Science is a religion whose dogma reinforces unfounded notions of empiricism and objectivity.

Science is a religion whose dogma reinforces unfounded notions of empiricism and objectivity.

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Science changes, Religion is dead.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Religion changes, though. It's been changing for centuries, millennia.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why? Did God get it wrong the first time or why do you have to patch religion?
        >our interpretation of the texts change
        Why did God give such unclear instructions to the people meant to spread his will if he knew in advance it would lead to confusion, strife and constant reinterpretation?

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >israelite groveler admits that comparing atheism to dogmatic religion is an insult to the former
    Classic

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >an observation of fact is somehow insulting
      projection of insecurity

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >based on the test results, you’d be considered obese
      >noooo stop fatshaming me doctor!

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >you see, being religious is sort of like being obese...
        kek

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    post-modern brainrot
    things can be self-evidently true and be considered brute facts
    >inb4 gOd!

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Religions which promote monotheism are an explicit attempt to create categories of phenomena which can't be studied. They do this by creating the concept of Universals/presuppositions in ones narrative of reality. It's basically a Cogitohazard. For example, Christianity is the Roman Empire's propaganda model/psyop following a mass purge of dozens of independent systems of spirituality which were based on a previous narrative of The Bible (which was also deliberately re-written with provably motivated intent throughout the first few centuries AD).

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why did you use bazinga picture

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I'm going to pretend empiricism and evidence aren't real so that I can deny evolution
    Extremely pathetic

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >no argument for his ideology

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Evolution has been proven via genetics.
        You are the one with no argument against this

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Empiricism is consistent and has explanatory and predictive power, unlike religion.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Religion changes. Empiricism is fake because your scientists will say it’s consistent until it’s not. Then you handwave issues by saying there’s new science explaining away the loopholes.
      >explanatory power
      Religion explains the world in much richer detail than science with words.
      >predictive power
      Book of Revelation

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Sad post
        Your religion isn't real and you need to pull your head out of your ass and accept reality.
        You're literally getting to the point where you just deny that humans can test things and make observations about the world.
        There is nothing in the book of revelation that has predictive power.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you have no reason to believe in objectivity

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Empiricism is fake because your scientists will say it’s consistent until it’s not. Then you handwave issues by saying there’s new science explaining away the loopholes.
        That’s called science. There’s nothing wrong with being wrong because you can simply change your stance when new evidence arises.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >There’s nothing wrong with being wrong because you can simply change your stance when new evidence arises.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            When new evidence contradicts something you change what you previously thought. Everyone does this all the time for everything. Science is just a more formal version of this that controls what it looks for in controlled experiments.
            There is no argument you can make against science that isn't equivalent to "you can't learn things about the world! You can't make observations about the world!".

            >his views change on a whim by whatever is approved by “the scientists”
            you can’t even think for yourself

            Nope. You don't even know how scientific research is conducted.

            you have no reason to believe in objectivity

            I already explained to you in the other thread that a personal creator diety is not required for logic or objectivity or natural laws to exist.
            Objectivity exists and the objective truth is that there is no conscious personal creator diety. There is just the universe and the unconscious eternal natural laws

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >objectivity exists! my morals however are subjective
            the audacity lol

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Those statements aren't in contradiction. Also I never said anything about morality

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >his views change on a whim by whatever is approved by “the scientists”
          you can’t even think for yourself

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hot take: Science, religion, and philosophy are all actually the same thing

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Useless Semitic babble.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    DURR MUH SCIENCE
    DURR MUH RELIGION
    DURRERRRRR

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *