You just literally posted a high school boy. Congrats you're gay.
2 years ago
Anonymous
How does it feel seeing dudes everywhere?
2 years ago
Anonymous
50% of the population is male. I have no problem seeing dudes everywhere. How does it feel being unable to differentiate between genders though? You must have had some interesting experiences anon.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>How does it feel being unable to differentiate between genders though?
Didn't that GPT bot trained on /misc/ posts have a really hard time discerning between genders? I remember it was a point of difficulty compared to a baseline bot.
2 years ago
Anonymous
It would seem that way. It is certainly incapable of any meaningful logic. It seem to think that being told it cannot visually differentiate between males and females was some sort of statement that only two genders exist. Lol bots.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>You must have had some interesting experiences anon.
projection
m8 you don't decide ones gander, it didn't work for trannies and it won't work for you
2 years ago
Anonymous
imma goose you
2 years ago
Anonymous
I dont mind buff women but she does look like a dude.
Not sure WHO you're quoting but the only gay one here is YOU
I bet you like it when they have no breasts, smell like bo, and have a clit bigger than your dick that you can suck on too, huh? homosexual
hey i'm looking to build a mini movie theater in my house and wanted to know the deal you got on that projector because it's the biggest one i ever seen and wanted one for myself
Based. I fricking despise maintaining Python code bases while Java is much more bearable only because strong static typing makes it much more compatible with an IDE.
On a related note, people on this board who shill for text editors while calling IDEs bloated are fricking moronic and clearly have never had a job. No matter how much you customize your vim or emacs editors, debugging and understanding thousands of lines of both your own and other people’s code will always be far faster and superior on an IDE. Your text editor will only be superior if you’re writing a small script or a smaller hobby project.
>Hates dynamic typing because his IDE can't help write code for him
Midwit response. Intellisense, dot-walking, etc can be easily achieved with dynamically typed languages.
Try saying "concrete api *contracts" next time so don't sound like a lazy moron that's allergic to reading docs/code.
>Hates dynamic typing because his IDE can't help write code for him
Ah yes the classic IQfy "using tools that give the same result while being faster than you makes you a moron." Why would you fricking write menial shit by hand when you can let your computer do it in 3 keystrokes and get the exact same result? >Intellisense, dot-walking, etc can be easily achieved with dynamically typed languages
This is just straight up false. Intellisense does not work anywhere near as well on a dynamically typed language compared to a statically typed one, and it is, quite literally, impossible to make it work as well when the type is literally not known until runtime. >Try saying "concrete api *contracts" next time
Yeah, that's precisely what I mean in that case. Why is it a bad thing to know exactly what kind of output I'm going to get and what stuff functions written by someone else accept? >lazy moron that's allergic to reading docs/code.
Yeah, I try to do that but dynamically typed languages have such shitty documentation and it takes so fricking long to understand wtf is going on.
For example:
https://docs.python.org/3.4/library/json.html#module-json
vs
https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/javax/json/Json.html
Like what the frick? Granted, Python has shit documentation overall, but other dynamic typed languages like JavaScript, while having acceptable documentation, still don't stand up to Java's documentation. Part of this complexity can directly be attributed to dynamic typing because having to explain the accepted inputs is so fricking complex and requires complete sentences while in Java the documentation has to just specify the type pretty much and give like a one word sentence.
>liking muscular women
Kek they have much higher standards than the fat roasties and bimbo Stacies that shot you down. They won't date an ugly fat NEET
Few years back every moron and his mom were raging about dynamic typing and I had plenty of arguments on IQfy with wannabe mobile app "devs" about whether or not static typed languages are obsolete. Surprise now all of them changed the tune and it makes me wonder what's coming next.
No matter what it is that you want, once the program runs, you're done with type declarations. Finished. RTTI won't help you, since, it can only deal with types that were known ahead of time.
Dynamically typed languages don't pretend that you can predict the future and allow new types to be created at runtime based on the situation.
>be a midwit >basically everyone has reached a consensus that you're a midwit >instead of attempting to learn something new just pretend that everyone else is a midwit
why do midwits do this?
