of any beauty pageant? Not every person with actual power or authority goes around fricking whatever he gets his hands on as you appear to imagine yourself doing if given the chance.
It's not a fricking contest you fricking monstrous idiot, it's a debutante ball.
It was so common that young rowdy white men would pay their local plantation owners to have a night with their female slave stock. And as you know, black women are hyper sexual so they didn't mind it either.
>Powerful man has access to numerous women with big asses and wide hips who literally can't say no
Where do think all those light-skinned blacks on the plantations came from, anon?
Enough for African Americans to be 15-20% white with up to 20% European Y-DNA.
Like most things it wasn't that uncommon, but the sheer scale some people imagine is complete bullshit.
People forget that, and I'm not endorsing this mind you, they viewed black as animals. Your average white man would no more court a slave girl then he would a cow. That's just how they felt.
Explain this then:
Because blacks never had, before or sense, any contact with any other group of people before or after slavery. Yes, it happened. I'm saying it was not all that common, not every slave owner had a black mistress. I dare so most didn't.
Based on what? It was pretty common according to most accounts and a woman's rapability was a selling point at auction. You sound like a revisionist. The southerners were scum and that needs to be accepted to move forward.
>It was pretty common according to most accounts
Name some. Oh, and not the scandals that show it was uncommon and frowned upon. Name some sources saying it was perfectly normal and accepted anywhere except new orleans (where even then it was impolite to flaunt even though literally everyone was doing it).
https://www.thirteen.org/wnet/slavery/experience/gender/history2.html
Took me about 8 seconds. I know you won't check but it really isn't difficult to find accounts. If you don't like this one go check yourself.
A completely unsourced article claiming without exception every slaver in the history of america raped all his female slaves, gee you really did bank on me not checking that didn't you?
Try harder.
This is Euro Y-DNA. Yeah, African blacks don't have it. In all thoses tests the European portion of AA ancestry is North or West European (England, Ireland). It's from the times of slavery.
Show your work.
For example here:
>Through comparison of estimates of X chromosome and genome-wide African and European ancestry proportions, we estimate that approximately 5% of ancestors of African Americans were European females and 19% were European males (Table S4).
From: The Genetic Ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States
And if you follow the source they'll mention their sample of 100 mixed race people from some colonoscopy trial or something equally moronic
Lol, just look up any forum with AA sharing their ancestry tests. Pretty much all of them have European ancestry.
>pretty much all of them
LOL
>We studied the genetic ancestry of 5,269 self-described African Americans
>self-described
I'm black, what if they test me and find out I'm 100% European?
This is founded in the fallacy that the majority of blacks are descended from american slaves. Most of their ancestors immigrated here from further south after slavery was abolished. Because if you think they had it bad in america, look up the shit they did in the caribbean.
This is true.
I don't know how common it was, but it definitely wasn't UNcommon. The average American black has about 15-20% White ancestry. The court cases in the antebellum South were full of White slave owners trying to manumit their half-black children.
More black women were raped by the northern looters than anything