How will they enforce this ? Isn’t this just a precedent they need to legitimize the use of digital IDs
https://x.com/knowingbetteryt/status/1772335922991812726
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
>productivity will skyrocket
>florida
ahahahahahaha
>they need to legitimize the use of digital IDs
>digital IDs
You are getting warmer.
A child is the responsibility of the parent. It's an inalienable responsibility. The government intervention just make things worse in many way.
This actually puts the responsibility into the hands of the parents. The parents need to approve of their child use of social media.
The parents will have to give up their own privacy and give data directly to the government. This is just to cover the asses of pedo CEOs and other high level business people who always seem to get caught being sleazy around kids.
They already do, via taxes, social security, id, all the legal paper trails, etc
if you think the government doesnt know who you are, then you're delusional
>they already have some of your data, let them collect some more!
cringe
>they have some
They know all the personal data on you lmao. What sort of "privacy" is lost by confirming you're a parent to a child? Thats nonsense. The gov knows who you are, that you have a child or not, that you're married or not, that you live at xyz place or not, that you own abc credit card, that you do x job, with x education that you're of x age, etc.
There's literally no privacy issue.
Stop making too much sense anon. He can't understand you.
Where does this information get stored? Who protects it from malicious third parties?
The same place that stores your name, your phone number, your ip address, your computer digital id, your email, your password, your photos, your videos, etc. Same exact servers as the current system in place.
lmao, what sort of nonsense are you trying to throw around
>moron thinks you actually store plaintext passwords
typical for IQfy
And if that place gets hacked or raided, that means that all that information is now in the hands of an unknown and most likely hostile party, which you wouldn't have had to worry about had a more libertarian approach been taken.
They already have all your information before and if nothing changes and they get hacked, your information is lost like that aswell.
No magic involved. Its same exact hing
Then all that information gets put up on the web for everyone to see for free. If it's encrypted they'll hold on and decrypt it when they eventually can. God knows how many companies have your information too considering it's constantly being sold here and there.
>when they eventually can
Ahahahaha.
They always did need parents approval
>kids should get access to online grooming because their parents should watch their every TCP connection
No troony, you lost. And you will keep losing.
Let me guess. This will not be enforced by fining the frick out of negligent parents who abandon their children in front of a computer, they'll simply ask everyone to use their real name if they want to use a social network. And so, the millionth think-of-the-children law will just mean more control over the average citizen, more state surveillance, less privacy, and it'll have zero effect on protecting the children, just like literally every single similar law that preceded it.
you can't. iirc there are minimum age limits on facebook accounts that kids get around.
>iirc there are minimum age limits on facebook accounts that kids get around.
Most social media sites already "require" you to be 13 to make an account, and yes, kids just lie about their age and make one anyway.
my opsec has permanently been ruined because i made a facebook account when i was 11 and used my real name
What operations are you carrying out?
The Great Nuggie Caper of the early 21st century.
>still using facebook
Meanwhile the forum I used to shitpost on as a teen recently went defunct. Millennials just can't stop winning.
>itt mad chuds
sorry homosexuals but the internet is a mistake and social media is the females domain which is why feminism is more rampant now than when 10 years ago.
>legitimize the use of digital IDs
We'll get there whether you think it's sufficiently "legitimized" or not.
Everytime they try to pass one of these 'ban otherwise non-pornographic websites for kids' bills, they instantly get shit on in the courts.
The problem is self-correcting - social media makes people feel like shit and is full of nonsense. People are already beginning to abandon it en masse, including kids. There's no need to bother with legislation to solve the problem.
Not a ban it just puts 1 extra step, requiring parents permission for underage kids.
Its not that hard because most kids live with their parents and can ask their mom/dad for permission within 10 seconds.
The courts have already routinely shot down even requiring the extra step. This is why stuff like banning kids from R-rated films or requiring id to buy M-rated games ends up just being a voluntary regulation rather than something that government imposes - because they (at least according to precedent) can't really do it without running afoul of the constitution.
Constitution guarantees social media accounts without parent approval?
Constitution guarantees that the government cannot encumber access to other people's speech, which social media unambiguously is.
>gov routinely shuts down access to torrent sites
>no one cries free speech
>under age children now have to ask their parents permission to use social media
>NOOOO FREE PEEECH
Copyright infringement is not protected speech. Some moronic 14 year-old opinions about gender roles (sadly) are.
>he dinks copyright is constitution
LMAO
It's in article 1, section 8, moron.
>torrent site shutdown falls under constitution
lmao
kids cannot consent to being raped by social media, nor can they consent to having sex with adults, or adults forcing castration ideology onto them.
Kids are under the legal supervision of the parents.
But they can consent to circumcision, right? I'm sure they also consent to being pushed into a church and being told that they will be tortured if they don't worship a magical israelite.
Where?
Im familiar with 'you cant censor me' free speech
How does 'you cant exclude me' not run afoul of basic securities or encryptions?
free speech has nothing to do with age requirements for using a commercial website. nothing stopping them from creating their own websites btw but i do tend to forget that americans are so dangerously low iq that even creating a basic html page that displays a picture would take you obese failures 10 years to create and $100k spent on hosting.
No way to determine actual adults vs kids posing as adults.
Social media sites simply block everyone from Florida.
It is as if the state and the people in it does not exist.
Honestly, I say go for it.
>righties are all about neoliberalism and freedom
>except when we say so noooo you can’t do this
literal horseshoe
>still uses left/right to describe the "two" "sides"
>productivity will go up because one of the population groups that doesn't work won't have access to social media
Where do stupid ideas like this even come from?
The same demo that thinks bringing child labor back is a good idea and not just a way to make everything shittier.
If the EU did this it would be based but because it's Florida it is lol (they can't enforce, regulate or implement anything)
who cares? my irc servers and imageboards wont have digital id requirements.
>social media are bad! banning them will increase productivity and decrease anxiety and depression!
>t. someone who spends literally all of their time managing a moronic social media account
these people have no self-awareness
There's no ban.
>Set DOB
>Sorry you must be x age to use
>User is clearly under that age
>Ban
It works so well for this site!
This site isn't a site for posting videos of yourself dipshit. If people get around it then that's just the same as porn.
>How will they enforce this ?
Probably the same way Steam enforces age requirements to view mature content, you fill in your date of birth, it does the math, and if you're over that age, you can view the page.
>how do they know it's your real date of birth
They don't.
In other words why isnt every citizen suing Joe Biden because they dont have access to his communications 24/7?
14yr old Floridians should be wrestling gators like their grandpappy
They dont sue Biden because its not a guarantee of free speech that everyone gets to hear everything.
None of thus will happen because they'll still use YouTube/TikTok.
don't worry, their teachers will make sure they get adequately pozzed, plus there's always tiktok
they will browse IQfy
I dont see the benefit to banning <14y olds who are the most controlled by their parents.
the people in high school and beyond are the ones that would need to be guided towards non-digital screen related thing if you wanted to socially engineer more productive individuals
on one hand, troony grooming will have less targets
on the other, privacy getting fricked up more and also they will groom teenagers anyway.
people instead should be educated more againsthharmful things, and parents should actually raise their kids properly.
>"small government" gays implementing big government as so as they are the government
im so fricking surprised