Dynamic typing exchanges performance for mutability
Static typing is better if a project allows for it, and with enough planning most cases allow for it
>it's more readable and self-explanatory >you want to restrict input and output of things they're meant to handle >intellisense works way better on static languages (how is this a bad thing?) >dynamic typed variables have more technical overhead to them >if a wrong-type object gets into your code and creates undefined behaviour, it's really difficult to debug >don't have to constantly consider edge cases for every single loc you write
take the static-typing pill before I give you the suppository OP
No, hating implicit typing is.
Dynamic typing is recognizing the verbosity problem and throwing away the benefits of static typing in order to solve it.
It's not ideal but it does at least help to solve the problem it was trying to solve.
Too bad Fortran did typing better 70 years ago.
Also, a type system is midwit bait to begin with, this whole thread reveals your brainlet status.
>Is hating dynamic typing the most obvious midwit trait?
I prefer static typing, but if you can't see the merits of both then yeah, midwitted.
Also, where my LBP bros at
I'm not asking anyone to change anything, just voicing a preference. Nobody is trying to take your fetish away from you. You can find a ripped mommydom who headscissors you until you pass out for all I care. Just isn't my thing.
It's not even my fetish, because I, unlike the people you're accusing of being gay, am actually gay. I just find it amusing that the same people who hate women for being feminine also find it distasteful for women not to be feminine
Problem with static typing is that programming languages that supports them always come with a shitload of useless oop autism.
Instead of being a tool to make programmers cooperate and understand the code, it becomes a clue the experience will be more similar to bureaucracy than programming
I look at all that fricking israeliteelry she's laden down with and I try to think what it must be like to have an animal npc brain >see shiny >I PUT SHINY ON ME, BE MORE BETTER
Liking muscular woman is the most obvious gay trait
homosexual
How are you not gay? I bet you also wish she had a 6 inch "clit" as well right?
yes
Based
>t. wienersucker
I've only seen one attractive muscular woman and she would've been more attractive if she dropped 15-20lbs of muscle.
She was hot in spite of being muscular, rather than because of it.
>posting the low res version
I don't care, still liking muscular women
I like strongfat mothers
150-400kg Amazon's where
based architect
I'm regaining my mom to 100kg+ she needs structural reinforcement based midi itx 5ft5 mommy build
yes but replace gay with high test
>basement dwellers like a woman less the closer she becomes to being able to beat them in an arm-wrestle
big girls intimidate me, I prefer them like pic related
A ten year old girl could beat you in an arm-wrestle
which is why you go for the five year olds
fpbp
>Liking woman is the most obvious gay trait
>liking hunky muscular women with giant dick clits and no breasts that look like men is "straight"
this homie gay af
You just literally posted a high school boy. Congrats you're gay.
How does it feel seeing dudes everywhere?
50% of the population is male. I have no problem seeing dudes everywhere. How does it feel being unable to differentiate between genders though? You must have had some interesting experiences anon.
>How does it feel being unable to differentiate between genders though?
Didn't that GPT bot trained on /misc/ posts have a really hard time discerning between genders? I remember it was a point of difficulty compared to a baseline bot.
It would seem that way. It is certainly incapable of any meaningful logic. It seem to think that being told it cannot visually differentiate between males and females was some sort of statement that only two genders exist. Lol bots.
>You must have had some interesting experiences anon.
projection
m8 you don't decide ones gander, it didn't work for trannies and it won't work for you
imma goose you
I dont mind buff women but she does look like a dude.
Imagine the smell.-
Frick hes ugly
>posts a pic of Onision in drag
>calls others gay
see
Cute girl.
some day your dick will get hairy and you'll stop caring about how straight it is to enter a vegana
Pussy is for homosexuals.
they hate you because you tell them the truth
>being sexually attracted to the opposite sex is gay
suzuha is perfect
Suzuha is so god damn hot
>Liking muscular woman is the most obvious gay trait
Based I worship my fat mom
Based (you)-farmer
>yes goy if you like muscular women then you must be gay and trans and
shut up israelite
>Liking women is gay
lel
Yes (although the more I use Python the more I'm loving types languages)
Fpwp.
>this post brought to you by a regular consoomer of corn syrup
>Liking [...] women is [...] gay
truth
True, true, but not as gay as preferring flat chested women
you shut your prostitute mouth titcow
Cringe.
Based.
fpbp
>its this gay again
>says liking women or fit women is gay every time
YOU sure like going to every board to show how gay you are dont you
Not sure WHO you're quoting but the only gay one here is YOU
I bet you like it when they have no breasts, smell like bo, and have a clit bigger than your dick that you can suck on too, huh? homosexual
OOF the malding replies kek
almost like a girl that wants to be more like a man is desirable to most men
This, but unironically.
The whole concept of "femininity" is just a psyop to normalize homosexual shit.
hey i'm looking to build a mini movie theater in my house and wanted to know the deal you got on that projector because it's the biggest one i ever seen and wanted one for myself
>not wanting to have 8ft tall ubermensch offspring
lol, what a gay
fpbp
No. Dynamic typing should be hated for any project with more than 100 lines of code.
Based. I fricking despise maintaining Python code bases while Java is much more bearable only because strong static typing makes it much more compatible with an IDE.
On a related note, people on this board who shill for text editors while calling IDEs bloated are fricking moronic and clearly have never had a job. No matter how much you customize your vim or emacs editors, debugging and understanding thousands of lines of both your own and other people’s code will always be far faster and superior on an IDE. Your text editor will only be superior if you’re writing a small script or a smaller hobby project.
Have a (You), based IDE king
>Hates dynamic typing because his IDE can't help write code for him
Midwit response. Intellisense, dot-walking, etc can be easily achieved with dynamically typed languages.
Try saying "concrete api *contracts" next time so don't sound like a lazy moron that's allergic to reading docs/code.
>Hates dynamic typing because his IDE can't help write code for him
Ah yes the classic IQfy "using tools that give the same result while being faster than you makes you a moron." Why would you fricking write menial shit by hand when you can let your computer do it in 3 keystrokes and get the exact same result?
>Intellisense, dot-walking, etc can be easily achieved with dynamically typed languages
This is just straight up false. Intellisense does not work anywhere near as well on a dynamically typed language compared to a statically typed one, and it is, quite literally, impossible to make it work as well when the type is literally not known until runtime.
>Try saying "concrete api *contracts" next time
Yeah, that's precisely what I mean in that case. Why is it a bad thing to know exactly what kind of output I'm going to get and what stuff functions written by someone else accept?
>lazy moron that's allergic to reading docs/code.
Yeah, I try to do that but dynamically typed languages have such shitty documentation and it takes so fricking long to understand wtf is going on.
For example:
https://docs.python.org/3.4/library/json.html#module-json
vs
https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/javax/json/Json.html
Like what the frick? Granted, Python has shit documentation overall, but other dynamic typed languages like JavaScript, while having acceptable documentation, still don't stand up to Java's documentation. Part of this complexity can directly be attributed to dynamic typing because having to explain the accepted inputs is so fricking complex and requires complete sentences while in Java the documentation has to just specify the type pretty much and give like a one word sentence.
*angry wageslave noises*
I'm trying to imagine life without "Go to implementation...", and it just makes me want to burn things.
I hate that a lot of people here code for their own projects and can't fathom actually having to look at and maintain other people's code.
they're only hot in anime
this
3dpd lose or deform their breasts as they build muscle
absolutely disgusting
seeing as how dynamic typing is primarily the purview of scripting languages and webshit. no I don't think so.
Either flat or curvy, but muscular is terrible. I like feminine females.
Yeah just chuck some breasts on dude now you're not gay
>liking muscular women
Kek they have much higher standards than the fat roasties and bimbo Stacies that shot you down. They won't date an ugly fat NEET
I respect virgins with high standards more than those who settle for landwhales just to be able to say they did get laid.
virgins with standards have an incredible ability to put the pussy on the pedestal and shoot themselves in the foot
I don't care what they do, I just said that I hate those with no standards even more.
>still better by default neener neener neener
cringe
moron.
Few years back every moron and his mom were raging about dynamic typing and I had plenty of arguments on IQfy with wannabe mobile app "devs" about whether or not static typed languages are obsolete. Surprise now all of them changed the tune and it makes me wonder what's coming next.
Cool story bro
Your reminder that "dynamic" languages are just static languages where you're restricted to a single type.
Statically typed languages are dynamically typrd languages where you're restricted to the types you declare ahead of time.
Which can be anything you want. In dynamic typing they are always one type.
No matter what it is that you want, once the program runs, you're done with type declarations. Finished. RTTI won't help you, since, it can only deal with types that were known ahead of time.
Dynamically typed languages don't pretend that you can predict the future and allow new types to be created at runtime based on the situation.
>I just want a gf I can spar with
bros I just want tomboy gf
Why are you complaining about it here instead of doing something about it?
because modern technology and it's consequences have made it impossible to do something about it
You're astonishingly quick at making excuses. Reconsider whether people would want to date someone that gives up this easily.
Kek have a (You)
>be a midwit
>basically everyone has reached a consensus that you're a midwit
>instead of attempting to learn something new just pretend that everyone else is a midwit
why do midwits do this?
Based on all your GAY logic a female to male troony with a hairy vegana and cut off boobs would still not be gay because its a woman and not a man
舐めたい
Giwtwm
Dynamic typing exchanges performance for mutability
Static typing is better if a project allows for it, and with enough planning most cases allow for it
>it's more readable and self-explanatory
>you want to restrict input and output of things they're meant to handle
>intellisense works way better on static languages (how is this a bad thing?)
>dynamic typed variables have more technical overhead to them
>if a wrong-type object gets into your code and creates undefined behaviour, it's really difficult to debug
>don't have to constantly consider edge cases for every single loc you write
take the static-typing pill before I give you the suppository OP
No, hating implicit typing is.
Dynamic typing is recognizing the verbosity problem and throwing away the benefits of static typing in order to solve it.
It's not ideal but it does at least help to solve the problem it was trying to solve.
Too bad Fortran did typing better 70 years ago.
Also, a type system is midwit bait to begin with, this whole thread reveals your brainlet status.
Dynamic typing is not about verbosity.
implicit typing results in unclear code
bump
>every opinion in this thread: people who have literally never made a commercial project that returned more than 5 digits
now post more girl abs
Machine capability is significantly lost on all dynamic languages.
What kind of "capability" is lost?
Things your cpu does best when memory isn't heavily fragmented
who are you quoting
Who said that
dynamic typing is a breeding ground for bugs.
>Is hating dynamic typing the most obvious midwit trait?
I prefer static typing, but if you can't see the merits of both then yeah, midwitted.
Also, where my LBP bros at
who are you quoting?
>soijak poster makes a moronic post
clockwork
I'm not asking anyone to change anything, just voicing a preference. Nobody is trying to take your fetish away from you. You can find a ripped mommydom who headscissors you until you pass out for all I care. Just isn't my thing.
It's not even my fetish, because I, unlike the people you're accusing of being gay, am actually gay. I just find it amusing that the same people who hate women for being feminine also find it distasteful for women not to be feminine
You wouldn't know, you're too stupid to tell whether someone is a midwit or not.
Problem with static typing is that programming languages that supports them always come with a shitload of useless oop autism.
Instead of being a tool to make programmers cooperate and understand the code, it becomes a clue the experience will be more similar to bureaucracy than programming
I look at all that fricking israeliteelry she's laden down with and I try to think what it must be like to have an animal npc brain
>see shiny
>I PUT SHINY ON ME, BE MORE BETTER
Cool anon, I get irrationally angry when I see a female too
>irrational
Nothing irrational about it.
I seriously consider rewriting my tic-tac-toe game from JS into Typescript.
I just had it with all these runtime errors.