Leave GitHub.
https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2022/jun/30/give-up-github-launch/
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Leave GitHub.
https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2022/jun/30/give-up-github-launch/
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
tik tok codemonkeys tik tok
>tik tok
>Tik tok
moronic zoomer.
What are some good alts?
Gitlab, hosting your own git server, using SVN.
>Gitlab
>>Has a Ukraine flag
Sorry, no
>tourism on IQfy
>RUSgay
Imagine invading your far weaker neighbor only to get mogged daily by a bunch of accountants and baristas that learned how to shoot just last week...
in their defense most of the mogging is being done by azov nationalist types that have been flighting non-stop since 2014
Even If they manage to destroy the ukranian army (they wont), they will have to deal with god knows how many insurgencies and guerillas, putin is moronic
>Imagine invading your far weaker neighbor
You mean like what the Union did to the Confederacy? The 1945 Yalta conference says Ukraine belongs to Russia forever.
Oh boy let's unpack this uneducated nonsense...
>You mean like what the Union did to the Confederacy?
The confederacy not only seceded illegally, but also made the first attack against the US.
>The 1945 Yalta conference says Ukraine belongs to Russia forever.
The agreement that Stalin promptly violated? Ukraine became a sovereign state during the inevitable collapse of the USSR. Russia has no claim. Cry about it.
Russia is internationally recognized ad the successor to that agreement. Cry about it.
The trannies are raiding IQfy again ?
When ever I see the Ukraine flag I just associate with the azov battalion being racist and curcifying people, whisper "based" under my breath, and move on with my day. Just psy-op yourself into thinking mainstream platforms are racist and you'll be happier.
They [i]are[/i] racist .. against "whites". Ukraine is basically being genocided by their own government. All the women shipped off to be fricked by foreigners and their men stay to be civilian meat shields or conscripted.
You can't be racist against whites, being racist is based but being anti-white isn't based.
>You can't be racist against whites
What?
Being racist implies being based. But "against whites" implies being anti-white". Being anti-white is not based, therefore we have a contradiction.
I don't think the "pretending to be moronic" angle is working for you as well as you think it is.
he's right. you're not based and not racist.
Russians are not white
Have you actually seen ethnic Russians lol? They're frickin' vampires. They don't have normal skin color, their skin is basically unnatural paper color.
I live next to Russia. They're not white, they're mongolian rape babies with 80IQ. They're about as white as """""white""""" am*ricans.
watch any live webcam placed in any western Russian city and see for youself, you brainwashed bug
Black person I see these monkeys on a daily basis in my town. They're not white.
I'm mongoloid (not really, but close enough). I can confirm that Russians are Russians, and Mongoloids are Mongoloids.
>but muh white/black
no one cares, Amerifat. Here discrimination/suprematism is based on ethnicity, not race.
Further proving your sense of identity is arbitrary and novel.
It is primarily developed by Ukrainians, after all.
It's developed by a Ukrainian, /misc/tard.
Maybe they shouldn't have placed their "country" (my_sides.webm) on Russian soil.
Shilling for social constructions like countries and borders is moronic.
i hope you like himars
This, it's not the place of a fricking source code hosting file to be fist pumping for Khazarian Nazis.
Every time a see Ukraine flag on software, I remember node-ipc, and nope out. I don't need "surprises" in my software.
What a moronic leap of logic.
gitlab is proprietary as well.
wut?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss
>with all proprietary code removed
>Gitlab
it's the same shit
>hosting your own git server
yes just ignore that github works for 99% of people, be a good consoomer and buy more server hardware that you don't need
>using SVN
bait
>be a good consoomer and buy more server hardware that you don't need
>nu-/g/aylord actively promoting centralization behind megacorp interests
Holy shit, this place is completely fricked.
>centralization bad
>no i wont explan why its just bad lol
>now buy this server hardware i conveniently have available to sell you
this place is fricked and its because of pathetic shills like you
>shitcoins have decentralization as THE (theoretic) feature
>everybody and their mother stores their wallets on crypto exchanges
decentralization is a meme that just doesn't work out in practice. nobody really wants to be their own bank or be their own cloud storage provider or maintain their own browser fork.
the biggest meme of all is how morons like him think decentralization means freedom from 'megacorp interests' when what it actually means is you have 1000 server operators all shilling for the same megacorps again
>what it actually means is you have 1000 server operators all shilling for the same megacorps again
You are among those server operators. Why would *you* shill for those megacorps if you clearly despise them?
"i despise megacorps" is not a valid reason to own a website
>"i despise megacorps" is not a valid reason to seek alternatives to megacorp websites
???
>despise megacorps
>seek "alternatives" to megacorp websites
>they do exactly the same thing as megacorp websites
>this is supposed to be better for some reason
Huh? Again, why would YOU be replicating megacorp behavior? It's YOUR website, everything is owned and controlled by YOU. There is no "they".
>there is no they
>need a server so you have to rent it out from someone
>need an IP/domain so you need to buy these too
>need a certificate for the website so you need to buy yet another thing
>this is supposed to be better than just having a free account on github that doesnt require you to buy anything or maintain any infrastructure
>>need a server so you have to rent it out from someone
Home server works fine.
>>need an IP/domain so you need to buy these too
You have an internet connection, right? There are free domains out there.
>>need a certificate for the website so you need to buy yet another thing
LetsEncrypt.
>>this is supposed to be better than just having a free account on github that doesnt require you to buy anything or maintain any infrastructure
Unironically yes. You have free reign of how the underlying infrastructure of your website is set up. You can swap out the parts you depend on as you wish. Keep in mind that not every company is a megacorp. On GitHub, you will ALWAYS be tied to scummy Microsoft.
>Home server works fine.
99% of ISPs will not allow you to do that, any sort of NAT in front of you will block this too
>Unironically yes. You have free reign of how the underlying infrastructure of your website is set up.
I don't want to maintain infrastructure or host websites, I just want somewhere to store my code
that's what freetards are unable to understand
>99% of ISPs will not allow you to do that
False and baseless statement.
>any sort of NAT in front of you will block this too
Port forward. The exception is CGNAT, which you probably don't have unless you live in a genuine shithole.
>I just want somewhere to store my code
Why do you hate megacorps and then defend them in the same breath?
>Home server works fine.
just buy more server equipment bro, spend money, consoom
>There are free domains out there
botnet
>LetsEncrypt.
insecure, botnet
>You have free reign of how the underlying infrastructure of your website is set up
who the frick cares, im just trying to upload some code to ordinary standard git
>You can swap out the parts you depend on as you wish
i dont want to do that, i want ordinary standard git
>Keep in mind that not every company is a megacorp. On GitHub, you will ALWAYS be tied to scummy Microsoft.
just pay my scummy startup instead bro, dont you know in 5 years they plan to get bought by microsoft for billions of dollars
.
>insecure, botnet
>t. John moron Horst
>can change provider of any of these anytime if you not satisfied
>certificate is completely free
>you don't learn anything with proprietary platform, it just werks for dumb idiots
>Heh, didn't you read the ToS? Tough luck, pal. Self-determination? Freedom? Right to privacy?!?! What are you, some kind of FRICKING NAZI? Megacorps controlling everything we're allowed to think, say, and do is actually a good thing because it's somewhat more convenient sometimes, but also capitalism is evil. No, I don't see how my own beliefs very obviously contradict each other for the benefit of some fat cat's wallet. If you don't like it, make your own platform, chud.
>OMG WTF NOOOO DON'T MAKE YOUR OWN PLATFORM FRICKING CHUDCELS YOU HAVE TO AGREE TO MY CODE OF CONDUCT RIGHT NOWWWWWW
every time with you idiots
how do you even manage to bear the weight of your own
Do you really think they're going to stop at preventing people from saying mean words? It's just going to get worse and worse from here
>Megacorps controlling everything we're allowed to think, say, and do is actually a good thing because it's somewhat more convenient sometimes, but also capitalism is evil.
I still have never even seen a lefty attempt to debunk this. I think it's a blind spot in their programming. They literally just pretend that religiously enforcing corporate ToS isn't in direct contradiction to their core beliefs. Hilarious.
No wonder they only ever talk about the correlation between having a McDonald's-tier degree and being a lefty, never actual cognitive ability.
>they do exactly the same thing as megacorp websites
Well, no, Facebook doesn't work without JavaScript like my website.
I own a website on GitHub pages. Not really "own", but at least I will be able to make a backup if GitHub goes to shit, which I can't do with gay platforms.
all those platforms allow you to download and backup your data
why am i making a website if im the only person whose gonna use it, might as well just download an offline app
>work without JavaScript
this isnt an actual feature, name one feature your social media site has that facebook doesnt
>why am i making a website if im the only person whose gonna use it,
Convenient access to the same data from multiple devices, and background jobs (such as CI) running on a reliable always-on machine.
>making everything this complicated
i dont need a website to copy files from my pc to my phone
>background jobs (such as CI) running on a reliable always-on machine.
just buy more server equipment bro, bro just buy an industrial grade ups, bro come on spend spend consoom
facebook supports that, press the zoom button in your browser
or just send it via email like a normal person
>or just send it via email like a normal person
I own a personal email server, BTW. And send link to CV on my own website via my own email.
>facebook supports
>in your browser
Choose one.
wow you removed one server in the chain of 100 servers required to deliver one email message
>just buy an industrial grade ups
lmao this site runs on mcbook minis and usbs
you don't need the 5k+ server rack with 50 disks
>this isnt an actual feature, name one feature your social media site has that facebook doesnt
Large fonts and markup.
Lol. Need more or basic shit is enough?
>why am i making a website if im the only person whose gonna use it
Don't you have a job? It's so easy to share CV with your own website.
Really not even sure how to approach any of these. Not once did I say I was an advocate for cryptoscams. Not once did I imply you needed to purchase brand new server equipment. Not once did I mention that you should just host all of your shit on someone else's infrastructure.
Seriously, have a nice day. If you are too stupid to setup a home server or something remotely close, maybe just go back to the board you came from.
I'm assuming this is all just bait, so congratulations, I got myself caught.
>Not once did I imply you needed to purchase brand new server equipment
>just setup a home server with sticks and rocks bro
>if you dont do that then its bait
cope
why would i buy dedicated server for git? i can run it on an existing one.
Go pay for copilot, goy
Self hosting isn't consumerism because you aren't consuming a conventional product that is ever-increasing and in need of consumption. That's like saying buying a wood saw to fashion your own chair alternative to a conventional one at Walmart is mindless consumerism. You're moronic.
>gitlab
>does not work with tor
>blocks countries their American overlord said them to block
>few years ago stopped hiring Russian and Chinese speaking people because of American election hack hysteria
>now blocks Russian IP pool entirely
>uses cuckflare
so much free! so much accessible to everyone! such a foss spirit! Would love to host basedware that may or may not contain backdoors that will nuke my entire codebase at any random moment of time because I'm affiliated with Jong Xina.
>what is selfhosted GitLab
Selfhosted GitLab does not have this problem.
Is source actually vetted? I'm not really keen about infecting my servers with stuff.
bloated
name something better then, i'll wait
https://gitea.io/en-us/
You can set it up with docker in minutes.
>You can set it up with docker
docker is bloat zoomzoom
air is bloat, stop breathing
I'm surprised they recommended source hut, since aparrently even using that site is enough to get you canceled just due to the association between it and drew devault.
I'm surprised because sourcehut is ugly, UI is unusable.
That place is woke as duck what are you talking https://sourcehut.org/blog/2021-01-13-regarding-ethics/
codeberg and sourcehut are 2 big (or, "big") ones, aso if you must use some big service shit use gitlab.com that is proprietary but at least some of it's code is public
(also there is gitgud if you are fine to be associated with IQfy)
Codeberg is the nicest.
Gitea
sourcehut if you love email
codeberg if you don't
self-hosted gitea if you are autistic or getting paid for it
Just host your own version control you stupid monkey. If you're not smart enough to figure out how to do that you have no business trying to write programs in the first place.
>git
>stagit
Let me guess, you "need" more?
sourcehut for maximum autism
git put them in .zip upload it to your self hoster wordpress site
Hello sirs, please get githubcopilot subscription it's very good.
my github is just a shared folder, no source control, just ctrl+z in atom editor
>atom editor
It's over, anon.
https://github.blog/2022-06-08-sunsetting-atom/
>it's literally nothing
FOSSgays mad
I will mirror my Github repos to a gitea instance but won't stop using it for now.
why don't you just do inverse, do shit on gitlab and mirror back to github, requires technically no work, just mirror to that, gitea lets you also mirror issues and pull requests, then just make github repo a mirror of that gitea one, and then add "report issues and bugs to https://aa.bb.cc/shit" to readme
That would be the ideal case but my gitea server has more chances of network failing (hosting at home) instead of GitHub, so I'd use it as a backup instead.
well then move to codeberg or somewhere, you can still use your own and shithub as mirrors
I really don't understand FOSS troons
>oh, you make money from software? how dare you!
99% of the devs don't gives a shit about how copepilot spit out some of your shitcode, homie. go cry to stallman about it
making money of gpl software is allowed, there is just 3 main pilars
>SHARE THE SOURCE
>LICENSE YOUR MODIFICATIONS WITH GPL OR LESS RESTRICTIVE LICENSE
>NO RESTRICTIONS THAT INFER WITH GPL
the problem with copilot is that shit that it produces is usually not licensed under gpl, so it is a violation.
>problematic activities
>working with the ICE
https://sfconservancy.org/GiveUpGitHub/#ICE-contract-details
Silence, leftist.
for me its cgit on my homeserver
homosexual
Frick off, glowie.
this just makes me tempted to use sourceforge, but it's such a piece of shit technically that I just can't
Try Fossil.
Fossil is fricking cool and it's a shame that nobody knows about it.
://sfconservancy.org
https://sfconservancy.org/news/2019/sep/16/rms-does-not-speak-for-us/
also, the time to leave GH was when microsoft was about to buy it
You are not as funny as you think you are.
didnt read is this about copilot training its AI on private and proprietary repositories?
>n-nooo you can't leave troonhub
>how will we steal your work to train our GPT-3 models now?
It doesn't have to be on github for them to mass scrape your git repo. As long as it's open source, anyone can download your shit and use it to train a ML model.
Captcha to view source code?
And when you git clone you could have like a POW challenge like in CTFs.
Am I missing something or a genius
Won't work, open source means it's legal for anyone to solve the captcha and then clone the repo back onto any other git service including github.
They're completely blind that only now do they see what Microsoft is trying to do here.
The entire "code of conduct" and "community covenant" thing is antithetical to open source culture but perfectly in line with corporate culture, so of course they use GitHub to foist it upon open source projects. The implementation might be different, but in the end it's just another AARD code or "accidentally" switching the default browser back to IE/Edge.
>The entire "code of conduct" and "community covenant" thing is antithetical to open source culture
Except it's literally not, code of conducts are completely in line with open source. Everyone can ban anyone else from contributing to their own personal git repository. What they can't do is stop someone else from forking the project into their own git repository, code of conducts were never meant to prevent that.
>there are people that didnt abandon github for one of the alternatives when microsoft bought it
This entire article reads like a troll post. All they essentially are saying is that "sourceforge went proprietary, so GitHub can as well" like what
Who paid for all this shilling? github is globalist garbage of course, but don't shit up this hell hole even more, you can smell how many goddamn teenagers and babies are posting here right now
hope sfc sue
They don't have enough funds to sue microsoft
You can host a git server on a sbc for $10
Can't leave a site I don't use.
> GitHub has a contract with ICE so you can't use it
> Well it's highly problematic to have borders and an immigration system
> No it doesn't matter how the citizens of the democracy voted. Becoming American is a universal right
tl;dr
Probably goes something like,
Microsoft bad, open source good, a.i. bad, me complain, muh license.
I think actually they're pissed that GitHub hosted some software that was used by ICE or something like that. You know, the site that has done more than any other to help push garbage social marxist identity politics into the open source scene, that made everyone stop using the word "master", and plasters BLM and gay pride banners all over everything, still isn't doing enough for their cause.
i only use github for mods and stuff how bad will it get? if SF is dead wheres the alternatives?
they can scrape your codes to do malicious things with from anywhere and you can only watch
Glad I moved to Codeberg.
I don't get the point of git forges in the first place. The browser is terrible to view source in, the search doesn't work properly, the patch workflows are unashamedly vendor lock-in...The only reason they exist is to treat development like social media
So, what are you using? Mailing lists with attached patches lol?
That would work, or simply ask someone to pull from my repo that's hosted elsewhere. Doesn't need to be email either, IRC works too for patches or pull requests (in the literal meaning, not GitHub's perversion of the term). Using a properly configured text editor and email client is significantly more convenient than GitHub could ever be
I still have no idea why it's pull request and not push request.
The git-request-pull(1) man page is mostly self explanatory, but for git forges and centralized development it doesn't make sense which is why GitLab uses merge request instead
Because the contributor is requesting the owner of the upstream repo to pull the changes from their fork.
On GitHub by opening a PR you're essentially pushing at that repository into a pull/$id branch and asking them to merge it into a different branch, which is potentially the confusion around naming since there's no actual pull at any point
As far as I understand it, a GitHub repo and its forks are one big repo under the hood (this is why you can view commits of forks in the parent's /commit/$ID view) with different sets of heads for each "front-end" repo, so there's neither push nor pull, just merge. GitLab calls it a merge request for that reason.
gitea can unironically do everything github can.
Can it fast-forward branches in forks from the web UI?
You can't "give up" something that's popular, just like nobody can give up twitter.
We're going to experience facebook all over again with github and barely anyone seems to notice it. Every fricking repository is on github. I had to make another github account after I delete my first one just to contribute non-code.
GitHub has been synonymous with open source for a while now. It sure as hell isn't going anywhere, no matter how much freetards seethe with rage. Also, thanks for reminding me to give Copilot a shot.
Lock it. Lock it now. This is the friendliest message I'm going to send while I look for ways to get OP banned.
>leave github
nope, cya
Don't care, I'm using as my portfolio. Seethe all you want toe cheese munchers.
I mean why would i? Why is it bad that It uses gpl code or something? I think it's great