Lets get a list of essential?

Let’s get a list of essential /homo/core going. Here’s what I have so far:
>The Iliad
>The poetry of Sappho
>Plato’s Symposium
>The Picture of Dorian Gray
>Maurice
>Brideshead Revisited
>Confessions of a Mask
>Memoirs of Hadrian
>The novels of Mary Renault
>Call Me By Your Name
>Song of Achilles
>My diary tbh

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >The Iliad
    Shalom.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If you have The Iliad might as well add titles like Iphigenia in Tauris tbh

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I remember someone working on a list a month or two ago

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Some of these books do not even contain mentions of homosexuality.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Which ones?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Hyperion

          I don't think Dorian Gray makes explicit mention

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >I don't think Dorian Gray makes explicit mention
            It is very obviously a gay novel with gay characters, written by a gay writer who tried to push how gay he could make the novel. (and he got censored to shit because of it)

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Wait, Walt Whitman was actually gay? Are you sure this isn't just the modern politically active alphabet soup people appropriating him based on weak grounds?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Whitman never tried to hide his homosexuality:
        >Critic Rufus Wilmot Griswold reviewed Leaves of Grass in the November 10, 1855 issue of The Criterion, calling it "a mass of stupid filth," and categorized its author as a filthy free lover. Griswold also suggested, in Latin, that Whitman was guilty of "that horrible sin not to be mentioned among Christians," one of the earliest public accusations of Whitman's homosexuality. Griswold's intensely negative review almost caused the publication of the second edition to be suspended. Whitman incorporated the full review, including the innuendo, in a later edition of Leaves of Grass.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >"that horrible sin not to be mentioned among Christians,"
          So he raped little boys, good to know

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Whitman never tried to hide his homosexuality:
        >Critic Rufus Wilmot Griswold reviewed Leaves of Grass in the November 10, 1855 issue of The Criterion, calling it "a mass of stupid filth," and categorized its author as a filthy free lover. Griswold also suggested, in Latin, that Whitman was guilty of "that horrible sin not to be mentioned among Christians," one of the earliest public accusations of Whitman's homosexuality. Griswold's intensely negative review almost caused the publication of the second edition to be suspended. Whitman incorporated the full review, including the innuendo, in a later edition of Leaves of Grass.

        He wrote (by the standards of his era) very openly about fricking men and women, although he was definitely bisexual, not homosexual

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Kek have you read Leaves of Grass? That shit is gay as goddamn hell.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        He got drunk with Oscar Wilde... everyone knows what happens then.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Weird/shame that Hogg is on here, but not Exquisite Corpse.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I think might be bi. Years of being of virginal pussy loser has made me sexually confused.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    fight club

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >essential /homo/
    >nothing french
    You're going to get bullied kid

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >217 ratings
      Honestly that’s about 200 more readers than I could have guessed.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Sometimes it genuinely terrifies me I share a planet with the person who wrote that blurb and the people who read the book in any way except to mock it.
      That combination of words in the summary must activate sleeper agents. The entire thing is totally incomprehensible to anyone from 2018 or earlier

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You're missing the Communist Manifesto

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Wingmen

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Great Mirror of Male Love!
    >My diary tbh
    Post gayanon, you're the best

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Sappho is gay
    oh shit guys what do we do he figured it out

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Samuel Delaney gets memed on a lot here for Hogg but Times Square Red, Times Square Blue is a very thoughtful and well-written account of gay life in NYC in the 70s/80s. He has a real talent for dialogue and for describing unique, memorable characters with only a few lines.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No Moby Dick? It's literally in the name of the book

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Edmund White?

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Also The Sea, The Sea by Iris Murdoch.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *