>Can't divorce her. >Has to provide for her.
Imagined if you are married, but your father-in-law keeps your wife away, but you have to pay for all of her bills anyway.
You didn’t answer the question. If your daughter is raped, will you press charges? Or will you let him marry her?
2 months ago
Anonymous
>You didn’t answer the question.
I did. >If your daughter is raped, will you press charges?
He has to marry my daughter, and he has to sent her $5,000 every month. If he can't, then he goes to prison until he settle his debt.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>$5,000 every month
where did you get that number? That’s twice the average salary
>your father-in-law keeps your wife away
That's not biblical. Your daughter would live with her rapist and have to frick him and give him kids.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Where is that from? What verse?
2 months ago
Anonymous
This is what the verse actually says. It’s not really clear what this means, but at least it is true that if the girl has sex with another man, that would be adultery (and she would deserve the death penalty). So either she never has sex again and doesn’t marry another man, or she fricks her rapist and starts a family with him for the rest of her life.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Where is verse that say that she has to live with him?
2 months ago
Anonymous
I don’t know, I’m not him. But what do you think it means that he must marry her? Do you think this means he can go frick off? Or that she doesn’t have to live with him? But even then, they’re still “married,” so they can never get married to someone else. That would be adultery
2 months ago
Anonymous
That is why I said,
>Rapes a women. >Now you have to has pay her welfare checks for the rest of her life.
2 months ago
Anonymous
You made up a fanfic where the wife doesn't live with her husband and doesn't have sex with him without any textual grounding at all, simply because a plain reading of the text makes you uncomfortable.
You're just another coper.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Where is the verse that say that she has to live with him?
2 months ago
Anonymous
That's how biblical marriages work. The woman lives with a husband, fricks him and gives him children.
Why do you think that this is an exception? Do you have any textual evidence?
2 months ago
Anonymous
2 months ago
Anonymous
Fun fact, in the original Hebrew and early Greek translation, it says "female child who is a virgin", not just "virgin".
2 months ago
Anonymous
Yeah it says nothing about age lol. So Christians are obligated to hand over their 8 year old daughters in marriage to any dark-skinned immigrant that rapes them. Truly a religion for cucks
2 months ago
Anonymous
Where is the verse buddy?
2 months ago
Anonymous
See
https://i.imgur.com/1TYqYoZ.jpg
This is what the verse actually says. It’s not really clear what this means, but at least it is true that if the girl has sex with another man, that would be adultery (and she would deserve the death penalty). So either she never has sex again and doesn’t marry another man, or she fricks her rapist and starts a family with him for the rest of her life.
2 months ago
Anonymous
https://i.imgur.com/RxYADr0.gif
That's how biblical marriages work. The woman lives with a husband, fricks him and gives him children.
Why do you think that this is an exception? Do you have any textual evidence?
Where is the verse that says that the wife have to live with her rapists?
>That's how biblical marriages work. The woman lives with a husband, fricks him and gives him children. Why do you think that this is an exception? Do you have any textual evidence?
I'm asking you.
2 months ago
Anonymous
how about the part where it says that the man shall rule over the woman? And be the head of the household? What the frick do you think it means when it says he shall marry her?
2 months ago
Anonymous
>man shall rule over the woman?
Just like a King or a father who rules over his country or family.
>And be the head of the household?
Give me a verse buddy.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Where is the verse that says that the wife have to live with her rapists?
Where's the line saying she doesn't? Marriage implies two people living together.
2 months ago
Anonymous
He spoiled her value, so he has to compensate her family for what he did. Makes complete sense.
What if he had to pay for her upkeep but she didn't have to live with him and continue getting raped by him and was free to marry someone else (obviously being raped would hurt her prospects, but it wouldn't be impossible)?
This is the correct answer, but since the modern religion (liberalism) says rape is the biggest sin, worse than murder, it is unthinkable. This comandment, which exist for the israelites by the way, is a way of paying reparations to the victim and her family.
These acient laws don't apply to christians, they are for israelites only and they barely live by them anyways. You're also judging a culture from a different time. The Bible was inspired by God but you can still see how it's a reflection of acient times. This is a remanent of the Bronze Age and acient laws like the Code of Hammurabi.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>not one jot or tittle shall pass away
why didn’t God give us an update?
2 months ago
Anonymous
>why didn’t God give us an update?
He did, read the New Testament.
2 months ago
Anonymous
ok where is the law concerning the rape of an unmarried virgin in the New Testament?
2 months ago
Anonymous
>ok where is the law concerning the rape of an unmarried virgin in the New Testament?
In no point because the old law was revoked and by Jesus Christ with His new covenant.
Luke 22:20: >20 In the same way, after the supper he took the cup, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you.
Acts 15:5-11: >5 Then some of the believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees stood up and said, “The Gentiles must be circumcised and required to keep the law of Moses.” >6 The apostles and elders met to consider this question. 7 After much discussion, Peter got up and addressed them: “Brothers, you know that some time ago God made a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe. 8 God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. 9 He did not discriminate between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith. 10 Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of Gentiles a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear? 11 No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are."
2 months ago
Anonymous
judgment would not be possible, grace would not be necessary, if it weren’t for the law. The law still exists, it’s just recognized that no one can follow it perfectly. There is no evidence that the law concerning the rape of an unmarried virgin has changed.
2 months ago
Anonymous
The new testament confirms the ol law.... but in other places says you don't need to follow it anymore; doesn't seem very clear
"Rape" here isn't necessarily implied to be forcible rape, in the original Hebrew it means having sex out of wedlock because in OT days marriage was mostly transactional.
>then show me ANY law about raping an unmarried virgin. It doesn’t exist.
It means precisely what it means. Marriage in the Middle East was and is mostly transactional so if you and a girl fug out of wedlock you were stuck with her because a virgin was un-marriageable.
now tell me why God’s absolute objective morality has changed and why you would be angry if your daughter were raped today
2 months ago
Anonymous
>now tell me why God’s absolute objective morality has changed and why you would be angry if your daughter were raped today
dude..people on this board don't have sex so how can anyone have a daughter?
>"Rape" here isn't necessarily implied to be forcible rape, in the original Hebrew it means having sex out of wedlock because in OT days marriage was mostly transactional.
Was basically everywhere until relatively recent times. The idea that women could frick 290 dudes before settling with a cucked beta provider didn't exist 500 years ago.
>"Rape" here isn't necessarily implied to be forcible rape
It certainly includes it. The part OP is referencing Deuteronomy 22:28-29. It uses the same phrasing to describe the sex as verse 25 ("seizes her and lies with her," NRSVUE), which is clearly rape. Contrast with verse 23 where the sex is presumed to be consensual because the woman wasn't heard screaming for help.
it is to prevent men from taking a girl's virginity and then leaving her. you bond with her through sex, you marry her. >b-b-but
nope, too bad.
it was for policing your own males, not the males of a foreign tribe, furthermore there was always the death penalty for it.
It is objectively a better system than what we have now. You want sex so bad? Get married, otherwise, we get to kill you and take your shit lmao.
In a society where honor is important, unlike in the matriarchal West, a raped girl is viewed as a worthless damaged goods & unmarriageable, she can at best become a concubine so barely a above a slave.
The only way for such a girl to recover her dignity and have a decent life is to marry the one who took her virginity because quite frankly nobody would lower himself to marry someone else's sloppy second.
Sounds like a you problem for not taking good care of your daughter
Finders keepers after all
You obviously don’t have a daughter, let alone a girlfriend
Neither do you.
Daily reminder:
you would tell your daughter to marry her rapist? Even a dark-skinned male?
>Can't divorce her.
>Has to provide for her.
Imagined if you are married, but your father-in-law keeps your wife away, but you have to pay for all of her bills anyway.
You didn’t answer the question. If your daughter is raped, will you press charges? Or will you let him marry her?
>You didn’t answer the question.
I did.
>If your daughter is raped, will you press charges?
He has to marry my daughter, and he has to sent her $5,000 every month. If he can't, then he goes to prison until he settle his debt.
>$5,000 every month
where did you get that number? That’s twice the average salary
>your father-in-law keeps your wife away
That's not biblical. Your daughter would live with her rapist and have to frick him and give him kids.
Where is that from? What verse?
This is what the verse actually says. It’s not really clear what this means, but at least it is true that if the girl has sex with another man, that would be adultery (and she would deserve the death penalty). So either she never has sex again and doesn’t marry another man, or she fricks her rapist and starts a family with him for the rest of her life.
Where is verse that say that she has to live with him?
I don’t know, I’m not him. But what do you think it means that he must marry her? Do you think this means he can go frick off? Or that she doesn’t have to live with him? But even then, they’re still “married,” so they can never get married to someone else. That would be adultery
That is why I said,
You made up a fanfic where the wife doesn't live with her husband and doesn't have sex with him without any textual grounding at all, simply because a plain reading of the text makes you uncomfortable.
You're just another coper.
Where is the verse that say that she has to live with him?
That's how biblical marriages work. The woman lives with a husband, fricks him and gives him children.
Why do you think that this is an exception? Do you have any textual evidence?
Fun fact, in the original Hebrew and early Greek translation, it says "female child who is a virgin", not just "virgin".
Yeah it says nothing about age lol. So Christians are obligated to hand over their 8 year old daughters in marriage to any dark-skinned immigrant that rapes them. Truly a religion for cucks
Where is the verse buddy?
See
Where is the verse that says that the wife have to live with her rapists?
>That's how biblical marriages work. The woman lives with a husband, fricks him and gives him children. Why do you think that this is an exception? Do you have any textual evidence?
I'm asking you.
how about the part where it says that the man shall rule over the woman? And be the head of the household? What the frick do you think it means when it says he shall marry her?
>man shall rule over the woman?
Just like a King or a father who rules over his country or family.
>And be the head of the household?
Give me a verse buddy.
>Where is the verse that says that the wife have to live with her rapists?
Where's the line saying she doesn't? Marriage implies two people living together.
He spoiled her value, so he has to compensate her family for what he did. Makes complete sense.
>Rapes a women.
>Now you have to has pay her welfare checks for the rest of her life.
What if he had to pay for her upkeep but she didn't have to live with him and continue getting raped by him and was free to marry someone else (obviously being raped would hurt her prospects, but it wouldn't be impossible)?
rape is based
you have to be 18 to post here
What it's saying is you break it you buy it. So don't frick a girl you don't want to spend the rest of your life with.
This is the correct answer, but since the modern religion (liberalism) says rape is the biggest sin, worse than murder, it is unthinkable. This comandment, which exist for the israelites by the way, is a way of paying reparations to the victim and her family.
Rape is unironically bad, yes. I don’t want my daughter to be forced to give birth to low IQ shitskin babies. Only cucks would think like this.
These acient laws don't apply to christians, they are for israelites only and they barely live by them anyways. You're also judging a culture from a different time. The Bible was inspired by God but you can still see how it's a reflection of acient times. This is a remanent of the Bronze Age and acient laws like the Code of Hammurabi.
>not one jot or tittle shall pass away
why didn’t God give us an update?
>why didn’t God give us an update?
He did, read the New Testament.
ok where is the law concerning the rape of an unmarried virgin in the New Testament?
>ok where is the law concerning the rape of an unmarried virgin in the New Testament?
In no point because the old law was revoked and by Jesus Christ with His new covenant.
Luke 22:20:
>20 In the same way, after the supper he took the cup, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you.
Acts 15:5-11:
>5 Then some of the believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees stood up and said, “The Gentiles must be circumcised and required to keep the law of Moses.”
>6 The apostles and elders met to consider this question. 7 After much discussion, Peter got up and addressed them: “Brothers, you know that some time ago God made a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe. 8 God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. 9 He did not discriminate between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith. 10 Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of Gentiles a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear? 11 No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are."
judgment would not be possible, grace would not be necessary, if it weren’t for the law. The law still exists, it’s just recognized that no one can follow it perfectly. There is no evidence that the law concerning the rape of an unmarried virgin has changed.
The new testament confirms the ol law.... but in other places says you don't need to follow it anymore; doesn't seem very clear
but what if its exactly what the guy wants?
"Rape" here isn't necessarily implied to be forcible rape, in the original Hebrew it means having sex out of wedlock because in OT days marriage was mostly transactional.
then show me ANY law about raping an unmarried virgin. It doesn’t exist. Now how did an omniscient god forget to include that law?
>then show me ANY law about raping an unmarried virgin. It doesn’t exist.
It means precisely what it means. Marriage in the Middle East was and is mostly transactional so if you and a girl fug out of wedlock you were stuck with her because a virgin was un-marriageable.
now tell me why God’s absolute objective morality has changed and why you would be angry if your daughter were raped today
>now tell me why God’s absolute objective morality has changed and why you would be angry if your daughter were raped today
dude..people on this board don't have sex so how can anyone have a daughter?
>"Rape" here isn't necessarily implied to be forcible rape, in the original Hebrew it means having sex out of wedlock because in OT days marriage was mostly transactional.
Was basically everywhere until relatively recent times. The idea that women could frick 290 dudes before settling with a cucked beta provider didn't exist 500 years ago.
>"Rape" here isn't necessarily implied to be forcible rape
It certainly includes it. The part OP is referencing Deuteronomy 22:28-29. It uses the same phrasing to describe the sex as verse 25 ("seizes her and lies with her," NRSVUE), which is clearly rape. Contrast with verse 23 where the sex is presumed to be consensual because the woman wasn't heard screaming for help.
This makes a lot of sense. I pray that OP will take this to heart, open his eyes, and accept Jesus Christ as his Lord and savior.
It's always funny watching christcucks thump their israelite book then go ACKCHYUALLY when you bring up what's in it.
It's a metaphor
It's based. Roasties don't deserve rights.
it is to prevent men from taking a girl's virginity and then leaving her. you bond with her through sex, you marry her.
>b-b-but
nope, too bad.
it was for policing your own males, not the males of a foreign tribe, furthermore there was always the death penalty for it.
It is objectively a better system than what we have now. You want sex so bad? Get married, otherwise, we get to kill you and take your shit lmao.
The actual translation to this is if two young people have sex outside of wedlock
that includes rape. There is no other verse that talks about rape
In a society where honor is important, unlike in the matriarchal West, a raped girl is viewed as a worthless damaged goods & unmarriageable, she can at best become a concubine so barely a above a slave.
The only way for such a girl to recover her dignity and have a decent life is to marry the one who took her virginity because quite frankly nobody would lower himself to marry someone else's sloppy second.