How much of his ideas were original? People keep telling me he took a lot of his work from Ellul. I'm writing a paper on him, so I wanna know of this is true.
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
How much of his ideas were original? People keep telling me he took a lot of his work from Ellul.
Read ellul to find out
I don't have time to
He only has one book you need to read. “The art of reading is skipping judiciously.” Read the first few chapters and determine which parts are important and skim them. You can learn far more in 2 hours of reading it than from IQfy
If you read the technological society and you're in a hurry you can get away with just reading the first two chapters, I don't think anything in the manifesto references anything beyond that
watered down Ellul, which is severely watered down Junger.
Suffer zoomie, you did have time.
aint no original ideas in the world homie
Based
I think a lot of his ideas were original, a lot weren't. His manifesto is the best summary of it all though.
I have some
But I'm not sharing 🙂
You could have had quads... that's what you deserve >:(
None of his ideas were original. Ted Kaczynski is a poor, misanthropic ill man with an unhappy life of lonely mathematical genius and trouble to find meaning in life, kind of like William Siddis. Except Siddis didn't turn out to be a murdering psychopath without respect for human life (maybe).
He did not produce original philosophical thought because he's intellectually incapable, because emotionally he's just a reactionary hack. His morality is part of the master-slave morality. He's a reactionary Luddite who doesn't understand that technological progress can never be stopped just as entropy cannot. Ultimately that's what Ted fears the most—entropy
>He's a reactionary Luddite who doesn't understand that technological progress can never be stopped just as entropy cannot.
Already figured from rest of this post that you're a troony but this past was just another level. Troonometer off the charts
The only people left who can believe in the teleology of progress are trannies, homosexuals, and zoomer tweens on megadoses of SSRIs.
>2 yo transgender
That's just child abuse. My fricking toddler identifies as a tip truck raptor ffs.
you guys understand that Ted was transgender, right? and that the most turning event in his life was when he tried to talk to a psychiatrist about changing his gender...
i love how conservatives always ignore this
Yeah, sure. Just like that one wistleblower which after getting sentanced to life in prison suddenly became transgender as a additional hummiliation exercise through MKULtra tactics.
Even if he sufefred from body dismorphia, he didn't start to jack off to being a woman but realised that this is an useless exercise and worked on oveercoming his mental illness.
Imagine trying to shittalk him or build up trannies with Ted of all people. Pure copium.
homies out here still believing in progression of time and history.
>technological progress can never be stopped
Why not?
Technological progress entails technological power and it is in the nature of power to trample weakness and persist in its growth.
Have not seen a post this bad for a few months at least
not an argument
Neither is the meaningless word salad of
Military/CIA actor.
Words found within the name.
If he was so smart why couldn't he predict that demonizing himself would make people discredit his work
I got you covered senpai
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13569317.2021.1921940
And yes you should read Ellul because he articulates his ideas much more thoroughly than Ted who relies on intuition way too much, basically if you're not some middle aged socially awkward woman hater the manifesto won't click with you, thankfully you're on IQfy
It is not that he took from ellul but that he misunderstood him, mainly based on a mistranslation of his 'système technicien' as technological society.
flawed from the start.mpmj0a
Genuinely what the frick was his problem? Why didn't he just join the Amish instead of trying to spark a worldwide revolt against technology?
He wanted to have a blast
He was an MK Ultra test subject
No one would've given a shit about his writings and ideas if he just went and joined the Amish. Also he was probably too socially maladjusted to join a community like the Amish.
Anarchism is a one of the hundred -isms made up by the bourgeois revolutionaries to saturate the political field in an attempt to make the plebeians stop thinking that kings were a thing. Atheists rewrite history this way.
With its moronic humanistically wishful-thinking non-aggression principle (NAP), Anarchism is literally the atheist fantasy of ''humanism of the bourgeois, without the legal republic of the bourgeois'' so it remains 100% controlled by bourgeois intellectuals. ie ''humanism is awesome''. And of course it can't be done in real life. It's literally a power fantasy for impotent beta cuck atheists. This is why it appeals to bugmen like troony-lover Ted Kazincky and veganally herd-follower Ayn Rand. Before atheists, anarchism never fricking existed and nobody ever though about this crappy religion (or ideology like atheists say, about their own religions).
Just came in looking forward to reading it
What edition is that?
Graphyco
>How much of his ideas were original?
None of it was original.
For extra street cred write him a letter and include his response in your essay.
yes