No. Everything existed, it just used in a very dense state. A balloon doesn't stop existing when it doesn't have air in it.
Also, nobody knows what happened before cosmic expansion began ~13.7 billion years ago. There's an event horizon there beyond which, we don't have the tools to understand what was occurring.
>"Nothing was nothing for an infinite amount of time before the Magic Wizard manifested out of nothing, created everything using sorcery, waited billions of years for dinosaurs to die out and gave patronage to a very specific tribe of semites to help further their bronze age geopolitical agendas and also harvest foreskin."
Theistbros...why are we so fricking moronic without sophistry?
Idk, (hue)man, Im not human, Im a hybrid of two other species mixed into humans and Im not into researching human specific DNA, I focus on other hybridic tribes.
I mean...I totally know, but youre asking for a course on Evolutionary and Molecular Biology. Mmm, no.
You genuinely do not know if humans are born to human mothers or nonhuman mothers? It is not a trick question.
2 weeks ago
Cult of Passion
Just going to ignore your inorance?
Here...let me help you.
>You genuinely do not know
WHY ARE YOU UNABLE TO SMELL THE FECES FLOWING FROM YOUR MOUTH?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Allow me to clarify, Confused One. Human babies are born to human mothers. Identify corrollaries as thou willst or don't, I don't care.
I ain't no monkey.
2 weeks ago
Cult of Passion
>Allow me to clarify
COGNITIVE DEFICIENCY.
YOU CANT SMELL FECES IN YOUR MOUTH.
STOP TALKING.
t.EVOLITIONARY BIOLOGIST, YOUR PROFESSORS ARE moronic AND WRONG.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
1. Calm down
2. Observe Darwinism is preposterous
3. Calm down again
4. Push caps locks to toggle off
5. Stop comprehending humanity as nonhumanity
6. Interpret from (5) that humanity is a distinct essence
7. Notice universities and the media censor dissenters from Darwin because >hurrr Scopes Monkey Trial
8. Postulate a big picture cause
9. Notice the trajectory of things
10. Dissent
11. Search for God
12. Find Him
13. Deep fry your degrees
14. Preach the Truth
15. Enjoy immortaity and perfection of the soul
2 weeks ago
Cult of Passion
>t.EVOLITIONARY BIOLOGIST, YOUR PROFESSORS ARE moronic AND WRONG.
I LECTURE YOUR PROFESSORS.
WHO THE FRICK DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?
HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU HAVE TO BE TOLD FOR YOU TO SWALLOW YOUR OWN PRIDE?
https://i.imgur.com/zPVfEXE.gif
Idk, (hue)man, Im not human, Im a hybrid of two other species mixed into humans and Im not into researching human specific DNA, I focus on other hybridic tribes.
I mean...I totally know, but youre asking for a course on Evolutionary and Molecular Biology. Mmm, no.
>but youre asking for a course on Evolutionary and Molecular Biology.
YOU ARE NEITHER, WHY ARE YOU LECTURING A PROFESSOR?
STOP IGNORING MY POSTS AND DEMAMDING RESPECT AT THE SAME TIME, DIRTBAG.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
I still do no understand how Darwin did anything other than situate Linnaeus on a timeline. I find it fascinating Henry Adams, who lived in England at the time, said Origin of Species came as a surprise to none, and all were ready to believe.
2 weeks ago
Cult of Passion
Not sure, as my way of Bio research is literally beyond the bulks understanding of Medicine (Chemistry foundation for Medicine/Biology) which was fine for those centuries but now it is no longer the "main mystery" of Life.
Namely, BioMagnetics/BioElectric (BioPhysics).
So this is an Age where "no one was expecting the next thing", and now the majority of academia is caught with their pants down, hence all the fraud papers and pandemic fiasco.
Purging of the old. A sacrifical Lamb on the alter of Advancement.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Hmmm, you don't seem to know anything. I will henceforth disgard you, """"professor youtubes""" .
2 weeks ago
Cult of Passion
>professor youtubes
Worked for the THOR peoject at DARPA.
His research overlaps mine.
You are not what you thought you were.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Shame on you go get a real job
2 weeks ago
Cult of Passion
>a real job
Dunking on Euler while high at a cafe in Thailand, as a M.D. (Cognition) *&* Mathematician (Pure Mathematics).
What better Job could I ever have asked for?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
You seem to be quite fond of yourself. Have you ever tried fricking yourself? I think you would like it. Go on, the thread will be here tomorrow morning.
2 weeks ago
Cult of Passion
>you go get >You >yourself > you >yourself >you
Euler is cool...but I could kick his ass.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
please stop
2 weeks ago
Cult of Passion
I cant.
Its my Job.
2 weeks ago
Cult of Passion
We have a very "lateral" view of Biology (Environmental Genetics). Molecular markers (DNA) isnt the key feature here, and it will take many years before science is able to see between the Molecules to see the effects of sub-Particle manipulation of orgamisms.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>doesn't even try to make an argument >tries to pass off the monkey trial as religious persecution
theistbros... were we too stupid all along? were the jesuits right about us?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Human babies are born to human mothers
white mothers giving birth to niglets disproves this
2 weeks ago
Cult of Passion
Just going to ignore your inorance?
Here...let me help you.
>You genuinely do not know
WHY ARE YOU UNABLE TO SMELL THE FECES FLOWING FROM YOUR MOUTH?
You can believe in God and still accept the overwhelming evidence of evolutionary processes and a lineage towards a common ancestor. What's with all the LARPers on this board, both Christians as well as Atheists, whi fail to understand the segregation of faith and science?
I'm agnostic but Genesis seems pretty clear on the creation process taking six days. What could be the possible metaphorical interpretation of that if it isn't literal?
It's a parable, Jesus spoke in parables all the time and told the apostles why. Nobody in the early Church took Genesis literally, the narrative is still true. God spoke Creation into being, God made Man in His image, Man rebelled and was exiled from paradise etc
>Nobody in the early Church took Genesis literally
Wrong, and doubting it in 400 or 200 AD doesn’t mean the original authors didn’t take it seriously.
So sick of you people pretending genesis always means whatever the latest science is despite it not saying that. Seriously one of the stinkiest lines of bullshit I’ve ever seen, you’re a moron if you buy the Christian cope that it always meant to say what modern physics, geology, chemistry and biology says
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
what is your evidence the original authors took it literally?
Original sin straight up can’t exist unless genesis was literal. In any case name one historical figure secular or ecclesiastical that argued the Old Testament should be read meataphorically prior to the 1800s.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Not him and on your side.
Augustine said it shouldn’t be but explicitly stated it was because it’s not believable and makes Christians look bad, even to the Romans.
In no way did he claim it was a metaphor that the world was actually created 4.5 billion years ago
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
it is kinda weird the israelites never found original sin in 2500+ years of reading Genesi, isn't it?
No original sin, no Heaven, no souls, barely a Satan...
One gets the feeling the sequel had a different director, producer and writing team than the original...
Listen I'm not a Christian, but I used to be one.
I don't think you have to take the Bible as being literally true about everything to be a Christian.
There is nothing in the Bible that says you must read religious texts in this way.
There are times biblical texts contradict themselves not even accidently, like how the Torah at numerous points contradicts itself because it is (probably) made up of several contradicting sources that an editor brought together (order of creation in Genesis 1 and 2 is an easy one to find where multiple sources is quite obvious).
I think the more fundamental thing that makes you a Christian (or religious israelite) is that you believe the biblical authors were divinely inspired and deeper truths about humanity can be discovered by reading the biblical texts. This isn't the same as the evangelical view that God more-or-less dictated the entire Bible himself and the human authors served more as flesh-puppets to write it down.
"The Bible" literally means "The Books" its meant to be a definitive text, but not one you're meant to take literally, rather one that became codified and standardized through centuries of scholarly debate and consensus about what is the closest to spiritual truth that is physically possible. Most Biblical scholars and clerics throughout history knew that the Bible was fill of contraditions and dubious translations, but the point was never to be an exact truth, just the closest possible thing to "the truth". Otherwise we would never have said debates to begin with. Christianity historically loved scholarly debate and encouraged it. Like you said, its modern evangelism that wants you to take The Bible literally.
My main gripe with evolutionists today is that we suddenly have to accept that scientists know exactly what was happening 300 million years ago, know exactly how old the Earth is, know exactly how old the universe is etc. It's all theoretical but everyone treats it like it's indisputable. Half of humanity doesn't have access to electricity, we still can't cure cancer, we can't even create a decent electric vehicle but we think we have it all figured out suddenly.
You're acting like people just came to these conclusions out of nowhere. We have a fairly high confidence that we know roughly how old Earth and the Universe are through scientific consensus and finding evidence to support various claims. If you think those claims are wrong then you're more than welcome to challenge them with counter-evidence. But don't just say its wrong because God, that's lazy reasoning. God knows you're smarter than that anon.
So we can barely predict the weather today but you know with such assurance what happened 13 billion years ago? And all because of a feint hue in objects hundreds of millions of light years away?
We only found the city of Troy a few years ago, but dinosaur bones and ammonites wash up on beaches despite supposedly being 50 - 300 million years old?
It's educated guesswork but people treat it like it's gospel when they don't do any research either, they just believe the man in the white coat
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>So we can barely predict the weather today
Last I checked weather forecasts were pretty accurate. But predicting the future is very different from analyzing past evidence that literally exists already
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Look you are not wrong in doubting some of the information about the history of life and rocks on earth, many pop-science gays exaggerate a lot of these things and say that they are dead-certain. But when it comes to analysis of data, in both genetics and geology we have had remarkable improvement in our analysis during the last 2 decades.
For example this (trichoplax adhaerens) is possibily a very far away cousin to the early ancestor of the common ancestor of animalia kingdom whatever that was. And the moron that made the picture then says "original form of humans and animals", which is just wrong.
>So we can barely predict the weather today
Last I checked weather forecasts were pretty accurate. But predicting the future is very different from analyzing past evidence that literally exists already
Then a new theory comes and you have to throw it all out the window because we don't know half the shit in the universe and scientists admit it, we don't know shit.
nobody cares about science in terms of arguments holding substance regarding certain topics. They associate Christianity with right wing and atheism with secularist movements among leftists
Therefore, it's all just window dressing for the same tired culture war bickering you find on this site. None of these gays are actually religious.
>You can believe in God and still accept the overwhelming evidence of evolutionary processes
What's God, given the latter, which means all knowledge is in evolutionary flux as well?
IQfy above everything hates being told what to do, and how the frick can you tell people what to do with a meme like amogus? you can’t weave any ideology into it.
One Electron Theory. Doing calculations mamy years ago and I self discovered the equation those guys used for their theory, was really meat seeing why that theory was a thing, not that I am on board woth it, but I see why it exists. I think its neat either way.
>OMG I have to just answer my own quesiton.
No you don't. Please stop. You're destroying half the thread you post in. Spend your time eating luxury Lidl cheese or finding friends.
>ex nihilo >just trust the science bro >no I don’t personally know how or why life spontaneously appeared, but these hecking cool scientist influencers probably know
That life sprouts from inert matter will never be empirical science because it simply doesnt happen and contradicts all logic. Its an irrational mythology for materialists. I was a cell that magically appeared then magically became a sea slug, then a fish, then a monkey, therefore life is meaningless and i can sin.
You know you’re made out of mostly water air and some soil right? All the ingredients for you are in a puddle of mud and the air around it outside. That goes for every living thing.
SUS
Amogus.
>athiests be like: my great great great grandpa
atheists believe nothing was nothing for infinity amount of time untill it became everything that exists for no reason
No, you do.
>uh the reason was because of God
But there can be no reason why God choose to start creating at the particular time he did.
No. Everything existed, it just used in a very dense state. A balloon doesn't stop existing when it doesn't have air in it.
Also, nobody knows what happened before cosmic expansion began ~13.7 billion years ago. There's an event horizon there beyond which, we don't have the tools to understand what was occurring.
Hope this helps in improving your understanding.
that 13 billion was disproved, there's no such thing as dark matter
>muh gaytheists out of nowhere
rent free. go kiss some Black person feet and donate to AIPAC
>muh Black person feet and AIPAC out of nowhere
Rent free, carry a tiki torch and LARP a believer.
>"Nothing was nothing for an infinite amount of time before the Magic Wizard manifested out of nothing, created everything using sorcery, waited billions of years for dinosaurs to die out and gave patronage to a very specific tribe of semites to help further their bronze age geopolitical agendas and also harvest foreskin."
Theistbros...why are we so fricking moronic without sophistry?
Amogus
Yes.
quick question
Human children are born to
a) humans
b)nonhumans
Idk, (hue)man, Im not human, Im a hybrid of two other species mixed into humans and Im not into researching human specific DNA, I focus on other hybridic tribes.
I mean...I totally know, but youre asking for a course on Evolutionary and Molecular Biology. Mmm, no.
You genuinely do not know if humans are born to human mothers or nonhuman mothers? It is not a trick question.
Just going to ignore your inorance?
Here...let me help you.
>You genuinely do not know
WHY ARE YOU UNABLE TO SMELL THE FECES FLOWING FROM YOUR MOUTH?
Allow me to clarify, Confused One. Human babies are born to human mothers. Identify corrollaries as thou willst or don't, I don't care.
I ain't no monkey.
>Allow me to clarify
COGNITIVE DEFICIENCY.
YOU CANT SMELL FECES IN YOUR MOUTH.
STOP TALKING.
t.EVOLITIONARY BIOLOGIST, YOUR PROFESSORS ARE moronic AND WRONG.
1. Calm down
2. Observe Darwinism is preposterous
3. Calm down again
4. Push caps locks to toggle off
5. Stop comprehending humanity as nonhumanity
6. Interpret from (5) that humanity is a distinct essence
7. Notice universities and the media censor dissenters from Darwin because
>hurrr Scopes Monkey Trial
8. Postulate a big picture cause
9. Notice the trajectory of things
10. Dissent
11. Search for God
12. Find Him
13. Deep fry your degrees
14. Preach the Truth
15. Enjoy immortaity and perfection of the soul
>t.EVOLITIONARY BIOLOGIST, YOUR PROFESSORS ARE moronic AND WRONG.
I LECTURE YOUR PROFESSORS.
WHO THE FRICK DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?
HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU HAVE TO BE TOLD FOR YOU TO SWALLOW YOUR OWN PRIDE?
>but youre asking for a course on Evolutionary and Molecular Biology.
YOU ARE NEITHER, WHY ARE YOU LECTURING A PROFESSOR?
STOP IGNORING MY POSTS AND DEMAMDING RESPECT AT THE SAME TIME, DIRTBAG.
I still do no understand how Darwin did anything other than situate Linnaeus on a timeline. I find it fascinating Henry Adams, who lived in England at the time, said Origin of Species came as a surprise to none, and all were ready to believe.
Not sure, as my way of Bio research is literally beyond the bulks understanding of Medicine (Chemistry foundation for Medicine/Biology) which was fine for those centuries but now it is no longer the "main mystery" of Life.
Namely, BioMagnetics/BioElectric (BioPhysics).
So this is an Age where "no one was expecting the next thing", and now the majority of academia is caught with their pants down, hence all the fraud papers and pandemic fiasco.
Purging of the old. A sacrifical Lamb on the alter of Advancement.
Hmmm, you don't seem to know anything. I will henceforth disgard you, """"professor youtubes""" .
>professor youtubes
Worked for the THOR peoject at DARPA.
His research overlaps mine.
You are not what you thought you were.
Shame on you go get a real job
>a real job
Dunking on Euler while high at a cafe in Thailand, as a M.D. (Cognition) *&* Mathematician (Pure Mathematics).
What better Job could I ever have asked for?
You seem to be quite fond of yourself. Have you ever tried fricking yourself? I think you would like it. Go on, the thread will be here tomorrow morning.
>you go get
>You
>yourself
> you
>yourself
>you
Euler is cool...but I could kick his ass.
please stop
I cant.
Its my Job.
We have a very "lateral" view of Biology (Environmental Genetics). Molecular markers (DNA) isnt the key feature here, and it will take many years before science is able to see between the Molecules to see the effects of sub-Particle manipulation of orgamisms.
>doesn't even try to make an argument
>tries to pass off the monkey trial as religious persecution
theistbros... were we too stupid all along? were the jesuits right about us?
>Human babies are born to human mothers
white mothers giving birth to niglets disproves this
Oh. This is a Cognitive deficiency.
t.Doctor (MD)
>Im a hybrid of two other species
I dont LARP on the internet.
>giant hooked merchant schnozz
not my ancestor, my nose is normal
>humans came from an unconscious slime not an intelligent force
holy shit we done drank the kool aid
proof plz
You can believe in God and still accept the overwhelming evidence of evolutionary processes and a lineage towards a common ancestor. What's with all the LARPers on this board, both Christians as well as Atheists, whi fail to understand the segregation of faith and science?
I'm agnostic but Genesis seems pretty clear on the creation process taking six days. What could be the possible metaphorical interpretation of that if it isn't literal?
The one I've heard is that time simply moves differently for God
It's a parable, Jesus spoke in parables all the time and told the apostles why. Nobody in the early Church took Genesis literally, the narrative is still true. God spoke Creation into being, God made Man in His image, Man rebelled and was exiled from paradise etc
>Nobody in the early Church took Genesis literally
Wrong, and doubting it in 400 or 200 AD doesn’t mean the original authors didn’t take it seriously.
So sick of you people pretending genesis always means whatever the latest science is despite it not saying that. Seriously one of the stinkiest lines of bullshit I’ve ever seen, you’re a moron if you buy the Christian cope that it always meant to say what modern physics, geology, chemistry and biology says
what is your evidence the original authors took it literally?
Original sin straight up can’t exist unless genesis was literal. In any case name one historical figure secular or ecclesiastical that argued the Old Testament should be read meataphorically prior to the 1800s.
Not him and on your side.
Augustine said it shouldn’t be but explicitly stated it was because it’s not believable and makes Christians look bad, even to the Romans.
In no way did he claim it was a metaphor that the world was actually created 4.5 billion years ago
it is kinda weird the israelites never found original sin in 2500+ years of reading Genesi, isn't it?
No original sin, no Heaven, no souls, barely a Satan...
One gets the feeling the sequel had a different director, producer and writing team than the original...
hmmmmm
Listen I'm not a Christian, but I used to be one.
I don't think you have to take the Bible as being literally true about everything to be a Christian.
There is nothing in the Bible that says you must read religious texts in this way.
There are times biblical texts contradict themselves not even accidently, like how the Torah at numerous points contradicts itself because it is (probably) made up of several contradicting sources that an editor brought together (order of creation in Genesis 1 and 2 is an easy one to find where multiple sources is quite obvious).
I think the more fundamental thing that makes you a Christian (or religious israelite) is that you believe the biblical authors were divinely inspired and deeper truths about humanity can be discovered by reading the biblical texts. This isn't the same as the evangelical view that God more-or-less dictated the entire Bible himself and the human authors served more as flesh-puppets to write it down.
"The Bible" literally means "The Books" its meant to be a definitive text, but not one you're meant to take literally, rather one that became codified and standardized through centuries of scholarly debate and consensus about what is the closest to spiritual truth that is physically possible. Most Biblical scholars and clerics throughout history knew that the Bible was fill of contraditions and dubious translations, but the point was never to be an exact truth, just the closest possible thing to "the truth". Otherwise we would never have said debates to begin with. Christianity historically loved scholarly debate and encouraged it. Like you said, its modern evangelism that wants you to take The Bible literally.
My main gripe with evolutionists today is that we suddenly have to accept that scientists know exactly what was happening 300 million years ago, know exactly how old the Earth is, know exactly how old the universe is etc. It's all theoretical but everyone treats it like it's indisputable. Half of humanity doesn't have access to electricity, we still can't cure cancer, we can't even create a decent electric vehicle but we think we have it all figured out suddenly.
You're acting like people just came to these conclusions out of nowhere. We have a fairly high confidence that we know roughly how old Earth and the Universe are through scientific consensus and finding evidence to support various claims. If you think those claims are wrong then you're more than welcome to challenge them with counter-evidence. But don't just say its wrong because God, that's lazy reasoning. God knows you're smarter than that anon.
So we can barely predict the weather today but you know with such assurance what happened 13 billion years ago? And all because of a feint hue in objects hundreds of millions of light years away?
We only found the city of Troy a few years ago, but dinosaur bones and ammonites wash up on beaches despite supposedly being 50 - 300 million years old?
It's educated guesswork but people treat it like it's gospel when they don't do any research either, they just believe the man in the white coat
>So we can barely predict the weather today
Last I checked weather forecasts were pretty accurate. But predicting the future is very different from analyzing past evidence that literally exists already
Look you are not wrong in doubting some of the information about the history of life and rocks on earth, many pop-science gays exaggerate a lot of these things and say that they are dead-certain. But when it comes to analysis of data, in both genetics and geology we have had remarkable improvement in our analysis during the last 2 decades.
For example this (trichoplax adhaerens) is possibily a very far away cousin to the early ancestor of the common ancestor of animalia kingdom whatever that was. And the moron that made the picture then says "original form of humans and animals", which is just wrong.
Then a new theory comes and you have to throw it all out the window because we don't know half the shit in the universe and scientists admit it, we don't know shit.
nuh uh white or black take it or leave it
nobody cares about science in terms of arguments holding substance regarding certain topics. They associate Christianity with right wing and atheism with secularist movements among leftists
Therefore, it's all just window dressing for the same tired culture war bickering you find on this site. None of these gays are actually religious.
>They associate Christianity with right wing and atheism with secularist movements among leftists
Do you mean on this board or in general?
>You can believe in God and still accept the overwhelming evidence of evolutionary processes
What's God, given the latter, which means all knowledge is in evolutionary flux as well?
>RNA world speculative evolution fan fiction
>baseless gradualist nonsense
>Pansp"uhidkhahaiguessitcamehereonarockfromspace"rmia
>Astrobilogical woo
>primordial soup - Oparin–Haldane hypothesis - sovietized schizophrenia
>phylogenic musical chairs - electric boogaloo
>all other subjective baseless speculative atheist nonsense and mythmaking for the scientism canon
>overwhelming evidence of evolutionary processes
Still waiting on that definitive proof pleases :3
>primordial "animal"
>not an opistoconth
>not a single flagellum
whats it about amogus being one of the few normie memes IQfy tolerates?
50% stonetoss and 50% lack of ideology, no joke.
IQfy above everything hates being told what to do, and how the frick can you tell people what to do with a meme like amogus? you can’t weave any ideology into it.
hmmm, i think obelisks are still not pyramids
Oh...and yes, kicked his ass too.
t.Dimenional Spacetime Theorist, incorporating what he couldnt; Imaginary Time (orthogonal Time)
Atleast he knew the difference between an obelisk and a pyramid
Seriously stop with these embarrasing posts you schizoid
He was midwit who shifted his theories with the winds.
Theoretical Physicist too?! Neat, whats you favorite Physics nonsense?
OMG I have to just answer my own quesiton.
One Electron Theory. Doing calculations mamy years ago and I self discovered the equation those guys used for their theory, was really meat seeing why that theory was a thing, not that I am on board woth it, but I see why it exists. I think its neat either way.
>OMG I have to just answer my own quesiton.
No you don't. Please stop. You're destroying half the thread you post in. Spend your time eating luxury Lidl cheese or finding friends.
YOUR LIFE IS VAPID AND MEANINGLESS.
WHY DO YOU LARP YOURE A REAL HUMAN?
>my fren lob me
WRONG. THEY LOVE YOURE AFFIRMING THEIR DELUSIONS.
NOTHING MORE. PARASITES.
>ex nihilo
>just trust the science bro
>no I don’t personally know how or why life spontaneously appeared, but these hecking cool scientist influencers probably know
same color as a scandi who has been exposed to the sun for 10 seconds, I'd say it's white
Whoa, dude…
All of racism just btfod by this post. This is everything!
>evolution is real because... the scientist says so (he's infallible)
>this fake CGI image is proof!
Literally ZERO fossil evidence for this. How low IQ do you need to be to get duped by this shit?
your attached image reflects a psyche of yours which when put under analization, proves you wrong
>analization
Stop trying to look smart, you're low IQ as frick. You're a blatant moron. You impress no one except other morons.
>you wrote 1 thing wrong
>allow me to roast you with insults heh le epic pwn
I wont even bother
i should go back in time and kill this thing
It would only make it stronger
That life sprouts from inert matter will never be empirical science because it simply doesnt happen and contradicts all logic. Its an irrational mythology for materialists. I was a cell that magically appeared then magically became a sea slug, then a fish, then a monkey, therefore life is meaningless and i can sin.
The Millery-Urey experiment showed that organic material can emerge from inorganic material
So does the fact that we've found amino acids on comets.
Correct. That makes life even more likely to form.
You know you’re made out of mostly water air and some soil right? All the ingredients for you are in a puddle of mud and the air around it outside. That goes for every living thing.
fake