Quantum computers

Are they actually a hoax to scam universities/companies out of research bux? If not, how come we STILL have nothing close to a useful quantum computer that will le break all cryptography?

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >if a piece of technology doesn't progress as fast as my completely personal expectations then it must be fake or a scam or something

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      but quantum computers have been "2 more years!!" for the past 10 years

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I get my information from tabloid headlines instead of primary publication
        It's not looking good pal, you still have time to delete the thread

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >only supposed quantum computer is limited to 20 qubits and requires cryogenic cooling in a giant vacuum chamber
          >its estimated that you need 13 million qubits to break RSA in a day
          yeah nothing is breaking anytime soon lol, if ever

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >dude remember how we went from the ENIAC to the iPhone in 10 years!?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The first demonstrated quantum computer using 2 qubits already dates from 1998. Thats already 26 years of nothing actually useful coming out of quantum computing, except for promises. So don't you dare to compare this to ENIAC, that was already useful from day 1.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Is this real? Zuck's metaverse had more to show for itself than this. I am now even more convinced it's a meme.

            >posts tabloid trash instead of claims coming from primary sources
            LMAOOOOO

            Here you go, quantumquck. Straight from the Nature article. The sooner you simply accept that you bet on the wrong horse, the sooner you can start the long, lonely road back from total moronation.
            https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-01965-3

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >nature paywalled blog post = official statement/research paper from IBM
            LMAO
            Unlike you I read this article and it says nothing about "2 more years" and it's very balanced in its predictions

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Trust me bro
            Yeah, I'll get right on that. In the meantime, you keep biting your nails watching the snail's pace progress of your precious memeputers.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not the one posting nature blog posts that you clearly don't even have access to lmao

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            No, you're the one having a stroke over the fact that not everyone is creaming themselves over this nothingburger.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, I am having a stroke. Any more things you like to believe?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Well, since you asked.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's real yeah. There is a big difference between physical qubits, and logical qubits. I think IBM has chip out there with something like 400 physical qubits, but to create even a single logical qubit you would need anywhere between 100-10.000 physical qubits. Even if you apply Moore's law to quantum computing for some reason, we would be 100+ years away from having anything "breaking".

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >2 more years
        name 1 person working on them that has said this
        no /misc/ and /x/ schizos dont count

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah

          IBM

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I get my information from tabloid headlines instead of primary publication
      It's not looking good pal, you still have time to delete the thread

      Quantum computing is a joke that spiraled out of control. It's nothing more than a random number generator, and everyone involved seems too deep in to admit it's all been a joke. Imagine being in charge of a department that's blown through millions, all while knowing the folks footing the bill have no clue. Surprisingly, we've still stumbled upon some pretty cool scientific discoveries, even though the whole field feels like a sham. Honestly, it's impressive how people manage to keep a straight face when they update us on their progress.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    yes

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    quantumqucks are at it again

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >posts tabloid trash instead of claims coming from primary sources
      LMAOOOOO

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://www.reuters.com/technology/ibm-says-quantum-chip-could-beat-standard-chips-two-years-2021-11-15/

        Good luck debunking Reuters, chud

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >outperform classical computers
          >at some tasks
          Damn homie can't even get past the headline

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    My university released a WHOLE ASS MAJOR for them. I was actually thinking of enrolling

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Your university is trying to get more student loan tuition bux from idiots.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        My university is free as we're in Europe

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Your university receives government funding based on enrollment numbers, so it still applies.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    ARM chips are way more interesting and promising than quantum computing.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, they generate so much "noise" (false positives) that they are basically unusable. They keep the scam going to by saying they will reduce the noise eventually.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >create random number generator
      >call the number
      >if you're correct, ask for another million bux for further research
      >if you're wrong, call it noise and ask for another million bux for further research

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I think you're right. This is pretty much it.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If there's a israelite, a poo or a chew behind it, it's a scam

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Are they actually a hoax to scam universities/companies out of research bux?
    Spot On

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *