Now that VP9 is here, what technology do you want to see next? JXL seems like the obvious path forward.

Now that VP9 is here, what technology do you want to see next?

JXL seems like the obvious path forward.

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No, thank you.
    png just works.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      50% less efficient lossless and other downsides. No point in using png.

      https://i.imgur.com/sKSeUhl.png

      Now that VP9 is here, what technology do you want to see next?

      JXL seems like the obvious path forward.

      Yes, jxl. I've started to reencode some folders, it works really quite well. Still have to try cjxl_ng tho.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      strictly and objectively inferior

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Now that VP9 is here, what technology do you want to see next?
    How about waiting at least 24h before yelling for another updoot?

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    vp9 is only useful because now you don't have to reencode youtube videos
    since there's no jxl content out there, there is no use in adding jxl

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      jewtube uses av1 now so you need to troony code their content anyway

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        they still use x264 and vp9 to encode everything
        matter of fact 100% of encodes are at least vp9 but probably only 60% or less are av1 as well

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      YouTube is gradually transitioning to AV1.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >transitioning
        YWNBAW

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, that's the first thing that pops up in your mind when you hear the word "transition."

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            in relation to the alliance for troony media?
            Yes.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    .webp
    What's even stopping them from just allowing it, anyway?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Ethics. WebP is shit.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    AV1 maybe, but only when it is mature enough
    i mean, vp9 should work fine now, at least it is theoretically allows larger bitrate with same file size and it allows true lossless compression

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Thing is it takes less time to encode vp1 with some parameters than vp9 with good parameters to produce superior quality.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    first it needs to be commonly supported by gnu

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    never gonna happen
    IM 7 is still largely not distributed

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    AV1 and webp
    We don't need other meme formats

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *