>Linux booted on >Thigh high socks on >Buttplug plugged and loaded >Chastity cage properly setup >Dildo lubed and prepared on chair
Let's. Fricking. Go.
I was just using that 6.8 uek to test out the the new ueknext kernel, but I'm currently using the RH kernel on my desktop and the UEK on my laptop. Once your hardware is supported and there's no kernel bugs for it, you're not going to see much difference using a new kernel. The UEK receives mostly security updates and critical bug fixes about once a month and sticks to a particular release like 5.15 for uek7 currently. The RH kernel gets significantly updated with new features between minor releases like 9.3 to 9.4, not that there's usually problems with that, but it's a different development model.
why don't you use the Red Hat kernel? what do you gain from UEK?
1. ZFS. And not the trainwreck imitations. Actual Oracle ZFS.
2. You're using their cloud compute servers and want the hypertuned kernel for their hardware to squeeze more performance.
If you're not using either benefit, the rhel compatible kernel is superior.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
I can't imagine doing anything serious with zfs. debugging that sounds miserable.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Oracle ZFS
Isn't that shit practically as dead as Solaris at this point and it's the "trainwreck imitations" that everyone actually uses?
when is the next ubuntu LTS release? i know it's in april
when it's released i am gonna do a fresh install because my computer has been sluggish recently
I thought I was the only one that liked this distro. It's the best RHEL clone, and UEK is nice, if you don't need 1:1 bug compat. I'm not sure why'd you would use it for your daily driver though, the main selling point is the no-cost 10yrs of patches you get for your server. It's comfy thoughever. Enjoy!
Can I use the Nvidia kernel modules for RHEL with the RHEL compatible kernel without any frickery? Rocky rebuilds their kernels and adds numbers to the path, which creates frickery, does Oracle do the same?
I haven't built nvidia modules in a long time, but this is the oracle kernel >kernel-core-5.14.0-362.24.1.0.1.el9_3.x86_64.rpm
rocky >kernel-5.14.0-362.24.1.el9_3.0.1.x86_64.rpm
nah, you understood exactly what i meant. looks like all the clones differentiate their kernel binaries in some way, Oracle puts "0.1" before el9, rocky puts it after el9, whereas Alma straight up changes the existing 1 to 2. perhaps this is just a naming convention and getting the modules to load is trivial, perhaps they're straight up incompatible. as it stands i'm not convinced that not having to renew the free Red Hat subscription once a year is worth all these potential headaches and i personally don't see the value in the clones. thanks for your help.
Pull out before you cumm
>Linux booted on
>Thigh high socks on
>Buttplug plugged and loaded
>Chastity cage properly setup
>Dildo lubed and prepared on chair
Let's. Fricking. Go.
Ooooh yeaaaaah
Ready to rock
Locked n' loaded
Let's punch some Nazis
let's rock
>Buttplug and dildo
Bro, what the frick are you doing to your anus?
>xhe doesn't know
tell us what he doesn't know anon, you can't out yourself anymore than you have
>you
>not gay
Getting The bare essentials
bat
dnf5
fd-find
ffmpeg
fzf
golang
micro
neovim
python3-pip
ripgrep
virt-manager
yt-dlp
zsh
>neovim
useless if you're not a codetroon
t.vscodelet
you forgo the most important: bash-completion
zsh already has that, bash is moronic
if i only use zsh for auto complete and colors should i just use bash?
custooomize
https://extensions.gnome.org
Install KDE
>What now
Nothing, stare at it for 6 hours appreciating the perfection then reinstall KDE/xfce/MATE
sudo apt-get remove --purge gnome xorg
sudo apt-get install sway
sudo reboot
sudo apt purge gnome
sudo apt install xfce
systemctl reboot
fix'd
For me, it's this lil guy
looks gay as frick, kys
prepare to get v&
I love Oracle Linux and I started
AMA
why don't you use the Red Hat kernel? what do you gain from UEK?
I was just using that 6.8 uek to test out the the new ueknext kernel, but I'm currently using the RH kernel on my desktop and the UEK on my laptop. Once your hardware is supported and there's no kernel bugs for it, you're not going to see much difference using a new kernel. The UEK receives mostly security updates and critical bug fixes about once a month and sticks to a particular release like 5.15 for uek7 currently. The RH kernel gets significantly updated with new features between minor releases like 9.3 to 9.4, not that there's usually problems with that, but it's a different development model.
...so, in other words, no reason?
1. ZFS. And not the trainwreck imitations. Actual Oracle ZFS.
2. You're using their cloud compute servers and want the hypertuned kernel for their hardware to squeeze more performance.
If you're not using either benefit, the rhel compatible kernel is superior.
I can't imagine doing anything serious with zfs. debugging that sounds miserable.
>Oracle ZFS
Isn't that shit practically as dead as Solaris at this point and it's the "trainwreck imitations" that everyone actually uses?
have a nice day, homosexual.
for what purpose do you install oracle linux?
I thought I was the only one that liked this distro. It's the best RHEL clone, and UEK is nice, if you don't need 1:1 bug compat. I'm not sure why'd you would use it for your daily driver though, the main selling point is the no-cost 10yrs of patches you get for your server. It's comfy thoughever. Enjoy!
sudo dnf remove PackageKit
ctrl+t
man bash
sudo apt install windows7
>oracle linux
literally nobody uses that
clearly, at least 2 people do
sudo engage warp drive
uninstalled my distro and went back to win10 today bros...
Throw your computer out of the window and purchase a Macbook like a normal person.
>What now?
sudo pacman -Rns gnome-meta && sudo pacman -S xfce4-meta
Do a flip homosexual
when is the next ubuntu LTS release? i know it's in april
when it's released i am gonna do a fresh install because my computer has been sluggish recently
the 25th isn’t it?
Can I use the Nvidia kernel modules for RHEL with the RHEL compatible kernel without any frickery? Rocky rebuilds their kernels and adds numbers to the path, which creates frickery, does Oracle do the same?
I haven't built nvidia modules in a long time, but this is the oracle kernel
>kernel-core-5.14.0-362.24.1.0.1.el9_3.x86_64.rpm
rocky
>kernel-5.14.0-362.24.1.el9_3.0.1.x86_64.rpm
alma
>kernel-5.14.0-362.24.2.el9_3.x86_64.rpm
Sorry, you said path, I'll check that if you tell me how.
nah, you understood exactly what i meant. looks like all the clones differentiate their kernel binaries in some way, Oracle puts "0.1" before el9, rocky puts it after el9, whereas Alma straight up changes the existing 1 to 2. perhaps this is just a naming convention and getting the modules to load is trivial, perhaps they're straight up incompatible. as it stands i'm not convinced that not having to renew the free Red Hat subscription once a year is worth all these potential headaches and i personally don't see the value in the clones. thanks for your help.
install dash-to-dock and runcat
Find a valid use case for gnome