is there any philosopher which counters Nietzsche's ideology of resentment and thinks entitlement is a good thing?
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
is there any philosopher which counters Nietzsche's ideology of resentment and thinks entitlement is a good thing?
But entitlement IS good. It's the slaves who think it isn't because they are, well, slaves and thus not entitled to anything.
makes me seethe because i assume fullbodies know something I don't
There are some. What kind of reader are you? A christcuck or a judeo-bolshevik?
Both and seethe
Nope just a sex starved white man
what you wrote doesn't mean anything, you're either a Black person or a woman
you are neither inspiring nor masculine, but above all you are boring
t. women
Mr. Popo?
there are many but they have countered you by beyond your reach
Nietzsche sounds pretty entitled to his ideology of resentment
He's just describing covert narcissism (look it up). And no one would dare claim an Eliot Rodger to be the hero of the story. He and his ilk are worms, and will forever be worms.
Are the people that demand human rights entitled?
Yes.
>And no one would dare claim an Eliot Rodger
he was. cry about it
That’s because no one is brave enough to actually do exactly that because of public perception. Most people care too much about society’s opinion to make any sort of a meaningful impact
I’m tempted to post a pic of my fat wiener just to prove you wrong,
I’m sure, whatever helps you sleep.
Already read that I’m speaking of overarching concepts not particular books
>is there any philosopher which counters Nietzsche's ideology
LOL
>Nietzsche
>resentment
Holy shit man. If not trolling, try actually reading him. Genealogy of Morals is a relevant start. If trolling, congrats.
I should add that most philosophers are wholly dependent on interpretation which is why you get different outcomes from different philosophers who attempt to tackle these works. If Nietzsche is the pinnacle by all which is named perspectivism is measured by, then his influence looms large on those who followed in his wake.
Shit I got more.
Considering that the same people will find glaring contradictions in the Bible, Nietzsche is full of similar contradictions in his own thinking. That’s self evident from the line in Twilight Of The Idols where he states “I distrust all systemizers”. However, it follows that since his philosophy tends towards the polemic and impressionistic it should be all rights be open to subjective interpretation. Many of his “followers” interpret “god is dead” as being celebratory, and they’re entitled to do so, but that does not mean that all written works should be interpreted in the same manner, especially scripture.
>is there any philosopher which counters Nietzsche's ideology
No. All philosophers either grapple with Nietzche and come off worse for it or else they pretend he doesn't exist.
>No. All philosophers either grapple with Nietzche and come off worse for it or else they pretend he doesn't exist.
that's some stupid atheist thinking. And any nonatheist thinkers dwarfs Nietzche and his clique of atheist worms
I think I heard some french homosexual philosopher say that he misidentified ressentiment from another narrower concept that was pretty much just "blaming other people for your frustrations" the whole thing was just a paragraph of his book and didnt say much more than that
Yes. It exists. Have it today.