>G
Correct >Is it given every card has 1 letter and 1 number?
It seems implied but is not explicit stated.
Why turn over the K though? D -> K is not the same as K -> D. Nothing could be on the other side of K to break the rule, so no need to turn it over.
>D -> K is not the same as K -> D.
Sorry. I meant that 3. Theres no reason to turn over the 3. Either it has a D on the other side and the rule is followed, or it doesnt and the rule is still followed.
1 month ago
Anonymous
I meant 3 total, being the D, K. and 7 cards. Not the card "3".
Anyway, many of these tests are truly moronic. I could guess G with 60% confidence only by looking at the provided answers. Also, the 3x3s often follow stupid patterns and you just have to know the tricks.
>. Otherwise 3,
Try again. With 3, at the minimum you are gathering useless information, but more severely, you are hallucinating rules that do not exist.
I meant 3 total, being the D, K. and 7 cards. Not the card "3".
Anyway, many of these tests are truly moronic. I could guess G with 60% confidence only by looking at the provided answers. Also, the 3x3s often follow stupid patterns and you just have to know the tricks.
>is it given every care has 1 letter and 1 number?
Fricking moron. It says it explicitly. A card that has D has 3 on the other side. Flip D to check if it has 3. Flip the 3 to make sure the thing doesn't have a D to the other side. Was that fricking hard?
If the K has a D on the other side I couldn't care less. The question is for Ds having 3s. Does D has or has not a 3? Is this 3 owned by a D? It does? Then the rule is kept.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Then the D on the opposite of the K doesn't have a 3. By your logic, you don't need to flip the 7 card either.
Both K and 7 must be turned over to prove that a counter example to D->3 does not exist by showing that D-/>K & D-/>7. D must also be turned over to prove the case that this D->3 because D->(anything else) would be a counter example.
These are the three cards, not turning them over could result in a counter example.
>D -> K is not the same as K -> D.
Sorry. I meant that 3. Theres no reason to turn over the 3. Either it has a D on the other side and the rule is followed, or it doesnt and the rule is still followed.
It's G from the movement of each element. Noticing the movement of each element requires separate scrutiny of each. This might as well be 3 questions fused into one, but the time given is all the same.
Also, you must read the squares from left to right. If you try to find a pattern vertically, you are setting yourself for failure and waste time for the whole test.
This is why this stupid shit is a fraud. Psychology is nothing more than a circlejerk huffing farts of israelites that lived more than 80 years ago.
You find more psychology in a sales seminar than this shit field.
>If you try to find a pattern vertically, you are setting yourself for failure and waste time for the whole test.
Actually there's also a pattern for vertical reading. It's just the hexagon moves 3 positions instead of 1.
Tests like this are usually set up so that there is an equivalent pattern holds in all 4 directions. This question goes the extra mile and even has it so that you can continue the pattern across multiple rows or columns. Although even if you didn't realize that you could narrow the answer down to C and G easily and eliminate C for not having triangle movement.
Or anything, really. Is IQfy intelligent?
G
Is it given every card has 1 letter and 1 number? Then 2, the D and 7 cards. Otherwise 3, the D, K, 7 cards (D could be opposite K).
>G
Correct
>Is it given every card has 1 letter and 1 number?
It seems implied but is not explicit stated.
Why turn over the K though? D -> K is not the same as K -> D. Nothing could be on the other side of K to break the rule, so no need to turn it over.
>D -> K is not the same as K -> D.
Sorry. I meant that 3. Theres no reason to turn over the 3. Either it has a D on the other side and the rule is followed, or it doesnt and the rule is still followed.
I meant 3 total, being the D, K. and 7 cards. Not the card "3".
Anyway, many of these tests are truly moronic. I could guess G with 60% confidence only by looking at the provided answers. Also, the 3x3s often follow stupid patterns and you just have to know the tricks.
>. Otherwise 3,
Try again. With 3, at the minimum you are gathering useless information, but more severely, you are hallucinating rules that do not exist.
read the thread moron
>Is it given every card has 1 letter and 1 number
a fine example of dumb neurotypical thinking
>is it given every care has 1 letter and 1 number?
Fricking moron. It says it explicitly. A card that has D has 3 on the other side. Flip D to check if it has 3. Flip the 3 to make sure the thing doesn't have a D to the other side. Was that fricking hard?
and if the K has a D on the other side? moron
If the K has a D on the other side I couldn't care less. The question is for Ds having 3s. Does D has or has not a 3? Is this 3 owned by a D? It does? Then the rule is kept.
Then the D on the opposite of the K doesn't have a 3. By your logic, you don't need to flip the 7 card either.
Both K and 7 must be turned over to prove that a counter example to D->3 does not exist by showing that D-/>K & D-/>7. D must also be turned over to prove the case that this D->3 because D->(anything else) would be a counter example.
These are the three cards, not turning them over could result in a counter example.
Surely the brainiacs on IQfy can solve these easily
B will fill first. A won't fill because B will overflow.
Or at least that would be the cast if the hose weren't cut.
is V/2 a closed system? Is it already full of an incompressible gas? What's the viscosity of the fluid?
Wut
I see
Bamp
I never had a girlfriend
You can talk to somebody else about your problems
Which book is this
i got it off an online test
It's F. Why? Because that's the first letter of Frick you.
It's G from the movement of each element. Noticing the movement of each element requires separate scrutiny of each. This might as well be 3 questions fused into one, but the time given is all the same.
Also, you must read the squares from left to right. If you try to find a pattern vertically, you are setting yourself for failure and waste time for the whole test.
This is why this stupid shit is a fraud. Psychology is nothing more than a circlejerk huffing farts of israelites that lived more than 80 years ago.
You find more psychology in a sales seminar than this shit field.
>If you try to find a pattern vertically, you are setting yourself for failure and waste time for the whole test.
Actually there's also a pattern for vertical reading. It's just the hexagon moves 3 positions instead of 1.
Tests like this are usually set up so that there is an equivalent pattern holds in all 4 directions. This question goes the extra mile and even has it so that you can continue the pattern across multiple rows or columns. Although even if you didn't realize that you could narrow the answer down to C and G easily and eliminate C for not having triangle movement.