>Tap "record phone call"
>It triggers a "this call is now being recorded" announcement to notify the other party
tf google?
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
How do you record phone calls secretly?
>Tap "record phone call"
>It triggers a "this call is now being recorded" announcement to notify the other party
tf google?
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Wired headset? Bluetooth receptor to 1/8 mic/headset plug? Why let the phone know what you are doing?
This is called wire tapping. You can record in person conversations without notifying other parties. But only in some states. If one party is on the phone then this is called wiretapping. There are specific rules which need to be followed when recording phone calls. Violating these rules is a violation of federal law. Proceed at your own risk.
>This is called wire tapping.
It's not, wiretapping is eavesdropping on the calls (or other communications), not recording them
What if I'm a thirdie and there are no laws for this shit? Also I don't want to root and break banking applications.
Depends on the state
I know your reddit level understanding of legal matters inclines you towards this position. But its not as simple as that. Even if you had a recording of an in person conversation and both parties acknowledge consent, that recording can be administratively thrown out of court for many reasons. Stop getting legal advice from the internet and police procedurals.
Yeah, but what do cops have to do with what I said?
>Yeah, but what do cops have to do with what I said?
They won't know you have recordings unless moronic and volunteering information. Anyone here could have recorded every call for the last 3 million years and nobody would know.
Oh btw, for the legal record, I tear off mattress labels. /thug life
I have no idea what this schizo take is about.
>They won't know you have recordings unless moronic and volunteering information.
So what good are the recordings? Do you actually believe that you get "surprise evidence" like they do in Perry Mason or Matlock? You have an evidentiary admission process at the beginning of legal procedures. You can't spontaneously add new evidence in the middle of a trial without going through the proper channels. Which again, aren't going to allow you to submit some grainy audio recording from a bluetooth headset which cuts in and out every 5 seconds. Introducing unauthorized evidence during a trial itself can be criminal btw.
>Oh btw, for the legal record, I tear off mattress labels. /thug life
Well I've never stolen a mattress. So I don't care. But whatever.
>So what good are the recordings?
Like babies and elderly, "depends". OP may want it so they can remember wtf they talked about. OP may want to listen to their own voice and the other persons voice to fap. OP may want a log or journal of their calls. OP may be bored. All valid reasons. I can think of many more. When I was a phone operator I monitored and recorded calls for quality assurance and that was in a two party state. All legal.
>Do you actually believe that you get "surprise evidence" like they do in Perry Mason or Matlock?
Black person it happens all the time, attorneys instructing witnesses to play videos from their phones and whatnot
>Black person it happens all the time, attorneys instructing witnesses to play videos from their phones and whatnot
I'm literally talking to a moron.
Fine. I have bootlegged audio for personal use. But in many circumstances recording conversations is still a felony.
>bootlegged
>wiretapping
>chain of custody
the level of moron by one poster, lmao
>attorneys instructing witnesses to play videos from their phones and whatnot
If this is done outside of court proceedings then this is literally a felony.
This is a uniquely moronic thread. If you want to record any audio, just find a microphone and hit the record button on another device. If that's for personal use then you have a recording which you can use by yourself in the future. If this is intended for any kind of legal situation like alluded to, then talk to a fricking lawyer instead of a digital Mongolian basket weaving image board. A lawyer can send do not destroy instructions to the other party. This board is full of moronic kiwihomosexual rejects
>then talk to a fricking lawyer instead of a digital Mongolian basket weaving image board
lol you made me spit out my drink. I also agree.
You assume the other party would have anything to destroy. Would be silly to rely on that instead of recording everything yourself.
You have nothing to contribute at this point.
>I'm going to record audio without consent
>Possibly commit a felony in the process
>Create a useless audio file that will be dismissed in evidentiary hearings
>In a lawsuit about nothing
>Because the party I'm taking to court doesn't have anything worth issuing a legal hold
This is unironically sub-plebbit tier moronation. If you're just recording phone calls or whatever because you want a record to refer back to, then buy a tape recorder, press the big red button, and make the phone call. It literally can't be more moron proof than pressing the big red button.
In eu you can record a call or conversation that you are part of. Such recordings can also be used as evidence. You're just making shit up.
Sure. But you have to disclose the recording. Which is what OP is talking about.
https://www.edpb.europa.eu/sme-data-protection-guide/faq-frequently-asked-questions_en
>Can I record telephone conversations with clients in order to improve quality of service and do I need consent for this?
>Yes, your clients must be informed, when they make a telephone call, of the purposes of the recording, the recipients of the recordings, of their right to object and their right to access the recordings.
That has to do with companies and such. Not persons. You don't have to disclose anything if you do it as an individual person.
I know with certainty that this interpretation of mainstream legal thought in the EU is simply wrong.
Can you provide a source to back up your claim? The sources in the wikipedia article that
linked don't support your claim.
You are genuinely moronic. Nowhere in this "source" exists a carve out for personal use. Now maybe nobody knows about your recording and you'll get away with it. Good for you. Try to use it and I'll laugh at you.
Telephone recording by a private citizen can be allowed in cases of self-defence, § 32 of the German Criminal Code,[10] or Necessity, § 34 of the German Criminal Code.[11] For discussion on lawful interception in Germany please see de:Telekommunikationsüberwachung
Only germany doesn't seems to limit the actual use. Other than that by and large call recording by individuals is legal in eu.
>Only germany doesn't seems to limit the actual use
Germans and Austrians are fricked in this way
Like it's a fineable offense to use dashcam there as well
How much are you going to bet? I'll add to my previous statement. Zoomers seem to lack any skill at anything at all. Its actually amazing that zoomers manage to navigate the internet.
https://frejun.com/know-your-rights-call-recording-laws-in-various-countries
That page only covers 7 countries and without citations. It is also clear that some of those are from commercial perspective and not personal use. These two often differ as is clear from the wikipedia article. This seems to be the case with spain but your aislop article fails to mention that.
https://www.lawhub.es/voice-recording-as-evidence-before-court-in-spain/ https://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/validity-of-recorded-telephone-conversations-in-spain/
So far only france and germany seem to require consent to record for personal use.
Spain, Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, Italy, Latvia, Poland and Romania do not
You're talking about this like it's an open question. It's not, you're just moronic. A few posts ago the answer was
>Only Austria and Germany are this cucked
Before than it was
>Not everyone lives in the cucked United States
Now France has been added to this list. You're just simply wrong about your interpretation but you lack the ability to move beyond the fact that you are simply wrong. But hey, try any one of the genuine pajeet ware apks from 3rd party playstores that people itt are shilling and probably nothing bad will happen. Nothing bad legally or allowing pajeets to install software on your phone.
I can almost see the headline in moronix or the ragister if someone used these apps. "Identity theft victim now being sued because of unapproved surveillance on private citizens", "Man who was hacked after installing 3rd party apks is now in court for revenge porn accusations", "Playstore still not secure, but better than alternatives". I hope someone goes through this so I can have a good laugh.
Like I said before, but a tape recorder and press the big red button. Otherwise it's just another case of laying with dogs and waking up with fleas. You don't own your android phone. Google owns it and you rent it with ad money.
I'm not buying iPhag
Unironically this. You don't own any mobile devices and even root gets you so far since the very software on the hardware layer is another barrier. Let's not forget the moronic platform attestation bullshit.
not the hecking revenge asmrinos
Germany is not the eu
Nope, not true in my (EU) country. You need the consent of both parties.
You may or may not be able to use it as evidence. It is usually admitted in criminal cases, but it's thrown out in civil lawsuits. The other guy can sue you for privacy violation.
country?
Install an app for it and you don't need to press any button
The whole point of this thread is that OP is either too stupid or too lazy to figure out a way of doing that without notifying the other party. I can tell you're a zoomer just because you lack any reading comprehension.
Call recorder on f-droid doesn't notify the other party
>Even if you had a recording of an in person conversation and both parties acknowledge consent, that recording can be administratively thrown out of court for many reasons.
Sure it can, but it will still most likely weight in on the judgement, ruling evidence as inadmissible doesn't erase it from people's minds you know
That recording will never even be heard by a jury. Manipulating the jury after it is dismissed is literally jury tampering. So far, this thread is
"How to commit as many felonies in one go, 101"
Why do you assume it would be dismissed? Call recordings are used as evidence all the time.
Lawyers professionally pick at hairs. The existence of an audio recording proves almost nothing. I think this example is Canadian, but similar circumstances abound in the American legal system as well. Simply using different recording mediums can see your evidence dismissed.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4b03e4b6-7a9f-4b91-88e5-4e1874b20875
if you record all your conversations routinely, recording a specific conversation is not considered a crime and you can use it as evidence.
why is it suddenly OK if you do it all the time?
He's probably mixing up something about whether automated logging is admissible in court.
because it's your routine, like something you do for yourself to avoid forgetting things, not entrapment or enticement.
no, it's not about being automatic.
moron
Open a voice recorder app on a second phone and hold it up to the first phone
>How do you record phone calls secretly?
By not living in a commie dystopia shithole like Germany or wherever this happens
ACRCube
Ignore the people arguing about wiretap laws. Just send the audio to a bluetooth headset and use a splitter to also send it to a handheld voice recorder. If you are worried about wiretap laws then don't use the recording in a court of law unless you are in a single party state as it pertains to wiretaps.
Ignoring wiretapping laws is an extremely dumb idea. Best case scenario is that you get a useless audio file which is inadmissible in virtually any court because of issues like dubious chain of custody. Worst case scenario you face legal penalties. In person conversations and things like bootlegged audio are a different circumstance. You can get into trouble for recording phone calls if one party is just temporarily residing in a multi party consent state.
Don't talk to cops. Ever.
Find the audio file that plays "this call is now being recorded" and delete it.
There are call recorder apps on f-droid
Used at least one of these to automatically record all my calls
Then i realized i never listen to them and they are waste of space so i uninstalled it
>OP just wants to know how to record phone calls without the other party knowing
>homosexuals start arguing about laws
Who gives a frick not everyone lives in the cucked states of america just discuss the technology.
This ^^^
The US is probably one of the least cucked in this regard. If you lived someplace like the EU, Canada, or oz you'd probably face even more penalties for violating another person's right to privacy.
Not a violation of privacy if you don't publish the recording
Doesn't fricking matter. If we're talking about any circumstance involving self defense (mentioned in the Wikipedia article I found after 10 seconds of searching) then you need to talk to a lawyer. Not fricking IQfy of all places.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_call_recording_laws#Germany
So private persons are allowed to record if there is a plausible self defense justification.
I literally said that in my post. You're too moronic to read the whole post. That's your problem.
install gentoo
Apply for a job at the CIA.
Lmao what the frick
I mean, it's literally illegal in many countries to even record a conversation, but announcing it is the most cucked thing you could do. Imagine accidentally pressing that button
Or accidentally pressing record on a zoom or skype call. One of the times I was monitoring a call for a wireless provider it was right after I patched the mainframes and forgot to apply the "US Specific" patches. It activated the operator override tone and they were like, "Who's there?! Is someone on the line with us?"
Skill issue. Install Graphene. I record calls all the time with no issues.
If you can't figure out how to install Graphene then you're moronic.
>1. switch the language to a forsaken one like indian or chinese
>2. tap the button
>3. the announcement is now saying something nobody understand
>4. now you can just brush it off, no one would care
https://github.com/chenxiaolong/BCR
not my problem
I use an app called "BCR", pretty sure its root only
OP is not technical enough for rooting a phone if he's asking this question here.
How is this app root only?
call recording on android is region locked
Haven't looked at it so I don't know. But the music and film industries complain about audio loop back software all the time. If I had guess that's why Google doesn't have much support for recording audio. Like it or not, music and film money is a lot bigger than schizo phone recording money.
/g/
Comparisons of US and EU legal doctrine on audio recordings. Telephone and otherwise.
Use ttslexx app from playstore
The phone app on CrDroid has the option to automatically record all calls. It doesn't notify anyone as far as I know
I like that most normies think they can't record calls anymore
it saved my ass because a few morons assumed I couldn't record them
I just pressed record when a psycho ex tried to threaten me, she had no clue
you don't its the other sides right to know if you are recording them
microphone
Install GrapheneOS.
https://grapheneos.org/features
>Call recording functionality within the Dialer app using modern Android storage with recordings stored in Recordings/Call Recordings and no restrictions based on region or special cases like playing a recording tone (users are still responsible for complying with their local laws).
that only works in SHIT TIER pixels
https://github.com/chenxiaolong/BCR
It's probably illegal where you live to record a call without informing the other caller.
it should be illegal everywhere
it should be legal everywhere.
BIO THE FRICK IT SHOULD NOT IT IS NOT YOUR FRICKING RIGHT TO RECORD SOMEONE WITHOUT THEM KNOWING YOU CREEPY CHILD MOLESTER
you're the creepy child molester. don't say things that you don't want to be recorded. I don't, personally
ILL SAY WHATEVER THE FRICK I WANT ILL BE VERBALLY ABUSIVE ILL BEAT SOMEONE ON THE POHNE I DONT CARE ITS MY FRICKING GOD GIVEN RIGHT TO KALWAYS KNOW WHO IS RECORDING ME YOU RIGHT WING FRICKING butthole
GO SUCK TRUMP'S BIG ORANGE wiener
i wish this applied to cameras
NOPWE FRICKNG THAT KARENS HAVE NO RIGHTS AND AER NOT HUMAN I HOPE EVERY SINGLE KAREN FCUKIGN DIES I AM RIGHT AND EVERYONE ELSE IS WRONG
Filming someone isn't illegal but if its personal usage it shouldnt be a big deal like someone taking a picture of you in frame and you never posting it anywhere but when you post it online or any where it should be for instance.
no no it fricking should you have no right ot privacvy aned no one should the feeling of being safe should be against the FRICKING LAW DIE DEI DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
I HATE YOU FUUUUCK YOOOOOOUUU OU SDON OF A BIIITCH I WANTED TO FRICKING DIE
rapist
You're moronic if you can't figure it out. Btw you need a rooted phone.
YOU CANT ROOT A SAMSUNG!!!!!!!
what if you do a screen record + audio?
FRICK YOU YOU WORTHLESS SACK OF SHIT STOP FRICKIGN RECORDING ME I SHOULDNT HAVE OT WATCH MY LANGUAGE OR PUIT ANYN THOUGHT INTO LIFE
Two party consent is unconstitutional and you can all tongue my anus.
To answer OP's question, you probably need to find the audio file with the stupid phrase and replace / delete it.
root your android with magisk and install call recorder by skvlex or basic call recorder module. i have call recording on my wife's phone as well as my own phone (pixel 6a & 4a respectively). it doesnt announce that you are recording the call. i dont care about what rules/laws/israeli regulations are in place. I'll do what i want with the device i paid for. I've been using this for years
most reddit thread of the day award