PROOF PI IS RATIONAL
It is well known that pi has an infinite amount of digits so therefore every possible sequence of digits exists in the digits of pi. Therefore the sequence "xxxx..." infinite times exists in pi which means pi is some digits then x repeating. X could be 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, whichever infinite sequence of the same digit comes first. This also means that there is a last digit of pi. As a programmer I don't usually mess around with mathematical concepts but you guys can't seem to make up your minds on whether or not pi is irrational so I thought I'd give my two cents. Also, if discovering this wins me one of your dumb prizes I don't care, you guys can claim it for yourself, trust me, I don't need the money.
you need the meds
fixing this is beyond the capabilities of contemporary medical science.
>infinite amount of digits so therefore every possible sequence of digits exists in the digits of pi.
Just because a number is irrational doesn't mean it contains every possible finite sequence of digits. Consider for example the irrational number 0.01001000100001000001...
This is circular reasoning, the number 0.010010001000010000001... is clearly rational because eventually there will be an infinite amount of 0s
Liouvilles constant contains even longer sequence of zeros. By your reasoning, it should be rational too?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liouville_number
>is clearly rational
Then what two numbers form the ratio that results in that value?
You do know that is what rational means, right?
Only the digits you compute will ever be real. Beyond that is just pure fantasy.
>has an infinite amount of digits so therefore every possible sequence of digits exists in the digits
Fallacious reasoning. The decimal form of one third has an infinite number of digits, yet all of them are 3 and you obviously cannot find every possible sequence of digits in it.
>but you can with pi
I'm not disputing that. I'm refuting the part I quoted.
Yeah and its rational
Anon, come on, it's so simple, pi is irrational because it's an attempt to quantify a qualitative property of reality which has no definitive boundary.
The number is never ending but reality becomes discrete when you zoom in enough.
yeah, no
there's mathematical evidence for that tho. what are you basing your claims on?
>there's mathematical evidence for that tho
There's mathematical evidence that our mathematical models don't work at that scale because we're unable to quantify the properties of reality, ergo you have the opposite of evidence, all you've proven is that you have no data about these scales and you aren't able to know anything what's happening on that level, because math is just representing states of a system as numbers, but since you are unable to observe the system at that scale you can't assign any numbers to it
>evidence that our mathematical models don't work at that scale
I think that's what the mathematical evidence implies, that shit should work if the smallest shit is planck scale. Planck postulate
>that shit should work
I don't think you understand what mathematics is and how it works
his math which checked out for some shit, also predicts spacetime is quantized. same as Einstein's work predicted shit which was eventually confirmed. if anything it's strong evidence, especially since your "no it isn't" means absolutely nothing in comparison.
Are you fricking moronic??
>"he [Planck] considered quantization as being purely a mathematical trick, raher than (as is now known) a fundamental change in the understanding of the world"
you seem to be, for missing the "rather than as is now known". his math has been fricking proven, it's not a trick. we don't have proof that spacetime is quantized, but we have mathematical evidence, from same math which has been proven with other stuff.
>you seem to be, for missing the "rather than as is now known"
You seem to be, for you are missing the part where the guy who came up with the math thought that quantization was a consequence of higher intelligence making shit up and he would be correct in his assessment
>planck scale
ah, the sub-wit's crack-cocaine
Computation is symmetrical
>every possible sequence of digits exists in the digits of pi
Pi has not been proven to be normal. And that only deals with finite sequences anyway.
>Therefore the sequence "xxxx..." infinite times exists in pi which means pi is some digits then x repeating. X could be 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, whichever infinite sequence of the same digit comes first.
Even if pi were normal, if X in your example is 0, that means an infinite sequence of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9 does not exist, contradicting your premise that every (or any) infinite sequence exists.
> As a programmer I don't usually mess around with mathematical concepts
You don't even know how to code you stupid piece of shit.
(22/7)/sqrt(e^3)
I proved PI is national
>As a programmer
ah, the glue eaters of mathematics
If you didn't realize yet OP is a troll.
oh, you are right, sorry
>has an infinite amount of digits
Wrong. It has less digits than the total entropy posibilities of the cosmos. I chaught you violating the laws of thermodynamics, fool
>Therefore the sequence "xxxx..." infinite times exists in pi which means pi is some digits then x repeating.
NO, you fricking moron, an infinity of numbers on a single dimension cannot be contained by an infinity of numbers in a single dimension too.
There is no such thing as an "infinity of x" since infinity is the uppermost upper limit rather than a specific number, so x tends toward infinity but can never be infinity.
pi is irrational because perfect circles don't exist in nature
No, it has nothing to do with nature, its that diagonals and curved diagonals can't be represented by square units.