>Proton is a fundamental parti-...
What did we gain from debunking this?
Maybe just stop debunking things? You're making physics more complicated for no reason.
Have you even seen these "quarks"? Which source fact-checked this?
>Proton is a fundamental parti-...
>Maybe just stop debunking things?
Never.
How about we stop making definitive claims about reality instead? Put the word "probably" before everything and the problem is solved, we wont have to debunk anything because no one would be lying
>probable vibrations
aka what I feel when I fire up the Rabbit™
>What did we gain from debunking this?
Who said it was debunked? Science doesn't get proved wrong, it only improves
Why do you think neutrons stick to protons?
>What did we gain from debunking this?
4 responses deep and no answer kek. That's because we've gained nothing. We've lost billions in funding that could have gone toward education or engineering. People and animals have either died or become irreparably damaged from these colliders. 60 years later and colliders haven't given us anything. Full stop.
> People and animals have either died or become irreparably damaged from these colliders
Did the chemtrails tell you that?
You don't even know the history of the collider. Why are you on this thread?
You're a persistent schizo
Kys fricking moron. Get out of this thread, and get out of reality.
>already has a schizo image ready
Topkek
>he doesn't know
Everyone laugh at the moron
AHAHAHAHAHAHA
The guy is 80 and still alive. Name a person that was killed by a particle accelerator.
Nobody said he died, and nobody said that someone died from a collider.
>People and animals have either died or become irreparably damaged from these colliders
Imagine being so psychotic that you forget what you wrote minutes before
ESL moron detected. Do you not know what "either..or" means?
>People who win a Nobel Prize either get a medal or get jizzed in the face by the king of Sweden
Bell's Palsy must also be the fountain of youth: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%27s_palsy
>MISSING THE POINT
>We've lost billions in funding that could have gone toward education or engineering.
Right, because nuclear/particle physics does nothing education. You know, except educating thousands of physicists, engineers etc. who don't grow old at CERN, but move to industry sooner or later. Engineering? Yeah, who needs the WWW. Or medical imaging based on particle detectors. And don't think of all the spinoff companies founded by physicists from collider experiments.
www would have been made even if CERN didn't. It's a simple consequences of sharing large data. You think LHC is the only place that generates large data and had a vested interest in sharing it? The delusion.
>You think LHC is the only place that generates large data and had a vested interest in sharing it?
Apparently it was the only place back then
We cannot even see protons and neutrons, yet we know that they are composite particles.
Where does string theory fit into this?
No idea, ask a theorist.
>Where does "my made up abstract theory of math masturbation" fit into this?
sounds like your problem
>People and animals have either died or become irreparably damaged from these colliders
good, frick them
>Have you even seen these "quarks"
yes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark#cite_note-Bloom-7
>Have you even seen these "quarks"?
We cant even see an atom, whats your point?
we can
sigh
Arent quarks smaller than light rays? How the actual frick do you see quarks?
You can see quarks with gamma rays with wavelength of quark radius
Doesn’t that mean there could be particles even smaller than quarks but there would be no bullshitery we could pull to be able to see them?
Quarks may be particles or just proton's propertied. Nevertheless quarks solved the massive particle zoo at 60's 70's
It didn't solve anything, you still have 3 fundamental matter particles, lol. It's a meme.
>Hurr guys i solved neutron and proton, now you have quark up and quark down! btfo!
Explain the strangeness quantum number without using the word "quark"
doesn't exist
Explain this then https://www.nature.com/articles/160855a0
>Some garbage paywall to useless word salad of projecting cloud chamber tracks
no thanks
Of course it does. That’s just silly
nah doesn't, never did, it's all made up sorry
Sounds like somebody’s mad they got btfo’d by science. Better luck next time
nope
There was way more than that. For example mesons. By having quarks, the set of fundameltal particles smallened in number many folds.
>if i cant see, it doesnt exist
>i can't prove it exists
>What did we gain from debunking this?
a bonus to working on nuclear fusion?
>hmm, today I will make another thread where I "pretend" to be moronic
>hmm, for past 100 years i will create made up science where i "pretend" to be moronic
The science is settled. Quarks exist. Deal with it.
except that there's no proof
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark#cite_note-Bloom-7
tl/dr
wikipedia says there are 100 genders aswell so dilate troony
So it must be right
we gained nothing more than any other observation
we just happened to observe that a proton is made up of quarks
seethe
we gained alot from science that isnt fairy tales and actually has grounds in reality, qm is popsci
>qm is popsci
35 year old white man living in a first world country with a meme degree 'science associate' who calls himself an engineer in plebbit and discord convos , whose understanding of qm is based on some bald smiling guy in a video with melodysheep background music and doesn't know what a hamiltonian nor an eigenstate is.
I pity your kind.
>projec-
smug.png
yeah, it's not real
tfw some schizo projects his insanity wave onto one of your preferred basis states