Is there any reason to buy Intel over AMD now that Zen 4 has beaten Intel?

Is there any reason to buy Intel over AMD now that Zen 4 has beaten Intel?

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The longevity of AMD's sockets is a compelling factor over Intel for me.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      this is the only reason, also my imaginary friend is telling me to mention IME as well.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Does that imaginary friend glow?

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    doing anything at all that isn't vidya

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      ...which would make AMD an even better choice? What did you mean by this?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >...which would make AMD an even better choice? What did you mean by this?

        How are AMD better for non-gaming?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          moar coars

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Stop using this board if you don't know anything about computers. Go away.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          by having proper cores only

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    moar cores :DD

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Post em

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      damn, those clock speeds are sexy
      t. 5800X

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Intel is now more-or-less just a larger version of AMD. After Intel has fully divested from their foundries they will be exactly like AMD. Already Intel has destroyed the competative advantage they had painstakingly built up over the decades — the close linkage between silicon design and manufacturing process which allowed Intel CPUs to be unrivaled for so long — EVEN after YEARS following EUV with TSMC. That’s all gone now; yes they’re going into EUV but they’ve also stopped using their custom tech and are now using industry-standard tools and tech, no different from TSMC or Samsung or anyone else. THAT’S why they’re now selling fab services to external customers, which is just a move to eventually divest from fabs altogether, following AMD into the downward spiral of incompetent leadership and a competency crisis. Everything Intel has touched as gone to shit; their competency crisis wasn’t limited to just CPUs. So moving forward no one should look at Intel being the forever-king of CPU performance, and they will in fact be interchangeable with AMD in all ways that matter. So just get whatever is in your budget and is the best match for your goals at any given time. Who knows, maybe one of them will disappear in the future since they will be producing the SAME tech on the SAME tools as everyone else moving forward into the near future.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      okay chang

      https://i.imgur.com/XdSqQBK.jpg

      Is there any reason to buy Intel over AMD now that Zen 4 has beaten Intel?

      If you're gaming AMD all day
      For other work shit Intel can make more sense
      Also Intel entry level CPUs are superior for home servers.

      and the pendulum will swing again eventually. It is nice to be able to talk shit to Intel gays for the first time in a while.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If you play video games, Intel still comes out on top in most cases.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >If you play video games, Intel still comes out on top in most cases.

      5800X3D tops all of Intel's offerings

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        crazy poorgay cope

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Intel chief engineer has always been a jeet for almost two decades
    >Still manage to compete with Ryzen
    INDIA SUPERPOWER 2030

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    i3 and i5 are better value for poorgays right now.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      *in ddr4 config

      and thats until you look at the cost of am4 boards

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Ryzen 5 5600 is around the same price as brand new i3 14100f

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Supporting Pissrael

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    AMD doesn't really have any compelling low-end offerings at the moment (maybe when 8300G actually shows up for sale, but even then 12100/13100 will probably remain the better choice if you don't need the beefier iGPU). Even i5s make a lot of sense if you're primarily using software that can take advantage of e-cores.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      AMD is in a weird place where their last gen parts would make a decent low end offering but the lack of integrated graphics on most of them means they're not actually useful for budget builders.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        That, and if you're getting a low-end system you'd probably rather have a fast quadcore than a hexacore that matches or slightly beats said quadcore in multithreading.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *