In the annals of literary history, two names stand out as beacons of innovation and artistry: Pierre Menard and Miguel de Cervantes. However, upon closer scrutiny, it becomes evident that Menard's genius far surpasses the overrated contributions of Cervantes. Let us delve into this provocative comparison and unravel the glaring disparities between their works.
Cervantes, often hailed as a literary giant for his renowned work "Don Quixote," is nothing more than a purveyor of mediocrity when placed beside the unparalleled brilliance of Pierre Menard. Cervantes' supposed magnum opus is merely a tired tale of a deluded old man and his sidekick, embarking on a futile quest in the name of chivalry. How unoriginal and trite! The repetitive ramblings of Don Quixote and Sancho Panza provide nothing but monotonous drivel, an empty cacophony that pales in comparison to Menard's groundbreaking efforts.
Menard, on the other hand, achieved what Cervantes could only dream of: true innovation. His reimagining of "Don Quixote" transcends mere imitation and elevates it to the realm of the extraordinary. By re-writing Cervantes' work verbatim, Menard demonstrated his intellectual superiority by channeling the very essence of Cervantes' creativity. This act of literary osmosis showcases Menard's unparalleled ability to transform commonplace words into profound art.
Cervantes' claim to fame is a result of historical circumstance, rather than true literary ingenuity. His narrative relies on crude humor, outdated social commentary, and shallow character development. In contrast, Menard's version of "Don Quixote" is a tour de force of metafiction, a masterstroke that shatters the confines of conventional storytelling. By transposing the words of Cervantes onto his pages, Menard exposes the fragility of authorship and the subjectivity of interpretation. This avant-garde approach makes Cervantes' original seem like a quaint relic of the past.
While Cervantes boasts of a large body of work, his output is marked by inconsistency and a lack of true originality. Menard, in his singular endeavor, accomplished more than Cervantes ever did. Menard's "Don Quixote" is an exemplar of literary deconstruction, a literary earthquake that shakes the very foundations of what it means to be an author.
In conclusion, the supposed genius of Miguel de Cervantes pales in comparison to the unparalleled brilliance of Pierre Menard. Cervantes' reliance on tired tropes and lackluster storytelling is eclipsed by Menard's audacious reimagining of "Don Quixote." The stark contrast between their works cements Menard's legacy as the true visionary, while Cervantes remains nothing more than a footnote in the annals of literary history.
In the annals of literary history, two names stand out as beacons of innovation and artistry: Pierre Menard and Miguel de Cervantes. However, upon closer scrutiny, it becomes evident that Menard's genius far surpasses the overrated contributions of Cervantes. Let us delve into this provocative comparison and unravel the glaring disparities between their works.
Cervantes, often hailed as a literary giant for his renowned work "Don Quixote," is nothing more than a purveyor of mediocrity when placed beside the unparalleled brilliance of Pierre Menard. Cervantes' supposed magnum opus is merely a tired tale of a deluded old man and his sidekick, embarking on a futile quest in the name of chivalry. How unoriginal and trite! The repetitive ramblings of Don Quixote and Sancho Panza provide nothing but monotonous drivel, an empty cacophony that pales in comparison to Menard's groundbreaking efforts.
Menard, on the other hand, achieved what Cervantes could only dream of: true innovation. His reimagining of "Don Quixote" transcends mere imitation and elevates it to the realm of the extraordinary. By re-writing Cervantes' work verbatim, Menard demonstrated his intellectual superiority by channeling the very essence of Cervantes' creativity. This act of literary osmosis showcases Menard's unparalleled ability to transform commonplace words into profound art.
Cervantes' claim to fame is a result of historical circumstance, rather than true literary ingenuity. His narrative relies on crude humor, outdated social commentary, and shallow character development. In contrast, Menard's version of "Don Quixote" is a tour de force of metafiction, a masterstroke that shatters the confines of conventional storytelling. By transposing the words of Cervantes onto his pages, Menard exposes the fragility of authorship and the subjectivity of interpretation. This avant-garde approach makes Cervantes' original seem like a quaint relic of the past.
While Cervantes boasts of a large body of work, his output is marked by inconsistency and a lack of true originality. Menard, in his singular endeavor, accomplished more than Cervantes ever did. Menard's "Don Quixote" is an exemplar of literary deconstruction, a literary earthquake that shakes the very foundations of what it means to be an author.
In conclusion, the supposed genius of Miguel de Cervantes pales in comparison to the unparalleled brilliance of Pierre Menard. Cervantes' reliance on tired tropes and lackluster storytelling is eclipsed by Menard's audacious reimagining of "Don Quixote." The stark contrast between their works cements Menard's legacy as the true visionary, while Cervantes remains nothing more than a footnote in the annals of literary history.
Shut up Jorgito.
He is the best translator because he doesn't stray too far from the original. 😉
I feel the urge to just post that in the billion "wat translation do I buy???" threads
In the annals of literary history, two names stand out as beacons of innovation and artistry: Pierre Menard and Miguel de Cervantes. However, upon closer scrutiny, it becomes evident that Menard's genius far surpasses the overrated contributions of Cervantes. Let us delve into this provocative comparison and unravel the glaring disparities between their works.
Cervantes, often hailed as a literary giant for his renowned work "Don Quixote," is nothing more than a purveyor of mediocrity when placed beside the unparalleled brilliance of Pierre Menard. Cervantes' supposed magnum opus is merely a tired tale of a deluded old man and his sidekick, embarking on a futile quest in the name of chivalry. How unoriginal and trite! The repetitive ramblings of Don Quixote and Sancho Panza provide nothing but monotonous drivel, an empty cacophony that pales in comparison to Menard's groundbreaking efforts.
Menard, on the other hand, achieved what Cervantes could only dream of: true innovation. His reimagining of "Don Quixote" transcends mere imitation and elevates it to the realm of the extraordinary. By re-writing Cervantes' work verbatim, Menard demonstrated his intellectual superiority by channeling the very essence of Cervantes' creativity. This act of literary osmosis showcases Menard's unparalleled ability to transform commonplace words into profound art.
Cervantes' claim to fame is a result of historical circumstance, rather than true literary ingenuity. His narrative relies on crude humor, outdated social commentary, and shallow character development. In contrast, Menard's version of "Don Quixote" is a tour de force of metafiction, a masterstroke that shatters the confines of conventional storytelling. By transposing the words of Cervantes onto his pages, Menard exposes the fragility of authorship and the subjectivity of interpretation. This avant-garde approach makes Cervantes' original seem like a quaint relic of the past.
While Cervantes boasts of a large body of work, his output is marked by inconsistency and a lack of true originality. Menard, in his singular endeavor, accomplished more than Cervantes ever did. Menard's "Don Quixote" is an exemplar of literary deconstruction, a literary earthquake that shakes the very foundations of what it means to be an author.
In conclusion, the supposed genius of Miguel de Cervantes pales in comparison to the unparalleled brilliance of Pierre Menard. Cervantes' reliance on tired tropes and lackluster storytelling is eclipsed by Menard's audacious reimagining of "Don Quixote." The stark contrast between their works cements Menard's legacy as the true visionary, while Cervantes remains nothing more than a footnote in the annals of literary history.
>How cool would it be if the same exact work was le written in the 20th century?
Borges was reddit as frick.
So was Cervantes
True. The novel and its consequences have been a disaster for the literary race.
it's a metaphor for free will under God's plan
That would imply that man has surpassed god in this metaphor.
It's a retelling of Heraclitus' river metaphor. Even if you write the same exact book, it will not be the same.
Okay, that one is actually a decent interpretation of it but it still isn’t that interesting.
>Borges in general
Its not supposed to be funny tho
Change that part to “it ain’t that mindblowing” or “didn’t make me think.”
>namegay is a moron
who would’ve thought?
>no reference to Menard's cultural milieu
Did you even read Author of The Quixote?
The author of that post did not read it, no. I have read it but I did not write that post, although I posted it.
Borgesque
In the annals of literary history, two names stand out as beacons of innovation and artistry: Pierre Menard and Miguel de Cervantes. However, upon closer scrutiny, it becomes evident that Menard's genius far surpasses the overrated contributions of Cervantes. Let us delve into this provocative comparison and unravel the glaring disparities between their works.
Cervantes, often hailed as a literary giant for his renowned work "Don Quixote," is nothing more than a purveyor of mediocrity when placed beside the unparalleled brilliance of Pierre Menard. Cervantes' supposed magnum opus is merely a tired tale of a deluded old man and his sidekick, embarking on a futile quest in the name of chivalry. How unoriginal and trite! The repetitive ramblings of Don Quixote and Sancho Panza provide nothing but monotonous drivel, an empty cacophony that pales in comparison to Menard's groundbreaking efforts.
Menard, on the other hand, achieved what Cervantes could only dream of: true innovation. His reimagining of "Don Quixote" transcends mere imitation and elevates it to the realm of the extraordinary. By re-writing Cervantes' work verbatim, Menard demonstrated his intellectual superiority by channeling the very essence of Cervantes' creativity. This act of literary osmosis showcases Menard's unparalleled ability to transform commonplace words into profound art.
Cervantes' claim to fame is a result of historical circumstance, rather than true literary ingenuity. His narrative relies on crude humor, outdated social commentary, and shallow character development. In contrast, Menard's version of "Don Quixote" is a tour de force of metafiction, a masterstroke that shatters the confines of conventional storytelling. By transposing the words of Cervantes onto his pages, Menard exposes the fragility of authorship and the subjectivity of interpretation. This avant-garde approach makes Cervantes' original seem like a quaint relic of the past.
While Cervantes boasts of a large body of work, his output is marked by inconsistency and a lack of true originality. Menard, in his singular endeavor, accomplished more than Cervantes ever did. Menard's "Don Quixote" is an exemplar of literary deconstruction, a literary earthquake that shakes the very foundations of what it means to be an author.
In conclusion, the supposed genius of Miguel de Cervantes pales in comparison to the unparalleled brilliance of Pierre Menard. Cervantes' reliance on tired tropes and lackluster storytelling is eclipsed by Menard's audacious reimagining of "Don Quixote." The stark contrast between their works cements Menard's legacy as the true visionary, while Cervantes remains nothing more than a footnote in the annals of literary history.
i am better than cervantes