Marie Curie is well known only because she's female.

Marie Curie is well known only because she's female. She's credited with conducting "pioneering research" in radioactivity. It's not a good sign when wikipedia doesn't even say specific accomplishments about you. She didn't discover radioactivity, that was Henri Becquerel.
Women can't think in riveting, unique, and complex ways because they evolved to be docile baby factories, while men had to use intelligence to strategize hunting stuff down.

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Women created CRISPR, I'm a man but I have to admit we got BTFO`d when that happened

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Women didn't make that shit. Just because you see women's names attached to a subject, doesn't mean they actually did anything.
      And people (men) have known how to genetically modify organisms for a very long time.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Man, I tried reading an article about crispr and instead got pages about what kind of coffee these two chicks drank when they met.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    OP, its ok if she didn't text you back. You're gay anyways, just live your life to your fullest 🙂

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >It's not a good sign when wikipedia
    Here is your problem.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    she was israeli

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Give me the Zuck

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Bruh I hate women as much as you, but Curie is legit. Gave herself cancer studying radioactivity and earned two nobel prizes.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      For her husband.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        yeah she cared about science more than she did going against the grain of her primitive society

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          She was her husband's lab assistant.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Shut up chud. Women are smarter than men. They're doing better in school and college. Men had to use patriarchy to control women because men are scared of female potential.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Just because her being "le woman in Science!" is lauded more than her actual accomplishments these days doesn't mean she wasn't actually an accomplished scientist.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      facts

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      yes it does. if she'd had any concrete accomplishments people would discuss them instead of discussing about "omg a scientist with a vegana"
      she was a israeli fraud, did nothing of any value, claimed credit for other people's efforts, especially after the others were conveniently dead

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        incel vibes

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          thanks, jidf

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            no prob
            t. jidf

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What a fricking moronic logic

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        i wonder what a twum blowjob feels like

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          That's called a twummer

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >that was Henri Becquerel.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel_Ni%C3%A9pce_de_Saint-Victor

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >In the 1850s, Niépce de Saint-Victor was trying to develop color photography, using light-sensitive metal salts, including uranium salts. Beginning in 1857, long before Henri Becquerel's famous serendipitous discovery of radioactivity in 1896, Niépce de Saint-Victor observed that, even in complete darkness, certain salts could expose photographic emulsions.[3][4] He soon realized that uranium salts were responsible for this anomalous phenomenon.[5] (Photographers in France, England, and Germany soon confirmed Niepce's findings regarding uranium.[6]) Niépce recognized that the "light" that was exposing his photographic plates was neither conventional phosphorescence nor fluorescence: the salts could expose photographic plates long after the salts had last been exposed to sunlight. Niépce's superior, Michel Eugène Chevreul, recognized the phenomenon as a fundamental discovery ("une découverte capitale"), pointing out that uranium salts retained their power to expose photographic plates even after six months in the dark ("encore actif six mois après son insolation").[7] By 1861, Niépce stated frankly that uranium salts emitted some sort of radiation that was invisible to the human eye:

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    nah, she's one of the women who deserve all their recognition, which is easily shown by the fact she got famous long before modern woke vomit

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    All she (and Pierre) did was discover two elements, Radium and Polonium. This was low hanging fruit ripe for the reach for anyone in the right French lab. By her time (actually since 1860) it was known that uranium was radioactive. Marie and Pierre curie noticed that uranium minerals were more radioactive than pure uranium, so they figured there was something else. They removed all the uranium and were left with a super radioactive residue that was basically concentrated polonium and radium. Doing this was sort of trivial grad lab tech work at some chemistry lab however they were the first therefore bazinga

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Noether's theorem (also israeli) is trivial shit and conservation laws, past that of momentum, are not deep at all.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Its not any more trivial than anything else in math. Older science was simpler than modern science, that has nothing to do with women. Isaac Newton's discovery of the laws of motion was also trivial?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Noether's theorem is a order of magnitude or two less interesting than Newton's laws of motion.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Thats just your idiotic personal desire to be a contrarian, your dont have any argument

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            That's just your idiotic personal desire to be a conformist, your don't have any argument.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Noether should arguably be up there with all the other big names from the dawn of quantum mechanics though.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      A woman also showed that Von Neumann's proof that Copenhagen was the only possible interpretation of QM was wrong quite early on and everyone ignored it because "lol, how could a woman have found a real problem with the work of the greatest living mathematician."

      Then some other dude figured out the same thing like 25 years later and quantum foundations could finally start.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    She did all this in 1920, do you think they gave her 2 nobel prizes for science for political correctness ... in 19 fricking 20?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >propaganda didn't exist back in the 1920s, they invented propaganda in 2006, shortly before giving the nobel peace prize to obama.
      the nobel prize was founded to be a propaganda tool

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      women were held to lower standards long before that

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Oh cute. You may actually believe that.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Women were held to much higher standards back when they weren't wanted in the fields they dominate in modern times

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This is the case of almost all well-known women. It's not that women are incapable, it's that they're not held to any real standards and get praise for nothing, so why bother.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i love women

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *