Pale Moon is what FireFox should have stayed and been without the bad parts about pale moon, they ruined everything and any good reason to use firefox.
Joooz
Pale Moon is what FireFox should have stayed and been without the bad parts about pale moon, they ruined everything and any good reason to use firefox...
>Firefox should be insecure, slow, and single process, for MUH ADDONZ
Thank god mozilla ignored freetards, firefox is actually usable these days
>Without the bad parts about pale moon
It would be better in every conceivable way and will appeal to techies and not globohomosexual normies
the xul addons were the best thing in firefox and they shouldn't have gave a shit about maintaining chrome addons with firefox, fricking morons, only with firefox's powerful xul addons they would wipe the shit stains from today's websites
NTA. What's XUL and why does it seem to be a big deal?
not him but xul addons could do anything
seriously anything, since the whole browser ui is also written in xul, xul addons could add features to the browser as if they were native/built in, because they literally have the same access as native/built in features
Cool. Must've been nice.
You say this, but are there any addons now that still don't have full functionality ever since they made the switch?
Off the top of my head, downthemall apparently was gimped somehow (dunno the details) and with tree style tab, I have to use CSS to had the tab bar now. Overall, doesn't seem like really made a big difference in the long run.
there's no reason they couldn't have replaced the only single-process xul addons with a modernised multi-process-capable xul addon system
they gimped firefox by adopting (only) webextensions
Daily reminder xul add-ons were able to run in multiprocess without sims not a lot of devs bothered to do it cause xul was already going to be removed soon so it was a waste of time, and we were supposed to transition those extensions to web extensions using native.js, but they wontfixed native.js as soon as there was no going back from xul removal.
So, frick you Mozilla.
multiprocess just leads to a laggy browser that spams processes until it runs out of available memory and crashes
well since that malicious character tobin has lost his succubus access to the toothpaste dude things will only get better, one could hope.
after not using it for few years now, i got the latest release to see how it is and everything seems to be fine - so far.
the main factor of whether it has a future of any promise is whether they can finish their webcomponents integration
not having tobin around to alienate any programmers is good but it's likely too little too late
>webcomponents
is that the google crap being pushed around?
if so, hope not, toothpaste programmer stated google is crap and i, besides many, agree with him.
i do not use google own sites much.
and if i do have a need for it then secondary browser will suffice.
it's an increasingly integral part of the internet unfortunately, every year more and more websites simply won't work without it
using firefox since 3.5 and still will
proof
Male Troon
well done
what about librewolf?
everybody said it and believe me when i say it, librewolf is just firefox with arkenfox user.js applied, different branding, and pre installed ublock origins.
Now because it's popular that doesn't mean they do something special, it also just happend to gain traction because it promotes itself as firefox without spyware which is far from the truth, it is not patched to the maximum, for that use tor browser.
So there you have it, when anybody questions about librewolf say this to them, just apply any hardened user.js and a few addons and ur done, same effect. It never did anything more than that and anythint special, it's a privacy pre built larping browser.
you have zero idea what you are talking about.
make a webm running tcpdump or wireshark while using that browser.
then do the sme with ff.
why are the pale moon gays still against multi-processing even tho it really gives better performance
they are like "oo mozilla removed xul because multiprocess we do not do multiprocess" then why don't you fix bugs that multi-process xul had? firefox esr52 was released in 2017, and it is 2022 now, they have had 5 years now
how come firefox became a lot less responsive when multiprocess was rolled out?
it might be for you, but for me who has like 200-500 tabs open multiprocess is way more responsive
i have hundreds of tabs open
the team behind palemoon is small, they removed mulitprocess because of the cost(time) of maintenance
king furgay stands upon the obese corpse of tobin and shall lead us to the promised land
I'd be inclined to agree if Male Poon wasn't made by a mentally unstable furry.
The computer engineer demographic has shifted enough in recent years that the furgay is becoming comparatively sane.
Yeah, no. Tobin was always the sane one.
Even if that were the case he's not anymore, after he got the boot he had a breakdown in public on the forums
why do you even care? the code sure doesn't
Neither is firefox's code so what's the difference.
chud browser