>"privacy" guides
>recommends proprietary password manager
are they even trying?
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
>"privacy" guides. >recommends proprietary password manager
>"privacy" guides
>recommends proprietary password manager
are they even trying?
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
privacyguides and privacytools have both been sold out to advertisers
don't count on either of them anymore
>don't count on either of them anymore
what's the better alternative?
there isn't any anymore
nothing newbies can rely on
you have to learn and understand everything yourself to be safe now, and even then you are likely to frick up anyway
we live in that kind of world now
What knowledge can you share?
>there isn't any anymore
It's weird that no anon made a wiki about this.
make a thread on IQfy specifying your use case and do what the schizos tell you
I know nobody cares but. I really wish the USA gov would produce open source, free password management, and push towards passkeys for login and make passwords a relic. The concept of paying a subscription for some service to help you manage the keys to your bank account etc… is just insane.
Imagine if pajeet can’t login to your grammas bank accnt because he doesn’t have access to a passkey. Grandma can give him the pin, it wouldn’t matter
>free
Who is going to pay for development and maintenance? YOU with your taxes.
This isn't a essential service like police or healthcare so it shouldn't be made.
You're paying for lack of maintenance with 1Password. They deliberately broke the version of their product that wasn't a trash fire.
And how do you think the government gets the money?
>Well first, taxes dont only pay for essential services.
I know but they should.
>Though I would argue it IS essential in the digital age, just like airbags and seatbelts are legal requirements for cars, to protect you from yourself or others.
Then forbid the use of passwords in a 3 year time. Only allow passkeys if your platform have more than XYZ amount of users.
>We need gov sponsored password/key/identity management to protect the avg citizen from themselves (password123), and others.
Yes, let's make everyone poorer because morons use non secure passwords knowing that they use weak passwords.
>This isn't a essential service like police or healthcare so it shouldn't be made.
Well first, taxes dont only pay for essential services. Though I would argue it IS essential in the digital age, just like airbags and seatbelts are legal requirements for cars, to protect you from yourself or others. We need gov sponsored password/key/identity management to protect the avg citizen from themselves (password123), and others.
>wanting passkeys not ironically
*phone gets stolen*
Goodbye accounts
You know that passkeys can be copied to any device (even on cloud password managers) if you do it via a secure environment?
Oh yeah, creating a single point of failure.
What do you think passwords have been for the last 60 years?
>what is mfa
Passkeys by itself are a mistake and so do password managers without a sort of two or three-factor auth.
Passkeys = MFA.
Passkeys on smartphones require your phone pin/password/fingerprint/face/eyes to use an identity on a website/app or to copy to a different device, that is already a multi factor authentication (something you have and something you know).
Schizo moron, look up how passkeys work.
And I say this from GrapheneOS.
>~~*secure environment*~~
and what the frick is that
what is pin and biometrics
also need to know the target service and account name
also could put another simple password in front of the passkey, like the word apples. then you have time before they crack that word to notify your bank to shut the accnt down. You would do this the same as if you lost your wallet, except the attacker has to additionally crack your passkey password, instead of just copy paste your credit card credentials.
>I wish the government cared about us, and they were not psychopathic pedos.
I feel you man.
Not everyone who carries about their privacy is freetarded schizo. Software is not le bad just because it does not fall into your weird philosophy. OP is a homosexual who can't into threat-modeling.
>weird philosophy
being able to see if there are backdoors is weird philosophy.
the backdoors live rent-free in your head
they also seem to live rent free in widely used software and no one seems to notice
Give a verifiable proof that software recommended by privacy guides is somehow backdoored or gtfo
>Give a verifiable proof
That's the problem, YOU CAN'T. You can't know if it's safe or not.
Then your statement will remain a delusion. As we have recently seen, free software can be backdoored as well and is certainly not free of vulnerabilities. Unless you can prove that software is somehow backdoored, it is not.
>free software can be backdoored as well and is certainly not free of vulnerabilities.
Yes, no one said the opposite, open source is good because we can check the code and see if there are any shenanigans.
>Unless you can prove that software is somehow backdoored, it is not.
So if you can't see my hands right now they aren't real? or does my typing with them right now make them real? We don't need to see the source code of 90% of proprietary software if they ping their servers every second, scan your machine, and send all the data to their servers. They say it out loud, WE FRICKING COLLECT YOUR DATA. It isn't some """conspiracy theory""" or some bs. If you want to deny the truth that won't affect it.
history, the recent happening and the fact that everyone in charge of a government will want them
they are like bugs, if you see one in your kitchen in means that there are more you can't see.
In case of serious software, you cannot audit that code yourself even if its open. Codebases of huge projects like chromium, gecko, android etc. consist of millions of lines of code and are constantly growing. therefore you kinda have to trust someone with it anyway, so I dont see why software being open source would make that much of a difference nowadays.
Did you patch your chinese backdoor in your Free and Open Source software yet, freetard?
Yeah
But it looks like yours is still in, undetected.
Obscurity gives more security than open sourcing it because then it becomes freetard nerds VS surveillance corporations battle that you will never win.
I have a kbdx file that has less data than op's image on all my devices that has all my passwords for all my accounts and I have been using that for the past 6 years
Anything that uploads your passwords to a server you do not control in an encryption scheme you did not create is big brother, no exceptions.
>using anything other than your brain to store passwords
ngmi
I had to pass a "cyber security" certification made by the French gov for my new company and it also recommended this shit.
Because if you tell illiterate normie to use keepass/whenever, in three months 90% of them will break it (loose database file, forget master password, overwrite file with old version and decide that it's program loosing data, etc) and go back to paper notes and one password everywhere.
just write on a paper, it's offline and no """hacker""", company or fed can see
not viable if you want passwords > 20 characters. have fun spending 3 minutes typing in a new password every time.
Just have a password manager with your master password on a paper
30min for 20 chars??? what's your age, 80?
3* pardon the typo.
They are AI generated
why not use keypass ? this and Syncthing allow me to sync my pw across all my devices
As long as its local and doesnt connect to the net, it doesnt really matter.
>privacy guidelines
>have no email
>use dnscrypt-proxy
>use qtox over tor for all messages
>never click any links
problem solved