"Loving" God be like:

>Adactylidium is a genus of mites known for its unusual life cycle. An impregnated female mite feeds upon a single egg of a thrips, rapidly growing five to eight female offspring and one male in her body. The single male mite mates with all his sisters when they are still inside their mother. The new females, now impregnated, eat their way out of their mother's body so that they can emerge to find new thrips eggs, killing their mother in the process (though the mother may be only 4 days old at the time), starting the cycle again.The male emerges as well, but does not look for food or new mates, and dies after a few hours.

Hmmm imma create this and give it a nervous system

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Still morally superior to troony perverts gaping On toddler anus

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Loving God be like: creates men who pretend to be women to gape toddler anuses

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Love wins 🙂

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    OP be like: the mites.. oh no.. think of the little heckin dust miterinos..

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Think of the peoplerinos... They must be so significant that an all-loving God cares about their affairs and afterlife.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Your life is worth no more than a dust mite's. When you die, you're both going to the same place. Eternal nothing.

        You fault is not knowing humans were made in the image of God. Human lives are more important than animals.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          According to judaism only israelites are human.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          So suffering of animals and other creatures is justified to you?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            When it's nature? Sure.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy

          • 1 month ago
            Cult of Passion

            Correct, Man's Law is superior to the Law of the Jungle.

            Give to us by the greatest Ape of all, our Lawbringer!

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not reading that but I assume it's the appeal to nature fallacy. I don't know why you're sending to me though.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Because you just committed the fallacy of affirming that something is justified because it's natural. Rape and pedophilia also exist in nature, but they are not justified or good.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            why don't you go back to my previous state where holding animals to human standards is moronic?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Ok, so why do you say that in nature suffering is justified? Why would God create a world where some creatures suffered so much just to have a stay in it?

            By the way, are we not nature as well?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            because animals need meat to survive? "Nature" is a vague term. All I'm saying is that humans aren't just another animal in the eyes of God. Suffering as a whole was never God's intention or design. It's a result of the curse.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >The suffering of animals is made righteous in the sight of God.
            Why would God consider that something righteous?
            >Animals need meat to survive.
            God chose this cruel way of feeding them when omnipotence granted many other solutions.
            >Suffering as a whole was never God's intention or design.
            What about picrel?
            >It's a result of the curse.
            Curse made by whom?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            so basically you're asking "If God is real, why do bad things happen" ?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            No, it's more specific. It's just "Why would God consider righteous the suffering of animals?". This also happens in humans but no need to adress it now.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >but no need to adress it now
            Why? Do you not feel the same empathy towards babies and children who suffer as you do for animals?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm just isolating each topic, but no problem, we could obviously include the suffering of babies with cancer, for example.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            And why should God spare babies from cancer?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            To be called benevolent.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            by who's standards?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I get that we'd have to define "benevolent". Would you agree that "wanting well/happy" is a reasonable definition?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Well meaning? Sure. Now how do we define what's good for us?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What is good is what makes us happy/well. I don't quite get your point. You could argue what happiness or being well means but I think we could say that unnecessary suffering is a state opposite to happiness. You might say "unnecessary to what?", and the answer would be to exist, live and know God.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Why do Christians think it's fine and dandy that God gives little babies cancer but they get mad when monsanto and bayer gives babies cancer?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            might have something to do with the fact that those companies are omniscient gods with thousands of years of history and philosophy surrounding them.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >because animals need meat to survive?
            And whose fault is that?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          t. Human

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Your life is worth no more than a dust mite's. When you die, you're both going to the same place. Eternal nothing.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No one is stupid and naive enough to believe in God in 2024, right?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This board is filled with Christcuck wienersuckers.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Why do they pretend to know anything about anything?

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    For all you know they have an orgasm with it happens and die in bliss.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >gangbangs sisters
    >is born
    >contemplates existence
    >dies
    What a legend

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Uhhh no one can know his ways praise Jesus

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This seems like a pretty good system for keeping the thrips population down but not extinct. Going by your description these mites need their eggs, so the mite population is directly related to the thrips population. But if they eat too many then few eggs means few mites.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Mites and most animals aren't conscious.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If it has a central nervous system, it's conscious

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They were created in antediluvian times by scientists for biological warfare. This is pretty well known at this point.

  10. 1 month ago
    Cult of Passion

    >The male emerges as well, but does not look for food or new mates, and dies after a few hours.
    Coomed then smoked and relaxed having finished life's work to fall asleep during sunset.

    ;_;
    o7

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Projecting humans' framework of morality and love onto insects
    Tell me anon, do you also think that dolphins smile all the time?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *