ITT: your favorite quotes by famous writers

Achilles got cucked by the tortoise

sounds like he's referring to someone, probably someone popular, that's been canceled

How would there be infinite numbers between 0 and 1? By merit of there being a finality (1) it would mean there is eventually some end to that series of numbers, even if we cannot feasibly count them all within our lifetime.

>some end to that series of numbers
Then what's the beginning of the series? What number would you count after 0?
The numbers between 0 and 1 can't be listed in a series, even one of infinite length, because the amount of numbers is uncountably infinite.
t. BS in Mathematics

>If you define a beginning and an end then how could the space between possibly be infinite?
NTA but it's because there is always another number (infinite numbers actually) in-between any 2 numbers you can name within the boundaries of such a set. That means the set is infinite. There are also different sizes of infinite sets (i.e. countable sets where you can attach cardinality to the members and uncountable sets which are larger because you can't).
>endpoint
There isn't an endpoint between any two members of the set because there are infinite members between them.

Assume that there exists some finite sequence containing all the numbers between 0 and 1 (excluding 1 and 0). Then, take the highest number in this sequence (which you can do because it's a finite sequence), and name it y. Now let x = 1+ y / 2.
x is not contained within the finite sequence (because x is higher than y, which is the largest number in the sequence) but it is contained between 0 and 1 (since it's higher than 0 and lower than 1). This leads to a contradiction, meaning that the sequence cannot be finite.

>Uhhh, yeah, there's totally a difference
>Oh, uhhh, what's the difference, you ask? uhhh, it's too complicated for me to explain with words
there's no difference at all, roastie

seethe

i've been with 31 different girls, many of whom cheated on their man with me or i was cheating myself. there is no difference.

Why is her not fricking any other men important all of a sudden?

And why do people ask for that vow in a marriage? You're deliberately avoiding something important here.

>loving 1 person for life
Exactly. For your whole life. Not for the rest of your life starting at the wedding.

Then what if your wife slept with 47 people on the day before your wedding? You're not gonna care, then?

>a relationship based in trust
>I trust her to not do something bad
>the thing is only bad because it betrays trust

What an absolute moron.

I agree with the other anon. You're mistaken here, because you presume that trust is betrayed only by something necessarily negative. But trust is not betrayed by necessarily negative acts, it is betrayed by anything that violates the agreed upon terms.
In a monogamous relationship, the implicit (or explicit) agreement is monogamy. But this does not presume a moral judgement on polygamy; it's simply a statement of a contract.
In other words, a violation of a contract is immoral while the act violating the contract does not have to be.

So if your future wife slept with 47 people the day before you got together you're fine?

>1. i'm a girl
Let me just scan those chromosomes real quick, uh oh a discrepancy

>I have a moral system that justifies being a bawd, and places the blame for my behavior on the men who want higher standards for me
A girl you say? Wow what a shock. Here's a tip: don't bend over backwards trying to justify your behavior when you're just going to lie about it to your future husband anyway.

what? when did i say my moral system justifies that. i'm literally just attacking a badly made point.
i don't participate in casual sex or blame sexual promiscuity on men. you're spending too much time on /LULZ/ you're reading things that aren't there.

although let's be real, the extension of sexual immorality and promiscuity is men's fault.
you have no one to blame but yourselves for putting the systems in place to allow widespread promiscuity

[...]
although let's be real, the extension of sexual immorality and promiscuity is men's fault.
you have no one to blame but yourselves for putting the systems in place to allow widespread promiscuity

I can almost imagine it know, the wiener, not attached to any individual man, not a mere average of all men's wiener, but rather the wienerness of all wieners poured into one, the Platonic ideal of a wiener, the Schrodinger's wiener which all at once assumed the girth and size of all wieners yet mightier than the sum of all its wienery parts, pounding the walls of your vegana and stretching it even passed its current flappery state.
In other words, in the same way you would only frick chads and not the average man said average man does not necessarily approve of your or chad's conduct you fricking prostitute.

certainly in some aspects
google who created
dating apps
promiscuity culture
atheistic culture
progressive culture
divorce
supported the sexual liberation movement
who's more promiscuous
who has less traditional family values
there's only one answer! (gender wise, don't mention any ethnic groups)

i just knew someone was gonna say israelites but idk if that's a myth or not so i didn't wanna have my point diverted

well if they were all israelites you'd certainly have a point
but for my last 2 points still stand. men have always been more promiscuous and less traditional and family oriented

What traditions are women known for?

being a mom is literally the oldest traditional role, being a father is fairly new. if he wasn't out hunting mammoths or getting drunk with friends in the local bar or out in some war in europe or just went off with their secretary

i don't think that but they certainly are victims too

i guess i was saying the figure of the modern present father is moreso new, since those fathers were also providing just in a different way.

lmao what. that's not what i said
also i don't think most men have done that on the course of history
just look at what men do when raiding and how powerful men treated women. would you say those guys then "failed at being men"?

