how is this constitutionally legal? talking about the TX porn restriction bill not xhamster just refusing to do business.
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
how is this constitutionally legal? talking about the TX porn restriction bill not xhamster just refusing to do business.
lol vpn providers eating good this year
The in build proxies from epic privacy browser work fine for these things.
never heard of it, is it lightweight and not programmed by troons?
into the trash it goes
ew, not touching that with a 10 foot poo
kiwifarms says otherwise, gooner.
>eradicate porn
Nothing of value will have been lost.
True, but that should not for the government to decide. Let each man decide for himself.
That's what they said about you know what.
>that should [be] not for the government to decide
Who else is going to do the eradicating?
>Let each man decide for himself
Not much of a campaign if the sentiment is, "come if you want, or don't, it's fine, whatevs [sic.]."
I'm creating porn with my mind right now, and I'm beaming it into God's consciousness.
You thought I was praying? No, I'm turning Baby Jesus into a gooner.
why do filthy degenerate subhumans always strawman every basic standard of human decency as just arbitrary religious puritanism? porn is terrible regardless of religion.
>frick these bible belt fundamentalist christains trying to force their religion on us by restricting us from goring and raping babies
honestly it is so absurd and moronic that it is literal evidence for the existence of satan
Yes, porn is bad for dopamine receptors and so on, but this is a massive step in government overreach which will set the stage for further government overreach.
>Antisocial hate websites are no longer allowed in the state of Texas.
>starting with IQfy.
>Similar to UK's anti-porn bill, perhaps you can bypass this by filling out a form and submitting it to your congressman along with your name, home address and zipcode
How exactly is it overreach?
>non digital porn is regulated
>digital content (hate speech, misinformation) is regulated
>digital transactions are taxed
Seems like a logical step to extend the already existing pornography laws into the digital space. The government has already started taxing the digital space, so the claims of overreach are a bit hyperbolic.
nobody is arguing its good
just that its non of your business or the govs and its a personal choice
should be the same with drugs. Individual freedom is lost on some people
>Individual freedom is lost on some people
Some people live in a society.
Imagine having to explain this one on the Day of Judgment. Yikes!
>Man, I really regret doing that
>Well if you really regret that, then it's all good, now, let's go bang some angels
i kneel
The problem is who define what is porn, what is obscene? Marie Le Penn got in legal trouble for sharing crime scene photos.
Being able to access a website is not a right protected under the constitution. The law applies to publishers, not consumers of media.
They are able to do this because obscenity is not protected speech by the 1st Amendment.
You can't just wave a magic wand and deem it "obscene" though under law.
A grand jury must decide using the Miller Test if it is obscene first. Then it is only obscene in that one jurisdiction.
They deem it constitutional to "protect children" Like 50% of all unconstitutional laws. The other 50% is "interstate commerce".
Texas didn't deem xhamster a porn site, xhamster deemed *themselves* a porn site. Texas passed a law restricting access to pron to minors, xhamster said "yup that's us so we'd better not let texans in just to be sure".
You're literally saying the exact same thing you replied to.
>You can't just wave a magic wand and deem it "obscene"
words don't have objective meaning outside of people's minds
words simply point to abstract concepts within our own subjectivity
when enough people agree that something is obscene, then it's obscene
that's how words work
So you agree racism and bigotry is bad then?
Pornography has a lot of bigotry and racism in the industry so yes, it is bad, thanks for agreeing with me.
>They are able to do this because obscenity is not protected speech by the 1st Amendment.
literally is. if it wasn't, america would not have an enormous porn industry. i love how you bloated pedophile christgays don't even know how the constitution works, just like the bible.
It actually isn't. Until the latter half of the 20th century it was pretty common for things to be banned for obscenity, and there were porn producers who were hit with bans for obscenity even in the early 2000s.
porn isn't speech
Yeah and that's why America had, in it's protestant past, lynched people for mere acts of perversion.
But now such laws would be a paywall for actions. And eventually people will pay mercs to get what they want. This is literally a threat to the US state and why the US probably let it go originally.
>They are able to do this because obscenity is not protected speech by the 1st Amendment.
Neither is hate speech, chud.
Obscenity is indeed covered by the 1st amendment. If you believe it is not you deserve to die.
Obscenity was not originally covered by the first ammendment.
Some israeli guy found a banned book, that was a tasteful romance with mild sex scenes, and fought the courts for that one to get accepted and legitimized. That being done, he immediately followed it up by using the precedent set by that court case to get a straight up aggressive porn book accepted, and won.
Source: Merchants of Sin, which I read 5 years ago, and I'm not in the mood to cite chapter and verse for you, or find the relevant wikipedia entry validating what I'm saying.
That being said, I agree that the government shouldn't be allowed to have any opinion on the content users use. This is going to lead to scope creep, and removal of our freedoms.
What is "obscene"?
Porn, definitely, anti-white, anti-Christian, anti-marriage, and pro-communist sentiment, probably.
If you read the last paragraph of my post, you'd see that you don't need to argue with me.
Your last paragraph doesn't change your first sentence, which is one that gets repeated a lot even though obscenity is always so vaguely defined.
>Your last paragraph doesn't change your first sentence, which is one that gets repeated a lot even though obscenity is always so vaguely defined.
Fair enough. I agree it is vaguely defined.
You both want to talk about something "vaguely defined," let's talk about this "freedom of speech" that doesn't seem to fully die no matter who or what is killing it.
>the government shouldn't be allowed to [...]
And you would know, having worked in Government for so long, I assume.
Sorry, what was that? Oh, never mind...
>Merchants of Sin
kek
Literally have a nice day, stormgay.
right back at you, shlomo
oyyyyy veeyyyy shut it down!!
>ledditor tw*tch meme
unironically killyourself shitlib normoid
Books convey information and ideas.
Porn does not. If it did it wouldn’t be porn, but would instead be erotic art.
>erotic art.
So my e-girl eroge are erotic art?
Probably. Artistic expression can tangibly be argued to fall under free speech.
What the coomers are missing is that this doesn’t allow a pornography business to go unregulated.
But my e-girl erotic art is regulated and definitely not allowed to be sold to minors either, just like porn.
That’s for different reasons, to enable the authorities to investigate anyone they want on the accusation of having CP. it’s more of a violation of the 4th amendment.
They use Hate Speech in the same way, and THIS is actually a violation of the 1st amendment.
I was questioning the difference between erotic art and porn. Don't get so hung up on the e-girl part of my posts.
I find that highly unlikely considering my initial comment made the distinction quite clear.
It makes your distinction clear, but reality is less clear since all this "erotic art" is being regulated the same way as porn, despite being art?
Again, you’re conflating porn with erotic media. There’s a legal distinction, which is why pornography is regulated but suggestive erotic content (as commonly seen on TV and in advertising) is not.
You do not have the legal education to use semantics here, anon.
>suggestive erotic content
My question in
was about eroge, which is by no means the sort of thing you'd see on TV or in advertising. The answer I was given was that it would probably qualify as erotic art in
. So what's going on?
Your question was about e-girl eroge. Did you even read your own post?
Anon are you feeling alright?
I'm really not feeling alright because every reply I've gotten after
has either contradicted that post or been totally unrelated to my actual question.
Anon, you specifically mention e-girl eroge and then seemingly forgot that you said e-girl eroge.
You’re clearly having issues remembering which posts are yours and what your argument is. I recommend you go lay down for a while, it’s probably due to lack of sleep.
Because that’s the only way I can understand how someone can not understand that pornography is legally defined.
Get well, anon!
And you're fixating on the e-girl part even though it doesn't really matter to the substance of the post. Surely if e-girl eroge are erotic art than all other eroge are as well. I wouldn't care to change anything about my original post had it not been for the two replies I got talking about CP when the e-girl is really not relevant to my question!
Anon, you keep ignoring the fact that pornography is legally defined. You're just trying to focus on e-girl for some reason as if that has any influence on the legal definition of pornography.
Get well soon, anon!
So you're denying the post
that started this discussion?
Are you finally ready to accept that the distinction you’re looking for is that pornography is legally defined?
I'm ready to accept that nothing you've said to me has anything to do with what was said in
and that I'd be better off talking to a wall.
So pornography being legally defined as distinct from other forms of media does not answer your question as to why pornography is different from erotic art?
If the explanation in plain English (repeated 5 times now) is not enough for you to understand, the problem is clearly (You).
The problem is that the explanation seems to contradict the previous posts. But if this is your final answer then I'll just disregard all of that and abandon this utterly barren joke of a conversation.
How does it contradict the previous posts? You keep suggesting things without substantiating your argument.
Substantiate my argument? There's no argument at this point, only confusion. Maybe you think you're being plan and obvious by just repeating "porn has a legal definition" five times, but all I really wanted to discuss what the idea that something that convents information and ideas is not porn, but erotic art. And all of these posts seem unrelated to that.
Not the anon you're jousting with but...why be so evasive to the point here? Language ultimately doesn't mean anything here. It is what it is, and it is seen clearly, refllected by the language.
What you call a piece of erotic media is a matter of culture and distinction but; the terms are only understandable where they apply. I get it enough that all anyone with porn on their drive needs to do is to not be anyone that they wouldn't want to be but, the next sproblem here is, setting new terms. Whatever the hell the new meta is, is being set by people who are not in their positions to watch and distinguish between the types of online porn; they are absolutely green and saying otherwise, is setting them up to act like fools.
So being evasive helps no one here. Why are these terms "in the books" yet, are not discussed?
Not even surveyed? It is known that there is a "mental health crisis" and a "epidemic of loneliness" but its all treated as unrelated to porn, very ignorantly..
I’m having an incredibly hard time understanding why you don’t understand the significance of legally defining something.
That’s probably why you have so much trouble understanding why requiring pornography sites to request identification isn’t a violation of the First Amendment.
Please try to argue less like women. It will greatly improve your experience whenever considering legality and regulation.
I understand the significance. You don't understand that that's not what I wanted to talk about. Yet you've persisted relentlessly in repeating yourself, seemingly without any desire to actually converse with me.
I’m talking about the topic as it’s stated in OP. You're trying to derail this thread.
>muh law
>ignores the lawmaking process
>ultimately treating law as an absolute end to achieve order
>resorting to insults
Either baiting or ignorant. I'm not here to make a hot-tke in your direction anymore and i'd ollie out of here if I were still a child. It would give me great joy but; that'd be a futile joy.
The problem here is you are speaking next-to-nothing about your point, defending an attack that does not exist, and neglecting to address what law legally can not address: interpretations. I at least know that a lawyer's entire job is to facilitate proper language and interpretation, by understanding the law in the middle. Lsawyers know law; you need to know how to live.
So; if you even read my post, you'd know that the concept of banning porn is a red herring. I was just discussing the ramifications and here you are defending like a hobby lawyer. You might as well have went "Get mad GG".
So, I'll back off from after saying that. No intellectual daggers are pointed at you; you don't have to be mad.
Whew...
>muh law
Anon, have you read the OP? Clearly not.
If you want to discuss the morality of regulating porn, go make a new thread.
Hey now. You mentioned morality and not me. No case is the last either, and each case sets precedent. Law is contextualized in reality, and reality is, ideally, improved by the system of law; I should not have to explain this if we are both really trying to understand the discussion here. I'm not kissing feet here, but you are, again, not reading enough somewhere.
I'll try to say something about the OP then. I was never focused on the humanitarian sentimental side of this issue; stop assuming that. You are projecting.
...but when I try to figure out how to talk about that, it's pretty worthless. Your repeated maneuvering is because you hate spoonfeeding, and this whole situation is just intellectualized combat. I can jusat google the terms, to see what they mean.
And so, that's it. That is my comment on that law. It appears to be a high-brow chess move, of manipulative ends; because it is blown out of proportion by people that can't google law, and evasive wise men who won't teach it's real consequences.
Dumb thread, probably harmless law, with a dumbass reaction. Because no-one can pull out a real conversation through coercion and chaos.
>you’re the one talking about morality
Strawman. You clearly read the convo chain you replied to.
Cause and effect is not morality. How "X" is effected by "Y" is not morality.
No one is assaulting your highly specific hill, chief.
I'll try for the lulz though. Here is my hot take:
It's good. Actually showing that they want to apply morals using law as a reflection of that, will keep them from being actual, factual, dumbasses. Moral grey is shit. They just need to, y'know, endure it for the longest run and back their legislature up with...you know...further morals.
It's morally wrong to destroy good things, after all.
Having porn on your hard drive doesn’t turn you into a potential investigation target. You’re belittling the way authorities abuse the idea of CP to defend your cooming habit (that you still have access to btw).
>They are able to do this because obscenity is not protected speech by the 1st Amendment.
It literally is, the morons that wrote the law could have added that porn was not part of it, but they didn't
The first amendment applies to information and ideas. Obscene books can contain information and ideas.
However, let us remember that physical pornography is already regulated, so there is clearly a limit to this argument of yours.
I hope Texas takes on furry porn.
Quit porn, coomer
>pulls wiener out on stream
>instantly cures stream-viewing coomers of porn-addiction
he didn't
Censor deez nuts, troon.
Soon all porn sites will be using the same hosting provider as Kiwi Farms. You know I'm right.
or they will be on a .onion which can be on any provider. inb4 someone says providers don't allow it.
Its a private business dumbass they can do whatever they want.
>how is this constitutionally legal?
States and the federal government can and do often make laws that are blatantly unconstitutional. It has to get challenged and overturned by a court before there's any hope of getting it thrown out, and they usually just ignore what the court said and enforce it anyways.
>and enforce it anyways
Often times, this is not actually possible. If something has criminal or civil penalties, those have to be enforced through the courts. And those courts are obligated to rule based on the higher courts' rulings.
Yes, they'll arrest you on bogus laws and put you through the ringer but you won't get convicted. Probably.
I don't see any issues. Watching people frick is nasty. Tiddies aren't special and asses are for making butt chili. veganas look like flesh caves. Do something productive with your time instead of jerk off to bawds. Sex is free on Tinder or your local women's shelter. Requiring an ID for porn is based.
