this is the image of their civilization they wanted to preserve for posterity? i mean, even as bad as the west is now, we dont make statues about bumfricking (we're not far off). was every male in ancient greece a sodomite?
>this is the image of their civilization they wanted to preserve for posterity?
No that's not what it was meant for. Probably just something owned by a rich coomer for his and his friends personal pleasure
>was every male in ancient greece a sodomite?
No one said they were.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Also this, modern day counterpart would be a Podesta artwork.
>Ancient Greece is the West
The largest religious institution in the "West" repeatedly gets outed for fricking little boys. We actually did take our culture directly from pederast.
its a fake commissioned by some gay from the 19th century you homosexuals
being openly gay was never accepted in the ancient world thats why hadrians boytoy turned up dead in the nile
>being openly gay was never accepted in the ancient world >there was an accepted and open social institution in the hellenic culture where boys had thigh sex with older men >the Romans considered it natural to be attracted to male youths
What the frick are you on about? The ancient world literally didn't care about your hetero/homosexual dichotomy
Because romans and by proxy westeners, have a worse opinion of bottoms than of tops, given how the one giving was more "manly" Than the one taking it, who had a submissive position
Something interesting: The Romans didn't make a difference between straight and gay sex. The only thing that mattered whether you were the one penetrating (masculine and honorable) or the one being penetrated (feminine and shameful).
Interesting, i know the greeks didn't have that much disdain for bottoms, since it was rather related to the younger man being fricked by the older man and it happened to many boys
Afaik in Greek society it was also normal even for noble boys to serve as bottoms for a pederast and gain social connections through him right? The Romans had their gay sex almost exclusively with slave boys, not with freeborns. Caesar was ridiculed because there was a rumor that he was penetrated by some anatolian (I belive) king on a campaign, so that would never fly. This is a good example for how much more of a role hierarchical power relationships played in Roman society as opposed to the Greeks.
2 years ago
Anonymous
CAESAR WAS TURKED
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Afaik in Greek society it was also normal even for noble boys to serve as bottoms for a pederast and gain social connections through him right?
No sex and mainly noble boys > Caesar was ridiculed because there was a rumor that he was penetrated by some anatolian (I belive) king on a campaign, so that would never fly.
Nikomedes IV
[...]
He might not be wrong but I find it hard to believe Hadrian went years and years traveling with this twink over the empire and having drunken parties all night and not even once tried to shove it in.
If he wanted to LARP as a Greek aristocrat then no. but they probably did have such relations
He might not be wrong but I find it hard to believe Hadrian went years and years traveling with this twink over the empire and having drunken parties all night and not even once tried to shove it in.
Thigh-humping, even the gayreeks weren't degenerate enough to put their dicks in another man's butthole.
> Thigh-humping
Isn't it some Greek Orthodox cope meme?
Anon...
vvvmmm greek bvlls? why is there 3d gay porn of vs?
That looks so hot
that's not ancient, it was made in the 19th century I recall
Nope, 1st century.
>I recall
You've been looking at a lot of those statues?
of course, I am a IQfytorian
this is the image of their civilization they wanted to preserve for posterity? i mean, even as bad as the west is now, we dont make statues about bumfricking (we're not far off). was every male in ancient greece a sodomite?
The only reason you don't make such statues is because Christianity is holding you back from going full troony.
>this is the image of their civilization they wanted to preserve for posterity?
No that's not what it was meant for. Probably just something owned by a rich coomer for his and his friends personal pleasure
>was every male in ancient greece a sodomite?
No one said they were.
Also this, modern day counterpart would be a Podesta artwork.
Sex is part of life, it's unhealthy to make that part taboo.
... that's why we shouldn't punish rape and encourage it
That's an extreme, oddly specific non-sequitur.
No they were a loud cancerous minority much like they are today
>Ancient Greece is the West
The largest religious institution in the "West" repeatedly gets outed for fricking little boys. We actually did take our culture directly from pederast.
Bad according to which standard? I don't think we can judge a civilization that was far greater than ours by our obviously inferior modern standards.
Based
Thats not a statue, it is probably erotica.
He is right though. Most brothels were female dominated and anal sex was extremely rare.
Pederasty should ideally not have anal sex either.
These too
its a fake commissioned by some gay from the 19th century you homosexuals
being openly gay was never accepted in the ancient world thats why hadrians boytoy turned up dead in the nile
>being openly gay was never accepted in the ancient world
>there was an accepted and open social institution in the hellenic culture where boys had thigh sex with older men
>the Romans considered it natural to be attracted to male youths
What the frick are you on about? The ancient world literally didn't care about your hetero/homosexual dichotomy
copium overdose
there are a ton of roman poets who write about fricking slave boys
I always find quite interesting they both born in the exact opposite peninsulas of the mediterranean
Why do we assume Hadrian topped?
Because romans and by proxy westeners, have a worse opinion of bottoms than of tops, given how the one giving was more "manly" Than the one taking it, who had a submissive position
>not having a cute twink give you a prostate massage with his boyclitty
sounds like the dominant position to me
Something interesting: The Romans didn't make a difference between straight and gay sex. The only thing that mattered whether you were the one penetrating (masculine and honorable) or the one being penetrated (feminine and shameful).
Interesting, i know the greeks didn't have that much disdain for bottoms, since it was rather related to the younger man being fricked by the older man and it happened to many boys
>be a greek boy
>get raped
greeks were really something else...
Afaik in Greek society it was also normal even for noble boys to serve as bottoms for a pederast and gain social connections through him right? The Romans had their gay sex almost exclusively with slave boys, not with freeborns. Caesar was ridiculed because there was a rumor that he was penetrated by some anatolian (I belive) king on a campaign, so that would never fly. This is a good example for how much more of a role hierarchical power relationships played in Roman society as opposed to the Greeks.
CAESAR WAS TURKED
>Afaik in Greek society it was also normal even for noble boys to serve as bottoms for a pederast and gain social connections through him right?
No sex and mainly noble boys
> Caesar was ridiculed because there was a rumor that he was penetrated by some anatolian (I belive) king on a campaign, so that would never fly.
Nikomedes IV
If he wanted to LARP as a Greek aristocrat then no. but they probably did have such relations
Because it's a reasonable assumption.
He might not be wrong but I find it hard to believe Hadrian went years and years traveling with this twink over the empire and having drunken parties all night and not even once tried to shove it in.