Rust is here to stay

Rust is the improved version of C just like C++. There's no reason to hate on Rust nor for Rustoceans to hate on their ancestor. Eventually we will have a working popular OS much safer and faster and more perfect written completely in Rust. There's no reason to resist the tide. Changing and evolution to adapt the hardware is what C programmers should do instead of being skeptical. Even better, all C programmers should learn to work with Rust and we can develop an evolved version of C better.
All you need, is pick up this book and start coding. Rust is exemtrenly easy if you have known C. In fact, it only takes a week to get familiar with Rust. Let's improve together for the future of evolved C, Rust.

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    There aren't any jobs

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why would you want superflouos bound checks in your syscall handlers? They should add an option to disable bound checking. But, theyre gay and never will. Also, why would you want all the million linked lists in the kernel to be "borrow-checked" every access with Rc<RefCell<T>>??
    And of course, cant wait to, well, ... WAIT to compile the kernel.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      There are unchecked getters for arrays too, no problem. Borrow checking happens in compile time so it has no runtime cost.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        RefCell is borrow-checked at runtime.
        >A mutable memory location with dynamically checked borrow rules
        >no problem
        Yeah ok Rakesh, let me just .get_checked literally everywhere on every array and slice.
        Not to mention all the trillion unsafe {
        } blocks that will be everywhere.
        Cannot be overloaded with Index, because you cannot impl Index for slices. The slice is arguably one of the most important types in rust.

        You should atleast finish the Servo browser along with a support for extensions before you shill this language as a "language killer".

        They couldnt finish it not because browsers are complex, which they are, but because rust is very slow to write in for noobs that dont know how to code. Because if youre a dumb noob that doesnt know how to code, like

        your rust code simply wont compile.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You are supposed to dynamically check the anyway. Rust just makes it imperative. Why are you getting so defensive?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            some one did a studied and rust found out is slower performance by 1.7x percent

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I don't even care about the performance, I hate it's ugly syntax and lousy design patterns.

            The zealots are constantly raving about the borrow checker, like it's going to solve every problem ever.

            Coding in Object Pascal is more enjoyable.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Imagine if you worked in a company where code reviewer was a midwit and he couldn't understand your code, he'd reject it and there's nothing you could do about it. That's the rust's borrow checker, you CANNOT prove to it in any way that you are right, without writing 500+ lines of cnile tier code, removing any benefit it had before you did this.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >make language for morons
          >it attracts morons and nobody else
          >morons still fail to get shit done
          and that's why C will always be king. it filters nuggets with surgical precision and leaves only ones worthy of writing high performance software

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Why do cniles always pretend that they write high performance software by default?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >highly specific structures and algorithms for the use case
            >no """zero cost"""" abstractions
            >full control, and the compilers are so good they help you out even further
            >UB (yes, it's a good thing if you're not moronic)
            and of course
            >we actually finish products

            just like your transition, rust is a meme at best and a mental health crisis at worst.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not OP, I'm just anon who every morning gets reminded that cniles are moronic due to waking up and thinking "I will update my gentoo install today", halfway in the resolution, I remember that Python is slower than your obese mother walking and I go wash myself, brush my teeth, eat breakfast and hope that by then I will be able to inspect use flags, read the news items, and hopefully accept new updates without anything breaking.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You should atleast finish the Servo browser along with a support for extensions before you shill this language as a "language killer".

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Servo got dissolved into mainline firefox, Servo rendering backend, Stylo and WebRender are being used in Firefox already. They just operate that way, same thing happened with Quantum.
      Not an mozilla employee btw so don't quote me on this.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    so is your axewound, and in fact after you have a nice day, your male bone structure will stay for thousands of years underground, until someone digs it up and finds out that a man was buried there

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    God I hope Rust continues to be isolated to a small vocal minority. I would kill myself if I had to code it professionally.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Rust is the improved version of C just like C++
    >Rust is the improved version of C
    >the improved version of C
    >>>>just like C++
    ruh roh

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    easy there bud, let me .unwrap() your post before you throw another melty

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    probably epic post but I'm just not going to read it sorry anon, just too schizo for me

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    the power of oestrogen

    I'm not OP, I'm just anon who every morning gets reminded that cniles are moronic due to waking up and thinking "I will update my gentoo install today", halfway in the resolution, I remember that Python is slower than your obese mother walking and I go wash myself, brush my teeth, eat breakfast and hope that by then I will be able to inspect use flags, read the news items, and hopefully accept new updates without anything breaking.

    >wakes up thinking about straight, white men
    checks out, have you tried grindr?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      cool deflection homosexual, cniles never care about performance until you threaten them
      >Python will have a JEET compiling now
      >it depends on LLVM
      >C++ code
      lol

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        we do, we just don't have to rave about it, since it's almost inherent to the language
        >bbbbbut PYTHON LLVM CPP GOTCHA CNILE
        what?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Python is getting faster? Nice. Another reason not to use Rust.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          sadly it also is getting more bloated

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      Estrogen troony meltdown. Go look in the mirror to remind yourself how ugly and manly you are.

      I think you guys are mistaken. I hate trannies. You clearly didnt read my post, I even mentioned the axe wound guy. Now what, what is your excuse? That you're fricking moronic nocoders?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >troony hates what it's become
        yes, we know

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Mojo is better though. Better python syntax, integrates fully with c++ and python, compiles using all the llvm optimizations... why would I ever touch ugly ass rust when I get all the speed of C and memory safety with python syntax?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >LLVM
      into the trash just like Python's default JEET, I am using programming language implemented in C, I will not install C++ compiler for it.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Cniles have dependended on C++ programmers for years to fix their performance issues and still larp that they are relevant.
    Rust trannies are the same, considering they also depend on LLVM. It seems like everyone who's better than C++ depends on LLVM for some reason?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I have 2 words for you: Cranelift
      It will be the day of mass an hero-ing on IQfy once cranelift releases

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        wrong cranelift is slow so not a compiler

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Zig is better

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >another wrapper for C++ compiler

      we do, we just don't have to rave about it, since it's almost inherent to the language
      >bbbbbut PYTHON LLVM CPP GOTCHA CNILE
      what?

      wouldn't a cnile who loves full control implement a JEET in C code, more optimal than shitty LLVM code written by C++ morons? Really makes me think that C programmers just aren't as good as they claim.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        wtf does python have to do with anything, moron? do you just like to think about big snakes in your ass all day or what?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          CPython's implementation language is in the name, and it's insufferably slow, Cniles, our response?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      heil zigler

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Estrogen troony meltdown. Go look in the mirror to remind yourself how ugly and manly you are.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >another wrapper for C++ compiler
    [...]
    wouldn't a cnile who loves full control implement a JEET in C code, more optimal than shitty LLVM code written by C++ morons? Really makes me think that C programmers just aren't as good as they claim.

    Get your daily dose of estrogen please

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      (You)

      [...]
      If you know bounds check will be superfluous, simply use the unchecked getter. I don’t understand why you are behaving so aggressive and condescending towards me. This isn’t how you talk irl, so why here?

      No thanks, I will stick to language where I have to go out of my way to get the range checks where they matter.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Good for you. I’ll stick to Rust and use iterators wherever possible.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          C++ has iterators and they're better than your inane garbage.

          >take a look at this screenshot of the page modified by Inspect Element
          ok

          I accept your concession homosexual. Absolutely noone likes C, and noone likes insecure homosexuals like you who are as bad if not worse than troony who made this thread.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I said literally nothing about C you estrogen monster

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I accept your concession, cnile, and thanks but no, feel free to drink it with your troony friend, because you're the same.
            t. C++ programmer

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >still projecting
            whatever lets you sleep at night, lol

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I’m not interested in C++. I’ll check it out maybe when the ranges and pattern matching has a decent synergy like in Rust but looks like it’s not happening anytime soon.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            already happened, you're just a nocoder who doesn't know anything about C++

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Already happened
            Can I see the equivalent pattern matching code in C++?
            fn is_palindrome(chars: &[char]) -> bool {
            match chars {
            | [first, between @ .., last] => first == last && is_palindrome(between),
            | _ => true,
            }
            }
            >nocoder
            How would a nocoder know about iterators and pattern matching?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'll get back to you when I can understand what that means.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I don't know Rust but that's pretty straightforward to me.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            yeah I'm sure it's more straightforward than the equivalent that any JeetCope grinder would write.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            > | _ =>
            Bro, that is not valid rust. The guard goes AFTER the pattern.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            @ ..
            | >
            |

            It's so ugly

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The code isn't even valid rust code. Since you didn't notice this you clearly don't know the semantics either. You do not have a right to say it is ugly, fricking midwit.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I don't know shit about rust, correct. But that just LOOKS ugly as frick. It is unaesthetic, unappealing. There is nothing nice about it. It is slop.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The author of the code here. The code is not ugly, you are simply too unfamiliar with pattern matching. Same code in Scala or F# would look pretty identical.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >same code in other dead languages
            now it makes sense

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            And also the code is valid. The other anon got knowledge-checked unfortunately. But I don't utilise these situations as a tool to impugn his competence, wish the other two anons who are hostile to me for no reason would understood.

