How do nordicists explain picrel?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
How do nordicists explain picrel?
How do nordicists explain picrel?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
lombards
Those are Germanic. And still, picrel.
If it was just a matter of being Nordic then why aren’t Norway and Sweden included?
>Lombards, Normans, Anglo Saxons, Franks
All seem pretty Nordic to me
>Germanic
Sources on picrel, I smell bullshit
>Normans
>Southern Italy in the moron zone
Lombards are East Germans and Angles, Saxons, and Franks are West Germans
Italy in the moron zone
Naples is included, norway and sweden aren't
97% of human accomplishment happened in fricking Naples?
Why start at the 14th century?
You know why. Because Anglos and Germans did literally nothing before that.
No one else did anything either or did we miss the Bronze Age space program?
Yeah, bro, sure.
Development of industry and science correlates strongly with high density population centers since the middle ages, that area contains regions which have been highly developed for centuries
>Rhine valley
>Flanders
>Northern france and Paris
>London
>Po valley
You can even narrow down that whole area into the so called "blue banana"
The blue banana is a fricking meme so that paris can feel like its included in some kind of bigger thing when Paris is clearly a singular phenmenon caused by French centralism. The blue banana contains the by far least developed regions of Germany and calling the eastern German states urbanized has never been true (besides Saxony).
Meant the "yellow banana" which has been moved north by professional French copers. Paris is not a part of the blue banana at all.
Rank the bananas
Green has to be one of the stupidest copes ever. Excluding historically rich regions like Saxony and Bohemia...
(a czech is more genetically related to germans and austrians than swiss are)
keep moving children, this man is not your uncle...
It's over.
What is the measure of distance?
+what is the margin of error?
"Distance to German" has only a 2% difference is that even sigificant?
Why are you pretending closeness to Germany is worth more than closeness to Switzerland?
I'm not pretending anything. I'm not German nor Czech nor Swiss.
There should be a pinned thread about how to understand g25 it's tiresome
Never saw it explained once in a Haploautist thread tbh and my demands for the meaning of the "distance" have never been answered.
+the distances are always posted without a reference to database
NTA, but distance is literally just how close they are to each other relative to others
Do you care to elaborate how the choice of certain Eigenvalues (dimensional weights) influences the result of the dimension calculations? Tbh the first time I've even heard the name g25. Are the distances somehow normalized so that values over 1 are impossible to be reached?
Read here about Eigenvalues:
https://www.dnagenics.com/services/g25coordinates
No idea mate, I barely know how to use the thing myself. But there are values above 1.
Kk, thanks for giving me the name G25, with the name of the technqiue known it will be way easier to ask how it works in the next fresh Haploautist thread.
>thanks for giving me the name G25
That wasn’t me but okay
>he blue banana contains the by far least developed regions of Germany
what is the ruhr
Eternal reminder.
forgot pic haha
>look how much we contributed to the time period in which the world has progressively gotten worse
Yeah, shocking.
That apply to westoid too thoughbeit
I'm not Russian but you have to be moronic to ignore Russian contribution in science, literature, military, politics...
>I'm not Russian but you have to be moronic to ignore Russian contribution in science, literature, military, politics...
Which is less than 3% compared to that region on the map, no?
The Russians could just be in the 3%. I agree that Russia has contributed a lot, especially in literature, but at the end of the day it's probably a tiny amount compared to the nations in OP's pic simply given the population density difference.
Yes west France, Iberia, Scotland and Russia collectively amount to 3% of historical event these past 6 centuries.
of important historical*
What exactly came out of west France that you're so adamant about including?
>When /misc/ cited Murray and realizes that his books has Ashkenazim making up 1:5 to 1:3 of European nation's significant figures despite being like 1-3:100 of the population.
Oh no no no!
>Half of France, Iberian Peninsula, Scotland and Russia left out
>Somehow Denmark and Naples made it
Why are people spamming this shit again?
>Russia left out
Ah yes, the great Russian accomplishments of Russia in the last 7 centuries....
For France, the divide is not really East/West, it's just about including Paris in the area.
Due to France being extremely centralized, most French accomplishments occurred in Paris.
As flawed as pantheon.world is it overall deliver a better perspective than Murray meme study which is obviously biased and cherrypicked.
Anyway we can see that Russia or Iberia contributed to more than "3%"
(note that these includes actors, contemporary musician, sportsmen etc... so US and UK numbers are inflated)
Here's a better one (I filtered out anyone with a HPI <60)
Starting in the 14th century?
No because it makes no sense to arbitrary cherrypick a time period like that
But anyway here you go:
This is fricking moronic.
It's not perfect but it's far better than Murray cherrypicking some encyclopedia. It gives a way broader point of view.
A pointlessly broad point of view. On one hand you have someone talking about important human achievements, and on the other hand you have a popularity contest. Do you think Donald Trump belongs on a list of people who have contributed significantly to the advancement of any field? How about fricking Taylor Swift?
>and on the other hand you have a popularity contest
Murray metric is a literal popularity contest though. That's why you get Einstein topping the Physicist ranking or Picasso topping the Art ranking.
>Do you think Donald Trump belongs on a list of people who have contributed significantly to the advancement of any field?
He's an important figure but yes he's overrate. Again I didn't claim it was perfect.
>Taytay
You can filter out singer, actors etc. it's just annoying and I didn't do it, I provided a disclaimer here:
>That's why you get Einstein topping the Physicist ranking or Picasso topping the Art ranking
Or to speak more directly that's why israelites and Anglo-Saxons are so overrepresented. Because they're the most famous.
Whats HPI?
see
Lol nvm
Reminder that 90% of this thread are morons who never read Murray's book and have no understanding of his methodology.