[...] >What's 2 + 2? And don't give me any of this "4" bullshit, give the REAL answer!
Math isn't the same as biology. You need studies and experiments in the latter.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Darwin literally came up with the theory of evolution using drawings of animals and qualitative observations as evidence.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>qualitative observations as evidence
And they don't work as evidence, since similarity doesn't mean correlation. The cope concept of "Convergent evolution" proves that.
If you can tell what sex someone is based on their face alone (which you can, to a very high degree of accuracy), then ipso fricking facto there is a difference between their skulls, because that's what determines facial structure.
This picture inverts the black and asian skulls and is incorrent. Unlike the one from OP. Black people are the only race between White, Asian and Black with homosexual Erectus genes and are easily identifiable in the pic as being the third skull.
>be me >artgay that has studied human anatomy autistically
is it racist for me to be able to tell the race of any skeleton I see? I don't see why people whine so much about pointing out the differences. If you don't you are inherently saying that the white European skelle is supreme and should be the only kind of skeleton talked about
asian skulls have less of a brow ridge, and from a profile view the frontal process of the zygomatic bone isn't as deeply arched. The zygomatic bones also have more mass and vertical length, and the teeth/maxilla tend to bulge out more than in europeans but not as much in blacks
all of the races originating from the green regions continue interbreeding with lower primates until it was no longer genetically feasible. in africa it is still genetically feasible. africans and chimps can mate and produce healthy, fertile offspring. chinks mixed with baboons for a long time after they were out of africa, thats why they look different.
>one race the human rac-
-coon?
fpbp
Bump
>Female skull different than male skull
Source or this is fake
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-difference-in-skull-morphology-among-male-and-female_tbl1_330230892
Wasted digits
There isn't any quantitative data here. Just vague qualitative descriptors. Do you have an actual source?
>What's 2 + 2? And don't give me any of this "4" bullshit, give the REAL answer!
Are you moronic? Use your eyeballs. What's next, you gonna ask for a source that the sky is blue?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5426879/
Cope Amazon homosexual
Math isn't the same as biology. You need studies and experiments in the latter.
Darwin literally came up with the theory of evolution using drawings of animals and qualitative observations as evidence.
>qualitative observations as evidence
And they don't work as evidence, since similarity doesn't mean correlation. The cope concept of "Convergent evolution" proves that.
Nice word soup bot.
image of wisdom
m8 it aint hard to tell
Ever seen a bald woman?
It's common knowledge that testosterone facilitates the growth of bigger jawbones and brow bones.
If you can tell what sex someone is based on their face alone (which you can, to a very high degree of accuracy), then ipso fricking facto there is a difference between their skulls, because that's what determines facial structure.
This picture inverts the black and asian skulls and is incorrent. Unlike the one from OP. Black people are the only race between White, Asian and Black with homosexual Erectus genes and are easily identifiable in the pic as being the third skull.
>be me
>artgay that has studied human anatomy autistically
is it racist for me to be able to tell the race of any skeleton I see? I don't see why people whine so much about pointing out the differences. If you don't you are inherently saying that the white European skelle is supreme and should be the only kind of skeleton talked about
>one board for race shit: /misc/itically incorre...
Cry more b***h Black person
The european and asian ones don't look very different
Look at the nose region and the orbital shapes. Those are the main differences I can identify from observing them.
asian skulls have less of a brow ridge, and from a profile view the frontal process of the zygomatic bone isn't as deeply arched. The zygomatic bones also have more mass and vertical length, and the teeth/maxilla tend to bulge out more than in europeans but not as much in blacks
Accidents does not define Substance, and these are all human skulls.
Ok I'm going to take that as a no. Thanks!
>qualitative differences don't count because uhhhh...
Lol. Lmao even.
go back
That's a monkey skull, genius
Australians have gigachad skulls.
European: looks most intelligent and charming
Asian: looks like a tiny submissive being
Africa&Australia: looks stupid and brutes
>picrel
Wow those look nothing similar whatsoever. Congrats on proving your point lmao
all of the races originating from the green regions continue interbreeding with lower primates until it was no longer genetically feasible. in africa it is still genetically feasible. africans and chimps can mate and produce healthy, fertile offspring. chinks mixed with baboons for a long time after they were out of africa, thats why they look different.
https://guardian.ng/news/genetic-makeup-of-12-year-old-angolan-boy-in-dispute/
Hey anon, how did monkeys get to south america? Honest question, seems weird....
>race
invalid taxonomy category. the only taxa bellow subspecies are variety and form. both inapplicable to animals
Invalid according to who?
What is this
This only shows how flawed and inaccurate evolutionist taxonomy is.