How do Anglo/German romeaboos cope with the fact that their ancestors destroyed Rome?

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It was historically necessary and Britain replaced Rome as its successor.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      you anglos pillaged and plunged the great empire, bringing europe to the dark ages for the next five hundred years

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why should anglo's care? it wasn't their empire and they gained from it's loss

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          if you germanics didn’t sack rome, we’d be exploring galaxies by now

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Destroying Rome is fricking based. Stay mad, brownies.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          you anglos have a history of pillaging, raping, and killing
          look at what happened in india australia, and the americas

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Stone age primitives have nothing to pillage and there's no evidence the British committed mass rapes. British rule was a benefit to the lesser races.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Rome wasn't destroyed, nor did it destroy itself. Late Roman emperors, at least from Diocletian to Honorius and Arcadius used Germanic tribes as means to stabilize the limes (hence the limitanei) and as a demographic ressource to repopulate previously plundered regions (like Thrace under Valens and Theodosius, 376-383, a period of time during which the battle of Adrianopolis took place, 378). Rome morphed into the papacy, the Byzantines, the Carolingians, the HRE and the Renaissance through cultural emulation and the revival of Roman law made possible by the church's canon law (12-13th century). Not to mention the fact that German national ideals, from 1814 onward (basically, a reaction against Napoleonic hegemony) rarely if ever claimed a Roman legacy which they associated with the French principles of the nation-state based upon citizenship, rather than that of the spirit of the Volk that was supposed to stem from the people, aka Lutheran peasants. Just look at Fichte or Wagner. The Germans state that the French are the last degenerate avatar of Romanhood.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      explain who cut off the aqueducts, forcing the civilians to return to primitive methods? who sacked and pillaged rome twice? who lowered the literacy of europe? it’s all caused by the germanic barbarians. the renaissance developed from italy as a response against barbaric law from germanics.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Explain how the Roman Senate actually allowed Alaric to pillage Rome (though not its churches, and to only make prisoners from the aristocracy to get ransom) to end Honorius' 410 authority crisis because he wasn't able to make himself respected, when Stilicho, his Vandal-born magister militum, whom he assassinated in Pavia, actually repelled Alaric twice in 402-403.
        This was institutionalised, therefore, it shows Alaric himself and his successor Athaulf (who married Honorius' sister) could represent Roman authority. Not to mention Rome wasn't a political capital anymore ever since Maxentius (312). Politically, this sack had no direct consequence. Symbolically, it's of course another story

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Rome destroyed itself, the worst the Germans and English did was go through the pockets of a corpse.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Anglo-Saxon varangians fought at the final battle of Constantinople, and prior to the collapse of the western Roman empire much of its army were made up of Germanics since the Romans lost interest in actually defending Rome.
    If you actually did your research instead of regurgitation blatantly false historical information you would know that Germanics didn't utterly destroy the Roman empire, by then it was in gross decline, and much of those Germans already had Roman citizenship and were promised land under the foederati system.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Complete bollocks, the empire degraded and by the time any wannabe tribe leader claimed parts of rome there was basically nobody caring about it, rome did not collapse in a day, it degraded very slowly over the centuries, the rome of octavian augustus was just a myth by the 5th century even for the roman nobility

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    By remembering their ancestors founded Rome.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Did they? Pretty sure it was Italians' Lombardic and Ostrogothic ancestors who did that

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      still the same germanic barbarians

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The Romans deserved it and I'm proud my ancestors destroyed their gay sissy empire

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      To form a far worse one and kill the entire white race by doing it, thank germs the eternal enemies of the white race

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The Germans were defending the white race.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Defended so well that now the craddle of white civilization is getting eroded and probably won't have a single white living in the next century, good defense bro

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The Visigoths were closer to modern Poles than to fricking Anglos

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You don't mean that culturally at all.

      Defended so well that now the craddle of white civilization is getting eroded and probably won't have a single white living in the next century, good defense bro

      The Germans were defending the white race.

      Odd blamegame. Britain and France declare war on Germany over the Danzig strip after Poles attack Germany, and your argument is victim blaming.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Gott strafe England

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          That's a saying devised by a Europhobic rabbinic.

          The truth is England strafe'd themselves.

          >Germany wanted that
          wehreboos either just as dishonest as or too moronic to read their leaders' own writing

          This is the part where you claim the ost myth is real and then I remind you that Poland was given a general government when in the past Poland would have been wiped off the map. You're about to tell a string of three lies back to back, starting with chapter eight of Mein Kampf.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >ost myth
            what myth lol?
            >image attached
            poland was consistently given a level of self-rule after the napoleonic wars far higher than the general government
            >congress poland
            >polish ssr
            >german regency kingdom
            mostly lead by actual poles instead of a german (hans frank) whom dismissed all poles as stateless and actively began the process of annexation
            >i- i said you were gonna do thing so you can't d- do it anymore!
            moron

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Germany wanted that
        wehreboos either just as dishonest as or too moronic to read their leaders' own writing

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Live by the sword die by the sword

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Anglo-Saxons only entered Britannia at the end when the Romans had already pulled out and the descendants of the Germanics in Germany at most when into Germania provinces. Italy and Spain have more descendants of people who actually sacked Rome

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Rome destroyed itself
    When the Germans finally successfully invaded the old Roman empire they found nothing but the decrepit ruins of old former glory

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *