>look up movie
>DVD rip: 13GB
>1080 rip: 19GB
>4k bluray rip: 56GB
they never learned to encode in russia?
>look up movie. >DVD rip: 13GB. >1080 rip: 19GB. >4k bluray rip: 56GB
>look up movie
>DVD rip: 13GB
>1080 rip: 19GB
>4k bluray rip: 56GB
they never learned to encode in russia?
They're archival quality, they won't degrade even when advances in encoding tech hit.
How often do you hang onto ancient MPEG2 videos, for example?
If you wanted to archive a DVD, you'd just upload the original 4.7GB data without any re-encoding to make it worse and larger.
It doesn't make it worse, it makes it compatible with more devices. Which is a good thing.
this is it. a h.264 video might look good now, but in 10, 15 years will look like dogshit.
a modern encoding like vp9 will decay a lot less over time
No and you couldn't tell a difference.
Can we assume that "AI upscaling," (which is just really algo upscaling they gotta stop with these buzz terms), will make this unnecessary anyways?
On this subject. I usually download Youtube videos in no higher than 720p quality. I use Nvidia's "AI" upscaler on the shield and it works great going to 1080p. Not sure how it'd look at 4k but I don't care that much. That implementation is already old as shit so I wonder what a modern AI upscaler could do.
is the eletricity consumption less than you'd waste in buying more disk space?
Probably. It pulls like 18W under max load (AI upscale isn't max load) and I average over a year maybe 30mins a day tops. That's like $1 a year.
I've got h264 anime from 15 years ago and they look exactly the same.
It's anime, It's not wine. it was already shit and it doesn't get better with age
rarbg chads always win
https://rarbg.coomer.party/
They give a shit about quality, unlike you anon wanting a 500MiB 1080p x265 rip
>you want little tiny movie?
>het blyat you get BIG movie with BIG file size and you will take it like man
Underrated
>download 20gb movie
>its a split rar archive
damn homie, that's nuts
cute cat
dumb rat
Come back here, homosexual. Explain the video in length. At least 2000 words or you're grounded.
>tfw no more yify rips
good thing I'm not a furgay
I won't download a movie if it's under 10GB, you start to notice the quality loss
Wrong
i found a 1080p 6GB copy of Aliens and the quality was amazing (especially after applying my own 60fps tweaked interpolation filter)
Any other 1080 rip out there looks like trash in comparison
>after applying my own 60fps tweaked interpolation filter
lmfao you have no right to be talking about quality
Cry more homosexual go watch pixelated trash at 22fps
what are you gay sperg, these are censored jav videos
>60 FPS
Gaymer brainrot.
>interpolated 60fps
it appears my superiority has caused some controversy
>superiority
you unironically just play with software
Ironic shitposting is still shitposting.
>(especially after applying my own 60fps tweaked interpolation filter)
boy do i have the TV for you
>Shannon's top pick
If I weren't convinced before, I sure am now!
>60fps tweaked interpolation filter
>quality
>60fps tweaked interpolation filter
kek nice bait
>Aliens 1986 Special Edition UHD BluRay 2160p TrueHD Atmos 7 1 DV HEVC REMUX-FraMeSToR - Torrent Size : 64.44 GB
This dropped few days ago...
>60fps
Slideshow
>what's a codec
>what's an encoder
>what are encoding settings
>what is source material
you are so fricking clueless and moronic
>what is cope
>what is arrest
Why would someone waste their time comparing encodes instead of grabbing the best thing out there?
How do you know what's best if you don't compare?
Artist's intention is Blu-Ray, not Chang Chong's HDBits encode.
But blurays can look different from each other.
There's some weird differences you can find on blurays sometimes.
It's not always just wildly different color grading or the vaseline smear made famous by that one Predator release.
For example the anime series School-Live has every single line across every frame be about one and a half times the thickness on its international bluray release compared to the japanese one.
I HATE BLUE MOVIES I HATE BLUE MOVIES
>6500k vs 9300k
You don't know warm until it's CRT.
What the frick is wrong with bongs?
Every country does the same thing.
Most of these are cases of releases done at different times and usually with different film prints. It wouldn't surprise me if none of these screenshots were done from the camera negatives and all done from whatever interpositives-positive prints they had laying around which usually have different color grading to eachother. Its the cheapest way.
In this picture you can see they darken the top and bottom so you'd pay attention to the middle. It's digitally altered.
The HDB encode will likely fix any flaws with the original source. If there are none they will try to reduce the size while getting it as transparent as possible to the original source. The comments from users there about different sources are quite useful too. Sometimes the "artist's intent" looks quite shitty including new remasters that are supposedly supervised by people who worked on the movie.
Here's an example of the director changing the look of his movie.
I usually shoot for ~8gb for 1080p and ~20gb for 2160p
We prioritize quality.
Remux or get fricked
most files don't originate from russia, dumb c**t. a tonne of stuff comes from """"private trackers"""".
>consuming rip slop
I only download remuxes or BDMVs
Go back to watching Yify artifact soup, bandwidthlet.
Its 2024, you can download 56gb in a couple of hours. Do you really need your films instantly?
not for americans, they're still paying $120 for less than 10mbps and they have to invent new terms to explain this away like changing the capitals in the "MBps" part
lmao lol
Kek, I pay 25€ for 1000mbps. 56gb would take 10-15 min
Is this real?
They get better speeds but it's still expensive and they all have data caps.
https://broadbandnow.com/internet-providers-with-data-caps
>data claps
Looks like Spectrum still doesn't have them. That's who my ISP was before I left the US. When I lived in a Comcast area they didn't implement them yet.
yes, israelites in america actually use
https://www.gbmb.org/mbps-to-mbs
to explain why their "fiber" which isn't fiber, because they won't pay for that, is less than 10MBps for an average of 120$ a month, with a data cap
most american fiber is "fiber to microwave link" which could be anything from a ubuquiti horn on a tower to a commercial microwave horn, it's up in the air, even if you live in a city
starlink is even worse at 100MBps with a 1TB data cap, and constant disconnects
once you go over the 1TB cap you're permanently marked as a slower connection around 10-30MBps
starlink in america is about the only way unless you live next to a large datacenter that actually has IT companies running fiber, to actually get a good route to ds3 lines that supply the ISP
american ISPs also sell dns queries they packet log, on top of the exorbitant price, which means there really isnt any limit to the extra money they make off customers. there is even a torrent information selling scheme, if your torrent traffic isnt encrypted, they sell your information to various movie copyright protection israelites.
american phone providers are still stuck on the data cap shit around 5gb-10gb, unlimited means "10gb-20gb maybe then you get slow speeds for the rest of the month"
In Russia upload and download speed is always the same on paper. In practice upload speed is even higher than download speed.
Why the frick in America you have asymmetric speed with upload being 5 times slower than upload? It's not ADSL era anymore.
they live under israeli regime
It's a miracle of Jesus that they don't have to pay for air
Because most of the US uses cable modems instead of fiber. Most ISPs don't have legit competition either and have a monopoly on their area.
I watch 480p 264 encowds
only bad thing about rutracker are the ISOs for music, zero advantages with that
most rutrack releases I've seen are over bitrate, yes it is better for quality, but it is mostly for archival purposes, cause you can safely decrease the value 2 times and you will not notice any difference until you start zooming the shit.
It's is basically a museum of digital media
Everything is for archival purposes, some movies even have 20+ audio tracks (original english and russian voiceovers from 90s)
>bdrip/dvdrip
>384p
seriously, what the frick? why does this happen all the time
>DVD rip: 13GB
excuse me? dvd's only go up to 8.5GiB, like the physical discs only get to that
unless you're talking about HD-DVD's?
I don't know about size because I only download Blu-ray rips but there are movies that were released on multiple discs
russians rip movies into a gzipped archive of flac audio tracks and bitmap frames. what? it doesn't fit on your hard drive? why are you even using a hard drive? stop being poor and buy a 1pb ssd
>download smallest rip possible
>use topaz video ai to upscale to 4k
>use flowframes to get it to 60+fps
>use nvidia sdr to hdr
Yep, it's movie time
might as well close your eyes and imagine the movie yourself
Directors, cameramen and colorists are general overpaid pseuds who don't understand their discipline so it's better to just have a program written by somebody competent or an ai do their job for them.
>2024
>encode
What movie, moron? Have you tried to search in a category with encodes instead of remuxes? Also, in bdrip, there are usually like 5-8 different audiotracks each ranging from 500MB to 1.5GB
what I hate the most is this new trend of x265/hevc torrents being actualy re-encodings of shitty x264 torrents, in the past it used to be that x265/hevc were either web rips from streaming services which were usually the top quality possible to deliver or that they were encoded from the bluray rip
huh? those look like reasonable sizes
Not my problem
>A:10
>V:10
Thanks based yify
I miss this little Black person like you wouldn't believe
heheheheh based vatniks.
Not you OP, JUST SHUT UP AND SIT DOWN!
SIT DOWN!! MOUTH SHUT!
>you WILL experience the movie with each voice track and you WILL love it
You can always use mkvtoolnix to remove the ones you don't want
Mods require users to add every approved translation if they want to get the "approved" checkmark or even post their release if another release with suitable voiceovers exists.
I find it useful since it prevents people from spamming their low effort shit.
>language: UK
>oh that must mean united kingdom english
>dirty disgusting slav audio comes out
What did you expect? English isnt russian and people have difficulty comprehending it (no one talks it, and speedreading subs is taxing). They want voice dubs, even if it's really a single bored guy who didnt have enough sleep speaking over everyone's voice.
>b-but my ears
Slav site, slav rules.
>Some extra 1.1 GiB (all audio tracks together) scare me
moron
Wow, that's like 5 minutes of additional download time!
Why don’t they just share the .m2ts file with seperate Russian external audio tracks when they make a remux? That way they could share the original audio and video without having to re-encode.
For example:
Video File: The Matrix (1999)/The Matrix.m2ts
Audio File: The Matrix (1999)/The Matrix.dts
it makes sense since they changed the lamps to LEDs
>the israelites are literally holocausting the incandescent bulb from the history of humanity
any movies for this feel?
soul status: destroyed
reminds me of those zoomer homosexuals who were watching some moronic version of db and sailor moon and complained about the proper colors.
There's no definitive version of either show. Every official release has positives and negatives.
LOL. Keep coping; nobody but zoomers have watched pink sailor moon.
Is that a fan edit or an official release?
TV reruns from film that degraded.
Is that a fan edit or an official release?
TV reruns from film that degraded.
dude, where's my car?
No-one's coping about anything. Toei objectively has shit releases for everything they've put out and 9/10 times fan restoration projects do a better job than them.
>Kineko
People other than SoM are CC restoring Dragon Ball? Awesome
Kineko (ex Femboy-films) are relatively associated with SoM. Quazza who is Kineko's film scan engineer and video editor, was a key member in SoM's cc team. Kineko is just a more professional team all around because they get requests for film scans and restorations.
I got this on bluray. They cropped it to 16:9 and did color changes. Frick Toei.
Quality over size. Wise russians.
I usually get a lower 1080p rip in x265 if it's just a movie or show I'm archiving to have.
If it's something I actually care about, like a big film or series, I try for a remux with full 5.1/7.1 Dolby Atmos in a Remux etc. Is this a good approach?
>they never learned to encode in russia?
That's because in Russia TCP packets aren't carried in physical shit-stained buckets.
If you have a 1Gbit connection like any civilized human being then that 56GB 4k bluray rip will take literally 4 minutes to download, I'm spending way more time answering this bullshit bait.
Unless you live in a third-world country where your ISP calls you "mister willy wienerburn, I see that this month you've already seen 10MB of gay fetish porn, from now on your download speed will be limited to one image of a penis a day, good day and a thousand freedom dollars please".
For me its one russian bored guy overdubbing every single voice in the movie while you can still hear the original audio underneath
>DVD rip: 13GB
homie you moronic?
To oversimplify slightly, there are three versions of a movie you might find on a tracker:
(1) The raw files/disk image of a DVD or Blu-Ray, OR those files converted into a more convenient format without actually re-encoding (the latter is called a "remux")
(2) An official encode ripped from a streaming service, without being re-encoded. These are lower quality than (1).
(3) A re-encode of (1) or (2), with lower quality and filesize.
>DVD rip: 13GB
The storage limit on one DVD is less than 9GB, so for a movie this only makes sense if it's a rip of a two-disk special edition or something.
>1080 rip: 19GB
This is small for (1), large for (2) or (3).
>4k bluray rip: 56GB
Quite small for (1), UHD BRs go up to 100GB. Too large for (2). Quite large for (3), but people seeking out 4K content are less likely to be concerned about filesize so the conventions are currently a bit different than for 1080p.
If you don't want the large sizes of (1), my suggestion would be to look for (2) where possible. They'll have filenames like "WEBDL" or "AMZN".
i've never come across a dvd that split a single movie across two discs
like i've seen full screen and wide screen versions on separate discs, and of course i've seen bonus feature discs, but the main movie you need both discs to watch? haven't seen that, and i've seen hundreds of dvd's
>hourly poorgay seethe thread
Why did they make the movies blue?
They hate things looking natural.
holy shit, I want to puke
>DVD rip: 13GB
What?
>Mfw I've been downloading 210gb+ DVD rips this whole time
When we're you guys going to tell me
Encoding is not the proble, they just usually have 6 different audios of russian dub
ok
>movie from 2021 release has 2021 popslop filter over it
What is your point? Do you think you are clever or something?
why did they do it bros
the pink sailor moon thing at least had the excuse that the original film has degraded over time, even if that's not a very good excuse not to correct it
it means they're in the matrix
I watched an original film version of this in a cinema recently and it looked like the 2021 version.
Does it have Se7en alliance bluray version ?
HDB has it
> Mutilated Aspect Ratio, crappy telecined 1080i transfer, and apparently Alliance have decided that 15mpbs is the optimal bitrate for every possible source.. apart from the 24bit lossless sound, i consider this BD wholly worthless.
> Mutilated Aspect Ratio
its actually contain more infomation than original aspect ratio and im fascinate by it bloomy look
Just get the open matte 35mm print ffs
Is there one on myspleen?
Robs Nostalgia Projects
You literally don't know what reddit spacing is newbie
You even did it in another thread too
Absolute moron
>commit the grave mistake of posting an [ENG] torrent without russian translation, despite there being none, and im not paying money for a russifier
>"hello where [RUS]????"
>"what is the point of this without russian language"
>thread deleted
Well, it IS called rutracker, not engtracker.
Read the rules.
They have a separate category for ENG only releases
Lol
Lmao even
moron poorBlack person thinks you get same quality with less space. Oh hello just buy dvd and enchant it to 4k
Not about encoding but ripping
Standard DVDs movies are shitty MPEG2 encoded so extracting them consumes no more than 1.7GB per hour
These morons are alreafy killing its quality wirh unnecessary (and poor) reencodes
How do Russians afford to seed at 20MiB/s every fricking movie i download from there? Whats the secret?
Cheap fiber internet in every home.
it costs less than like 10$ monthly to them with no data caps and no israelite fricks sending them letters to cease their pirating
it's no secret, it's quite obvious actually
a better question is how come ameritards are content with what they get, literally pic related
A combination of not knowing better things are possible and being a nation of people who are streaming instead of pirating. Cable is the dominant tech and it's fine for downloading but inferior for uploading.
It's getting smarter.
>they never learned to encode in russia?
actually they do
http://www.compression.ru/
>see video encoding
>it isn't optimized for the two people still using dialup or unemployed autists on neo4chinz who DEMAND everything be optimized for someone with a single 250GB 7200RPM HDD
>shit pants and cry
If it isn't a 480p <= 20mbps MPEG2 file, I can't run it on my Pentium III 800mhz processor though. Big sad.
Choose YIFY.
Never
Yes. It's pretty rare to see 10 bit HEVC for mysterious reason.
You have to search for HDR10 to find them.
I assume there are not many of them because 10bit encoding of an 8bit source alters the original colors. And that's not allowed.
> 10bit encoding of an 8bit source alters the original colors
No, it does not.
It literally adds two binary zeroes after a 8bit value and makes it 10bit.
> without having to re-encode
There is no “having to re-encode” when you just add some new audio track.
It's called a remux. That's a lossless operation of copying existing video / audio / subtitle tracks into a new container file.
>No, it does not.
It does.
>There is no “having to re-encode” when you just add some new audio track.
Oh ok, I didn’t know that.