Science says we need to eat 4700mg of potassium per day.

Science says we need to eat 4700mg of potassium per day. Even if you select a super high potassium food source, like banana, that’s over 11 bananas a day. Nobody in history has ever done that, so how can we have evolved to need it?

Also, everything science has ever said about nutrition turned out to be false.

Science is discredited and moronic. It needs to be dismantled and replaced with literally anything else. Even reading tea leaves would be right SOME of the time.

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Does ecological meats and innards contain the nutrients we have evolved with needing?
    If so I wouldn't recommend anyone the banana diet.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Science says we should spam bananas all day long. You question Science?

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Potash is basically in every plant.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah let’s spend $250 and 4 hours a day trying to cram a small moose’s worth of greens into our stomaches to hit 4700mg. the science way.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Could you provide the paper you base these claims on?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Type potassium daily value into search

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        So you are outraged that you read some blog and are now mad? I fail to see the issue you are having besides the obvious case of low IQ

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          May I ask if you are acting this dumb to piss us off?

          Can we not have one fricken place without your homosexualry ? Your dumbc**t arguing is tedious.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            What about "please provide the source for your claims" is me acting dumb? If you believe the source exists, then simply provide it.

            >The American Heart Association is a blog because you read their recommendation quoted in a blog
            The mind of a scientist

            Can you actually provide the link to their paper about the subject then?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            You are an insincere rat person. There’s a million credible sources

            https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/should-i-take-a-potassium-supplement
            > That's just 2% of the 4,700 mg recommended dietary intake for potassium.

            Now — source on your claims and words? Source? Got source on that? Mmmyeah, gonna need a sourcerino including etymology of words back to at least the Saxon invasion.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >You are an insincere rat person. There’s a million credible sources
            If there are "a million credible sources" then that means providing one is even easier that means you not providing one looks even worse.

            The icing on the cake is that you do in fact link a blog as a response.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The FDA requirement for potassium supplements to not contain more than 2.1% of the required daily amount is dangerously close to conspiratorial.

            Then again they are saving people from getting thirsty by eating salt pills so maybe they know best.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >The American Heart Association is a blog because you read their recommendation quoted in a blog
          The mind of a scientist

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Daily nutrients needs is the canary in the coalmine when it comes to business interests affecting real science

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes you need equimolar amounts of potassium and sodium. Yes you are deficient. The universe itself is deficient. That's what you get for evolving the ion exchange mechanisms.

    The real moron here is the schizos who know this yet cope and seethe. Stop eating sugar water. Eat milk and meat and supplement if you're too poor. No excuses.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have. I do that. I'm eating a banana right now
    Every day i eat more than that

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I spam bananas

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The icing on the cake is that the source poster above is a pedophile. Pedophiles molest children and that’s bad. Everyone agrees he is a bad pedophile and he’d have to source us good to change this science state.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why such a hateboner towards "science"? You do realize you dont ever have to listen to anything a scientist says, right?

    In fact, nobody has to.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >be me
    >know plenty of people 50+
    >also few that are 70+
    >they all eat shit
    >look good, feel well

    I don't think science really understand shit when it comes to what we need.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *