Is it a meme? or is it the HDR of audio like OLEDs are the pinnacle of displays?
 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
|
Is it a meme? or is it the HDR of audio like OLEDs are the pinnacle of displays?
Is it a meme? or is it the HDR of audio like OLEDs are the pinnacle of displays?
|
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
|
Not a meme. I have on my phone and does make a improvement but its nor worth paying for it when you can get it for free on android and windows
>OLED
>pinnacle of displays
It loses to fricking CRTs
>Blur Busters
Yes, and?
>120hz is standard nowadays
You can get above the rock now.
crts have better motion at 60hz than an lcd/oled has at 120hz
and don't forget crt's can do 120hz as well
>and don't forget crt's can do 120hz as well
But can they do 1440p simultaneously?
>It loses to fricking CRTs
Exception in brightness, color gamut, refresh rate and contrast. Keep coping boomer
That's all well and good but we have 1 ms GTG response times now and more than 120 Hz refresh rate as well. Where I live you can barely find CRTs at all, let alone 1080p CRTs.
https://www.shi.com/product/14660042/Samsung-SyncMaster-793DF
This is probably the best one still available in 2024. It wasn't exactly the best monitor money could buy back when it was new.
Just ignore the dumpster diving CRTard, he just like to derail every thread.
RESPONSE TIMES LITERALLY DO NOT MATTER
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_motion_blur
>Both OLED and "Crystal LED" technologies also have response times far shorter than LCD technology, and can reduce motion blur significantly. However, all consumer OLED displays are sample-and-hold,[2][31] which leads to the same amount of motion blur as a conventional LCD.
I don't really give a shit, I'm not an expert in monitor technology and they aren't exactly giving OLED monitors away, so only people who have them are big YouTube channels I guess. It's not like I or to be honest most other people will be able to compare OLED monitors to CRT monitors which at least in my country no longer exist, let alone 1080p ones or ones comparable to OLED monitors in any way. So what's the point of these comparisons to unobtanium technology?
you don't even really have to have seen them, they could be 0ms pixel response time and still have about the same amount of motion blur, because motion blur is caused by sample-and-hold, not slow pixel response
while pixel response does compound blur, it's negligible compared to sample and hold
>So what's the point of these comparisons to unobtanium technology?
To show you that you've been scammed and gaslit into thinking GtG is all that matters. "Keep buying blurry garbage, goym!"
THEY'RE LAUGHING AT US
START DEMANDING IMPULSE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES **NOW**!!!
I don't want to use 25 year old monitors either
BUT THEY'RE BETTER THAN WHAT THEY"RE SELLING NOW
soon enough if not already people won't even remember that displays were capable of sharp motion
they're now pushing high refresh rates as the "solution", the obvious problem being that that only helps very high framerate content
your 400Hz display isn't going to make a 60fps video look any better than if you were using a 60Hz display, it's a fricking farce
the frick does response time have to do with motion performance?
It's so riddled with proprietary nonsense there's no way to actually get Atmos content and listen to it. It's basically an imaginary tech demo.
>there's no way to actually get Atmos content and listen to it.
>Source: my poorgay ass
>It's so riddled with proprietary nonsense
MP3s were also proprietary Fraunhofer nonsense at some point
Atmos is pretty cool in a proper movie theater but utterly irrelevant in the home unless you have 4+ speakers installed in your ceiling.
Good for consuming content related to automobiles, but not worth paying for it. Prefer device or packages that come with it.
I don't understand what Atmos even is. If you read Wikipedia, it sounds like there are 128 sound channels which the processor "pans" around the speaker configuration according to 3d coordinates. But then the consumer implementation has "Atmos-enabled" speakers, and theres fricking phones with Atmos? I don't see much reason to buy-in compared to 5.1.
It just means that an audio channel has a position and there are 128 "object"s of audio. These audio objects can be anywhere in a 3D volume. It's up to the device such as an AVR to map those audio channels and positions to a given speaker configuration.
not him but that makes sense, so it works like video game 3D audio
Atmos - meme
HDR - meme
OLED - legit
t. knower haver & thinker
>t. moron
Like HDR, it's only a meme if you're poor and can't afford a proper set-up. A proper 7.1.4 system with ceiling mounted speakers costs ~3000$ + labour, but it unironically sounds better than most cinemas.
it's a meme unless you experience it in a cinema
What even is the point of surround sound
There's only a screen in front of you, stereo with center channel is sufficient amount of imaging
Don't need some meme gimmick noises behind or above me then sójface at it
Why the hell industry uses a closed standard? It aint that complex
Because nobody bothered to make a good open standard. Same as HDR with dynamic metadata.
Not sure about Atmos but Dolby audio does wonders with laptop speakers since lenovo can't put speakers in sensible places and copes with Dolby audio. The best part is it's just a fancy convolver and I can just replicate it with pipewire
It's not like OLED since it doesn't degrade in 6 months of normal use at least.
assuming manufacturers aren't overvolting pixels outside their safe range for profit
you can always just not use the brightest setting
MicroLeds are the pinnacle of displays, but Oled is already something.
?si=g1vH-pTitT0oQ047