his PR is going to work overtime today
imb4 >it was just a test >we got good data >every time we fail we learn something so failing is a good thing >the heat tiles are supposed to all fall off >the engines didn't fail to re-light we just chose to not re-light them >release video in a week showing rehearsed s0-y clapping from the control room that will be filmed in the next few days
>IFT-1 cleared the pad, but failed to stage >IFT-2 staged, but both stages then failed shortly after >IFT-3 got to the reentry, but the booster failed the landing burn and the ship got lost after some time during the reentry
Seems like progress to me.
>human rated
That's only needed for NASA astronauts >orbit fuel transfer capable
They were testing it today.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>orbit fuel transfer capable >They were testing it today
I'm cheering for SpaceX, but come on. I don't think even you consider it a real orbital fuel transfer test.
After hundreds of billions of government subsidies and 30 years of SpaceX trying to beat it pictured remains the best rocket ever built.
Will Musk ever recover?
Saturn V completed it's missions and carried humans into space. Starship is an exploding soda can that does nothing but explode. It's a $1 billion firework.
>In 1969, Apollo 11 was the first mission to land astronauts on the moon. Saturn V rockets also made it possible for astronauts to land on the moon on Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Apollo 1 barbecued its inhabitants on the pad.
Frick off
2 months ago
Anonymous
That was the capsule though not the booster. The Saturn V will always be the most powerful looking rocket since its shape looks like a high powered rifle cartridge while the starship looks like a flying dildo.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>muh looks
Real life is not science fiction. It doesn't matter one bit what the rocket looks like, pseud homosexual.
They are getting farther each time but probably not at the rate nasa would like
>but probably not at the rate nasa would like
It's not like they have a lot of options. And even at the current launch rate, SpaceX is advancing far faster than any other vehicle out there.
So, it happened AGAIN. We can blame FAA , we can blame NASA, we can praise SpaceX's effort but the truth is it's simply not enough. We need more changes, determination you name it, it all stinks.
Don't get me wrong, I still have full faith in Elon and the lads, but MASSIVE reinforcements are desperately needed in the next launch. Otherwise I'm not very optimistic about starship, or our chances in making it to the moon or mars for that matter. Not launching like this. What do you think?
Anon, you DO realize that if Starship wasn't made with reuse in mind, this would have been considered a successful launch, right? My bet is that the next IFT will have both parts of the vehicle do a soft splashdown.
without resuablity, why would government and NASA fund Muskrat space endeavour? NASA did "the thing" decades ago. Muskrat has NASA engineers with all the knowledge and NASA money, his job is to deliver what was promised, otherwise what is the point of sspaceX?
It burned up because the shielding was on one side, it's a massive ship, and the thrust vectoring wasn't capable of keeping it rolled over and aligned with the atmosphere as it came in at 25,000 kph. If anything, they're going to have to look at making more powerful thrusters.
Thunderf00t did a pretty good job explaining it on his live stream said it should be up for patreons as well as yt at the same due to how bad this launch was.
>TSLA sliding bad despite record year for the rest of the S&P500 >SpaceX ship destroyed on reentry >TwitteX user numbers at all-time low
Elonsisters, is this our year to kick chairs?
he was a gay and God shot him down. praise to our king above
The bible is fake and gay. israeli sorcerers aren't real.
his PR is going to work overtime today
imb4
>it was just a test
>we got good data
>every time we fail we learn something so failing is a good thing
>the heat tiles are supposed to all fall off
>the engines didn't fail to re-light we just chose to not re-light them
>release video in a week showing rehearsed s0-y clapping from the control room that will be filmed in the next few days
>IFT-1 cleared the pad, but failed to stage
>IFT-2 staged, but both stages then failed shortly after
>IFT-3 got to the reentry, but the booster failed the landing burn and the ship got lost after some time during the reentry
Seems like progress to me.
Progressed from an imbecile to a moron
>i dont like brute force testing! Its sovlless!
>every crash should stop scientific progress for ten years!
t. 85IQ browncel
Your entire country is brown
that is all easy shit
good luck with making the starcuck human rated and in orbit fuel transfer capable
>human rated
That's only needed for NASA astronauts
>orbit fuel transfer capable
They were testing it today.
>orbit fuel transfer capable
>They were testing it today
I'm cheering for SpaceX, but come on. I don't think even you consider it a real orbital fuel transfer test.
They are getting farther each time but probably not at the rate nasa would like
>nasa would like
Nasa would take decades to develop starship like rocket
How about something like the Saturn v
Saturn V has SOVL musk has nothing
A decade and counting to develop a poor man's Shuttle-Saturn V Frankenstein
i just want to see the booster hitting the ocean at twice the speed of sound
are you moronic?
After hundreds of billions of government subsidies and 30 years of SpaceX trying to beat it pictured remains the best rocket ever built.
Will Musk ever recover?
based
the SaturnV was built by God fearing men some of which were veterans in ww2
this generation of engineers are cooked
Nothing, and I mean nothing, will ever beat nazi engineering.
>Nothing, and I mean nothing, will ever beat nazi engineering.
Anglo and Russian engineering seemed to do that just fine.
Saturn V is expendable rocket which is what Starship currently is while being more powerful. How is Saturn better?
Saturn V completed it's missions and carried humans into space. Starship is an exploding soda can that does nothing but explode. It's a $1 billion firework.
>In 1969, Apollo 11 was the first mission to land astronauts on the moon. Saturn V rockets also made it possible for astronauts to land on the moon on Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Apollo 1 barbecued its inhabitants on the pad.
Frick off
That was the capsule though not the booster. The Saturn V will always be the most powerful looking rocket since its shape looks like a high powered rifle cartridge while the starship looks like a flying dildo.
>muh looks
Real life is not science fiction. It doesn't matter one bit what the rocket looks like, pseud homosexual.
Sometimes I can't tell if people here are being ironic or if they're truly as fricktarded as they seem.
They're real, anon.
They are that dumb.
Jews
Sabotaged by israelites, is simple as that.
It was essentially a repeat of ift2. Stage separation then super heavy went boom and a few moments after that starship went boom.
It's ogre.
>It was essentially a repeat of ift2
Pic related.
>but probably not at the rate nasa would like
It's not like they have a lot of options. And even at the current launch rate, SpaceX is advancing far faster than any other vehicle out there.
So, it happened AGAIN. We can blame FAA , we can blame NASA, we can praise SpaceX's effort but the truth is it's simply not enough. We need more changes, determination you name it, it all stinks.
Don't get me wrong, I still have full faith in Elon and the lads, but MASSIVE reinforcements are desperately needed in the next launch. Otherwise I'm not very optimistic about starship, or our chances in making it to the moon or mars for that matter. Not launching like this. What do you think?
Anon, you DO realize that if Starship wasn't made with reuse in mind, this would have been considered a successful launch, right? My bet is that the next IFT will have both parts of the vehicle do a soft splashdown.
it wasnt success tho. the 2nd stage got fricked.
Imagine this but with 200 colonists roasting on board, someone needs to stop Elon
without resuablity, why would government and NASA fund Muskrat space endeavour? NASA did "the thing" decades ago. Muskrat has NASA engineers with all the knowledge and NASA money, his job is to deliver what was promised, otherwise what is the point of sspaceX?
You seem to have missed the point of my post.
I think you shut your fat mouth.
literally what are you talking about
How many yes-men are going to lose their jobs?
It burned up because the shielding was on one side, it's a massive ship, and the thrust vectoring wasn't capable of keeping it rolled over and aligned with the atmosphere as it came in at 25,000 kph. If anything, they're going to have to look at making more powerful thrusters.
Anon, I don't think the control thrusters were working at all during reentry.
Thunderf00t did a pretty good job explaining it on his live stream said it should be up for patreons as well as yt at the same due to how bad this launch was.
>I-It was always possible there just isn't any market demand
Thundertroon on damage control
>TSLA sliding bad despite record year for the rest of the S&P500
>SpaceX ship destroyed on reentry
>TwitteX user numbers at all-time low
Elonsisters, is this our year to kick chairs?