they should use AI to consolidate the 500 trillion duplicate questions they have and kill their moronic "community bot" that continually bumps 12 year old abandoned questions by 1 karma jeets.
Pajeets literally do most "AI" in real time anyway. Not only reviews of chats, but real time tweaks have been admitted to as well.
So this means quite literally nothing, at all, will change. Except if you call 'jeets an AI, and put them behind a large impressive looking data center with blinking lights and cables everywhere, it is much better for your share prices.
IBM pioneered this with Deep Blue, which they mainly used to cheat with during the match with Kasparov. Just literally fake it, what's the worst that can happen?
IBM did cheat, one of the conditions for the match was Deep Blue was to be unattended, except for a neutral official who was to enter the moves, and NOT hooked to the Internet.
Watch the documentary Kasparov And The Machine. QRD is IBM said Deep Blue would battle Kasparov WITHOUT and Internet connection, but they hooked it to the Internet anyway. Then it changed its playing style completely in real time, to the style which matched one of Kasparov's long time top rivals, so Kasparov thought. He did not know (at the time, not for sure anyway) that that very rival was at the IBM HQ "advising" the Deep Blue team in real time.
It was a huge PR win for IBM and their stock shot way up and stayed there for years because of this one fake chess match. These days every IT company knows about this story and why not try it?
Also notable? IBM couldn't find space to even store poor old Deep Blue itself, though it wasn't very large, just the size of a normal fridge. So they had it thrown into one of those huge industrial shredder machines and turned into pea gravel sized particles. It was a big deal at the time because Paul Allen wanted to put it in his computer museum and restore it and play chess against it. But even that was unacceptable to IBM.
OpenAI is the most based company I've seen in a while. Especially for making so many people seeth.
> ITS OVER FOR STACK PAJEETFLOW
why?
>Ban AI answers
>Train your own model based on goyim's free work
israeliteD
they should use AI to consolidate the 500 trillion duplicate questions they have and kill their moronic "community bot" that continually bumps 12 year old abandoned questions by 1 karma jeets.
Pajeets literally do most "AI" in real time anyway. Not only reviews of chats, but real time tweaks have been admitted to as well.
So this means quite literally nothing, at all, will change. Except if you call 'jeets an AI, and put them behind a large impressive looking data center with blinking lights and cables everywhere, it is much better for your share prices.
IBM pioneered this with Deep Blue, which they mainly used to cheat with during the match with Kasparov. Just literally fake it, what's the worst that can happen?
That's one explanation for why some questions go unanswered.
>IBM pioneered this with Deep Blue, which they mainly used to cheat with during the match with Kasparov. Just literally fake it
quick rundown??
I think Kasparov accused IBM of cheating after the match. Ofc the conspiracy chuddies here latch onto that
IBM did cheat, one of the conditions for the match was Deep Blue was to be unattended, except for a neutral official who was to enter the moves, and NOT hooked to the Internet.
IBM admits to cheating.
Watch the documentary Kasparov And The Machine. QRD is IBM said Deep Blue would battle Kasparov WITHOUT and Internet connection, but they hooked it to the Internet anyway. Then it changed its playing style completely in real time, to the style which matched one of Kasparov's long time top rivals, so Kasparov thought. He did not know (at the time, not for sure anyway) that that very rival was at the IBM HQ "advising" the Deep Blue team in real time.
It was a huge PR win for IBM and their stock shot way up and stayed there for years because of this one fake chess match. These days every IT company knows about this story and why not try it?
>playing style
this has no meaning. the only "style" of play a computer has is selecting the move that has the highest calculated value.
>bans OpenAI
>partners with OpenAI
>Noooooooooo you should not use AI in your solutions!!!!
>Hello goyim we're now going to provide you AI solutions
imagine thinking deleting does anything but hide it from public view
ur code is already being fed into their next model
Also notable? IBM couldn't find space to even store poor old Deep Blue itself, though it wasn't very large, just the size of a normal fridge. So they had it thrown into one of those huge industrial shredder machines and turned into pea gravel sized particles. It was a big deal at the time because Paul Allen wanted to put it in his computer museum and restore it and play chess against it. But even that was unacceptable to IBM.
>restore it and play chess against it
kek so the implication is that it COULDN'T do this without internet
Obviously. And chess pros at the other end of the connection.
>this has no meaning
Of course it does.
>The human touch is what made it unique
sure
this was my experience every time I asked a question