well then we just have fundamental differences in what we think "real men" are
also loads of men harmed and raped their wives, so i think most would get filtered by your demands
also
>tfw you failed at being a man because you couldn't defend your farming shack from the 500 trained mercenaries approaching your home

>also loads of men harmed and raped their wives
Quite the victim complex you have there.
I can also say that: 'most people don't use toilet paper', because those 'most people' are savages who make up the greater population of the planet (id est: China and India), rather than the population of a civilised country.

and if you frick with women who'll leave you divorced and take your house and kids it's your fault

as i said it's okay if you left or if you want a virgin wife. clearly your values don't match. i was just dismantling that part of the socrates argument

as i said, he made a mistake in why he felt angry at getting cheated on.
it's because she betrayed his trust, i'm guessing john green isn't getting mad at the idea of his wife having sex when she probably didn't know him etc etc etc

i'm saying that him being mad because he got cheating doesn't correlate with him being mad because his wife had sex before she met him.
basically, adultery and fornication aren't the same and indifference to one doesn't mean indifference to the other. you can have varying opinions on them

[...]
although let's be real, the extension of sexual immorality and promiscuity is men's fault.
you have no one to blame but yourselves for putting the systems in place to allow widespread promiscuity

also my final point: men are more promiscuous than women. you're speaking into a void and ranting about an imaginary thing.

>le double standard
No-one here has suggested that it's okay for men to be promiscuous while it's not for women.

>yeah no one "here"
Then what are you getting mad at us for?
I hate promiscuous men as much as promiscuous women, so don't think I'm a hypocrite.

The values aren't eroding, we're just seeing an increase in the number of men who are sad and desperate enough to accept their wife getting railed by other men. Fricking hell why even be married at that point? Maybe it's better than watching her walk away with half your life savings and the kids? What a nightmare.

>clearly your values don't match
Those aren't my values, they are universal values. Nobody wants to marry the town bicycle, and the man who does so KNOWS he is doing something pathetic. He has just convinced himself it's okay because he thinks he has no better option. It's not his values, it's just the fact that he's fricking sad.

I’d be wondering how she found the time for 47 men in one day. What the frick are these hypotheticals lmao

Well first she’d need to make a Craigslist ad and get 47 men that don’t think they’re just going to get robbed.

The record is 919 men in one day. If you scheduled it ahead of time 47 men is very achievable.

>open relationships
You're already in a hole here, do you really want to keep digging?

Nice

remember to shut down any sort of these illogical arguments as soon as they appear.

"The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about.”

She is one of the ugliest women I've ever seen.

https://i.imgur.com/99URdVm.jpg

It's crazy how far charisma towards the insipid masses can take one nowadays. I don't give a shit about John Green, but I do envy his wealth. All of these public "intellectuals" make me sick to my stomach. A randomly IQfy anon would probably be better than John Green, but I doubt they would have his "charisma" towards the insipid masses.

I find it difficult to smile in public any more.

She is one of the ugliest women I've ever seen.
[...]
It's crazy how far charisma towards the insipid masses can take one nowadays. I don't give a shit about John Green, but I do envy his wealth. All of these public "intellectuals" make me sick to my stomach. A randomly IQfy anon would probably be better than John Green, but I doubt they would have his "charisma" towards the insipid masses.

I find it difficult to smile in public any more.

>hot
Yes.
She's also cultured and intelligent, unlike her husband.

hey guys, chapter three here to send you back to chapter 6

lmao was never hugboxxing or asking for validation, in fact i know here it'll lead to the opposite you moron.
i'm just saying it's funny the majority of consumers of literature are women yet people are surprised when they see the occasional one browsing here

no one says the majority of gamers are women though
and everyone knows that's not true
whereas most people know how many women read, even if it's corny romance models
i hate this new era of "give me studies studies give me a source this has been skewed on the x and y axis", sometimes you just know by observing and living in society

So you admit that you're using this board as your personal hugbox to seek out validation for your own self-serving arguments about women?

lmao was never hugboxxing or asking for validation, in fact i know here it'll lead to the opposite you moron.
i'm just saying it's funny the majority of consumers of literature are women yet people are surprised when they see the occasional one browsing here

>goes to a literature board
>surprised to find women
shouldn't be many such cases but alas

r*dditor detected

what
I'm genuinely startled, are you trolling? Even going by your nonsensical evidence standard nazis didn't consider poles and israelites to be aryan in fact all slavs where subhumans according to their ideology and israelites weren't even human, and I'm pretty sure there's plenty of photos of german the german invasion taken on the first of september

what am I making up, nazis considering nearly everyone besides them as subhuman??? you can always just read mein kampf and/or nazi speeches and find out for yourself, they're available online

not him but here

You are delusional and moronic beyond all belief. I can only conclude that you're either an amerimutt, which is indicated by your outstanding ignorance to even the simplest to understand and most widespread historical data, or a Pole/Slav trying to reconcile your Nazism and love for Hitler with your ethnicity. Either way I kindly ask you to leave this board and never return, raising its average IQ by a few point.

To not have a sexually attractive appearance*