Ukraine isn't being sent pallets of money. It's sent equipment. Equipment made by americans. Paid with themoney approved in the aid package
>Equipment made by select few companies comprising the military industrial complex that then use said money solely to further their own political interests and just so happen to give massive donations to politicians that approve these kinds of "aid" packages
FTFY. Now explain how this is helping the average American?
>how does this benefit us
The aid is used to turn more subhumans russian Black folk into mulch, any quantity of money is worth it even if it only results in one more dead useless aids infested homosexual vatnik scumsucking loser
Preventing Russia from conquering any country they feel like is part of America's global objectives.
these people don't understand how any of this works. They are such third world brained frickheads that if ever the situation does happen where the US is no longer the strongest they will regret it and then join a even worse war lord that will rape them. They are dumb african third world shitheads.
It makes me happy
$500M in equipment? what's that, like 3 guns, 50 bullets, and a set of replacement hydraulic hoses for a plane?
Not like the people crying over "muh money that could do good here" actually care about that, it annoys them that its killing russians and twarting russian interests.
>Tinder
20k swipes 0 matches
>how is this constitutionally legal?
Supreme court refused to block the bill.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-declines-block-texas-pornography-restriction-rcna149877
>watching porn is a constitutional right!
no tiktok
no porn
no abortion
no weed
lmao
all that is missing is
no Black folk
no latinx
and you would have heaven.
add no israelites to the list
It's not constitutionally legal, duh
Pornography is free speech
Can't have freedom of speech without the stuff you don't like
>go to liquor store
>ask for booze
>need to be 21
>UHH MUH RIGHTS?!?!
You think this law actually protects chillins?
No sir, no sir.
All this law does is violate your privacy.
Horney kids are gonna find porn regardless of how orwellianly stupid you design your government
It prevented you, an underage moron, from accessing the site.
I'll say it's working
The question was one of constitutionality, not motive. Don't shift the goal posts.
>Horney kids are gonna find porn regardless of how orwellianly stupid you design your government
This is a terrible argument because you can apply to any law ever created.
>Kids are always gonna drink beer, may as well get rid of the drinking age.
>Kids are always gonna have sex, may as well get rid of the age of consent.
>Kids are always gonna get into fights, may as well make battery legal.
I agree with the AoC one
>>Kids are always gonna drink beer, may as well get rid of the drinking age.
The drinking age is bullshit
Should be 16
>>Kids are always gonna have sex, may as well get rid of the age of consent.
I don't see why not, I was sexually mature and active at 15
>>Kids are always gonna get into fights, may as well make battery legal.
Fighting is an important part of human male development.
homosexual helicopter parents that prevent their kids from fighting because "someone might get hurt" should be fricking euthanized
Kids play fight because they're preparing for their real future fights as an adult
wow you sound like a cool and tough guy. Can I have your autograph? homosexual. You're just as immoral as the gays.
carding someone when they buy alcohol is not the same as carding someone just to get access to a website
the latter would be abused by every major website to kill internet anonymity. I’d rather see porn banned outright than what little remaining internet freedom there is be stripped away
The constitution does not require businesses to provide a service to all states. States (states rights) allow states to make their own more restrictive rules unless specifically otherwise mentioned in the Constitution of the United States of America. Please quote the part of the constitution you believe applies and don't say 1st amendment, it's unrelated to private businesses.
>Kids are always gonna have sex, may as well get rid of the age of consent.
Yeah.
>motive is irrelevant to speech laws
>intent is irrelevant to speech laws
Speech without motive or intent is nothing but buzz.
For what is the purpose of speech laws if it does not have nexus with some degree of motive or intent?
>>Kids are always gonna drink beer, may as well get rid of the drinking age.
You can't download beer. It is actually quite hard for kid to get a reliable supply of beer. Mostly thanks to the laws.
>>Kids are always gonna have sex, may as well get rid of the age of consent.
That's what happens. There is literally nothing stopping kids from having sex. Kids frick around all the time in middle school and especially high school.
>>Kids are always gonna get into fights, may as well make battery legal.
If two kids want to have a fight there is literally nothing stopping them.
Battery is something completely different from a kid having sex or drinking beer, as there is an actual victim in that situation.
Yes I agree, it's moronic to have the drinking age set at 21
They can't even get tobacco anymore.
Why is a 18 year old allowed to join thr military, sign up to be a pornstar, vote, and so on, but not allowed to drink?
And get a large student loan
alcohol makes you stupid
Both the military and joining the porn industry do more damage to a human than anythung under suicidal tier drinking would.
lowers "teen drunk driving" incidents.
pure theatre
>Why is a 18 year old allowed to join thr military, sign up to be a pornstar, vote, and so on, but not allowed to drink?
Because most of USA is centered around driving and thet are no other options. So drunk driving was and still is a big issue.
you're still a senior in high school at 18. it would be super easy for them to buy alcohol for freshmen.
Demonstrates to children that the government can do whatever the frick it wants even if what it wants is moronic.
Honestly though realistically it should either be 18 or 19.
18 if you correctly feel
>once you're old enough to sign up to die in a war or sign up for hundreds of thousands in college debt, you should be allowed to have a drink at your own discretion.
19 if you instead feel
>There's a compelling safety value in keeping alcohol out of high schools: 19 is basically equally as good as 18 for college students and adults who are now majority age, while still as a matter of law making it harder for seniors to distribute alcohol to high school underclassmen
>jews would rather shut down access entirely instead of making sure only adults can access it
Really gets the ol noggin joggin
Please understand, Bible clutching Texans need to stop their daughters from seeing porn so that they don’t complain about how small their dad’s dick is when they rape them.
ew. why are atheists so vulgar?
>how is this constitutionally legal?
Not a constitutional issue. Businesses may reserve the right to refuse business to anyone for nearly any reason. This is Texas, they fire people for wearing the wrong color shoes on Tuesday.
Stop watching porn OP, you are wasting your life and I'm certain you consider suicide often.
>cries about porn site getting blocked instead of using vpn/proxy/whatever
you are a /misc/ roach , aren't you?
Incels crying about how they can’t watch their porno lmao
it's funny how conservative texas still is despite all the commiefornia refugees
>it's funny how conservative texas still is despite all the commiefornia refugees
yeah it's almost like there's not as many actually moving there and you're a moron for believing everything you hear on the news
>yeah it's almost like
is it almost like that yeah?
>whose funding all this anti-obscenity and anti-violence censorship shit
>it's Israeli israelites every time
It's actually nothing to do with conservatism.
It's fallout from blatant Israeli censorship promotion. They can't enforce laws under "anti-semitism" with all this gaza shit, so they have to do it through this round-about method. They target 3 things every time (normally with NGO protocols):
>sex and sexual violence
>race issues
>lgbt
Rinse and repeat until they completely censor your media and render the US population blind slaves.
You see, these laws don't affect israel or wealthy israelites in the US.
>Weinstein got conviction overturned recently on bullshit measures
>this was after trying to contact Israel over things
This is the new world order. israelites raping your wives and children while you literally cannot complain about it (because that's doxxing now).
Hitler did nothing wrong it seems.
I mean to bring up violence against women is laughable when you ignore the bigger elephant in the room.
They like to especially not comment on the racial characteristics of such things. That might make people think.
That transgender suicide shit is actually part of a much bigger problem - genocide through psychological operation tactics.
I mean it's fricking laughable to just point to the problem being just violence and sexual perversion, when those are symptoms of a natural reaction to a cartel trying to terrify, rob and disenfranchise entire populations for the sake of their own personal leverage and interests external to that nation.
The sex is just an outlet for their personal frustrations with things like money and paying their bills. Why is that a thing? Because the job supply dried up. Jobs that were outsourced to places like China and more recently (and strangely given the surrounding context of the region and the likelihood of increased risk because of it) Israel. The former is just costs and savings related. The latter makes no sense whatsoever and is a clear case of a subversive state trying to enfranchise itself to the detriment of another by usurping their industry. There's no real cost/savings argument to be had. It's pure political frickery and, ironically, racism. Talk about pot calling the kettle. But now everyone is nowadays. It's just a game of leverage and no one really is saying things how it is.
Unless you're mixed race like me and see an even bigger problem here and how these stupid hives are seeking pyrrhic victories they don't know are pyrrhic.
It is strange how much of this political shit is now just IQfy shit thanks to AI. AI is a threat to leverage. People that don't quite understand it's potential see it as nothing but a threat.
>iTz NoT rEaL cOnSeRvAtIsM!
Black person republicans love brownnosing israel. you just don't like that cold hard truth so you say homosexualy shit like this.
wtf is wrong with people. Maybe stop watching porn?
all coomers and simps get the rope
That is some supremely lazy art style. Kys christgay.
Keep being /misc/gays, homosexuals
morality is necessary to keep a society running. You're a hypocrite if you think your actions don't affect society but other people's actions do.
I slit your mother's throat and make you frick the gash, normie
could asked the same thing but with your uncle last night, homo.
>normie
>not normalhomosexual
And I bet you call the /misc/gay a tourist too, israelite.
>man porking each other affects society negatively guys, trust me!
how to spot a mental midget
good, hope all of america bans porn
their culture was far better when it was more prudish and they have an unfortunate level of cultural relevance around the world
>good, hope all of america bans porn
It's mostly in the works. Some conservative states have passed laws requiring people to use a verified ID in a centralized database. This will incentivize some teens to steal mom or dads credit cards and ID which could land them in teeny-prison. Once enough conservative states pass this, it could become federal law for all US states, then eventually all countries will have to follow suit or be sanctioned. Then that database may be required for any site that permits user generated content, like this one. It's only gets weirder from there.
explain how this is bad without sounding like an incel or an homosexual (same thing, coitus is between a man and a woman)
>if you complain about this you are an incel or an homosexual
>complaining about something that involves positively engaging with sex
Next you'll say complaining about laws forbidding sex makes you an incel or an homosexual.
about something that involves positively engaging with sex
>porn
>positive
>Next you'll say complaining about laws forbidding sex makes you an incel or an homosexual.
>porn=sex
holy fricking incel
>he doesn't get what positive meant in that grammatical context
Brainlet detected.
ESL detected
>calls me, a native speaker, an ESL because he is actually an ESL and is frustrated that he might have misinterpreted english
>or is a legit southerner with no real understanding of english
I guess active promotion isn't acting "positively" for you then?
Promotion of what, you stupid Black person? Xhamster is a porn website, it doesn't
"positively engage with sex"
UOL detected
Autist detected
How does this benefit the israelites?
Mutts never do anything that doesnt benefit thsir masters, not sure what the goal of this is. Upsetting normies and lowering vote number for republicans? (Not because republicants are any better but to make sure their controlled opposition doesnt get too strong)
Yes, clearly when the Founding Fathers drafted the first amendment the intention was that coomers would have unrestricted access to israeli pornography.
I mean, how else could a Democracy survive?
is this really that much of a hinderance seeing as vpns are so common place now? I feel like people will either find and alternative or just start using vpns.
Kids don't use vpns as they do not have credit cards. Its not about blocking your coomer adult ass from porn.
They use their parents CC
Sure they will. Every kid just have unlimited access to parent credit accounts.
This law is good. It does not restrict normal adults from porn. Only kids and schizos.
>Sure they will. Every kid just have unlimited access to parent credit accounts.
This is the current thing. Most will grab and copy the card info when mommy is in the shower, and let's be honest, dad went for a pack of smokes years ago and isn't coming back.
This reads like the most puritan parent from the 80s who thinks their child wasnt smoking pot in high school.
Zoomers spend all day watching content creators, and these content creators are constantly shilling VPNs to them. Said zoomers just need to ask their parents to pay for a cheep thing that supposedly makes them "safer". I can guarantee you that their idiot GenX parents will be glad to do so. And this isn't even touching on the fact that zoomers share porn on services like Discord all the time. Do not underestimate the determination of a horny teenager.
All porn bans will do is make zoomies slightly less technically illiterate while doing almost nothing to prevent them from cooming. I welcome you idiot bootlickers to try, because the results will invariably be funny.
Bla bla bla. It seems someone is mad they don't see their daily cuckold story from xhamster. You should ask your mom more tendies
I accept your concession.
confession denied
Is it constitutionally legal to ID check children trying to buy porn or beer in a store? It's so funny, you gays b***h and moan when governments dragnet us because digital is easier, but then want to have your cake when it comes to letting the internet be the wild west.
Maybe USENET will make a cum-back.
These states doing this will make for a decent experiment over time. Sexual assault crimes have gone down since the proliferation of porn on the internet, these states making it harder to access porn through laws should cause a reversal or at least a decrease in the rate of decline if access to porn was the cause.
>Sexual assault crimes have gone down since the proliferation of porn on the internet
All crimes have gone down since the proliferation of cars not pumping the atmosphere full of lead.
You're a fricking moron if you think lead has any detremental effect on people.
The greatest and richest generations all had no fear of lead.
Leads actually beneficial for growing children. Lead paint wasnt banned because of what it does to kids, it was banned because they wanted an easier way to x-ray homes. A moderate amount of lead in a childs diet is good for them.
moron. I hope you never breed.
>t. Lead deficient zoomer
yea no
the dude who invented leaded gasoline got lead poisoning before it even started being sold, people knew lead was poisonous well before leaded gas was made, they just didn't give a shit, literally "someone else's problem"
we're still recovering from leaded gas
correlation != causation
that graph is far from the only example of it, there are studies demonstrating a correlation between blood lead levels and criminal behaviour
https://manhattan.institute/article/lead-and-crime-a-review-of-the-evidence-and-the-path-forward
Much weaker link than race.
Not even a lib but no, that's not even remotely true.
The violent crime rate is also heavy correlated with abortion access. Also wouldnt lead gas in the air just correlate to population?
Shouldn't the chinks be the most violent people on Earth then? They basically live in a toxic wasteland.
I mean, chink death tolls are always frickhuge.
There is no evidence of that. Sex crimes have gone down all the time, and porn came at the same time as the internet.
Sexual assault is down but mental illness is at an all time high
It’s a natural socioligical experiment. Can’t wait for the paper to be out on it
same thing except for abortion bans. with many red states banning it and states like TX that have outright said you will be sued if any action you take could be construed as messing with the baby's (not the mother's, they don't care about her) life, there's been a brain drain of pre-natal care professionals from these states. i predict an increase in 100% preventable pregnancy-related deaths in the coming years.
>it's against the constitution to require ID to verify age to receive pornographic material from a service
>in 2024 he beats his meat to 3dpds
lol, lmao even
So whats the play? Is this a israeli conspiracy or an anti israeli move?
israeli conspiracy if anything. TX already has a law on the books that makes it illegal to boycott israel in any way, shape or form.
funny. I already boycott israel and I live in TX. Though I wonder at what level they enforce it if at all
touch grass
eat the bugs
Just use a VPN.
Good, maybe you'll start to recover what little braincells you've lost to brain rot and excessive cooming.
big free speech like russia rauo
Finally, e-bawds and furry artists will need to find real fricking jobs. Frick them all for thinking they can get away with living an easy life by just posting a few pictures a month online.
as long as the 100 other pron sites arent touched with
don't care, stop being a coomer incel piece of shit.
this law protects women from becoming objectified and human trafficking.
human trafficking doesn't exist
Get fricked ameriBlack person, got what you paid for
While I agree that porn should be illegal. I don’t know that the application of this restriction of speech won’t result in other restrictions of speech.
There may be precedent on this and the case law is the law not necessarily the constitution
This. It's just an excuse to take away more rights and push for ID across the whole internet. Anyone who opposes is just going to be called a degen coomer etc. It's very sinister.
Porn sites shouldn't be illegal but they should be locked under a login with ID to verify you're 18+
The worst thing about porn is that you get addicted to it at 12 when barely any cum comes out of your dick and you get almost permanent brainrot from becoming a coomer exposed to endless BBC, trannies, and other degenerate shit
Maybe, just maybe, that's a failure of your environment and that you would have gotten addicted to the first thing along the way? Maybe perhaps a little bit of self-reflection instead of knee jerking "pron bad coom bad"? I found IQfy porn at like 10 but didn't get addicted, to this shit. Have a modicum of personal responsibility you moron.
>Have a modicum of personal responsibility you moron.
it's NEVER been about instilling personal responsibility with chr*stians; they want to control your lives, period. it's no different from leftists wanting to do the same thing, the only thing that's different is the motivation and reasoning.
they're both authoritarian regimes that are 2 sides of the same coin. always have been
>they want to control us!
read
>i want to be bad to myself and my environment because muh hecking freedurm
Christianity is the truest freedom. Christ is King. No amount of seething is going to change this.
you would make a good slave
I'm my own boss
Because the laws are to protect people from being addicted and enslaved
Christianity doesn't have these "allowed hours"
As I said, no amount of seething and lying is going to change that the God of Abraham, who is the God of Jesus and of all the world, has given us words that give freedom.
>Because the laws are to protect people from being addicted and enslaved
>fences are there to protect the cattle
Luckily we are not cattle. We've received everything, and we're warned against throwing it away.
Even if I went along with your analogy, you'd want to protect the cattle from predators or thieves, and you wouldn't want them to run away.
Ideally, we'd have the strength to withstand these temptations, but it is not so, therefore we need to be protected.
>therefore we need to be protected.
Moo, moo.
Alright, it's obvious you don't care about your or others' well-being. Don't be surprised when this addiction catches up to you.
>Because the laws are to protect people from being addicted and enslaved
so i need other people to choose for me? explain exactly how that is the "truest freedom".
>thinking not having the option to get addicted is worse than not having the option to quit the addiction
let me ask you again since you didn't answer: explain to me how other people making decisions for me on what i can/cannot do in my private life is the "truest freedom"
Other people have also made the decision that you can’t rob banks.
we're not talking about robbing banks, we're talking about what media i consume in the privacy of my own home.
Your comment was made in the abstract and not specific about media.
My reply was thus suited.
Plus porn has always been restricted to adults. You just seem upset that the internet isn’t outside of the law anymore.
>Your comment was made in the abstract and not specific about media.
cool, that's not what this thread is about so you can go elsewhere since you aren't interested in staying off-topic.
staying on-topic*
>angry coomer seething
I’m not reading your essay.
People insisting laws mandating porn sites to check IDs is an attack on free speech are simply stupid and don’t understand that porn shops have been living under these laws for decades.
People just want the internet to be outside the law when it suits their interests.
concession accepted
confession denied btw
NTA but, you are being subjective to you and, you are not me. Therefore, your opinion is invalid; as it is so subjective, it is a actual needle in a haystack. It would not apply correctly.
See how anyone can do, that thing you are doing? Do not do that.
Infact, this thread is just fishing for a subculture you think will be coincidentally here; to rile them up. If you really want to discuss the nature of eroticism, you would go to
or
but nooo; you probably try to gaslight "anonymous cowards" on IQfy for fun, while simultaniously being a coward, anonymously.
It is not about porn and it never is or was; it's about getting attention towards ideas. Please get your own attention, and spend precious time trying to gaslight the "losers", as they exist in your mind.
Every major investor in the internet could fall off tomorrow and i'd be glad still; not out of nihilism but, at least I'd know, for all of time, who these people truly are. Technology is a poor crutch, for a lack of social sense. In that sense, why take it away, if you already know it's a crutch?
>Christianity is the truest freedom.
then why are the only states that are pushing these laws infested with christian fundamentalists?
>christ is king! He said during his state allowed hours of worship.
>leftists
>authoritarian regime
The only authoritarian regime in the US is right, or right of center at BEST. You are politically illiterate.
i'm addicted to IQfy more then any porn. ive been here every day since 2006 and i will continue to be here every day till I am dead.
An environment with easily accessible porn. The accessibility is the problem, not the child.
These bans create a higher barrier to entry and most kids will give up, or get caught buying a VPN by their parents.
Also, how is it productive to blame a child for seeking out something they don't understand, that hijacks their reward system similar to junkies who regularly take heroin.
I know you say this only because you like the ease of access for yourself, but frick you for allowing that selfishness to ruin a next generation.
> but frick you for allowing that selfishness to ruin a next generation.
Narcissism defines millennials. There’s no real surprise here.
baning Porn is a good step to undoing the israelite's schemes.
hitler banned porn immediately, and look how their economy grew.
young men can't just be jacking off and not working.
they need guidance.
with israelites, You Lose.
.t someone who quit porn 10yrs ago and never made a better decision in my life
>he quit porn
>10 years ago
The shit they put out today is on a whole different level old man. Dip your toes in it once and it'll pull you down under.
nah, I don't think I will.
quiting Porn got me my 1st GF.
porn is evil, just straight up evil.
That's like asking how is it legal for stores to ask for ID when they sell alcohol or tobacco.
First, you do not have a constitutionally protected right to access a website. Second, the website is not banned, they're just required to age verify visitors, and they chose to ban the state rather than do so because they know a significant portion of their userbase is children.
>states will require an id for porn but refuse to implement an id requirement for voting
Actually, the states that require ID for one are typically states that require ID for the other.
PORN
IS
BAD
FOR
YOU.
Porn literally KILLS your motivation and drive. Your brain has subconscious mechanisms which evolved all around finding a partner and reproducing. By using porn you are completely undermining those psychological systems which, unfortunately, include your social drive and motivation to achieve things in life.
STOP
USING
PORN.
>M-m-muh f-free speech
>M-muh artistic expression
Don't care. Sure, that's a problem. But (You) NEED to stop using it. Use whatever excuse you can find to get your addiction under control because it is literally KILLING you slowly.
>videos of people having sex are why i'm a loser that does nothing with his life
absolute state
Pretending it doesn't cause problems for a lot of people is just cope. It's not healthy.
consider having self control for once in your life
People have shown again and again that they don't have self-control. Banning is the only answer at this point, it's for your own good.
>pls save me from myself daddy government uwu
yeah nah, weaklings belong out of the gene pool
Looks like you're already out of the gene pool, you porn addict coombrain.
projecting, last word btw
deflecting, first word btw
yes, ban sex and cover the women
texas is a muslim state
that's the muslim way
>reddit spacing
do
you
like
my
spacing?
go be muslim somewhere else
go be a coombrain somewhere else, you don't belong on here.
>political tourist thinks coomers are the ones out of place
every time
Reddit is superior to this shithole full of brainwashed gun crazed texan muslims
also, you being all jelly about of superior website is fricking funny
seethe more, stupid coomer
>Reddit is superior to IQfy
Frick off back there. Immediately.
1. no,
2. i do what whatever i want
3. you are fricking moronic
also, check out my awesome spacing
also, go frick yourself
Can we start banning people for spelling and punctuation?
Poor spelling and punctuation leads to female violence psychological. It's too much anarchy. It's too much freedom.
>reddit spacing
go to bed puritan
>reddit spacing
south park's thanksgiving stream.
>People have shown again and again that they don't have self-control.
Indeed, public administrators, ngos and foreign state agents (that may or may not be Israeli israelites) have no regard to respecting liberty and are psychopathic with their administrative policy pushing, purely for money reasons most of the time. It's their best interest to restrict everything that you do. You are just the object or scapegoat for their own personal wealth.
You know, the very thing these sorts complain about us doing.
Total fricking hypocrites.
At the end of the day, it's purely subjective legislation to someone's pockets and that's it. There is no objective motivation, the objective is merely a facade these sorts use to make more money and more laws. The law is just leverage to them. Power. Money.
Any law they make is just there to enslave people more and make them more money.
Pornography is what's enslaving people, look how low our fricking birth rates are.
The government is actually doing it's job for the people by banning dangerous shit just like this.
>hurr durr, your not allowed to murder? wheres my freedumm!!!
>Pornography is what's enslaving people
>therefore I need to literally control what you see and do
>to prevent your slavery
you're so close to getting it!
I think perpetual agitation and chaos is the only method of freeing people.
Unless you want to be free of perpetual agitation and chaos.
It's all subjective bullshit ayy.
Frick hives.
Frick societies.
Ted did nothing wrong and died for your sins.
that's called censorship, same thing is happening in israel/russia wars
wait til you learn about addiction
When's this website getting banned for being a porn website then?
I don't actually support banning but if it helps you give up your masturbation/porn addiction then I can see it's benefits. IQfy would likely split again (IQfy/IQfy) & be forced to check ID or us a "I'm over 18" button.
use*
I hope you get help with your puritan addiction. It's not healthy obsessing over what other people are doing in their free time that hurts you in no way whatsoever.
Frick off, porn and drugs are just symptoms of a failing debt system that is now being leveraged by foreign states to genocide massed.
Porn and drugs are just symptoms.
That's why they crack down AI porn but then largely leave "certified pornography" that is biased and controlled. The goal isn't to end porn. The goal is to merely use porn to leverage political bullshit.
Which is why porn is now being manipulated in most states through laws.
Texas is just an anomaly really. An absurd one that will likely get people into trouble just for engaging in sexual actions on camera within people's own homes.
Cameras which, btw, are everywhere in homes nowadays and are constantly active on most devices.
Have a phone in your bathroom?
Potential breaking of the law.
Naked in front of your computer while your hair dries?
Potential breaking of the law.
Texas is dumb.
But most other states are cracking down on the types of porn rather than porn in general. It's about human behaviour control and, subversively, population control. They don't want you spreading disease and making babies when they want motivations for in-taking immigrants that aren't white and agitated by israelites.
>oh wait they are also pissed off by israelites now
>well I guess just control the actions of ALL races to stop this nonsense!
This is why they never talk about race in this context regarding violence against women nowadays.
They only talk about race in the context of removing a specifically hated race from positions of influence, mainly those that could be driven to head administrative positions, positions of power and influence.
While ignoring the other obviously enfranchised races and their disproportion in the workplace.
Thats a lot of fricking words to just say you can't control your urges. Banning porn is always a good thing.
go be muslim somewhere else
>Porn and drugs are just symptoms.
Whatever your social, economic, or environmental conditions are, it is a choice to use porn. I am trying to tell you that it is bad for you and it doesn't matter if you blame society or the economy. Porn and masturbation are hurting you and you can chose to stop.
That doesn't mean porn industries exploiting their unconscionable conduct to get away with mind fricking actresses until they're literal slaves is a good thing either.
But then again, this is why they avoid cracking down on the real industry and not the AI industry. The AI industry doesn't reinforce the cartel culture, it escapes it and earns the cartel less money. And it doesn't involve real people.
So this cartel can't allow that. That's why they beeline specifically for AI and even hentai in many states.
And they use mere psychological effect as the reason, rather than talking about groups of people that literally dope up their prostitutes and actresses until they do their porn. It's not about stopping real exploitation. It's stopping the thing that is stopping the real exploitation. You know, these organisations that exploit literal women and the NGOs that are now leveraging this over the thing that could literally stop it.
Ain't that ironic?
Such laws are made by pure evil people pretending to be good.
you vill quit porn and you vill work harder for shekelstein!
>watching porn is antisemitic
porn was invented by ~~*them*~~, you moron
didn't know texas was a extremist muslim state
I think all laws and corporate entities and states should be resisted and eradicated perpetually.
Whenever a law is made or a corporate policy established, it just enslaves people more.
Btw you are a right winger if you believe this nowadays.
That's how insane the press and the current state of the system is.
It's now deluded into thinking this is a far right cause.
I'll say it once, I'll say it again. There is no right that isn't totalitarian. There is no left that isn't anarchy.
These two things are like water and oil and they cannot mix. If it is, then the person mixing it is a liar.
I like how laws are made nowadays to free foreign people and give them leverage while depriving citizens of their ability to do things.
The west is just dead. Completely broken and now is just being put into a cage now.
Western citizens are just slaves to foreigners.
easy, move out of your shithole country
Nah, just break the law. The state is dead now. It cannot be revived. It's clear now.
Following the law just gets you beaten and broke.
... is the goal here.
This is what this legislation being pushed nowadays is REALLY doing.
Frick accelerationists. They're just a cartel.
A israeli mafia and their agents/mercs. The US state is merely their prostitute.
I'm convinced violent rebellion is how the cartel now recruits people and the state is reinforcing that now.
So I guess stealth and remote programming is the only way now.
>trying to ban porn
All the good looking women who would make great wives and mothers are taken in high school and college the latest. Whatever remains is taken shortly after they enter the workforce. There exist very few good looking (7 and above) women that are single and have a good heart, are modest, raised in a decent family, soft spoken and pretty. The window of opportunity when they are single is very very narrow. These are the 2% of women, the highest stock of females this wonderful creation can offer. If you don't frequent their circles or the events they attend you have no chance of meeting them. Women also don't go anywhere alone, so whatever hobbies women have or events they attend it is done with their husband or boyfriend and if they are single with their groups of friends.
Boomers and gen-x are throwing money at young pussy like never before, we are talking boat trips, exotic trips, paying their rent and bills, buying them gifts, trips to beauty salons, etc. Many of them have net worths in the millions. Just look at all those modelling agencies and realize how many pretty girls are being baited to frick the rich and upper class.
Then there are chad millennials and chad zoomers who get their first pick at all the young pussy.
Then at the end of the line there is you anon, the average nobody with no money, no charisma, no looks, no social circle, no experiences and no toys.
tldr; there simply aren't enough single good looking young white women to go around for everybody, they are rare and exist mostly in very niche places where men without social circles (loners) can't get in to
this is the most incel shit i've ever read
saving it to share later. thanks poor coomer!
>where men without social circles (loners)
You mean poor people that are literally being gatekept out of the job supply and any leveraged financial position.
They're not loners, just losers.
Because losers are just people with no money and no ability to be exploited by people with money. (Power and influence will soon be nulled without money. This is why they hate IQfy the most. It's not containable. Uncontrollable and therefore not exploitable by those sorts of people and their psychopathic control groups.)
That makes them dangerous.
That means capitalism is directly responsible for this shit now, has become mere racketeering and free speech is literally an impediment to their monopoly of power.
But hang on, many of these industry rackets made porn a thing to begin with. It sold things for them. Made them more money.
hmmm. The dog is chasing it's tail?
Regardless, these laws only affect the poor to make the rich richer. That is all.
I refuse to contribute to the israelite world order. Just talked to a guy who started the process of doing Uber and Bolt. All the paperwork cost him like $2000 dollars but the time invested to get all the papers is worse. So much bureaucracy it's unreal. I will not be going through all that bullshit sorry.
I have checked out of society over 10 years ago. Nothing has changed since then, instead things have gotten worse, more competition, more bullshit requirements, more paperwork, more bullshit something else.
Don't be negative man. When last did you get out the house? or your town? or even your country?
You talk about events, There are other places to meet woman.
Yeah the girls in porn are hot, some of them but look at the guys they are with, many 4 out of 10 and don't workout, workout and work on your appearance.
There is more enough man, Just go and see the world.
good luck.
>send trillions to israel
>send trillions to ukraine
>trillions of dollars of debt to china
>zionist occupied government from top to bottom
>taxes on taxes on taxes
>
>NOT DUH HECKIN PORNO!!!!!!!!!!
Literally invading gaza right as they push this porn shit the most. They want to use the porn/female violence shit to shepherd the anti-israeli shit away from violent active types that could actually upset their lobbying. They've been doing this for 70 years.
we have to move all texans to gaza where religious biggotry and guns are the main thing.
im sure they're gonna feel right at home
Take your meds
see
Jews are literally relevant to this anti-porn anti-ai shit now. They and the gaza shit are 100% the reason for this shit.
>in the pic, doxxing means talking about their actions at all, i.e. journalism
>it's legislation to stop journalism, because this is what anti-dox laws are
This was in the context of porn censorship and violence against women bullshit too. This tiny nugget was the literal bottom of the article because clearly the journo is now concerned about the cartel's actions.
An apartheid regime established on the basis of establishing equality is truly ironic.
praise russia and whatever the reason is interpol/USA is not simply blocking domains breaking their own laws
what a bastion of freedom
So... the thread about Rossman on literal telecommunication racketeering and corruption was deleted by mods, while this one is still up?
here
huh?
Its not and i wont be surprised when a prominent elite gets his data and ID leaked from a data breach, we will never EVER see this law again thank god.
The best part is it doesn't even affect the other 1000s porno websites because my government is ran by incompetent old men who can barely pull out of the minor they rape, let alone pull out of a bi-partisan bill that helps no one but government surveillance.
No amount of "bans" can stop shitty parenting.
YOU should be watching your kids, not the government.
>YOU should be watching your kids, not the government.
Well I kinda think kids should be free to their own accord too.
Otherwise they get complacent and raped.
I decided to look into the guy who sign the bill, Attorney General Ken Paxton, and well
>https://www.kut.org/politics/2024-03-26/texas-attorney-general-ken-paxton-cuts-deal-to-have-fraud-charges-dropped-trial-canceled
>The terms of the deal were announced on Tuesday morning during a court hearing in Houston. Paxton must complete 100 hours of community service, take 15 hours of legal ethics courses and pay around $270,000 in restitution to his accusers.
>"It was a case on Day One we knew they couldn't prove, and on year nine we still knew they couldn't prove. Ken's not guilty," Paxton's lawyer, Dan Cogdell, said.
>"""not""" guilty for financial fraud
>you go to jail forever for simply poorly filing your taxes
The government is not your friend. Who does this anti-porn bill actually help? I can still access objectively WORSE websites, with little effort.
If places like rule34 and e621 are ruled out because they are ARTISTIC and not specifically porn, well it would explain why they barely panicked.
>Its not and i wont be surprised when a prominent elite gets his data and ID leaked from a data breach, we will never EVER see this law again thank god.
It won't. The Texas bill very specifically prohibits companies from holding any personal data used to ID you, whether it's the company that's age gated or a 3rd party verified. The only way data would get leaked is if the companies break the letter of the law
(2) comply with a commercial age verification system that verifies age using:
(A) government-issued identification; or
(B) a commercially reasonable method that relies on public or private transactional data to verify the age of an individual.
It literally does not.
>The only way data would get leaked is if the companies break the letter of the law
Because companies are known to follow the law. :^)
Yes, it literally does
Sec. 129B.002. PUBLICATION OF MATERIAL HARMFUL TO MINORS.
(a) A commercial entity that knowingly and intentionally publishes or distributes material on an Internet website, including a social media platform, more than one-third of which is sexual material harmful to minors, shall use reasonable age verification methods as described by Section 129B.003 to verify that an individual
(b) A commercial entity that performs the age verification required by Subsection (a) or a third party that performs the age verification required by Subsection (a) MAY NOT RETAIN ANY IDENTIFYING INFORMATION of the individual after access has been granted to the material.
I'm not surprised some coomer shitskin is lying on the internet though. No one can trust your kind because all you ever do is lie and scam people.
>he thinks this in any way stops them
>when every ISP just got sued for a measly 200 million for selling your RAW data to third parties
I am utterly baffled by your naivete.
Laws do not matter to corporations, only YOU, the peasant.
Regular porn should be accessible by everyone otherwise everyone will start using google or other search engine and inevitably end up on site with illegal porn.
Constitution doesn't guarantee a right where you can show your penis and vegana in front of kids.
>porn sites? bad!
>gore sites? OK!
we're living in the twilight zone...
Porn websites infect your computer with keystroke logging malware
This is the most normie and inaccurate thing McAfee could tell to sell more of his antiviruses.
This is example 99999 where you can see that extreme right is just as censorship happy as woke progressives. Government cannot police access to information. It doesn't matter if I want to say Black person or want to see some breasts. So much for 1st Amendment!
All extremists must be purged for a good society.
All pornographers should get the rope.
>Government cannot police access to information
It can and, if it needs to, it will.
>So much for 1st Amendment!
See
>government overreach
Only exists when Government tries to regulate something it physically can't.
>Only exists when Government tries to regulate something it physically can't.
Government overreach means the government is grabbing more power than it needs or should have.
You redefining the term doesn't persuade anyone.
>more power than it needs or should have
That's a fascinating concept. Who are you to say how much Power a Government should have? What Authority do you hold in that realm?
>redefining the term
And what Authority to you hold that one definition (which you happen to prefer) is more useful or practical in terms of political reality than another (which you happen not to prefer)?
>to you
*do
>Anti-BDS laws require you to sign pledge of loyalty to Israel and suck at least 5 circumcised wieners per day or else you're excluded from receiving government aid - great!
>Police force literally trained by ADL and Mossad to murder wrong-thinkers - love it!
>prevented from accessing israeli interracial troony porn sites - NOW THIS IS THE LAST STRAW, I WON'T TAKE THIS ANYMORE
Texans need to be culled tbqh
I wonder what would've happened to terry if the israelites hadn't mutilated his wiener
Get a VPN, gooner
I frick on the constitution.
i haven't been able to access xhamster since the virginia law went into effect
i don't even live in virginia
i don't even live in the usa
just getting routed through virginia is enough
thanks america
The stars at night are big and bright (clap, clap, clap, clap) Deep in the heart of Texas!
The prairie sky is wide and high (clap, clap, clap, clap) deep in the heart of Texas!
The sage in bloom is like perfume (clap, clap, clap, clap) deep in the heart of Texas!
Reminds me of the one I love (clap, clap, clap, clap) deep in the heart of Texas!
The coyotes wail along the trail (clap, clap, clap, clap) deep in the heart of Texas!
The rabbits rush around the brush (clap, clap, clap, clap) deep in the heart of Texas!
The cowboys cry ki yippee yi (clap, clap, clap, clap) deep in the heart of Texas!
The dawgies bawl and bawl and bawl (clap, clap, clap, clap) deep in the heart of Texas!
?si=ITA3CzQ_rLdgKyEi
>(clap, clap, clap, clap)
>mfw when americans
Ironic
Why don't you find a nice (obese) woman (who only had 289 prior ducks inside her) to settle down with? Anons these days....
porn has never counted as free speech anon. Its always been separate and banable.
Based frick coomers and frick morons that can't subvert blockers.
>how is this constitutionally legal?
The American Constitution bans many common-sense Government actions, such as ensuring that the Government has a monopoly on force.
I wonder. Do female pornstars get married? Are there men out there who are completely fine with the fact that their wife has been fricked by dozens of men and engaged in tons of all sorts of naughty activities on film? Are they unphased when someone says "Oh hey, I know your wife! I saw her getting gangbanged and they cummed all over all her"
I'm very libertarian on the subject, you should be allowed to do whatever you want to do with your life. However, I always worry about your well-being when you make life choices that I couldn't choose. I worry that females who would become pornstars should be getting married instead, that they'd be happier that way, and I think becoming a pornstar narrows the pool of men who would marry her.
>rightoids cry about "muh librul censorship" for ages
>rightoids also try to ban websites they don't like when they have political power
lol
>look I just want to distribute pornography to children and maybe if I say this you'll let me
>muh children
Gonna go burn some harry potter books?
ESL
HAHAHA GOTTEM UOL
good morning sar
>muh sports-team politics
This is just what a Government leaving adolescence looks like.
>texas becomes the final bastion of western civilization
inconceivably based
America has no freedom of speech
its just noise for them to talk about constantly but isn't actually enforced
just look at the protesting on campuses against Isr*el, they've called in the fricking national guard over some 18 year olds in tents
that is suddenly "antisemitism" which even if it were true is apparently illegal in America but waving a swastika, praising Hitler openly, or being racist towards dark skins is A ok
Its such a bizzaro and backward country
>America has no freedom of speech
No country does. No functioning one, anyway...
In China and Iran you can talk pretty openly about anything except the government
Sweden is very free, probably the closest you can get in the modern world. They don't tend to shy away on many topics. They even allow Nazism on freedom of speech grounds which is usually the one thing not allowed in European countries.
>in these places you can talk about anything not important
Cool, same as America.
>Cool, same as America.
don't think so mate
Jews and Israel are sacred cows which you do not dare criticize
anti capitalism and anything that isn't excessive consumption is also generally frowned upon
The Trans debate is still toxic and hijacked by radicals in America where in Europe it has become more acceptable to talk about how its maybe not a good and sane thing
Congress are trying to ban tiktok under the pretense "China" but the reality is that a lot of controversial topics in America have surfaced on tiktok and it makes the leadership very uncomfortable
Its no different from China banning Whatsapp, twitter, Facebook etc but when China does it, America sneers like they are better when really they are the same.
Israel is undeniably related to the government.
So by your own admission, China would censor the same speech.
>Israel and China share the same government
wot m8
If Israel had as much power in China as they do in America, China would censor criticism of them, since criticizing Israel is ultimately criticizing the government that supports them.
>when China does it, America sneers like they are better when really they are the same
yes, they're both Governments. One just likes to pretend otherwise for nearly a quarter of a millennium before getting called "tyrannical" over trivial things like defending its border or stopping sedition.
>Sweden is very free
I can tell. It's why a lot of people are criticizing it, though not usually in those terms.
xhamster is shit use eporner instead
realistically speaking paid pornography should be considered equivalent to prostitution and thus be illegal. Of course we live in Satanic times, so unpaid pornography is now anathema (outside of hentai) and the only legal porn is the paid prostitution.
they just deleted the other thread but to the anon that asked to share my shit
would be very hard to do and I am not talking porn here, what I learnt tho is that transcoding video is just a fricking waste of time and cpu, if you want to save space you are better off reducing photosets quality, can always play with with imagemagick (wrote some scripts for that) and you can get to the point of saving 70% space on those with no visible difference (after all you will be busy jacking off and not looking for minimal artifacts), also just store the shit as you get it, I wanted to come up with some organization system and just gave up, you are probably better off with something simple as folders with video-category or photosets-category or site-caterogy , and putting the actress name on the file names + the scene name, I use linux and I dont know if its the file manager that I use or what but running a simple text search accross 4 TB drives with thousands of pics and videos is easier that remembering and manually looking for files in a folder structure or using any media manager solution. I also wrote some stuff in jenkins to run youtube-dl on demand on some fetish content channels, anyways don't obsess over it too much, store your shit, jackoff be done with it and get to do something else, also always encrypt so you dont end up like
, if you obsess over this shit, you will end up realizing you have wasted more time looking for the porn and trying to organize it rather than actually jacking off and on the other hand there is only so much material that you will never be able to get everything, same as if you wanted to read all the existing books or know everything about anything, its just fricking pointless