            >same code in other dead languages
            now it makes sense

            Scala is pretty big in data science, anon. Rust is emerging as the successor of C/++.
            C++ is adopting pattern matching in a few years, you should familiarise yourself with this idiom.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >data science
            lol, lmao, we already had the only solution we needed, they were called databases

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I admit it, I didn't know that was *valid*, but it is certainly superfluous. One can remove the |. Superfluous like all those fricking dynamic borrow checks you wont admit are there.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >C++ is adopting pattern matching in a few years, you should familiarise yourself with this idiom.
            it won't matter since it'll be implemented in the most moronic and useless way possible

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Kek, I hope not, but std::variant makes me worried. Still, I can't blame them, standard libraries are a moronic concept, it's ironic that rustrannies chose to have one.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You clearly haven't used the Rust stl. I can assure you it is LEAPS AND BOUNDS different from the C++ stl.

            c-can i b-borrow this?
            huehue let me c-check
            *BEEEEEEEEEP* (brain EEG)

            Yeah lol, literally

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I know that Rust HashMap uses SipHash which tells me everything I need to know about quality of its standard library

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Siphash is alright for medium sized key. You can of course override the default hashing yourself by implementing the Hash trait.

            Rust is peak programming. I love it.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            SipHash is shit for any sized key, it's fricking slow and thrashes icache, it doesn't belong in a hash table
            >muh security
            all a threatre, mitigate spam of your API instead of accepting it all and trying to larp that your hash function can handle it

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            An even bigger brain than

            Siphash is alright for medium sized key. You can of course override the default hashing yourself by implementing the Hash trait.

            Rust is peak programming. I love it.

            You know I miss the old days.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Correct. SipHash is bad. That's one bad thing among 999 good things. Great catch, midwit!

            How is this relevant? Does he even work on C++ anymore? He already did his job, C++ won.

            He didn't learn Rust. If you do not fully know both C++ and Rust you cannot compare the two. Yet bjarne usually wont even mention the name Rust. He just blissfully ignores its existence. He knows C++ has been replaced. Times have changed

            Siphash is alright for medium sized key. You can of course override the default hashing yourself by implementing the Hash trait.

            Rust is peak programming. I love it.

            Someone with a brain. Take notes all you morons in this thread.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            yes because Rust is not relevant, he spent his life trying to improve C instead of trying to replace it, he won, trannies will never achieve anything

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You can drop in another hashing algorithm very easily. Bit of a pain not to have it by default but meh. Typically I use https://lib.rs/crates/ahash

            Siphash is alright for medium sized key. You can of course override the default hashing yourself by implementing the Hash trait.

            Rust is peak programming. I love it.

            >You can of course override the default hashing yourself by implementing the Hash trait.
            This is not how you replace the hashing algorithm, the most you can do by implementing Hash is feed the same algorithm different input.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >new language from scratch
            >environment from scratch
            >suffers same problems C catches flack for
            grim

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What? Does C have this problem?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            NTA but some have gripes with the way you package C libraries. And it is not even part of the "ecosystem" (there is none). Basically a do whatever the frick you want attitude.
            Rust is a fricking corporation, yet can't get a centralized package managing system right. Hell, even pypi is better than this shit (which is also not Organisational dicksucking, fwiw).

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I like cargo/crates.io a lot more than pip/PyPI and it's very different from C no matter how you look at it, IDGI
            >Rust is a fricking corporation
            What do you mean?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >What do you mean?
            look at the fricking rust """foundation""" you moron, it's a fricking front for huge companies. it is inorganic slop created by corporations that all have huge public scandals in their past.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Also python is getting pattern matching. Java already has it in java 21 and C# has a gimped version of it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >take a look at this screenshot of the page modified by Inspect Element
        ok

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    If you know bounds check will be superfluous, simply use the unchecked getter. I don’t understand why you are behaving so aggressive and condescending towards me. This isn’t how you talk irl, so why here?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I hate to break it to you Rakesh, in that which your refer to as "IRL", your so-called PhD thesis aint shit.

      >troony hates what it's become
      yes, we know

      Again, I hate trannies, read the fricking post dumb nocoder

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >weeeh jeet weeeeeeh nocoder

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I do not have a PhD thesis, why are you hallucinating? And why are you being so defensive? What did I say to trigger you like this?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          My bad, MSc, soon to be PhD. Defensive or not, you can interpret it either way. However, you haven't brought anything of substance to the discussion. You do not say anything new. You probably don't know as much as I do about low-level programming. Go ahead, give me a fricking example moron.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I didn't do masters either. I started working full time after my bachelors.
            >However, you haven't brought anything of substance to the discussion
            You weren't giving me any thing substantiative to discuss about. So far you have complained about bounds checking overhead and I only said you can use unchecked getters in scenarios like this.

            > | _ =>
            Bro, that is not valid rust. The guard goes AFTER the pattern.

            https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=006b390a35a50e1fa4f308f98bcac2a2

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Why the frick are you here? Go to work???

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >if i say jeet every other post, they wont notice i smell and my skin is brown

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >itt: THERES A CNILE FLYING OVER MY HOUSE

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Rust is here to stay because enough C-level corpobozos got duped by the marketing pitch from pozzilla evangelist teams into adopting it into their core.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Superior rust book incoming
    I don't understand the hate Rust gets, and with this board it only comes down to anons shouting slurs without any technical discussion.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I hate being shilled at and will insult shills regardless of language. Only maid lisp gets an exception from me for posting cute pictures

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I just hate tech troons

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    C++ iterators have interface similar to pointers so even cniles can use them without getting butthurt about C++ superiority, why can't Rustsisters do this?

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Pass, I respectfully decline to participate in modern computing. I will probably stop using a computer alltogether soon.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    c-can i b-borrow this?
    huehue let me c-check
    *BEEEEEEEEEP* (brain EEG)

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    all this seethe because of based bjarne and based old white men

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Bjarne is senile now. People change. Understand this. Bjarne then isn't the same person he is now. Just because he has the same name, doesn't mean he's the same and will always be. What's so difficult about this concept to you?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        How is this relevant? Does he even work on C++ anymore? He already did his job, C++ won.

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    ALL OF YOU DELUSIONAL BOOMER BACKWARD TECHNICAL C PROGRAMMERS DON'T EVEN UNDERSTAND WHST IT MEANS TO PROGRESS AND EVOLVE TO BECOME A BETTER. YOU ALL WILL BE LEFT IN THE DUST TOMORROW ONCE RUST OS BECOME A THING AND IT WILL SOON BE A THING. C HAS TOO MANY DRAWBACKS AND IT'S ALREADY 50 YEARS OLD. STOP CLINGING ONTO A DYING BACKWARDS LANGUAGE AND ACCEPT THE CHANGE. I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY YOU BOOMERS KEEP REFUSING TO BECOME BETTER PORGRAMMERS. I GUESS ALL OLD MEN WERE THE SAME. YOU GUYS ARE AS IGNORANT AS THE PEOPLE THAT REFUSED TO USE THE COMPUTER AND INSTEAD KEPT USING AN OUTDATED FAX MACHINE TO GET AROUND.

    AND NO. THIS IS NOT A SEETH. I JUST WANT TO SAVE YOU. WHY DO YOU KEEP REFUSING TO BECOME BETTER?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine when the AIs start writing operating system code in Rust. But wait.. if an AI is that good, wouldn't it be better to write the code of the OS in C? C compiles way faster and doesn't have bound checks that cannot be disabled. I think the AI would pick C instead of Rust. Someone(something) that intelligent wouldn't need handholding. It would thrive from the expressibility of raw C.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        and yet "AI" cannot write C without a segfault even if you threaten its immediate deletion if it fails to do it

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        AI would unironically do good with C because C errors are human errors. Bots are good at repetitive tasks without fail. Rust is designed for humans.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >AND NO. THIS IS NOT A SEETH
      hormones gone wild

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    -ACK!

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >you vill use our troony language with our CoC shitlord
    kek pyton already has bled experts (e.g. the decimal module) because of special snowflake homosexuals

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don't write C/++ or Rust because 99% of my programming tasks can afford a GC.
    But for that 1% task I will prefer Rust because it is modern and has good guardrails.

    All the people fighting each other are not the representative of real world, none of them are working on the NT kernel or Linux. So I don't care what they have to say. If Rust is good in Linus' book, it's good for me too.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      absolutely 0 code was written in Rust for Linux, and Windows programmers use C++

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I program for both Windows AND Linux.
        I use both C++ AND Rust
        People like you are so fricking stupid. You think it has to be either one or the other.

        yes because Rust is not relevant, he spent his life trying to improve C instead of trying to replace it, he won, trannies will never achieve anything

        Rust didn't exist back then, obviously

        and yet "AI" cannot write C without a segfault even if you threaten its immediate deletion if it fails to do it

        Hence the word *when*

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I obviously meant the kernels, I and yeah I know, I don't expect you to be allowed to frick up kernel code with your garbage.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            win32kbase_rs.sys
            >I don't expect
            lol, love to see it

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            don't make people look things up, link them to propaganda and hope that they won't do their own research

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            NtQuerySystemInformation with 0xB says otherwise.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        https://www.phoronix.com/news/VP9-Linux-Kernel-Rust-V4L2-RFC
        https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/new-windows-11-build-ships-with-more-rust-based-kernel-features/

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >VP9 codec
          lel, I use gentoo, and I know for a fact that this is irrelevant and not a thing on my system
          >windows
          good for them, pajeets cannot write C nor C++ anyway

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Cant wait to have programmers like you replaced by AI. Soon, (You) will not be representative of the real world. You'll be a useless man.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        sadly, the hype about AI is nothingburger and even he has very low chance of actually being replaced

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Nothing he said. You know vacuum is not 100% vacuum. There's always the possibility. Wishful thinking goes a long way anon.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            but these models are fundamentally broken, even most moronic brownoids are smarter than LLM's, and they cost less money to feed than LLM's in electricity bills...

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Fortunately all AI is not LLM. There are image processing AIs too. Wonder what comes next. Perhaps one that excels at logical reasoning. Combined...

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            photoshop did what AI does not back in 80's using dumb algorithms

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Clearly not. CPUs and GPUs are several magnitudes faster nowadays. Even if such an algorithm existed then, the hardware did not.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            there's an old demo from 1986 where with photoshop, you could remove world trade center from new york city skyline, AI cannot imitate such art

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yes. Nevermind. AI is a hoax. It will never improve. The evolution curve is an S curve and it has plateaued. 2 more weeks.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Hell yeah brother just 2 more weeks, only kernel programming will exist by 2025!

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >rust is here to stay
    is that a promise, a threat or a delusion?
    >dead tomorrow, gone today
    dead tomorrow, gone today

    let us know when r*st is stable and used for anything more than personal toy projects

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >rust threads usually die in a mater of a few hours, usually sub 20 replies
    >this one is at 120 and going strong on page 1 before i make this post
    yesterday IQfy really was broken...
    Tonikaku, rust is ngmi, C is actually growing faster than your shitlang LMAO

    >captcha: tryg4
    something rustjeets will never have to do while programming, C is the drivers language.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Agreed. I'm learning it now. I honestly think this is like the stock market. People shit all over something until it explodes, then they suddenly want in aka fomo. It's being used more and more often though. It's inevitable that the market for it will grow. By the time I'm good with it, there will be more opportunities.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >fomo
      word of the day, huh
      >jumps on it as if "the stock will go up"
      the projection is clear as day
      >by the time I'm good at it, there will be opportunities
      so you will never be good at it (just like anyone else, because the language is inherently bad)

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I think the language has potential but the ecosystem just isnt mature enough yet.

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    129/8/1
    all me btw

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I'm considering learning it but there's also plenty of software written in C++ that I may want to help maintain in the future. Both of them seem like big investments, I'm not sure where to start.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      C++ has proven itself against the test of time and will always be around due to legacy software but there is always a chance at this point someone comes up with a better version of Rust and everyone migrates over, that said it has alot of QoL over C++ as a modern language.
      C++: https://www.learncpp.com/
      Rust: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >will always be around due to legacy software
        Um no, C++ is evolving too.
        Rustrrannies judge C++ by C++98 (lol) but we live in 2024 and C++23 is pretty damn nice

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Rust. Is. Unreadable. (Period)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *