It depends. Occasional sex itself is fine but chasing after women or even being in a relationship with one is not because then the persons mind and attention is divided between his passion and ambition for science and other things, people. So as long as one has absolutely casual sex (with bawds) once or twice a month then it should be fine
If you can spend zero time and resources on women without being celibate then no. Also, even incels with no chance at sex become moronic chimps around women so it's more about avoiding women than avoiding sex.
Absolutely not
https://www.quora.com/Does-Euler-have-any-living-descendants-today >Euler fathered 13 children. Five survived and gave him about 20 grandchildren. So it is very likely that he has some direct descendants living. >There was a big project to find them that spread across Germany, Russia and Switzerland. To date, it has documented 2,000 direct descendants (many of whom, of course, died in past centuries.) >The published list, whose most recent entry was a death in 2006, doesn’t have an index of those still living, but you can read it (in German)
I don't think so. I know einstien and rembrandt (not math related but still skilled) had children. If you have a partner that doesn't drive you insane I think it can work.
i think it's a personality issue, but how do you explain that the smartest men in history were either unmarried, childless, or celibate, and this in a period of such religious fervor that not having a wife would be very suspicious, newton, leibniz, kant, hume, plato, aristotle, da vinci, michelangelo, beethoven these men are spread out over philosophy, science, math and art and in some like leibniz, you can't even argue that he was too autistic, there is a general aversion among them all, some premonition if you will, to women and relationships, even noether, a female genius shared this sentiment.
Yes surely so. There is no matter in the discourse of discussions amongst historical intellectual giants than their shared celibacy and life paths. Any perceived relationships between the opposite sexes will ultimately devolve into tawdry displays of uninspired communications. In turn such animalistic theatre will prevent the mind from actualizing hyperdimensional reality into its constituent parts.
Sex's sole purpose is for reproduction. When a couple is trying to have a baby it takes months of daily sex to be successful. Women are thus naturally selected to gatekeep sex and to remind men of sex constantly when the time comes, and later to raise babies. They are not selected for anything else. With that in mind it is wise to not initiate a relationship with a woman without that goal in mind. And if you feel the world is populated enough then there is no reason to reproduce and instead you can focus on produce and your individual growth. A matriarchy will bully young men and shove sex and butts in their face at an early age to keep them in underdeveloped beta line. In a matriarchy if men start getting together women focus on disrupting the group by calling them gay, fascist, nerd, incel and this propagates culturally (ironically when women finally find a gay guy they are friendly with him). A patriarchy does the opposite, it expects a brotherhood and values men. In a patriarchy women are treated as the means of reproduction they are, which facilitates households or at least keeps them in line. A lewd male mind is thus a matriarchal slave, his purpose is to grind for women and receive not even sex("you are out of your Communist council determined work position, incel drone!"). These lewd thoughts go against real creative ambition, in Sex City you get an endogenous drug rush not a creative, material gain. Notice how aggressive other matriarchy slaves are with you when you signal individual independence and lack of interest towards sex and women, it is ape tier, their brains are not fully functioning. I have a Catholic friend who is trying to nofap but he snaps like a simp so easily, hating other men and saying men are naturally less worthy than women, justifying wars where many young men are forced to die in. He is not able to develop real mathematical abilities because he is often thinking in terms of irresponsible female emotions.
when I'm single I'm very IQfy and disciplined in my studies, when I'm in a relationship, it gets in the way of the gym, of dieting, of dedicating time to both necessary and recreational study and recreational reading. 99.9% of other people are midwits, especially women, so I get sucked into tiktok-brain tier discussions on top of it which further diminishes my pursuit of intellect. I'm far from a genius but I am more than capable of becoming intelligent and participating in something productive to the whole of humanity, but entertaining relationships with women certainly get in the way of that. Working entry level jobs while I go to school is the same barrel of monkeys though and even more necessary, and a relationship reduces the amount I have to do that if I can convince her to move in with me so that is worth considering. I can tone out woman-brain, I can't just not-pay bills.
no, but it doesn't matter either way - if you are on this website and you think this is something worth thinking about, you should go touch grass and get laid
is that something that you need to have/muster or is it something that naturally happens when you understand that you understand something that other don't?
not talking about that, yeah clearly easy to interact with hotdog seller on the street. wasn't talking about those kinds of interactions
1 month ago
Anonymous
good to see that public interaction is a filter for you.
stay low IQ
1 month ago
Anonymous
>public
it's not about the random public interactions you fricking brainlet. >I can hide it so good
yeah, wondered why you're so good at it? because there's nothing to hide you monkey
>activities linked to IQ increase
Doing diffcult math and logic problems (e.g. Springer Graduate Texts)
Orbitofrontal D1-D2 stimulation (apparently very potent)
Learning a new language (the more it differs from your mother tongue, the better)
Nucleus Basalis stimulation
Learn to play an instrument
Some (!) meditation techniques
Neurofeedback training (specifically Dual-N-Back)
Intermittent fasting
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
some memory activities/games
Continued education
lucid dreaming
some binaural beats
necessary but not sufficient
Not really. But it likely would buy you a lot more free time to research stuff and expand your knowledge power
It depends. Occasional sex itself is fine but chasing after women or even being in a relationship with one is not because then the persons mind and attention is divided between his passion and ambition for science and other things, people. So as long as one has absolutely casual sex (with bawds) once or twice a month then it should be fine
this, or else you have more than one women in the housr so they can give attention to and help each other when you are occupied.
Most of the top tier scientists are family and sex havers.
Cope harder.
If you can spend zero time and resources on women without being celibate then no. Also, even incels with no chance at sex become moronic chimps around women so it's more about avoiding women than avoiding sex.
Absolutely not
https://www.quora.com/Does-Euler-have-any-living-descendants-today
>Euler fathered 13 children. Five survived and gave him about 20 grandchildren. So it is very likely that he has some direct descendants living.
>There was a big project to find them that spread across Germany, Russia and Switzerland. To date, it has documented 2,000 direct descendants (many of whom, of course, died in past centuries.)
>The published list, whose most recent entry was a death in 2006, doesn’t have an index of those still living, but you can read it (in German)
I don't think so. I know einstien and rembrandt (not math related but still skilled) had children. If you have a partner that doesn't drive you insane I think it can work.
No, but it sure as hell doesn't hurt.
i think it's a personality issue, but how do you explain that the smartest men in history were either unmarried, childless, or celibate, and this in a period of such religious fervor that not having a wife would be very suspicious, newton, leibniz, kant, hume, plato, aristotle, da vinci, michelangelo, beethoven these men are spread out over philosophy, science, math and art and in some like leibniz, you can't even argue that he was too autistic, there is a general aversion among them all, some premonition if you will, to women and relationships, even noether, a female genius shared this sentiment.
They were all born before the shower.
what shower?
It's a question within the prelude. Untenable.
Yes surely so. There is no matter in the discourse of discussions amongst historical intellectual giants than their shared celibacy and life paths. Any perceived relationships between the opposite sexes will ultimately devolve into tawdry displays of uninspired communications. In turn such animalistic theatre will prevent the mind from actualizing hyperdimensional reality into its constituent parts.
>becoming
Yes, but once you became a genius you can safely frick b***hes without losing your genius status.
Sex's sole purpose is for reproduction. When a couple is trying to have a baby it takes months of daily sex to be successful. Women are thus naturally selected to gatekeep sex and to remind men of sex constantly when the time comes, and later to raise babies. They are not selected for anything else. With that in mind it is wise to not initiate a relationship with a woman without that goal in mind. And if you feel the world is populated enough then there is no reason to reproduce and instead you can focus on produce and your individual growth. A matriarchy will bully young men and shove sex and butts in their face at an early age to keep them in underdeveloped beta line. In a matriarchy if men start getting together women focus on disrupting the group by calling them gay, fascist, nerd, incel and this propagates culturally (ironically when women finally find a gay guy they are friendly with him). A patriarchy does the opposite, it expects a brotherhood and values men. In a patriarchy women are treated as the means of reproduction they are, which facilitates households or at least keeps them in line. A lewd male mind is thus a matriarchal slave, his purpose is to grind for women and receive not even sex("you are out of your Communist council determined work position, incel drone!"). These lewd thoughts go against real creative ambition, in Sex City you get an endogenous drug rush not a creative, material gain. Notice how aggressive other matriarchy slaves are with you when you signal individual independence and lack of interest towards sex and women, it is ape tier, their brains are not fully functioning. I have a Catholic friend who is trying to nofap but he snaps like a simp so easily, hating other men and saying men are naturally less worthy than women, justifying wars where many young men are forced to die in. He is not able to develop real mathematical abilities because he is often thinking in terms of irresponsible female emotions.
that's a very large point of view
i think its reptilians trying to eradicate men in order to have an obedient society
I have sex, your opinion is invalid
Newton's celibacy was only a symptom of being an autistic psychopath which is the real cause of him being a """"genius"""".
when I'm single I'm very IQfy and disciplined in my studies, when I'm in a relationship, it gets in the way of the gym, of dieting, of dedicating time to both necessary and recreational study and recreational reading. 99.9% of other people are midwits, especially women, so I get sucked into tiktok-brain tier discussions on top of it which further diminishes my pursuit of intellect. I'm far from a genius but I am more than capable of becoming intelligent and participating in something productive to the whole of humanity, but entertaining relationships with women certainly get in the way of that. Working entry level jobs while I go to school is the same barrel of monkeys though and even more necessary, and a relationship reduces the amount I have to do that if I can convince her to move in with me so that is worth considering. I can tone out woman-brain, I can't just not-pay bills.
no, but it doesn't matter either way - if you are on this website and you think this is something worth thinking about, you should go touch grass and get laid
It's a requirement for having conviction if your ideas are unpopular.
is that something that you need to have/muster or is it something that naturally happens when you understand that you understand something that other don't?
if you're so smart, why cant you act like a normal person long enough to get laid?
impersonating normies is a hell of a lot harder than you'd imagine it to be
i do it all the time.
just have a different mindset when in public. IQfy memes arent funny to anyone outside of this site.
not talking about that, yeah clearly easy to interact with hotdog seller on the street. wasn't talking about those kinds of interactions
good to see that public interaction is a filter for you.
stay low IQ
>public
it's not about the random public interactions you fricking brainlet.
>I can hide it so good
yeah, wondered why you're so good at it? because there's nothing to hide you monkey
Understanding that you don't understand and moving forward is the best way to evolve forward. Don't chase women, chase ideas.
>tfw too smart to manage to get laid
cope, incel.
>activities linked to IQ increase
Doing diffcult math and logic problems (e.g. Springer Graduate Texts)
Orbitofrontal D1-D2 stimulation (apparently very potent)
Learning a new language (the more it differs from your mother tongue, the better)
Nucleus Basalis stimulation
Learn to play an instrument
Some (!) meditation techniques
Neurofeedback training (specifically Dual-N-Back)
Intermittent fasting
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
some memory activities/games
Continued education
lucid dreaming
some binaural beats