Is it true that Turks bleached Anatolia

Is it true that Turks bleached Anatolia

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    yay a stupid schizo spam nonsense thread
    i need to channel the personal hatred i feel right now somewhere

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/BHFSz5H.jpg

      Yoruks are the Turks with the highest Mong in Anatolia, they're also some of the lightest Turkish groups.

      Turks who are close to Yoruks = lighter features on average, Turks who close to Cappadocian Greeks or Cypriot Greeks = darker features on average.

      NO.
      they were not white, and they are not
      white.
      sinstasha and andronovo were already bmac mongrels.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah but were those "big mac mongrels" whiter than Anatolian Greeks?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It depends on some things;
          what kind of white? Mediterranean white or Germanic white?

          The early Sinstasha and Andronovo were very similar to the northern Euros, but in less than 1000 years, they became bmac mongrels and perhaps Elamites.
          the Anatolians didn't undergo much Indo-European genetic change... it was more of a cultural and linguistic thing. They have less steppe ancestry than the Greeks.
          and worse;
          The Greeks were agricultural + native European hunter-gatherers, forming the EEF, while the Anatolians are not like that.
          they were not EEF.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            By white I mean this

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Well, as already shown, the Sinstasha looked North European or Central European, so they were definitely whiter than the Anatolians.
            Anatolia unfortunately only underwent linguistic changes....
            Maybe they looked like Mediterraneans.
            see this image;
            an Egyptian representation of the Hittites.
            Did they have fair skin? Yes. they had. but they were not like in your photo.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            how you can it have;
            fair skin with black hair.
            Well, the ancient Hittites were not very far from the Mycenaeans according to some PCA, perhaps their appearance was not very different...
            but the modern turkish larp of we wuz hittitaz n shite is moronic, they are ultra-mutts.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Sintashta have no BMAC ancestry.

        https://i.imgur.com/hmiZElZ.png

        Is it true that Turks bleached Anatolia

        Yes, and slavs.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          No.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            None of these samples are sintashta.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I know.
            I'm saying that these people who have the greatest sinstasha ancestry outside of Europe are mongrels.
            and the andronovo were quickly diluted with bmac trash.. including cultural.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            um, considering that some Slavs are still literally 80% Andronovo, the Slavic migration whitened the Balkans much more than the Turkic mongoloid mongrels did to Anatolia.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I don't know if I understand your argument??

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            the invasion of real white people into Anatolia would have a much better impact on the genetics of the local residents than the invasion of dysgenic, ugly, gigasmutted Central Asian Turkic scum.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I agree...
            Who knows, maybe future samples will show us some different things?
            There were several tribes in Anatolia. Who knows, maybe one had at least 25% spare tire

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            seething Latinx "crusader" detected

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yoruks are the Turks with the highest Mong in Anatolia, they're also some of the lightest Turkish groups.

    Turks who are close to Yoruks = lighter features on average, Turks who close to Cappadocian Greeks or Cypriot Greeks = darker features on average.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes and no
      The turkics had no genetic impact in anatolia or barely (15 % max) but yeah the turkic seljuks who invaded anatolia where way West eurasian/fair than everybody thinks
      They were in majority West eurasian by that time, had IE paternal DNA and assimilated a lot of indo aryans with them

      They barely have any mong
      Turkic ≠ mongoloid

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Turks are literally the whitest people in the Balkans

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Turks destroyed anatolia.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    trvthnvke but we are still not done yet, the bleaching must resume immediately

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    proud jatt reporting in to serve our great turkish race

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Silence, chaiwallah

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why do everybody think turkics were mongoloids/ching chongs ?
    They were way more West eurasian than everybody think

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      because roaches are disgusting mongrel and mongoloid subhumans. each day you homosexuals larp as something new

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Im not a turkroach but turkics were never mongoloid
        Most of the time they were in majority West eurasian

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          wasted, and no they weren't majority west Eurasian, the frick are you on kek

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            They were whiter than native Anatolians

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            By the time of the seljuks ?
            They were 70-80 % West eurasian with a lot of fully West eurasian individuals who got assimilated

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      wasted, and no they weren't majority west Eurasian, the frick are you on kek

      Target: Kazakhstan_Turk.SG
      Distance: 3.1994% / 0.03199416
      42.8 Russia_MLBA_Sintashta
      36.2 Mongolia_EIA_SlabGrave_1
      21.0 Turkmenistan_Gonur_BA_1

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    No

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *