Why not kde IQfy bros?
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Microsoft Gives $10k to GNOME
Why not kde IQfy bros?
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
this is actually as recompense for not sharing the 25 year old filepicker thumbnails technology
Fibbity bippity
>10k
>financial boost
that will pay a few weeks of a developer's time at most
>a few weeks
1 week at most
No bloody basterd, Gnome sirs make 3 dollars per hour I've tried to become one for years now
Or one mandatory inclusiveness class for all employees
Windows 12 will use Gnome as a desktop. Nice.
I guess pajeets are so incompetent microsoft wants freetard desktop now
>thanks for not implementing the thumbnails in the file picker
I'm 100% sure Microsoft, Canonical and Gnome team are colluding to make the default experience for the new linux user as shit as possible. There are no other explanation for than to be so consistently bad at their job.
14 years ago when a first tried ubuntu, I hated and it put me off linux for months. Wasn't until I tried to use proper distros and proper DE that I started to fall in love with linux.
I bet that this was the same experience for many people, but many never gave it a second chance.
More like they are colluding to make Windows 11 more like gnome, because regression is progression for Microsoft.
>installed ubuntu
>hated it
>installed fedora
>hated it even more
yeah
because Fedora ships with GNOME
Uhhhhhhh, no?
spins.fedoraproject.org
You can also install Fedora Server and install a DE later or install Fedora Everything and choose your DE during installation.
They're paying them to continue fricking up the Linux desktop.
That way there's no competition when Microsoft tries to squeeze the users with the help of TPM.
>Why not kde
Deliberate sabotage. GNOME is ran by morons who will eventually kill the Linux desktop with their autism. KDE powers SteamOS which is a rival to Windows' dominance of PC gaming. If GNOME wins, Microsoft wins.
Which is a hilarious idea because GNOME's and GTK's entire existence began as a way to get people to stop using QT back when it still had proprietary code in it.
GNOME sucks ass. It could literally implement about five features and focus on performance and stability for the next decade and nobody would care.
Why don't you implement the 5 features?
Other people already have as extensions and GNOME keeps breaking them.
Implying the GNOME team accepts any pull requests not made by trannies or GNOME devs
First github, then canonical, their IPO is probably next year
>joey sneedon
For me was:
>installed ubuntu
>hated it
>installed fedora
>liked it
>installed mint
>loved it
>installed arch
>loved even more
Similar story for me, except it was all arch-based distros until i went and installed stock arch.
Then you installed BBC and loved it so much you became a sissy
GNOME is designed to sabotage Linux.
>GNOME is designed to sabotage Linux.
Fact
https://www.theregister.com/2013/06/03/thank_microsoft_for_linux_desktop_fail/
So M$ basically mindbroke GNOME devs? It makes so much sense now why they avoid having anything that's similar to Windows.
KDE actually works it doesn't need the money
>money from microsoft, no strings attached
time to remove all g-no-me packages
>$10k
Hope GNOME devs won't spend it all in one place.
gnome touch 2 LETS GOOOOOO
After they wasted all their cash on those outreach programs they’re going to need every breadcrumb they can eat.
Name one reason outreach programs are a waste?
Name one thing wrong with diversity and inclusion?
>Name one thing wrong with diversity and inclusion?
Brings you undesirables.
>Brings you undesirables.
But that's the opposite of what it brings? Not doing diversity and inclusion brings you undesirable racists.
>You hire people based on the color of the skin or on what they have between their legs,
But that's the opposite of what it does? You're advocating for hiring the white or asian man before the other person. You're ok with political twitter activists as long as they're white and asian males.
>You're advocating for hiring the white or asian man before the other person. You're ok with political twitter activists as long as they're white and asian males
That a complete falsehood, I'm advocating on hiring the best person for the role, most of the time if not always, the diversity hire it's not the best person for the position.
You're basically saying that I don't want Black folk or foids hired, the problem is that most Black folk and foids have low IQs so they're not qualified to most positions they're hired and they've only gotten the job because of what's between their legsd or the color of their skin.
And do you want to know the truth, Goolag, Applel and Microsoft have 80%+ of white and asian men working for them, they're literally selling you the diversity and inclusion trash while not having any non white or asian person doing programming tasks.
>I'm advocating on hiring the best person for the role
Unless that person is a minority, then you cry and complain. Because you're a racist. You could at least try to hide it by not calling them "Black folk and foids" in the same paragraph.
>Not doing diversity and inclusion brings you people hired based on their competence.
No. Racism is not equivalent to competence.
the cope in this post
>"I'm not racist or sexist I just hate Black folk and foids"
>Get told you're actually just a racist and sexist
>NOOOO COOOOPE
> I never claimed that.
Yes you did. That's effectively what you're saying. Let's examine your following statement.
>I would hire a qualified racist over less competent minority.
Racists will not work with minorities so all you've done here is make it so minorities can never work on that team. You're enabling their racism.
>Yes you did.
No, I didn't. Read it all again, and think real hard.
>Racists will not work with minorities
Yes, they will. Not every racist throws n-words left and right, and chases blacks with a noose.
The only thing I'm doing is advocate for hiring the best person for the job. That's not racism or any other form of 'ism. Cope m8. Also stop putting words in my mouth and assuming so much since everything you spout into the "void" says more about you than me.
>Racists will not work with minorities
Lies and projection. Racists work with minorities all the time. Minorities are the ones refusing to work because the person next to them on the assembly line refused to call them by their moon gender.
>If they're going to drive everyone else out of the company with their racism then they're not the best person for the job.
>stop putting words in my mouth and assuming so much since everything you spout into the "void" says more about you than me.
>Minorities are the ones refusing to work
How are you this dense? This is exactly what I just said. When you hire racists, minorities can't work at that company because the racists push them out.
>racists push them out
If you quit your job, you're pushing yourself out.
>No. Racism is not equivalent to competence.
Wtf are you even talking about? Of course it isn't. I never claimed that. You are somehow assuming that without deliberate inclusion programs only racists will be hired. Also, newsflash, sometimes racist can be the most qualified person for the job. And yes, I would hire him over less competent minority.
>Not doing diversity and inclusion brings you undesirable racists.
No. Not doing diversity and inclusion brings you people hired based on their competence. Doing diversity and inclusion brings you people hired based on their race, sexual orientation etc.
>Not doing diversity and inclusion brings you undesirable racists.
I'd hire David Duke himself if showed up to work consistently, on time, and performed his duties as required by his work contract. I'd even have a special tree on the corporate campus so he can lynch Black folk during his smoke breaks if it improves his performance. Enjoy not making money while you and your board spend two hours before each meeting sorting out each other's pronouns and acknowledging which tribe's burial grounds your office sits on.
So you're saying you'd hire a worker knowing full well that he is going to use the money you're paying him to fund mass killings of blacks? How are you trying to say you're not racist?
>Read it all again, and think real hard.
Just did and came to the same conclusion. You're supporting racists.
>Not every racist throws n-words left and right, and chases blacks with a noose.
They could if they would. Give them the opportunity to go mask off like you're doing, and they'll do it. See the other poster in this thread for a perfect example. You give him the opportunity to go mask off on this site, and he openly talks about lynching blacks. It happens every time.
If they're going to drive everyone else out of the company with their racism then they're not the best person for the job.
>So you're saying you'd hire a worker knowing full well that he is going to use the money you're paying him to fund mass killings of blacks?
What my employees do with their own money is none of my fricking concern.
>How are you trying to say you're not racist?
I'm not. You must have me confused with someone else.
>What my employees do with their own money is none of my fricking concern.
So if they use their money to plan a kidnapping and rape of your wife and children, that's fine?
>I'm not.
Please for the love of frick, travel outside your backasswards village and get some life experience.
>But they can't, so they don't.
They will keep trying until they can.
>When was the last time someone lynched a minority in Silicon Valley?
A long time ago, until they forced them all to move to Oakland.
Harassing you until you quit is one of the most basic tactics used by abusive managers and coworkers. Who am I kidding, you've never had a job.
>Harassing
Grow a spine.
>Put up with my abuse or quit
That's exactly how they do it.
If you choose to be weak, you don't deserve a job.
Then racists should not have jobs. They are the weakest of all, the simple act of seeing someone with a different skin color causes them to ape out.
Then they will get desperate, and stab you in your stupid face in the middle of the street.
>So if they use their money to plan a kidnapping and rape of your wife and children, that's fine?
What my employees do with their own money is none of my fricking concern.
>They could if they would.
But they can't, so they don't.
>It happens every time.
When was the last time someone lynched a minority in Silicon Valley?
I think this is extremely obvious for a normal, well adjusted human being, but what someone does with their money is no business to someone else.
If I'm at a company and I decide to spend all my salary on cocaine and alcohol my employer shouldn't have anything to say as long as it doesn't affect my performance in the workplace, simple as.
But it seems that nowadays you have to be in line with the current political trends or otherwise you are literally ostracized from life and unable to live in this world, explain to me what difference there is with this and china's social credit score besides that china is upfront with it?
shitskins, females and deviants.
Name one thing wrong with any of those?
they spend more time on twitter than on working
So, exactly like elon musk?
Why did you bring him up?
I didn't, you brought up twitter. He literally owns twitter.
didn't know that since I don't follow him or use twitter
they live
why are journos such morons? if there are no strings attached to a micro$oft boost, that means the money is the string itself
>Why not kde
KDE is not politically charged, most probably these diversity hires that accepted the donation to GNOME did so seeing how woke and SJW it is and how much diversity and inclusion they prop up.
KDE doesn't have anything political to it, even the CoC is just be friendly and nice instead of the Contributor Covenant from the coraline dude GNOME has.
>KDE is not politically charged
look at this moronic Black person
weren't you complaining how "kde is ran by german troons" just last year when they changed the logo to a rainbow flag?
>IQfy is one person
No, I wasn't complaining myself, moron
>Name one thing wrong with diversity and inclusion?
You hire people based on the color of the skin or on what they have between their legs, this means that having two people applying for a job you'll hire the Black person or the foid before the white or asian man even if they're overly under qualified for the job.
This basically means that in some years worth of time you'll run the company to the ground because you'll basically have fired or dismissed all talent, and hired basically political activists that do nothing but complain on twatter all day.
I have faith that they have realized that their userbase wont tolerate it. This month the pfp has not changed, and no virtue signal posts were made.
>This month the pfp has not changed, and no virtue signal posts were made.
the good ending
>KDE is not politically charged,
Black person, KDE literally changed to lgbt logo and last year their lead dev made a video about how you should leave KDE if you are not inclusive
>lgbt logo
At this point the whole pride month shit is basically just another hallmark holiday. A cheap gimmick for marketing/sales, not really political. And it's just a logo anyways, nothing like the idpol cancer that has befallen other open source projects in the past.
>lead dev
The guy you are referring to is just some random Italian zoomer. I don't think KDE even has a lead dev.
they want to keep linux shit, that's why
$10k is a few months of rent
>Funding one of the most divisive things on Linux
Makes sense. They don't want Linux to succeed.
nothing is divisive about it though, butthurt kde shills are perpetually mad about everything and always will be
what was gnome's code of conduct again?
$10K, oh my rent money! I wish it'll be useful to them.
>gnome is going nowhere
>basicly the opposite of a desktop experience
>weird tablet design, huge focus on anti userism
>UI stutters and lags
>microsoft: "our strategy works, lets keep em busy doing those things that makes sure that they will never actually fix the problems in their DE, making sure the user experience stays horrible"
>microsoft sends gnome money with a note "you are doing good job"
>microsoft wins
Because KDE is actually a good Desktop Environment, whilst Gnome is all corporate and the UI & Art feels like it was made by a bunch of thin-skinned homosexuals
>kde
>good
aaхaхaхaхaхaхaхххaххaхaхaхaх
Because Gnome is a plague to the Linux desktop, so it's in their best interest to have it remain as *the* Linux desktop.
>don't worry there are no strings attached
>your friends at Microsoft.
Seriously? How can people be this stupid?
Wake me up when they bring Office to Loonix.
wow a month salary for one person
I know microsoft feels bad for lifting gnome's design for windows 11, but theres no way that design was worth 10,000$.
>$10k is a lot of money....in the Linux world.
Its almost like GNOME is controlled opposition where have i seen this setup before again?
Gay Microsoft giving money to Gaynome, nothing to see here
wow how generous of microsoft, a whole $10k. It's nice they've started donating the loose change they have in their couch.
Because ms copied gnome for win 11
10k is an insult tbh
embrace extend extinguish
GNOME is sabotage.
This donation proves it.
finally an incentive to implement thumbnails in file picker
Wow, $10,000. Impressive.