fricking five star goddamn post
everyone knows the shrunken size = shrunken importance thing but including the emphases on erect phalluses adds a new dimension.
we should also emphasize the word "aesthetic" doesnt just refer to a superficial, visual effect or an arbitrary taste-preference. the aesthetic in this case is a rule based on an underlying hierarchy of concepts.
if you went through life blind and never touching your own hands and lips you might interpret them as giant organs - some of us have might have seen that youtube video 😉
similarly, with art being a reflection of a certain kind of consciousness - certain things tend to be emphasized.
our culture is wiener-obsessed - and for flatly erotic, sensual and egotistical reasons - so the expressions to be found in our generation's college kids' art is all some irrelevent and subjective view of their own stupid bodies.
As an element in art, a big strong penis in roman times may well have had an erotic component - but it had little to do with the sculptor's "daring and important" statement about himself and more to do with granting physical incarnation to the greater concept of individuation. this was an unspoken truth, understood intuitively, immediately by the eyes. they didnt need some gay excerpt printed on a plaque beneath the art, or a tourguide's lecture to tell you this.
fricking five star goddamn post
everyone knows the shrunken size = shrunken importance thing but including the emphases on erect phalluses adds a new dimension.
we should also emphasize the word "aesthetic" doesnt just refer to a superficial, visual effect or an arbitrary taste-preference. the aesthetic in this case is a rule based on an underlying hierarchy of concepts.
if you went through life blind and never touching your own hands and lips you might interpret them as giant organs - some of us have might have seen that youtube video 😉
similarly, with art being a reflection of a certain kind of consciousness - certain things tend to be emphasized.
our culture is wiener-obsessed - and for flatly erotic, sensual and egotistical reasons - so the expressions to be found in our generation's college kids' art is all some irrelevent and subjective view of their own stupid bodies.
As an element in art, a big strong penis in roman times may well have had an erotic component - but it had little to do with the sculptor's "daring and important" statement about himself and more to do with granting physical incarnation to the greater concept of individuation. this was an unspoken truth, understood intuitively, immediately by the eyes. they didnt need some gay excerpt printed on a plaque beneath the art, or a tourguide's lecture to tell you this.
Worth noting that those greek and roman statues would invariably be displayed on at least a pedestal as tall as the statue, maybe even on top of a column. If they had big dicks it'd block the view of the rest of the statue and be pretty awkward to look at
this, a big penor is basically the Big Mac of sexuality. >whoaaa I'm overwhelming my sensory organs through what amounts to brute force instead of cultivating taste and meaning
no wonder why BBC spam is uniquely American
you ever felt uncomfortably overstimulated? yeah, it's not pleasurable.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Then how come I've had several GFs and a GF(male) who were very specifically in to me tying them up and overstimulating them
2 years ago
Anonymous
because they're sick. most people are nowadays.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>[blanket statement based on personal anecdote] >[refutation] >[whining about degeneracy and claiming everyone different from you is the crazy one]
I don't do this often, usually I'm the one calling people Black folk when they do this, but
[...]
wdym by that? that they wanted pain? idk, people are fricked up.
No they wanted more stimulation than they'd be willing or able to provide themselves.
2 years ago
Anonymous
there's a difference between wanting more and being overwhelmed. being tickled is an almost universal example of overstimulation. also, I think you neglected to tackle the Big Mac analogy when it comes to taste. you could either try to "game" your receptors by overloading them with fat, salt, and sugar, or you can try to refine your taste.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I don't need to tackle that, it's a false analogy. The sensation of touch and the pleasure/pain spectrum is not at all like the sense of taste detecting combinations of chemicals. Not in nature, mechanism, or its effect on the brain. You might as well try to directly compare vision to smell
2 years ago
Anonymous
How is it any different? It all boils down to the perception of inputs delivered by switches and signals at the end of the day. I think you're just being intellectually lazy.
2 years ago
Anonymous
They aren't processed by the brain in any comparable way. How can I compare touch, which only conveys a sense of pressure and temperature, to the near infinite combinations of flavors?
2 years ago
Anonymous
There are all kinds of dimensions to touch. Pleasure, pain, roughness, smoothness, wetness (or lack thereof), dryness, heat, stickiness, friction, temperature, etc. That's a non-exhaustive list. And they can all be arranged in all kinds of intensities with nearly infinite combinations. There are more unique kinds of mechanoreceptors alone than there are taste receptors of all kinds. Taste receptors are even funnier too, since there's 3 for sweetness and 61 for everything else, so what you like in the "rawest" sense is actually quite simple. And it's all delivered to your brain through nervous signals.
The analogy works, possibly far better than you've bothered to test it. You're just not thinking about this seriously enough.
2 years ago
Anonymous
wdym by that? that they wanted pain? idk, people are fricked up.
He was a god of fertility, so his penis is being emphasised to demonstrate that purpose, like what
fricking five star goddamn post
everyone knows the shrunken size = shrunken importance thing but including the emphases on erect phalluses adds a new dimension.
we should also emphasize the word "aesthetic" doesnt just refer to a superficial, visual effect or an arbitrary taste-preference. the aesthetic in this case is a rule based on an underlying hierarchy of concepts.
if you went through life blind and never touching your own hands and lips you might interpret them as giant organs - some of us have might have seen that youtube video 😉
similarly, with art being a reflection of a certain kind of consciousness - certain things tend to be emphasized.
our culture is wiener-obsessed - and for flatly erotic, sensual and egotistical reasons - so the expressions to be found in our generation's college kids' art is all some irrelevent and subjective view of their own stupid bodies.
As an element in art, a big strong penis in roman times may well have had an erotic component - but it had little to do with the sculptor's "daring and important" statement about himself and more to do with granting physical incarnation to the greater concept of individuation. this was an unspoken truth, understood intuitively, immediately by the eyes. they didnt need some gay excerpt printed on a plaque beneath the art, or a tourguide's lecture to tell you this.
says >everyone knows the shrunken size = shrunken importance
They saw smaller penises as a sign of higher IQ.
my dick is that size unerect
they didnt find bulbous flaccid penisses aesthetically pleasing, they did depict themelves with huge wieners when erect though
fricking five star goddamn post
everyone knows the shrunken size = shrunken importance thing but including the emphases on erect phalluses adds a new dimension.
we should also emphasize the word "aesthetic" doesnt just refer to a superficial, visual effect or an arbitrary taste-preference. the aesthetic in this case is a rule based on an underlying hierarchy of concepts.
if you went through life blind and never touching your own hands and lips you might interpret them as giant organs - some of us have might have seen that youtube video 😉
similarly, with art being a reflection of a certain kind of consciousness - certain things tend to be emphasized.
our culture is wiener-obsessed - and for flatly erotic, sensual and egotistical reasons - so the expressions to be found in our generation's college kids' art is all some irrelevent and subjective view of their own stupid bodies.
As an element in art, a big strong penis in roman times may well have had an erotic component - but it had little to do with the sculptor's "daring and important" statement about himself and more to do with granting physical incarnation to the greater concept of individuation. this was an unspoken truth, understood intuitively, immediately by the eyes. they didnt need some gay excerpt printed on a plaque beneath the art, or a tourguide's lecture to tell you this.
Worth noting that those greek and roman statues would invariably be displayed on at least a pedestal as tall as the statue, maybe even on top of a column. If they had big dicks it'd block the view of the rest of the statue and be pretty awkward to look at
nice, im learning.
?t=374
this, a big penor is basically the Big Mac of sexuality.
>whoaaa I'm overwhelming my sensory organs through what amounts to brute force instead of cultivating taste and meaning
no wonder why BBC spam is uniquely American
I would hate for women to say my dick is overwhelming their sensory organs. Thank god I'm a dicklet
you ever felt uncomfortably overstimulated? yeah, it's not pleasurable.
Then how come I've had several GFs and a GF(male) who were very specifically in to me tying them up and overstimulating them
because they're sick. most people are nowadays.
>[blanket statement based on personal anecdote]
>[refutation]
>[whining about degeneracy and claiming everyone different from you is the crazy one]
I don't do this often, usually I'm the one calling people Black folk when they do this, but
No they wanted more stimulation than they'd be willing or able to provide themselves.
there's a difference between wanting more and being overwhelmed. being tickled is an almost universal example of overstimulation. also, I think you neglected to tackle the Big Mac analogy when it comes to taste. you could either try to "game" your receptors by overloading them with fat, salt, and sugar, or you can try to refine your taste.
I don't need to tackle that, it's a false analogy. The sensation of touch and the pleasure/pain spectrum is not at all like the sense of taste detecting combinations of chemicals. Not in nature, mechanism, or its effect on the brain. You might as well try to directly compare vision to smell
How is it any different? It all boils down to the perception of inputs delivered by switches and signals at the end of the day. I think you're just being intellectually lazy.
They aren't processed by the brain in any comparable way. How can I compare touch, which only conveys a sense of pressure and temperature, to the near infinite combinations of flavors?
There are all kinds of dimensions to touch. Pleasure, pain, roughness, smoothness, wetness (or lack thereof), dryness, heat, stickiness, friction, temperature, etc. That's a non-exhaustive list. And they can all be arranged in all kinds of intensities with nearly infinite combinations. There are more unique kinds of mechanoreceptors alone than there are taste receptors of all kinds. Taste receptors are even funnier too, since there's 3 for sweetness and 61 for everything else, so what you like in the "rawest" sense is actually quite simple. And it's all delivered to your brain through nervous signals.
The analogy works, possibly far better than you've bothered to test it. You're just not thinking about this seriously enough.
wdym by that? that they wanted pain? idk, people are fricked up.
Your personal anecdote means nothing.
Because they saw erect penises as animalistic and something that relies on instinct alone instead of reason, wisdom, intelligence etc
>the least intelligent people (subsaharan africans) are also the ones with the longest dicks
it checks out
Dicklet cope
>dicklet cope
mutt cope
is it? The second most intelligent people (eastern Asians) have tiny dicks. Coincidence?
It's definitely a meme that black guys are more well endowed.
So whites clam mental superiority from hair/eye color and Asians claim mental superiority from dicklet?
Jews are the first most intelligent people and they have big dicks like Ron Jeremy
lmfao! nobody tell him
We're average down there, just hairier
Yet some also have micropeens like Harvey Weinstein.
Black person cope
That's a meme though
It was just the beauty ideal back then, no reason to depict what you think is ugly except as a joke (the graffiti of Priapus, satyrs etc)
Based Greeks not giving a frick what women care about anything as it should be
Because Greek men are dicklets. Every other post to the contrary is pure cope.
ITT white boys claim their small penises make them more "cultured" and "refined"
Greek boys
porn has fried your brain
flaccid penises exist
The actual reason (the origin of their aesthetic preference) is that greek sculpture evolved from making pederastic kouros twink statues
fake and roman
He was a god of fertility, so his penis is being emphasised to demonstrate that purpose, like what
says
>everyone knows the shrunken size = shrunken importance
They were growers.
Is this how amerimutt history lections are like?!
It'd make you gay to make big ones so they tamed them down