Quarks are bullshit. Prove me wrong.

Quarks are bullshit. Prove me wrong.

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    when you really look at it closely most of the universe is bullshit anon.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it's bullshit all the way down.
      and all the way up.

      The Atom is not bullshit. Quarks are bullshit.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Prove me wrong.
    I can't

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Electrons are bullshit

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it's bullshit all the way down.
      and all the way up.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it's bullshit all the way down.
      and all the way up.

      Electrons are real though. You can have an electron beam and generate nice little x-ray. You can confirm it's an electric beam by measuring mass/charge etc

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Electrons are quarks.
        >You can confirm it's an electric beam by measuring mass/charge etc
        >Light isn't real

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Phlogiston is bullshit
          >hurr dat mean u think fire be bullshit

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Electrons, and leptons in general, aren't affected by the Strong force.
          Quarks very much are.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      bros somebody better explain wtf fractional charge is
      https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00832-z

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Turns out that not everything is a multiple of some random particle's value for some property. Wow. Such contraversy!

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    deep inelastic scattering. the data is pretty obvious that there are point-like constituents in protons and neutrons. similar observations to how rutherford proved atoms have small nuclei.

    usually before calling a scientific theory “bullshit” it is good practice to propose another theory to explain the data (or else to question the validity of the data.) do you have a different proposal that explains deep inelastic scattering data?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Can I say god did it?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Tldr

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Quarks aren't bullshit. Prove me wrong.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the discovery of quarks has led to ZERO technological advancement
    their existence is just in theory

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      just because one can’t (currently) use the quark theory to make a profit doesn’t mean it’s wrong. nobody is making a profit on the theory of dark matter explaining the rotation curve of galaxies. the theory just explains something better than any other theory so that wins in the realm of ideas. it is actually good that there exists a realm of reality where we can study things without any potential profits. it gives us a nice clean and pure realm of nature to discover and study without money causing there to be a hovering cloud of clownworld people

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >nobody is making a profit on the theory of dark matter explaining the rotation curve of galaxies

        oy vey we need to build a trillion dollar telescope to look for dark matter!!!

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Those telescopes are already being built to spy on you.
          >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KH-11_KENNEN
          A few others pointed away from Earth is the least they can do.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Particle physics will eventually lead to a giant payoff after the chiral anomaly gets better understood, as it will lead to breaking baryon number conservation. Its theorized that a fusion-like reactor running at 2 Terakelvin can achieve total mass to energy conversion.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Molecules are bullshit

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Cult of Passion

    A wierd tri-point of reality. Curious as to what force to apply to it to make it do what I dream of.

    I havnt really heard anything, but I havnt been looking for it either. Maybe the things we calls stuff makes us not see it in other ways...

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're a rectumangle

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    so it just stops at atoms? nothin else?

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    All subatomic particles are ephemeral points of contact between representatin theory and 'reality'.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I cannot. They truly are bullshit. Probably just spin xyz directions

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Quarks are epicycles.
    The first quark model was invented by Heisenberg, in his time there were only two quarks, up and down quarks, and they were to be akin to the electron spin states up and down. He called this Isospin, it had the same mathematics of spin.
    Combinations of two quarks allowed for an explanation of neutrons, protons and pions.
    So 5 particles were explained as a combination of only 2 particles, it was a good model.
    It failed to explain other particles like Kaons, which was strange so a new quark was invented called Strange quark. This was done by Gell-Man.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Atoms are bullshit. Everything is made of aether densities, and gravity is actually due to the flow of aether particles to greater aether densities. For Earth, the flow velocity is 9.8 m/s^2.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >velocity
      >uses units for acceleration.
      Opinion discarded.
      Come back when you get your GED you Black person.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    only quark theory i sort of get is the eightfold way, which only uses 3 quarks, i think it was improved with the idea of "flavor symmetry" and later with "color symmetry".

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *