How do you cope with AI replacing you?
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
How do you cope with AI replacing you?
How do you cope with AI replacing you?
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
By not being a writer. I also don't care for contemporary writers so good riddance tbdesu.
No one reads what I write anyway.
It’s probably drivel
I just did.
if it's a good book then cool I enjoyed my time, don't care if it was written by a human, robot or dog. I'm still getting royalties in the mail so AI hasn't done shit
I don't write, I read. There's enough non-contemporary lit for me to enjoy for my entire lifespan
I don't write the same formulaic bullshit over and over again, so I'm not concerned. AI can't make anything new, so anyone with an ounce of creativity won't be threatened. So like those book a year romance authors and thriller authors are probably sweating bullets but no one else.
Its like when stable diffusion came out and IQfy was flooded with AI rendered pics, but now they've all vanished. They were cool for the moment, but they shortly lose their appeal. AI cant make the je ne sais quoi of art and never will be able to
>je ne sais quoi
>attached image
You make good points, but they seem completely moronic if you just back them up with moronic notions
yeah that pic isn't the best. my appreciation for anime breasts leads to some quality control issues when i save pics from IQfy. i didn't see the feet when i saved it
>Its like when stable diffusion came out and IQfy was flooded with AI rendered pics, but now they've all vanished.
That's not what happened at all. The models and techniques got sophisticated enough that there isn't a generic "AI style" anymore, it can emulate literally any style in the hands of a competent user. AI art didn't vanish, it just got better at blending in and you stopped noticing it.
the other day I went to pixiv and the best posts were consistently ai, of course I didn't realize it was ai at first
>I didn't realize it was ai at first
How? It's just the same anime face with their breasts out.
do you think that's all ai does? are you living in a cave?
AI struggle doing sex scene with motion.
I'm more interested in the fact that artificial 'intelligence' is proving the collective unconscious exists and that some human beings seemingly don't have it.
Not going to happen. I haven't seen a single creative thing made using an AI
I just moved from writing to editing and make more money now.
poetry wins once again. AI can write perfect prose, but can even come close to a decent verse.
Tech corps are simply paying poets and scholars to give the programs high level input
Yet the better a human being is at doing anything, the more machine-like they appear in their performance.
Link?
By writing about things that AI has absolutely no ability to write about. Namely the things which it has had its datasets removed on or is prevented from answering on in a positive light.
>White Nationalism
>Ethno-Centrism
>Fascism
>Nationalism
>Justification for preemptive violence
>Standard family arrangements
>Firm gender roles
cringe, you will never be anyone of note
ch2 in 2023 is more like mixed vs mono, mono races vs each other is outdated and you're clinging to a frayed notion. not sure why you want to write about all that unless you're gonna be wrong on purpose
logic of the cope
iambs are harder to see
than dactyls excluding threes
I got writing contracts before AI. I got writing contracts after AI. Nothing has paradigmatically changed. Given the court rulings on AI being uncopyrightable and labor movements organizing against it, I don't think anything will paradigmatically change.
It's literally just the newest attempt by exploitative third-worlders to make a cheap buck, same with crypto and those shitty Youtube kids' videos. The fact that discussions around AI far outweigh anything actually made with it says volumes about what it can and can't do. I'm not "scared of it" moreso than annoyed of it constantly being at the center of every conversation.
>I got writing contracts before image-oriented AI.
>I got writing contracts after image-oriented AI.
>Nothing has paradigmatically changed for me yet.
>labor movements organizing against it
Kek
You realise that being a ‘writer’ isn’t a real job.
~~*Intellectual property*~~ is a scam.
>this thread
Holy fricking cope
Meh not really, for now nothing has changed for writers/writing in a significant way. AI assisted writing is pretty primitive and its very far away from just being able to tell an ai to write a book for you and have it conjure up a "human quality" book. You could argue it having gotten as far as it has shows that it will in the foreseeable future but thats not a given either.
Writecels are in deep denial but to be fair it's not here yet. With atcels it was more immediate, with specialized AIs.
I want AI music to be a thing so much. The music industry is fake and gay.
Same with film and vidya.
It already is a thing, although still early. But you can find AI beats or even classical compositions
And it all sounds like absolute ass
It doesnt. It actually sounds better than 90% of stuff ever written by humans. You have the top 5-10% in mind as a point of reference
>dayum this painting isn't as good as michelangelo... its over, AI is worse than humans in art despite it being already better than 99% of humans ever within a year or so
Amusing cope. It's over, you are replaced
AI can't replace you if you were never published in the first place.
I find it more impressive that he got read-worthy text out of AI.
>In the neon-lit labyrinth of the urban sprawl, a cyberpunk silhouette cut through the seething, data-soaked night. Cloaked in a tattered, reflective trench coat, their face hidden beneath a shadowy hood, the enigmatic figure moved with a glitchy grace, a dance choreographed by the frenetic pulse of the city's electronic veins. Chrome cyberware glistened beneath the sporadic neon glow, each augmented limb pulsating with a quiet hum of cybernetic life. Their eyes, concealed behind mirrored shades, betrayed no emotion as they navigated the cyber-jungle's chaos with the cold precision of a machine, scanning the digital graffiti of holographic billboards and dodging the flickering holograms of corporate propaganda. In this urban jungle, where the real and virtual worlds converged, they were a ghostly sentinel, a wanderer in the dark, haunted by the echoing whispers of forgotten code and the relentless march of progress.
Truly, we are haunted by the echoing whispers of forgotten code and the relentless march of progress.
I'm writing an audio drama akin to shakespeares and am planning to capitalize on the boom in podcast listenership in our current time.
i should have said shakespeares plays because i know one of you will not automatically assume the obvious
based AI making YA authors homeless
anon, you do realize most ya authors and basically people in the literary world come from money and established families right? how many underground writing success stories do you hear about nowadays?
otherwise id say based too
What percentage of writers do you think are using AI by now? And I mean top percentage, new york times bestseller types, not lowly article writers or prolific Amazon authors.
Obviously they'd never admit it, the second one of them does the paranoia will spark a massive witch-hunt, but it makes you wonder. I personally have no problem with it, I see it as a tool not unlike a calculator, but normies and the media will surely lose their minds over it. Wait until the average midwit learns he, too, can say he published a book—and he doesn't even need to go through the effort of writing his own dogshit.
Anyone needing to use AI for writing has an extra chromosome
Writecel cope
>writecel cope
Nice selfie writecel
Uhhh huh, post physique
AI can't come up with fresh ideas or plots and without those there's no reason to read or write anything. This is by statistical necessity
on the other hand if you can't produce an AI of your own you are probably ngmi
But there aren't any original books. Most books are variations of the same tropes, and "never seen before" characters all have some precedent in history or elsewhere. An AI can emulate this easily
Most people just read slop too, even a basic AI can take away 99% of readers
It's called creative writing for a reason. All good books have something distinct about them. It's true that AI may succeed in generating slop to appeal to the masses. But to write anything worth reading IMO you need to have a capacity for experience, sentience, feeling, a perspective. All things AI lacks.
>But to write anything worth reading IMO you need to have a capacity for experience, sentience, feeling, a perspective. All things AI lacks.
This doesn't actually mean anything. It's your abstract explanation of even more abstract aesthetic criteria you set yourself, wrapped in a non-sequitur
A writing AI with random generation, fed with all the experiences described in all books as well as humanities studies ever, could write highly unique books. Humans are still needed for quality control but virtually all writers are gone
It'a not
>AI replaces 100% of humans
it's
>AI + a couple of jobbers replace 99,9% of humans
And that's without taking human input from anyone who wants to write a book himself, guiding the AI. Writer as a profession will be dead much faster than fully automated AI churning out great american novels
>This doesn't actually mean anything.
It means plenty if you're not an NPC. Nothing's abstract about it. Take any author worth talking about and consider how their unique combination of perspective and experience of the world influenced their output. Where they were born, how they were raised, what they learned, their thoughts and feelings about the world, their relationship to society and other people. They didn't just scrape a bunch of disconnected second-hand experiences and amalgamate them like AI does. They had a unique chain of experiences as an embodied being situated in the universe. Their brain is unique, at least in the finest details. All the best authors are not simply copies of what came before. If you doubt that it speaks only to your questionable standards.
Computer programs don't have genes so they have no access to the collective unconscious via blood memory. They literally have no creative, imaginative faculty of mind. That's why they need human beings to continually provide them with original creative input, which they can then rearrange in a million clever ways using rapid powers of machine calculation.
The brain is a literal computer, I knew writecels are low iq but you really take the schizobabble cake
this reasoning is as moronic as arguing that there are no species because evolution happens one miniscule change at a time. it's obvious that new ideas are emerging all the time, even if they aren't radically new from one iteration to the next.
False analogy
An AI can put together the same things humans put together to create something original. It's simple probabilities
t. techlet who doesn't understand how language models generate text that looks coherent at all and just thinks of them as 'magical cyber genies'.
>he thinks trash like GPT is book-oriented
Completely moronic and panicked writecel
Yeah I know that input generating output is something notoriously difficult for AI to, and also that all "good" writers used experiences as input that they recollected from memory but also can't be found anywhere
Who are you trying to fool but yourself writecel?
>>he thinks trash like GPT is book-oriented
what point do you think you're responding to here?
AI is good because it will filter all the low IQ "writers" so we'll be left with people who are worth paying for putting words on paper
Cope
>brown name
>AIslop
What a surprise
I use chat GPT to edit my writing and its a pain in the ass because almost anything triggers a constant policy violation. Plus, I have tried to generate stories or plots with it and only superficial trash comes out. It is mostly over for copyeditors and journalists but creative writing will persist. Might even speed up the process once the editing software improves.
This is a shit thread form a jealous troon out to demoralize you.
Now describe one of these girls in your best prose.