No, because the only people who know/care are historians whose area of expertise is MENA. Most people who bring it up don't actually care about White people. It's just a culture war counterweight to American Black person whining. You can tell because it's always some amerimutt with no genetic or cultural connection to slavs (the majority of slaves taken were slavic). Like this pol troony here
Slavs may be example how to act to Black folks. You see, tatars from Crimean Khanate not only was real slave traders, kinda 3 millions slaves from Russia, but also this homies also burned Moscow. Real pain in ass. But then slavs said: no, tatars, you will be punished. And tatars was fricked. And tatar population in Crimea n around just become lower and lower year by year, slavic is bigger year by year. And also comdrade Stalin deported this homies into random places. As result: tatars that stolen literally millions slaves from Russia and Ukraine now punished! Black folks should to do with withes the same thing, ya feeling?
the Circassians were also punished for this.
Sorry. >t. Rus
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Circusassians was deported into sunny Stambul, not creepy. Tatars was deported to Kazakhstan. Wanna visit Kazakhstan? (Borat music slowly starts to play)
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
I live in Siberia, it's not much different.
except that we have more forest.
It has to do with money. This topic of research would get no shekels from the ~~*chair*~~ and would have to be conducted and funded outside of the academic world. It would not feature in popular media either, for the same reasons.
What's interesting is that the descendants of white slaves don't form a permanently indigent class of people in countries like Turkey. This is worthy of note.
What is modern Ukraine (lmao) and the Greater crimean region in general, was a an IRL PVP zone.
The Muslim Turks of the area just mastered the server and bullied neighboring pagan nomads and Slavs. The turks all converted to Islam sp the only targets left were Christian Ukrainians and polaks.
Whites were took weak and only started a comeback late with the cossacks, who funnily enough were pretty much the turkic equivalent of Wiggers.
Finally the great white nation of Russia brutally smashed and disbanded the Turkic slavers of the area, this now empty region was then repopulated by Russians, leading to the demographics of today.
Notice how all this history doesn't involve western or Catholic Christians. Thus the anglo dominated west has no care for it. It's simply really.
It will never be made common knowledge by the anti-white establishment.
No, because the only people who know/care are historians whose area of expertise is MENA. Most people who bring it up don't actually care about White people. It's just a culture war counterweight to American Black person whining. You can tell because it's always some amerimutt with no genetic or cultural connection to slavs (the majority of slaves taken were slavic). Like this pol troony here
>the majority of slaves taken were slavic
This isn't true for Barbary
Slavs may be example how to act to Black folks. You see, tatars from Crimean Khanate not only was real slave traders, kinda 3 millions slaves from Russia, but also this homies also burned Moscow. Real pain in ass. But then slavs said: no, tatars, you will be punished. And tatars was fricked. And tatar population in Crimea n around just become lower and lower year by year, slavic is bigger year by year. And also comdrade Stalin deported this homies into random places. As result: tatars that stolen literally millions slaves from Russia and Ukraine now punished! Black folks should to do with withes the same thing, ya feeling?
the Circassians were also punished for this.
Sorry.
>t. Rus
Circusassians was deported into sunny Stambul, not creepy. Tatars was deported to Kazakhstan. Wanna visit Kazakhstan? (Borat music slowly starts to play)
I live in Siberia, it's not much different.
except that we have more forest.
Дa я тoж. A чё тeбя тaк чypкecы бecпoкoят?
Mнe нa нa них пoхyй.
Дa мнe тoж
Бaзa, хyли.
Cтacян бывший нaцик пpocтo.
It has to do with money. This topic of research would get no shekels from the ~~*chair*~~ and would have to be conducted and funded outside of the academic world. It would not feature in popular media either, for the same reasons.
this didn't matter to the USA so it doesn't matter overall
Most of the "white" slaves were Turks and Circassians (churkas)
Not true.
Yes true
Baybars, the most famous Black Sea slave. What was he?
I don't know, but he is just one example after all.
Majority were slavs and circassians. Not sure where you're getting the "turks" thing from.
What's interesting is that the descendants of white slaves don't form a permanently indigent class of people in countries like Turkey. This is worthy of note.
the ottomans were only perpetuating what the byzantines and venetians had been doing to slavs long before them.
What is modern Ukraine (lmao) and the Greater crimean region in general, was a an IRL PVP zone.
The Muslim Turks of the area just mastered the server and bullied neighboring pagan nomads and Slavs. The turks all converted to Islam sp the only targets left were Christian Ukrainians and polaks.
Whites were took weak and only started a comeback late with the cossacks, who funnily enough were pretty much the turkic equivalent of Wiggers.
Finally the great white nation of Russia brutally smashed and disbanded the Turkic slavers of the area, this now empty region was then repopulated by Russians, leading to the demographics of today.
Notice how all this history doesn't involve western or Catholic Christians. Thus the anglo dominated west has no care for it. It's simply really.