It's the logical conclussion to idealizing Greek and Roman pederasty, the former being with boys from 12-18 and the latter being mostly pre-pubescent child prostitutes (puer delicatus). There was no adult-adult love that was seen in good light in those days.
11 months ago
Anonymous
we must retvrn
11 months ago
Anonymous
Yes. To bronze age EVROPA before the Cretans and their gay shit.
if you're mean this in the sense of like the beloved must be strictly over 18 and everything else is evil or something then you're brainwashed i'm sorry
11 months ago
Anonymous
>bro, 50yos sodomizing 12yos is totally fine
have a nice day
Also, >You're mean this
11 months ago
Anonymous
i never said that and dont look like that and actually think sex is disgusting but loving 12yo boys in moderation is perfectly fine and if you disagree feel free to tell me why
11 months ago
Anonymous
You're stripping them from having a healthy sexual development, they're guillible and easy to manipulate and child sexual abuse has been linked to mental illnes and later paraphilias. I hope you never get near a child.
11 months ago
Anonymous
I literally explicitly said I think sex is disgusting and you start talking about sex my God you're so fricking brainwashed
11 months ago
Anonymous
>strawman
Sex or molestation. Both are under the category of "sexual abuse".
11 months ago
Anonymous
never mentioned sex
never mentioned molestation
rage harder until you're exhausted and maybe when you come to your senses you can start paying attention and talking about what i actually wrote
11 months ago
Anonymous
What's your point? Are you one of those "virtuous pedophiles" or by "love" you mean fraternal love? If the earlier kys and if the latter not related to thread.
11 months ago
Anonymous
In the sense of Plato, divine love (love of a person's abstract qualities) in combination with a little vulgar love (love of a person's materially sensible qualities), is what I consider to be acceptable. Touching and embracing a kid like a parent normally would is fine. No molestation or engaging in any sexual activity. Capiche? Don't reply to me unless you capeesh, or I might just leave you and your thread alone.
11 months ago
Anonymous
also, >failing to greentext
see? i can do it too 🙂
Plato.
"when male unites with female for procreation the pleasure experienced is held to be due to nature, but contrary to nature when male mates with male or female with female, and that those first guilty of such enormities were impelled by their slavery to pleasure."
Plat. Laws 1.63
Surely having sex with a woman for the sake for simply having sex being aware that it wont end in procreation if precautions are taken is then also as wrong as homosexuality then?
Biography Memoir, but these type of questions come up. Growing up gay in a strait society is rough and being introspection is necessary for happiness and survival.
Morality isn't real homosexual. You base your own morals on what you perceive as righteous or morally wrong and only you yourself. If you base it on what others believe then you obviously fall into Society's perception of what is right or wrong and the answer should be very clear from that alone.
I disagree I think there is a morality that arises naturally in the universe and to stray from it causes deep suffering we can see this in degenerate societies and I dont just mean the west.
I dont believe that also simply because majority of people hold a belief it makes it more or less right, but the way youve phrased it makes you sound like a edgey pseudo rebellious teen.
https://desuarchive.org/his/thread/15250444/
read this epic thread (includes discussion of literature books)
your diary
https://warosu.org/lit/thread/20477079#p20477079
And this
Gayposters seem to be consistently well read (more so on the greeks). Or maybe it is just a couple anons crusading for gayreek culture
It's only one dude from what I've seen, and he's not just gay, but a gay pedophile.
Oh well, that sucks :/ wish he wasn't a pedo
It's the logical conclussion to idealizing Greek and Roman pederasty, the former being with boys from 12-18 and the latter being mostly pre-pubescent child prostitutes (puer delicatus). There was no adult-adult love that was seen in good light in those days.
we must retvrn
Yes. To bronze age EVROPA before the Cretans and their gay shit.
Alot of them seem more pedoy then gay here, was more interested in standard adult homosexual not pedo crap
if you're mean this in the sense of like the beloved must be strictly over 18 and everything else is evil or something then you're brainwashed i'm sorry
>bro, 50yos sodomizing 12yos is totally fine
have a nice day
Also, >You're mean this
i never said that and dont look like that and actually think sex is disgusting but loving 12yo boys in moderation is perfectly fine and if you disagree feel free to tell me why
You're stripping them from having a healthy sexual development, they're guillible and easy to manipulate and child sexual abuse has been linked to mental illnes and later paraphilias. I hope you never get near a child.
I literally explicitly said I think sex is disgusting and you start talking about sex my God you're so fricking brainwashed
>strawman
Sex or molestation. Both are under the category of "sexual abuse".
never mentioned sex
never mentioned molestation
rage harder until you're exhausted and maybe when you come to your senses you can start paying attention and talking about what i actually wrote
What's your point? Are you one of those "virtuous pedophiles" or by "love" you mean fraternal love? If the earlier kys and if the latter not related to thread.
In the sense of Plato, divine love (love of a person's abstract qualities) in combination with a little vulgar love (love of a person's materially sensible qualities), is what I consider to be acceptable. Touching and embracing a kid like a parent normally would is fine. No molestation or engaging in any sexual activity. Capiche? Don't reply to me unless you capeesh, or I might just leave you and your thread alone.
also, >failing to greentext
see? i can do it too 🙂
>Alot of them seem more pedoy then gay
Don't you know who is shockingly overrepresented when it comes to being pedos, anon?
Many such cases!
You're talking like we aren't on a board with daily e-girlta threads and pictures of little girls reading to pass it off as IQfy related
The Bible
Plato.
"when male unites with female for procreation the pleasure experienced is held to be due to nature, but contrary to nature when male mates with male or female with female, and that those first guilty of such enormities were impelled by their slavery to pleasure."
Plat. Laws 1.63
Surely having sex with a woman for the sake for simply having sex being aware that it wont end in procreation if precautions are taken is then also as wrong as homosexuality then?
Not as wrong because it can be fruitful
Biography Memoir, but these type of questions come up. Growing up gay in a strait society is rough and being introspection is necessary for happiness and survival.
It's morality neutral. That fits on a fortune cookie, so no book is necessary.
What manga is this?
Spy x family
Its actually disgusting therefore morally wrong
Something being disgusting doesn't make it bad. Maggots eating a corpse and pooping are gross, but are arguably necessary.
Morality isn't real homosexual. You base your own morals on what you perceive as righteous or morally wrong and only you yourself. If you base it on what others believe then you obviously fall into Society's perception of what is right or wrong and the answer should be very clear from that alone.
To read this and proclaim reddit would be an understatement.
I disagree I think there is a morality that arises naturally in the universe and to stray from it causes deep suffering we can see this in degenerate societies and I dont just mean the west.
I dont believe that also simply because majority of people hold a belief it makes it more or less right, but the way youve phrased it makes you sound like a edgey pseudo rebellious teen.