If you ain't Catholic/Orthodox why are you even a Christian? You're not doing it right. At all.

If you ain't Catholic/Orthodox why are you even a Christian? You're not doing it right. At all.

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Radiochan

    >catholicism
    >muh pope
    >priests have been raping for at least the past 100 years with the Church actively covering up their crimes
    >be orthodox
    >sort of the same thing, but even more corrupt

    • 2 months ago
      Cult of Passion

      That is because overcoming one's subconscious, instinctual, impulses, is a part of being an ascended, sovereign unto yourself (for a time). Also, I strongly suspect the Environment, namely Magnetic convergences, for certain promotions of ideas to include sex.

      To see other people be unable to resist temptations, sex, dugs, money, power, or even fake things, fake acolades or titles or importance...most usually stop early because 'that one thing' was the thing presented to them. A very self damning kind of thing.

      Even in ancient times its easy to fill your short life with cheap distractions, and Nature is kind here to not make it easy, the thing thats trying to make you fail is also trying to show how to succeed, but by inversion, not oversion.

      Related to Developmental Psychology and its ultimate roots, why sex and cults are almost ALWAYS tied to each other.

      ...I could post more but...yeah, Im high.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >well yes Apostolic tradition just means we make it up, how can you tell?

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I know right.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Catholic/Orthodox
    Nice try, Latinoid, but you're not one bit better than the Protestants. Your errors are of a different kind, but you're just as heretical.

  5. 2 months ago
    Cult of Passion

    Not enough "DEVIL!.....GIT GONE!"
    [seizures on the ground in tongues]

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Doesn't matter as protestants were right about most things in there doctrine. They were right about Sola scriptura, symbolic baptism, believer's baptism, aniconism, no veneration of saints, no intercession of saints, decentralized church polity, home churches and priesthood of the believer. But the big issue is that they were wrong about Sola fide.
    See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Perspective_on_Paul
    Also they should of based there ethics on the 1st century israeli roman interpretation of the bible not the medieval interpretation.
    In the 20th century we had more scholarship on how to do bible hermeneutics an could figure out the intended meaning of the texts. We got a lot of new manuscripts and learned about the literary devices the bible was written in. But also that Catholicism, Oriental Orthodoxy and Eastern Orthodoxy was wrong on most of it's special doctrines/interpretations because it takes a medieval interpretation to a 1st century israeli roman text. It utterly butchers the doctrine(basically making it a different religion).

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >sola scriptura
      >Jesus never says he's God
      >why yes we still believe in trinity and idolatry is fine why did you ask

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        never says he's God
        wrong
        >>why yes we still believe in trinity
        it's biblical
        >and idolatry is fine why did you ask
        no it isn't that's a serious point of conflict against caholicism

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >no it isn't that's a serious point of conflict against caholicism
          Orthos and protties also use crosses everywhere so they're no different

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I knew I shouldn't have indulged you.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >oh no don't tell me the TRUTH!! anything but that!

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Only atheists complain about megachurches. It's a completely moronic talking point from a christian pov.

    So the better question is why do terminally online atheists embrace catholicism and orthodoxy and the answer is they try to make upfor their lack of personality or veritable life skills with flashy imagery.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >doing it right

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Sola Scriptura, Sola Fide.
    I do not recognize Catholicism and Orthodoxy which are heretical, paganfilled perversions of Christianity.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      the only reason you have a bible is cause those groups scribes wrote it down for you

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Neither denomination did exist at the time and literally not a single biblical author believed anything close to either of them. Might as well say Peter was a Mormon and gave the keys to Joseph Smith. Completely ahistorical

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        actually israeli scholars translate the bible from hebrew

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          where did you get your new testament from? what manuscript or codex is your source? where did you get your list of books? (hint: it was written by catholic/orthodox hands).

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Every book in the bible is older than the Papacy.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Which specific manuscript/codex are you using as your source though? You keep ignoring the question troony. Also the papacy was founded in 33 AD. Your Jim Bob church was founded in 1990.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Nestle Aland for nt masoretic nor ot.
            No it wasn't.
            >The word pope derives from the Greek πάππας (páppas), meaning 'father'. In the early centuries of Christianity, this title was applied, especially in the East, to all bishops[17] and other senior clergy, and later became reserved in the West to the bishop of Rome during the reign of Pope Leo I (440–461),[18] a reservation made official only in the 11th century.[19][20][21][22][23] The earliest record of the use of the title of 'pope' was in regard to the by-then-deceased patriarch of Alexandria, Heraclas (232–248).[24]

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >written in greek
            >written in greece
            >but it wasn't orthodox who wrote it down. it was heckin proto-baptists.

            Yeah...

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            in greek
            Yes
            in greece
            Mostly
            >>but it wasn't orthodox who wrote it down
            Correct.
            >it was heckin proto-baptists.
            What an immature response to getting all your claims refuted.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *