Nope. Global warming + El Niño. It will go down, not all the way to the minimum and chuds will say that global warming is a hoax. Then, it will go up even further for the next big El Niño and chuds will claim it's just the weather/has always been like this.
>60°S — 60°N
you fricking moron, even the artic circles are closer to the equator than the 60° circles
the surface above the 60° circle is 21.5 million km2, so total not taken in consideration is 43 mil km2... out of the 510millions km2.
your argument really sounds like: >muh scientists only took 92% of the earth for their study! how am i supposed to believe that correlates to the entire earth?? only 92% baka my head
# >you fricking moron, even the artic circles are closer to the equator than the 60° circles
Lol. See pic rel.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/60th_parallel_north >the surface above the 60° circle is 21.5 million km2, so total not taken in consideration is 43 mil km2... out of the 510millions km2.
Except OP graph is about sea water, not total surface area of Earth.
Your anger is cute though. It reveals more than you know.
>Except OP graph is about sea water, not total surface area of Earth.
Most water beyond 60° is frozen, so the surface temperature is exactly the freezing point of water.
>the global warming institute
fake af
trusting the global warming institute to tell you the truth about the global temperature is like asking a used car salesman "should i buy this car?"
if you're asking if this is what was supposed to happen, then yes, predicitons were made as soon as we saw that El niño was happening
If you're asking if it was supposed to happen naturally, then the answer is no, el niño happened multiple times in the past, but a high surge in temperatures last decades caused by the past 80 years of human activities made it so that the 2024 temperatures are record breaking
>Climate Change Institute
Random question: If tomorrow morning for whatever reason everyone in the world decided that global warming wasn't a problem and no one should be pissing themselves about it anymore what would happen to the "Climate Change Institute" and everyone who works there?
>If tomorrow morning for whatever reason everyone in the world decided that global warming wasn't a problem
So nothing's changed then? >what would happen to the "Climate Change Institute" and everyone who works there?
nothing. people have a morbid fascination. watching the world turn into a shithole in real time is like watching their neighbor's house burn down to most people.
In climate science, a tipping point is a critical threshold that, when crossed, leads to large, accelerating and often irreversible changes in the climate system.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipping_points_in_the_climate_system
I believe that the climate is in fact changing, as it always has and always will, but mankind's contribution to it is vastly exaggerated. It's being exploited for political reasons, and as a red herring for people to argue about instead of all the other ways we are actually fricking up the environment.
You know how science work right? If you think scientists are exaggerated co2 contributions to climate change then prove, no scientist will say ever say they are 100% sure its man-made.
This reminds me of how I told climate scientist that ocean is one big smoothener for warming, and it's not only getting warmer, but it's "floods" more, because of increased percipration.
Nah, we're fricked.
Nope. Global warming + El Niño. It will go down, not all the way to the minimum and chuds will say that global warming is a hoax. Then, it will go up even further for the next big El Niño and chuds will claim it's just the weather/has always been like this.
good news at last
i can't wait
>World
>60°S — 60°N
I fricking hate climate soientists
>60°S — 60°N
you fricking moron, even the artic circles are closer to the equator than the 60° circles
the surface above the 60° circle is 21.5 million km2, so total not taken in consideration is 43 mil km2... out of the 510millions km2.
your argument really sounds like:
>muh scientists only took 92% of the earth for their study! how am i supposed to believe that correlates to the entire earth?? only 92% baka my head
moron
#
>you fricking moron, even the artic circles are closer to the equator than the 60° circles
Lol. See pic rel.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/60th_parallel_north
>the surface above the 60° circle is 21.5 million km2, so total not taken in consideration is 43 mil km2... out of the 510millions km2.
Except OP graph is about sea water, not total surface area of Earth.
Your anger is cute though. It reveals more than you know.
>Imagine being this moronic
Not an argument.
Why would I waste my time arguing with a moron?
I acknowledge your concession.
My concession is that you're a moron. Since my stance never changed it's actually your concession, moron.
this gotta be ragebait bc ain't no way you are this moronic
>Except OP graph is about sea water, not total surface area of Earth.
Most water beyond 60° is frozen, so the surface temperature is exactly the freezing point of water.
>the global warming institute
fake af
trusting the global warming institute to tell you the truth about the global temperature is like asking a used car salesman "should i buy this car?"
if you're asking if this is what was supposed to happen, then yes, predicitons were made as soon as we saw that El niño was happening
If you're asking if it was supposed to happen naturally, then the answer is no, el niño happened multiple times in the past, but a high surge in temperatures last decades caused by the past 80 years of human activities made it so that the 2024 temperatures are record breaking
it's ideal if anything. warmer temperatures mean more of the suns energy is being trapped and can be harnessed
16 Mars everyone.
>it's hot in the fricking Sahara
k, keep me posted
>Spain is Sahara
que?
temperatures are going to drop sharply next week, we expect light freezings again
>weather is climate when it suits my agenda
>Climate Change Institute
Random question: If tomorrow morning for whatever reason everyone in the world decided that global warming wasn't a problem and no one should be pissing themselves about it anymore what would happen to the "Climate Change Institute" and everyone who works there?
>If tomorrow morning for whatever reason everyone in the world decided that global warming wasn't a problem
So nothing's changed then?
>what would happen to the "Climate Change Institute" and everyone who works there?
nothing. people have a morbid fascination. watching the world turn into a shithole in real time is like watching their neighbor's house burn down to most people.
Scientifically speaking, no, that is not a normal distribution.
No, thinking cow farts will cause the earth to food is not normal.
lots of people in here who just couldn't care less what the evidence shows.
Your pissy admission of defeat is acknowledged.
In climate science, a tipping point is a critical threshold that, when crossed, leads to large, accelerating and often irreversible changes in the climate system.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipping_points_in_the_climate_system
I believe that the climate is in fact changing, as it always has and always will, but mankind's contribution to it is vastly exaggerated. It's being exploited for political reasons, and as a red herring for people to argue about instead of all the other ways we are actually fricking up the environment.
You know how science work right? If you think scientists are exaggerated co2 contributions to climate change then prove, no scientist will say ever say they are 100% sure its man-made.
Yes, it's normal. Climate has always changed. This is perfectly natural and has nothing do with policy. Stop noticing things. Frick you, racist.
No. The ocean is about be gigafricked in a few years... Well, more fricked than it already is by pollution and over fishing.
Good. Frick Florida.
This reminds me of how I told climate scientist that ocean is one big smoothener for warming, and it's not only getting warmer, but it's "floods" more, because of increased percipration.