>Camus >Freud >Peterson >Rand >No Plotinus, Augustine, Aquinas, Ockham, Hobbes, Leibniz, Rousseau...etc
This the worst selection of philosophers I've ever seen. Plus, your criteria for ranking them is all over the place.
>Plato and Nietzsche are both in s tier >Aristotle and Hume are both in s tier
Fricking how? Their philosophies are literally the polar opposite of each other's.
Why the appreciation for Scotus, anon? Considering the absence of any other major medieval philosophers in your ranking (besides Boethius), what do you find so special about him?
Haecceity is the most beautiful thing in the history of philosophy
>As kingfishers catch fire, dragonflies draw flame; >As tumbled over rim in roundy wells >Stones ring; like each tucked string tells, each hung bell's >Bow swung finds tongue to fling out broad its name; >Each mortal thing does one thing and the same: >Deals out that being indoors each one dwells; >Selves — goes itself; myself it speaks and spells, >Crying Whát I dó is me: for that I came.
>oh look it's another non-distinct American accent generic voice narrator reading off Wikipedia for 50 minutes
I know this kind of content is popular since people need to fill their time and distract themselves from the misery of life but cmon
S - Kant
The rest are irrelevant
hegel and pashukanis annihilate kant, theoretically and practically, respectively
Atheist "philosophers" are garbage tier by default
>Nietzsche S tier
also Marx in A tier means op should kill himself and/or go back to /leftypol
>lit would rate stirner high but rand low
Makes sense, Rand is just wish.com Stirner.
>Camus
>Freud
>Peterson
>Rand
>No Plotinus, Augustine, Aquinas, Ockham, Hobbes, Leibniz, Rousseau...etc
This the worst selection of philosophers I've ever seen. Plus, your criteria for ranking them is all over the place.
I was going to write a sincere response but this person should just kys
>Plato and Nietzsche are both in s tier
>Aristotle and Hume are both in s tier
Fricking how? Their philosophies are literally the polar opposite of each other's.
It's not about who is right, it's about who is based
>S
Duns Scotus
>A
Empedocles, Plato, Zeno, Plotinus
>B
Spinoza, Leibniz, Aristotle, Epictetus
>C
Schopenhauer, Kierkegaard, Boethius, Sarte
>D
Wittgenstein, Nietzsche, Rousseau, Heidegger, Hume
>F
Hegel, Kant, Marx
Why the appreciation for Scotus, anon? Considering the absence of any other major medieval philosophers in your ranking (besides Boethius), what do you find so special about him?
Haecceity is the most beautiful thing in the history of philosophy
>As kingfishers catch fire, dragonflies draw flame;
>As tumbled over rim in roundy wells
>Stones ring; like each tucked string tells, each hung bell's
>Bow swung finds tongue to fling out broad its name;
>Each mortal thing does one thing and the same:
>Deals out that being indoors each one dwells;
>Selves — goes itself; myself it speaks and spells,
>Crying Whát I dó is me: for that I came.
Literature, not philosophy
S:
Plato, Kant, Hegel, Lao Tzu, Plotinus, Aristotle
A:
Schopenhauer, Proclus, Sextus Empiricus, Stirner, Berkeley, Socrates, Leibniz
B:
Decsartes, Locke, Kierkegaard, Spinoza, Marx, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Cicero, Zeno,
C:
Wittgenstein, Hume, Epicurus
moronic tier:
Rousseau, Sartre, Camus, Marcus Aurelius,
Peterson, Rand, Nick Land, and Freud are not philosophers, camus and aurelius only barely can be considered so
rand and freud are
yeah and i'm a botanist
Bait tierlist, not even reading
>oh look it's another non-distinct American accent generic voice narrator reading off Wikipedia for 50 minutes
I know this kind of content is popular since people need to fill their time and distract themselves from the misery of life but cmon
People who unironically watch that schlock are genuinely moronic.
>No Jesus or Bhudda
Maybe.
Heidegger would be on top. And Camus on mid tier.
You know you are talking pop philosofy when the existencialists and nietzche comes in
Why is Aurelius in A tier? He made aphorisms, not original contributions.